Anaconda, Crime, and Fail: 7 Ways Police Will Break the
 Law, Threaten, or Lie to You to
 Get What they Want
 Cops routinely break the law. Here's how.
 By Larken Rose / The Free Thought ProjectOctober 19, 2015
peteschult:

libertarirynn:

gvldngrl:

wolfoverdose:

rikodeine:

seemeflow:

Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood.
1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself.
2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt.
3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.)
4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything.
5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions.
6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released.
7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches.
U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges).
Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so.
Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore.
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want

One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else


Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life.


Important 


Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation.


Cops are *never* your friends. And they are under no obligation to protect you. Ever.
Get rid of pigs!

peteschult: libertarirynn: gvldngrl: wolfoverdose: rikodeine: seemeflow: Because of the Fifth Amendment, no one in the U.S. may legally be forced to testify against himself, and because of the Fourth Amendment, no one’s records or belongings may legally be searched or seized without just cause. However, American police are trained to use methods of deception, intimidation and manipulation to circumvent these restrictions. In other words, cops routinely break the law—in letter and in spirit—in the name of enforcing the law. Several examples of this are widely known, if not widely understood. 1) “Do you know why I stopped you?”Cops ask this, not because they want to have a friendly chat, but because they want you to incriminate yourself. They are hoping you will “voluntarily” confess to having broken the law, whether it was something they had already noticed or not. You may think you are apologizing, or explaining, or even making excuses, but from the cop’s perspective, you are confessing. He is not there to serve you; he is there fishing for an excuse to fine or arrest you. In asking you the familiar question, he is essentially asking you what crime you just committed. And he will do this without giving you any “Miranda” warning, in an effort to trick you into testifying against yourself. 2) “Do you have something to hide?”Police often talk as if you need a good reason for not answering whatever questions they ask, or for not consenting to a warrantless search of your person, your car, or even your home. The ridiculous implication is that if you haven’t committed a crime, you should be happy to be subjected to random interrogations and searches. This turns the concept of due process on its head, as the cop tries to put the burden on you to prove your innocence, while implying that your failure to “cooperate” with random harassment must be evidence of guilt. 3) “Cooperating will make things easier on you.”The logical converse of this statement implies that refusing to answer questions and refusing to consent to a search will make things more difficult for you. In other words, you will be punished if you exercise your rights. Of course, if they coerce you into giving them a reason to fine or arrest you, they will claim that you “voluntarily” answered questions and “consented” to a search, and will pretend there was no veiled threat of what they might do to you if you did not willingly “cooperate.”(Such tactics are also used by prosecutors and judges via the procedure of “plea-bargaining,” whereby someone accused of a crime is essentially told that if he confesses guilt—thus relieving the government of having to present evidence or prove anything—then his suffering will be reduced. In fact, “plea bargaining” is illegal in many countries precisely because it basically constitutes coerced confessions.) 4) “We’ll just get a warrant.”Cops may try to persuade you to “consent” to a search by claiming that they could easily just go get a warrant if you don’t consent. This is just another ploy to intimidate people into surrendering their rights, with the implication again being that whoever inconveniences the police by requiring them to go through the process of getting a warrant will receive worse treatment than one who “cooperates.” But by definition, one who is threatened or intimidated into “consenting” has not truly consented to anything. 5.) We have someone who will testify against youPolice “informants” are often individuals whose own legal troubles have put them in a position where they can be used by the police to circumvent and undermine the constitutional rights of others. For example, once the police have something to hold over one individual, they can then bully that individual into giving false, anonymous testimony which can be used to obtain search warrants to use against others. Even if the informant gets caught lying, the police can say they didn’t know, making this tactic cowardly and illegal, but also very effective at getting around constitutional restrictions. 6) “We can hold you for 72 hours without charging you.”Based only on claimed suspicion, even without enough evidence or other probable cause to charge you with a crime, the police can kidnap you—or threaten to kidnap you—and use that to persuade you to confess to some relatively minor offense. Using this tactic, which borders on being torture, police can obtain confessions they know to be false, from people whose only concern, then and there, is to be released. 7) “I’m going to search you for my own safety.”Using so-called “Terry frisks” (named after the Supreme Court case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1), police can carry out certain limited searches, without any warrant or probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, under the guise of checking for weapons. By simply asserting that someone might have a weapon, police can disregard and circumvent the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches. U.S. courts have gone back and forth in deciding how often, and in what circumstances, tactics like those mentioned above are acceptable. And of course, police continually go far beyond anything the courts have declared to be “legal” anyway. But aside from nitpicking legal technicalities, both coerced confessions and unreasonable searches are still unconstitutional, and therefore “illegal,” regardless of the rationale or excuses used to try to justify them. Yet, all too often, cops show that to them, the Fourth and Fifth Amendments—and any other restrictions on their power—are simply technical inconveniences for them to try to get around. In other words, they will break the law whenever they can get away with it if it serves their own agenda and power, and they will ironically insist that they need to do that in order to catch “law-breakers” (the kind who don’t wear badges). Of course, if the above tactics fail, police can simply bully people into confessing—falsely or truthfully—and/or carry out unconstitutional searches, knowing that the likelihood of cops having to face any punishment for doing so is extremely low. Usually all that happens, even when a search was unquestionably and obviously illegal, or when a confession was clearly coerced, is that any evidence obtained from the illegal search or forced confession is excluded from being allowed at trial. Of course, if there is no trial—either because the person plea-bargains or because there was no evidence and no crime—the “exclusionary rule” creates no deterrent at all. The police can, and do, routinely break the law and violate individual rights, knowing that there will be no adverse repercussions for them having done so. Likewise, the police can lie under oath, plant evidence, falsely charge people with “resisting arrest” or “assaulting an officer,” and commit other blatantly illegal acts, knowing full well that their fellow gang members—officers, prosecutors and judges—will almost never hold them accountable for their crimes. Even much of the general public still presumes innocence when it comes to cops accused of wrong-doing, while presuming guilt when the cops accuse someone else of wrong-doing. But this is gradually changing, as the amount of video evidence showing the true nature of the “Street Gang in Blue” becomes too much even for many police-apologists to ignore. http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-ways-police-will-break-law-threaten-or-lie-you-get-what-they-want One of the biggest realizations with dealing with cops for me was the fact that they CAN lie, they are 100% legally entitled to lie, and they WILL whether you’re a victim of crime, accused of committing a crime or anything else Everyone needs to reblog this, it could save a life. Important Seriously if you ever find yourself in custody don’t say shit until you’ve got some counsel with you. No cop is your friend in that situation. Cops are *never* your friends. And they are under no obligation to protect you. Ever. Get rid of pigs!

anaconda
anaconda
Crime
Crime
FAIL
FAIL
Friends
Friends
head
head
Life
Life
Police
Police
shit
shit
Supreme
Supreme
Too Much
Too Much
True
True
tumblr
tumblr
Supreme Court
Supreme Court
Gang
Gang
American
American
Anonymous
Anonymous
Blog
Blog
Blue
Blue
Break
Break
Chat
Chat
Converse
Converse
Definition
Definition
Exercise
Exercise
Free
Free
Good
Good
Happy
Happy
Home
Home
Http
Http
Limited
Limited
Nature
Nature
Ohio
Ohio
Power
Power
Prohibition
Prohibition
Rose
Rose
Search
Search
Spirit
Spirit
The General
The General
Video
Video
All That
All That
Belongings
Belongings
Due Process
Due Process
Entitled
Entitled
Failure
Failure
Government
Government
Intimidation
Intimidation
Lying
Lying
Never
Never
Reason
Reason
Suffering
Suffering
Thought
Thought
Fishing
Fishing
All The
All The
Asking
Asking
Back
Back
Be Happy
Be Happy
Been
Been
how
how
got
got
haven
haven
bully
bully
answer
answer
just cause
just cause
another
another
ask
ask
car
car
random
random
com
com
once
once
cops
cops
the police
the police
class
class
who
who
questions
questions
gone
gone
can
can
warrant
warrant
one
one
friend
friend
law
law
examples
examples
case
case
deception
deception
weapons
weapons
via
via
charge
charge
hide
hide
weapon
weapon
may
may
knowing
knowing
name
name
don
don
cop
cop
beyond
beyond
org
org
believe
believe
why
why
torture
torture
will
will
fifth amendment
fifth amendment
think
think
pigs
pigs
own
own
did
did
them
them
all
all
fourth amendment
fourth amendment
face
face
make
make
they
they
public
public
words
words
you
you
evidence
evidence
court
court
show
show
person
person
confessions
confessions
lie
lie
general
general
rationale
rationale
post
post
example
example
what
what
perspective
perspective
still
still
order
order
for
for
confession
confession
question
question
officer
officer
records
records
manipulation
manipulation
www
www
the informant
the informant
oath
oath
technical
technical
concept
concept
fine
fine
arrest
arrest
implication
implication
warrants
warrants
civil
civil
hold
hold
use
use
href
href
used
used
using
using
treatment
treatment
more
more
this
this
get
get
of course
of course
seriously
seriously
done
done
like
like
this is
this is
making
making
people
people
full
full
well
well
find
find
such
such
name of
name of
ridiculous
ridiculous
present
present
just
just
enough
enough
whatever
whatever
anything
anything
then
then
harassment
harassment
familiar
familiar
because
because
broken
broken
aside
aside
everyone
everyone
acceptable
acceptable
might
might
someone
someone
offense
offense
intimidated
intimidated
those
those
away
away
threaten
threaten
for example
for example
accuse
accuse
implying
implying
understood
understood
pretend
pretend
testify
testify
whenever
whenever
kidnap
kidnap
noticed
noticed
with you
with you
violate
violate
whereby
whereby
legally
legally
as if
as if
get away
get away
anything else
anything else
will do
will do
repercussions
repercussions
excuse
excuse
circumvent
circumvent
illegal
illegal
persuade
persuade
their
their
ever
ever
concern
concern
however
however
likewise
likewise
undermine
undermine
suspicion
suspicion
intimidate
intimidate
regardless
regardless
usually
usually
back and forth
back and forth
guise
guise
consent
consent
essentially
essentially
ploy
ploy
hoping
hoping
claim
claim
adverse
adverse
based
based
probable
probable
justify
justify
testimony
testimony
there
there
victim
victim
ironically
ironically
disregard
disregard
logical
logical
too
too
obtain
obtain
fact
fact
probable cause
probable cause
burden
burden
agenda
agenda
whose
whose
tactics
tactics
deterrent
deterrent
through
through
ignore
 ignore
almost
 almost
no
 no
called
 called
something
 something
things
 things
hours
 hours
need
 need
know
 know
want
 want
wrong
 wrong
yet
 yet
say
 say
much
 much
anyway
 anyway
around
 around
else
 else
others
 others
gets
 gets
wear
 wear
catch
 catch
again
 again
serve
 serve
terry
 terry
just go
 just go
certain
 certain
already
 already
warning
 warning
excuses
 excuses
there is
 there is
cowardly
 cowardly
consented
 consented
answering
 answering
difficult
 difficult
amendment
 amendment
they know
 they know
nitpicking
 nitpicking
tumblr blog
 tumblr blog
the supreme
 the supreme
apologizing
 apologizing
you know why
 you know why
find yourself
 find yourself
in other words
 in other words
supreme-court-case
supreme-court-case
out
out
over
over
plant
plant
From People
From People
Letter
Letter
Talk
Talk
Innocence
Innocence
Easier
Easier
Threat
Threat
And
And
Other
Other
You Know
You Know
U S
U S
Safety
Safety
Constitutional
Constitutional
The Process
The Process
You What
You What
Both
Both
Protect
Protect
When
When
Claimed
Claimed
Simply
Simply
Punishment
Punishment
That
That
Try
Try
Forced
Forced
But
But
Not
Not
Legal
Legal
Where
Where
Effort
Effort
For You
For You
You Are
You Are
Obviously
Obviously
For Me
For Me
The
The
Caught
Caught
A Good
A Good
From
From
When The
When The
Basically
Basically
Important
Important
Precisely
Precisely
You Should
You Should
The Law
The Law
Your
Your
Save
Save
Rights
Rights
Its
Its
Friendly
Friendly
Trick
Trick
Trial
Trial
False
False
Told
Told
Many
Many
Has Been
Has Been
Kind
Kind
Needs
Needs
Protect You
Protect You
Examples Of
Examples Of
The U
The U
Individual
Individual
Blatantly
Blatantly
Amount
Amount
Very
Very
Deciding
Deciding
These
These
Without
Without
The Fact That
The Fact That
While
While
Think You
Think You
Checking
Checking
After
After
Ways
Ways
Situation
Situation
Guilt
Guilt
Obligation
Obligation
Plea
Plea
Acts
Acts
Countries
Countries
Was
Was
With
With
Cause
Cause
Low
Low
Receive
Receive
Rule
Rule
Comes
Comes
In A
In A
Should
Should
Are
Are
Have
Have
Informant
Informant
Statement
Statement
Going
Going
If You
If You
Searches
Searches
Not You
Not You
The Implication
The Implication
Had
Had
Seized
Seized
Tries
Tries
Who Is
Who Is
Also
Also
Put
Put
Until You
Until You
Go Far
Go Far
You Did
You Did
A Href
A Href
Https
Https
Borders
Borders
Amendments
Amendments
Which
Which
Only
Only
Truly
Truly
Process
Process
Tumblr Com
Tumblr Com
Has
Has
Counsel
Counsel
Often
Often
Being
Being
Against
Against
Extremely
Extremely
Commit
Commit
Custody
Custody
Easily
Easily
Far
Far
Must
Must
Position
Position
Is Just
Is Just
If You Don
If You Don
To You
To You
Yourself
Yourself
Giving
Giving
Doing
Doing
Prove
Prove
Changing
Changing
My Own
My Own
Happens
Happens
Excluded
Excluded
Than
Than
Circumstances
Circumstances
Dealing
Dealing
Worse
Worse
Accountable
Accountable
No One
No One
Individual Rights
Individual Rights
Individuals
Individuals
Getting
Getting
Unreasonable
Unreasonable
Committed
Committed
Judges
Judges
Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties
Accused
Accused
Crimes
Crimes
Known
Known
Even
Even
Liberties
Liberties
His
His
Some
Some
Clearly
Clearly
Biggest
Biggest
Himself
Himself
Wrong Doing
Wrong Doing
Carry
Carry
So Called
So Called
Good Reason
Good Reason
Troubles
Troubles
Above
Above
Claiming
Claiming
Rid
Rid
Course
Course
Prosecutors
Prosecutors
Could
Could
Punished
Punished
It Was
It Was
Gradually
Gradually
Therefore
Therefore
Having
Having
Insist
Insist
Whether
Whether
Incriminate
Incriminate
Reblog
Reblog
Several
Several
After The
After The
American Police
American Police
And There
And There
And They Are
And They Are
Any
Any
Badges
Badges
Bargains
Bargains
Believe That
Believe That
Break Laws
Break Laws
Caught Lying
Caught Lying
Charging
Charging
Confess
Confess
Cops Show
Cops Show
Effective
Effective
Explaining
Explaining
Fifth
Fifth
Got Some
Got Some
Have A
Have A
Heres
Heres
Hold You
Hold You
If Not
If Not
If You Need
If You Need
In The
In The
Into
Into
Is Not
Is Not
Is That
Is That
It Comes
It Comes
It Was Something
It Was Something
Making Excuses
Making Excuses
Methods
Methods
Minor
Minor
Named After
Named After
No Evidence
No Evidence
Not Answering
Not Answering
Or Not
Or Not
Procedure
Procedure
To Do
To Do
All Too
All Too
All Too Often
All Too Often
Almost Never
Almost Never
Any Other
Any Other
Fellow
Fellow
Coerce
Coerce
Hold Over
Hold Over
Mocked
Mocked
The
The
But
But
That
That
2 Weeks
2 Weeks
Brennan
Brennan
Anti Trump
Anti Trump
And
And
Errors
Errors
clapper
 clapper
said
 said
no
 no
yeah
yeah
tumblr
tumblr
True
True
Food
Food
family
family
Energy
Energy
Drinking
Drinking
Dogs
Dogs
Click
Click
Children
Children
Cats
Cats
apparently
apparently
Andrew Bogut
Andrew Bogut
Being alone
Being alone
Being alone
Being alone
Andrew Bogut
Andrew Bogut
apparently
apparently
Cats
Cats
Children
Children
Click
Click
Dogs
Dogs
Drinking
Drinking
Energy
Energy
family
family
Food
Food
True
True
tumblr
tumblr
yeah
yeah
no
 no
said
 said
clapper
 clapper
Errors
Errors
And
And
Anti Trump
Anti Trump
Brennan
Brennan
2 Weeks
2 Weeks
That
That
But
But
The
The
Mocked
Mocked
Hold Over
Hold Over
Coerce
Coerce
Fellow
Fellow
Any Other
Any Other
Almost Never
Almost Never
All Too Often
All Too Often
All Too
All Too
To Do
To Do
Procedure
Procedure
Or Not
Or Not
Not Answering
Not Answering
No Evidence
No Evidence
Named After
Named After
Minor
Minor
Methods
Methods
Making Excuses
Making Excuses
It Was Something
It Was Something
It Comes
It Comes
Is That
Is That
Is Not
Is Not
Into
Into
In The
In The
If You Need
If You Need
If Not
If Not
Hold You
Hold You
Heres
Heres
Have A
Have A
Got Some
Got Some
Fifth
Fifth
Explaining
Explaining
Effective
Effective
Cops Show
Cops Show
Confess
Confess
Charging
Charging
Caught Lying
Caught Lying
Break Laws
Break Laws
Believe That
Believe That
Bargains
Bargains
Badges
Badges
Any
Any
And They Are
And They Are
And There
And There
American Police
American Police
After The
After The
Several
Several
Reblog
Reblog
Incriminate
Incriminate
Whether
Whether
Insist
Insist
Having
Having
Therefore
Therefore
Gradually
Gradually
It Was
It Was
Punished
Punished
Could
Could
Prosecutors
Prosecutors
Course
Course
Rid
Rid
Claiming
Claiming
Above
Above
Troubles
Troubles
Good Reason
Good Reason
So Called
So Called
Carry
Carry
Wrong Doing
Wrong Doing
Himself
Himself
Biggest
Biggest
Clearly
Clearly
Some
Some
His
His
Liberties
Liberties
Even
Even
Known
Known
Crimes
Crimes
Accused
Accused
Civil Liberties
Civil Liberties
Judges
Judges
Committed
Committed
Unreasonable
Unreasonable
Getting
Getting
Individuals
Individuals
Individual Rights
Individual Rights
No One
No One
Accountable
Accountable
Worse
Worse
Dealing
Dealing
Circumstances
Circumstances
Than
Than
Excluded
Excluded
Happens
Happens
My Own
My Own
Changing
Changing
Prove
Prove
Doing
Doing
Giving
Giving
Yourself
Yourself
To You
To You
If You Don
If You Don
Is Just
Is Just
Position
Position
Must
Must
Far
Far
Easily
Easily
Custody
Custody
Commit
Commit
Extremely
Extremely
Against
Against
Being
Being
Often
Often
Counsel
Counsel
Has
Has
Tumblr Com
Tumblr Com
Process
Process
Truly
Truly
Only
Only
Which
Which
Amendments
Amendments
Borders
Borders
Https
Https
A Href
A Href
You Did
You Did
Go Far
Go Far
Until You
Until You
Put
Put
Also
Also
Who Is
Who Is
Tries
Tries
Seized
Seized
Had
Had
The Implication
The Implication
Not You
Not You
Searches
Searches
If You
If You
Going
Going
Statement
Statement
Informant
Informant
Have
Have
Are
Are
Should
Should
In A
In A
Comes
Comes
Rule
Rule
Receive
Receive
Low
Low
Cause
Cause
With
With
Was
Was
Countries
Countries
Acts
Acts
Plea
Plea
Obligation
Obligation
Guilt
Guilt
Situation
Situation
Ways
Ways
After
After
Checking
Checking
Think You
Think You
While
While
The Fact That
The Fact That
Without
Without
These
These
Deciding
Deciding
Very
Very
Amount
Amount
Blatantly
Blatantly
Individual
Individual
The U
The U
Examples Of
Examples Of
Protect You
Protect You
Needs
Needs
Kind
Kind
Has Been
Has Been
Many
Many
Told
Told
False
False
Trial
Trial
Trick
Trick
Friendly
Friendly
Its
Its
Rights
Rights
Save
Save
Your
Your
The Law
The Law
You Should
You Should
Precisely
Precisely
Important
Important
Basically
Basically
When The
When The
From
From
A Good
A Good
Caught
Caught
The
The
For Me
For Me
Obviously
Obviously
You Are
You Are
For You
For You
Effort
Effort
Where
Where
Legal
Legal
Not
Not
But
But
Forced
Forced
Try
Try
That
That
Punishment
Punishment
Simply
Simply
Claimed
Claimed
When
When
Protect
Protect
Both
Both
You What
You What
The Process
The Process
Constitutional
Constitutional
Safety
Safety
U S
U S
You Know
You Know
Other
Other
And
And
Threat
Threat
Easier
Easier
Innocence
Innocence
Talk
Talk
Letter
Letter
From People
From People
plant
plant
over
over
out
out
supreme-court-case
supreme-court-case
in other words
 in other words
find yourself
 find yourself
you know why
 you know why
apologizing
 apologizing
the supreme
 the supreme
tumblr blog
 tumblr blog
nitpicking
 nitpicking
they know
 they know
amendment
 amendment
difficult
 difficult
answering
 answering
consented
 consented
cowardly
 cowardly
there is
 there is
excuses
 excuses
warning
 warning
already
 already
certain
 certain
just go
 just go
terry
 terry
serve
 serve
again
 again
catch
 catch
wear
 wear
gets
 gets
others
 others
else
 else
around
 around
anyway
 anyway
much
 much
say
 say
yet
 yet
wrong
 wrong
want
 want
know
 know
need
 need
hours
 hours
things
 things
something
 something
called
 called
no
 no
almost
 almost
ignore
 ignore
through
through
deterrent
deterrent
tactics
tactics
whose
whose
agenda
agenda
burden
burden
probable cause
probable cause
fact
fact
obtain
obtain
too
too
logical
logical
disregard
disregard
ironically
ironically
victim
victim
there
there
testimony
testimony
justify
justify
probable
probable
based
based
adverse
adverse
claim
claim
hoping
hoping
ploy
ploy
essentially
essentially
consent
consent
guise
guise
back and forth
back and forth
usually
usually
regardless
regardless
intimidate
intimidate
suspicion
suspicion
undermine
undermine
likewise
likewise
however
however
concern
concern
ever
ever
their
their
persuade
persuade
illegal
illegal
circumvent
circumvent
excuse
excuse
repercussions
repercussions
will do
will do
anything else
anything else
get away
get away
as if
as if
legally
legally
whereby
whereby
violate
violate
with you
with you
noticed
noticed
kidnap
kidnap
whenever
whenever
testify
testify
pretend
pretend
understood
understood
implying
implying
accuse
accuse
for example
for example
threaten
threaten
away
away
those
those
intimidated
intimidated
offense
offense
someone
someone
might
might
acceptable
acceptable
everyone
everyone
aside
aside
broken
broken
because
because
familiar
familiar
harassment
harassment
then
then
anything
anything
whatever
whatever
enough
enough
just
just
present
present
ridiculous
ridiculous
name of
name of
such
such
find
find
well
well
full
full
people
people
making
making
this is
this is
like
like
done
done
seriously
seriously
of course
of course
get
get
this
this
more
more
treatment
treatment
using
using
used
used
href
href
use
use
hold
hold
civil
civil
warrants
warrants
implication
implication
arrest
arrest
fine
fine
concept
concept
technical
technical
oath
oath
the informant
the informant
www
www
manipulation
manipulation
records
records
officer
officer
question
question
confession
confession
for
for
order
order
still
still
perspective
perspective
what
what
example
example
post
post
rationale
rationale
general
general
lie
lie
confessions
confessions
person
person
show
show
court
court
evidence
evidence
you
you
words
words
public
public
they
they
make
make
face
face
fourth amendment
fourth amendment
all
all
them
them
did
did
own
own
pigs
pigs
think
think
fifth amendment
fifth amendment
will
will
torture
torture
why
why
believe
believe
org
org
beyond
beyond
cop
cop
don
don
name
name
knowing
knowing
may
may
weapon
weapon
hide
hide
charge
charge
via
via
weapons
weapons
deception
deception
case
case
examples
examples
law
law
friend
friend
one
one
warrant
warrant
can
can
gone
gone
questions
questions
who
who
class
class
the police
the police
cops
cops
once
once
com
com
random
random
car
car
ask
ask
another
another
just cause
just cause
answer
answer
bully
bully
haven
haven
got
got
how
how
Been
Been
Be Happy
Be Happy
Back
Back
Asking
Asking
All The
All The
Fishing
Fishing
Thought