🔥 Popular | Latest

The best response to what is c++: TOP DEFINITION C++ A programming language for Real Men. Most languages try to provide a simplified way to solve specific problems well. C++ makes no such concession and tries to be mediocre at everything. It lets you program at a very high level, and a very low level in the same program. It lets you write procedural code, object oriented code, generic code and mix them all up. It makes you decide everything and provides no help if you get it wrong. It is by far the biggest, most complicated, ugly, down-right dangerous language you can use. But it does run fast. It takes at least twice as long to program in C++ as any other major language (except C). The men who program in C++are Real Men. The women who program in C++ are Real Men too. You can spot a C++ programmer from their testosterone fueled swagger, and the unbelievable amount of contempt they inject into the phrase Java "programmer". They'll probably do the air quotes and all. Dev: 'Hey, Reg, you know C++ right? What does: "\src\Cont.cpp(52): error C2679: binary '=': no operator found which takes a right- hand operand of type 'int' (or there is no acceptable conversion) C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\include\vector(392): could be 'std:_Vector_iterator<_Ty, _Alloc> &std::_Vector_iterator<_Ty, _Alloc>::operator = (const std:_Vector_iterator<_Ty, _Alloc> &)' with_Ty=Main::Cont, _Alloc=std:allocator<Main::Cont> while trying to match the argument list "(std:_Vector_iterator<_Ty, _Alloc>, int)' with_Ty=Main::Cont, Alloc=std::allocator<Main::Cont> "mean?' Reg: 'You missed a semicolon at the end of the line. The best response to what is c++

The best response to what is c++

Save
chamiryokuroi: rainy-days-will-never-end: dietmountainmadewka: relatablepicturesofhomersimpson: cathugging: relatablepicturesofhomersimpson: philhollywood: I always wondered about this room. Where is it? Whenever you notice something like that, a wizard did it. behind the garage And that’s the end of that mystery why the simpsons got a bigger house than my parents Homer is a nuclear engineer This post made me realize that Homer is in fact a Nuclear engineer… Except he isn’t. Homer is a low-level safety inspector at the plant, and his family is perpetually broke which is a plot point in many episodes. So we can just assume family money, mob connections, or perhaps indeed wizards are responsible for his large home.Or as someone else pointed out in the notes, property values in Springfield could just be catastrophically low allowing one to buy a large house even for a meager salary.: chamiryokuroi: rainy-days-will-never-end: dietmountainmadewka: relatablepicturesofhomersimpson: cathugging: relatablepicturesofhomersimpson: philhollywood: I always wondered about this room. Where is it? Whenever you notice something like that, a wizard did it. behind the garage And that’s the end of that mystery why the simpsons got a bigger house than my parents Homer is a nuclear engineer This post made me realize that Homer is in fact a Nuclear engineer… Except he isn’t. Homer is a low-level safety inspector at the plant, and his family is perpetually broke which is a plot point in many episodes. So we can just assume family money, mob connections, or perhaps indeed wizards are responsible for his large home.Or as someone else pointed out in the notes, property values in Springfield could just be catastrophically low allowing one to buy a large house even for a meager salary.

chamiryokuroi: rainy-days-will-never-end: dietmountainmadewka: relatablepicturesofhomersimpson: cathugging: relatablepicturesofhome...

Save
lyinginbedmon: gahdamnpunk: How is this NOT harassment? I have no words.. Something I remember from my Criminal Law classes is that, quite genuinely, looking at someone (occasionally even pointedly not doing so) can constitute assault. It seems absurd, looking at someone? Where’s the harm, right? Well, it turns out it’s so that the law has recourse against people who just stand in a public space and start through someone’s living room window. For weeks. Just randomly chasing somebody, even without intent to actually harm, is legally assault. It’s not harmless, it’s months or even years of therapy and paranoia against ever going outside your home, if you even think your home is still safe. TLDR: Yes the law has already seen you play “I’m not touching you” and it is already fed up with your BS. : AAMIR KHAN Follow @hdni2803 This is the most fucked up shit I've ever read frightening girls Yesterday, 04:41 PM I once approached a teenage girl (around 14 years old) by asking her for directions at first. Then I proceeded to ask for her name. She became afraid and started walking away. I followed her, and then she went from walking briskly to running. Her gait was peculiar, because she ran like a newborn fawn, turning around every so often, trying to see if I am still following. (Now, I want to make clear that I absolutely abhor rape and did not have any intention in that direction, not molestation not any of that.) Initiate * Joined: Dec 2017 Posts: 139 She had no reason to be frightened. I wasn't gonna anything. But the feeling when you follow a girl and she notices you, and she tries to loose you or picks up the pace. That is kind of a good feeling. You become important to her. You are no longer some random insignificant face in the crowd. I know it is kind of low-level behaviour. But I do enjoy doing that. I go to another city, look for a girl that is walking by herself and start following her. After a while they notice you. After dark, after sunset it may suffice to just walk in the same general direction as a girl that is valking in front of you. They become paranoid. I recommend you lonely incels try it some time. Just to make her afraid. If you know your limits and don't actually harass -let alone rape- that girl, it should be harmless psychological fun. Ren Follow @buckmayn I literally feel disease sick men are a fucking AAMIR KHAN @hdni2803 at This is the most fucked up shit I've ever read - edaeocilulies. nit. m 12:22 PM - 5 Oct 2019 32,388 Retweets 107,390 Likes > lyinginbedmon: gahdamnpunk: How is this NOT harassment? I have no words.. Something I remember from my Criminal Law classes is that, quite genuinely, looking at someone (occasionally even pointedly not doing so) can constitute assault. It seems absurd, looking at someone? Where’s the harm, right? Well, it turns out it’s so that the law has recourse against people who just stand in a public space and start through someone’s living room window. For weeks. Just randomly chasing somebody, even without intent to actually harm, is legally assault. It’s not harmless, it’s months or even years of therapy and paranoia against ever going outside your home, if you even think your home is still safe. TLDR: Yes the law has already seen you play “I’m not touching you” and it is already fed up with your BS.
Save