🔥 Popular | Latest

lessonsinsilence: lordrachaelmarissa: bando–grand-scamyon: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 👏 THE 👏 FUCK 👏 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child’s parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible—and then]  …and then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn’t pertain to you. I’m sorry — White teacher: —you know what, I’m sorry -I’m sorry… Black student: —No, no, no…I let you talk -I let you talk, you’re gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I’m sorry that this is the way that it is. You’re right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything…and that’s not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we’re complaining or we’re ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about ‘Oh, I don’t want—there’s too many Latinos and there’s too many—’ White teacher: I didn’t say that— [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don’t want this to turn into a Latin country because there’ll be too many  White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept— White teacher: Don’t tell me I’m closed-minded— Black student: Everything you’ve said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I’m closed-minded. Black student: You don’t need to agree—I -I’ve had conversations with people that don’t agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept—you’re not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right— White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything….who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF  Other Random: GO OFF– *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON’T SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I’m mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! YES, BECAUSE I’M MAD. This gives me hope. I’m 22. I’m not that old, but I’m assuming I’m older than these students in the video. To see this young intelligent woman school her teacher on white privilege and the affects of white supremacy gives me hope. They are young and using their voice! This is gives me hope ya’ll.  this👏student👏deserves👏an👏award👏for👏putting👏up👏with👏that👏teacher👏 : lessonsinsilence: lordrachaelmarissa: bando–grand-scamyon: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 👏 THE 👏 FUCK 👏 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child’s parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible—and then]  …and then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn’t pertain to you. I’m sorry — White teacher: —you know what, I’m sorry -I’m sorry… Black student: —No, no, no…I let you talk -I let you talk, you’re gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I’m sorry that this is the way that it is. You’re right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything…and that’s not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we’re complaining or we’re ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about ‘Oh, I don’t want—there’s too many Latinos and there’s too many—’ White teacher: I didn’t say that— [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don’t want this to turn into a Latin country because there’ll be too many  White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept— White teacher: Don’t tell me I’m closed-minded— Black student: Everything you’ve said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I’m closed-minded. Black student: You don’t need to agree—I -I’ve had conversations with people that don’t agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept—you’re not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right— White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything….who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF  Other Random: GO OFF– *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON’T SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I’m mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! YES, BECAUSE I’M MAD. This gives me hope. I’m 22. I’m not that old, but I’m assuming I’m older than these students in the video. To see this young intelligent woman school her teacher on white privilege and the affects of white supremacy gives me hope. They are young and using their voice! This is gives me hope ya’ll.  this👏student👏deserves👏an👏award👏for👏putting👏up👏with👏that👏teacher👏
Save
what-the-fandomm: 2sunchild2: kukumomoart: chancethereaper: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. bro you can literally see every fold of her pussy that just isn’t how fabric works Lol body painting literally Clothes don’t suction themselves around tiddies.If that was the case I’d be wearing hoodies all year i mean there is dangerous objectification for male characters, but it’s not prevalent in written or drawn sources because that doesn’t harm the person and therefore isn’t relevant. it’s only something to bring into the conversation when you’re talking about how it affects the actors.male actors are sometimes forced to starve for days so that they can get scenes where their muscles are stood out (there’s a really good post with article links about this i’ll try to find it), but these drawings don’t affect an actual personit’s a completely different subjectand i mean for god’s sake you can’t counter the fact that someone deliberately drew her with her coochie out with some bullshit about how male characters are hyper-masculine in a glorified way: Frank Cho added 2 new photos with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speechless CHO! NERT SE prasLE THE caMERa 2G CRap! IG a stock N HEET CRP SERNG P 1RT ENTM FR MA RA what-the-fandomm: 2sunchild2: kukumomoart: chancethereaper: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. bro you can literally see every fold of her pussy that just isn’t how fabric works Lol body painting literally Clothes don’t suction themselves around tiddies.If that was the case I’d be wearing hoodies all year i mean there is dangerous objectification for male characters, but it’s not prevalent in written or drawn sources because that doesn’t harm the person and therefore isn’t relevant. it’s only something to bring into the conversation when you’re talking about how it affects the actors.male actors are sometimes forced to starve for days so that they can get scenes where their muscles are stood out (there’s a really good post with article links about this i’ll try to find it), but these drawings don’t affect an actual personit’s a completely different subjectand i mean for god’s sake you can’t counter the fact that someone deliberately drew her with her coochie out with some bullshit about how male characters are hyper-masculine in a glorified way
Save
thewickedverkaiking: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. MEN WANT OBJECTS WOMEN WANT PEOPLE : Frank Cho added 2 new photos with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speechless CHO! NERT SE prasLE THE caMERa 2G CRap! IG a stock N HEET CRP SERNG P 1RT ENTM FR MA RA thewickedverkaiking: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. MEN WANT OBJECTS WOMEN WANT PEOPLE
Save
libertarirynn: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: existentialist3: rainbowmonkeysinspace: pesthouse: classic-ash: wtfokcreepy: poppunkvampire: well I found my high school rapist on okcupid which allows me to out this fucker this man is named Ian Dickinson. he lives in Vancouver WA and he is 24 years old. when I was 16 and he was 19, he and an accomplice (who I will not out for personal reasons) assaulted me in his bed while I cried and begged them to stop. when I told him afterwards that what he had done wasn’t ok, he told me I shouldn’t have worn the skirt I had on and I deserved it, and then he laughed. we were both sober. he’s studying Engineering at Clark Community College in Vancouver. stay away from him. Stay safe, ladies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I live on the other side of the continent, but I’m still reblogging this because this man is a straight up cunt and deserves to be signal boosted. I hope you never have sex again. Ian Dickinson do not employ Ian Dickinson he is a rapist use his name as many times as possible so this post shows up when you google him So when his employer googles him they will see Ian Dickinson is a rapist Ian Dickinson rapes women Ian Dickinson is a criminal Ian Dickinson should have an arrest warrant Ian Dickinson should not have a job Ian Dickinson is in Vancouver WA Ian Dickinson is a cunt. Ian Dickinson should be charged as a rapist BASED ON FUCKING WHAT??? A nameless, faceless Tumblr user (who by the way I noticed has deactivated) puts up some random person’s picture and claims he’s a racist, and you morons gobble it up like fresh baked pie. I can’t fucking believe what I’m seeing right now. Thousands of notes of people eager as fuck to label this man a rapist despite ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to say that he is one. OP could be angry girlfriend, hell an angry BOYfriend. OP could’ve gotten that picture off the Internet. OP could be a fucking 40-year-old man and you dipshits wouldn’t know one way or another because a random Tumblr account puts up a picture and says “this guy is a rapist“ and nobody ever lies on the Internet, right? Seriously use your fucking brain for 2.5 seconds I am begging you. I would like to argue this. There are the specific ages that the two were, the recount of there being a third party and recounting excatly what the accused said. I mean that’s pretty solid evidence if you ask me. They even told us the man’s college! That’s SOILD evidence. Change my mind. @libertarirynn @the-fallen-storyteller raped me. I was 19 and they were 24. There was somebody else there (who I will leave out for personal reasons). Afterward they said “sucks to suck, buttercup“. They’re studying mathematics at the university of California. Stay away from them. ——————- There. According to you that’s a completely believable story with SOLID evidence. Honestly your statement is so ridiculous that I’m willing to consider maybe you were joking. Hell I hope you were joking. But just in case you weren’t that’s my rebuttal. @libertarirynn Sorry sweetie, you wrote wrong. The man was 19, currently 24, and the victim was 16 years old. The victim found the accused on okcupid, a dating site, you don’t just out someone for no reason. Maybe it could have been a vengeful girlfriend, maybe. The victim recalled the incident. I bet if you ask them for the full details, they can recall the ENTIRE experience. Are you fucking serious right now? Like are you actually, fucking serious right now? Do you believe literally everything you read on the Internet? Do you believe that hot Russian singles are in your area? Do you believe that “doctors hate him”? Do you believe that you can stop paying car insurance with one weird trick? Like I honestly don’t even have enough jokes for how asinine what you’re saying is. Your entire argument boils down to “this is true because someone on the Internet said that it was true“ and that’s literally it. You don’t have any proof she saw this picture on OkCupid. You don’t have any proof the ages are accurate. You don’t have any proof the person who made this isn’t a 45-year-old man living in Japan. This is honestly the fucking stupidest thing I’ve read all day and that’s saying a lot. So guess who blocked me? 🤣Lmao you specifically asked me for debate. If you can’t take the heat stay out of the kitchen 🤷🏽‍♀️: libertarirynn: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: existentialist3: rainbowmonkeysinspace: pesthouse: classic-ash: wtfokcreepy: poppunkvampire: well I found my high school rapist on okcupid which allows me to out this fucker this man is named Ian Dickinson. he lives in Vancouver WA and he is 24 years old. when I was 16 and he was 19, he and an accomplice (who I will not out for personal reasons) assaulted me in his bed while I cried and begged them to stop. when I told him afterwards that what he had done wasn’t ok, he told me I shouldn’t have worn the skirt I had on and I deserved it, and then he laughed. we were both sober. he’s studying Engineering at Clark Community College in Vancouver. stay away from him. Stay safe, ladies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I live on the other side of the continent, but I’m still reblogging this because this man is a straight up cunt and deserves to be signal boosted. I hope you never have sex again. Ian Dickinson do not employ Ian Dickinson he is a rapist use his name as many times as possible so this post shows up when you google him So when his employer googles him they will see Ian Dickinson is a rapist Ian Dickinson rapes women Ian Dickinson is a criminal Ian Dickinson should have an arrest warrant Ian Dickinson should not have a job Ian Dickinson is in Vancouver WA Ian Dickinson is a cunt. Ian Dickinson should be charged as a rapist BASED ON FUCKING WHAT??? A nameless, faceless Tumblr user (who by the way I noticed has deactivated) puts up some random person’s picture and claims he’s a racist, and you morons gobble it up like fresh baked pie. I can’t fucking believe what I’m seeing right now. Thousands of notes of people eager as fuck to label this man a rapist despite ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to say that he is one. OP could be angry girlfriend, hell an angry BOYfriend. OP could’ve gotten that picture off the Internet. OP could be a fucking 40-year-old man and you dipshits wouldn’t know one way or another because a random Tumblr account puts up a picture and says “this guy is a rapist“ and nobody ever lies on the Internet, right? Seriously use your fucking brain for 2.5 seconds I am begging you. I would like to argue this. There are the specific ages that the two were, the recount of there being a third party and recounting excatly what the accused said. I mean that’s pretty solid evidence if you ask me. They even told us the man’s college! That’s SOILD evidence. Change my mind. @libertarirynn @the-fallen-storyteller raped me. I was 19 and they were 24. There was somebody else there (who I will leave out for personal reasons). Afterward they said “sucks to suck, buttercup“. They’re studying mathematics at the university of California. Stay away from them. ——————- There. According to you that’s a completely believable story with SOLID evidence. Honestly your statement is so ridiculous that I’m willing to consider maybe you were joking. Hell I hope you were joking. But just in case you weren’t that’s my rebuttal. @libertarirynn Sorry sweetie, you wrote wrong. The man was 19, currently 24, and the victim was 16 years old. The victim found the accused on okcupid, a dating site, you don’t just out someone for no reason. Maybe it could have been a vengeful girlfriend, maybe. The victim recalled the incident. I bet if you ask them for the full details, they can recall the ENTIRE experience. Are you fucking serious right now? Like are you actually, fucking serious right now? Do you believe literally everything you read on the Internet? Do you believe that hot Russian singles are in your area? Do you believe that “doctors hate him”? Do you believe that you can stop paying car insurance with one weird trick? Like I honestly don’t even have enough jokes for how asinine what you’re saying is. Your entire argument boils down to “this is true because someone on the Internet said that it was true“ and that’s literally it. You don’t have any proof she saw this picture on OkCupid. You don’t have any proof the ages are accurate. You don’t have any proof the person who made this isn’t a 45-year-old man living in Japan. This is honestly the fucking stupidest thing I’ve read all day and that’s saying a lot. So guess who blocked me? 🤣Lmao you specifically asked me for debate. If you can’t take the heat stay out of the kitchen 🤷🏽‍♀️
Save
the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: existentialist3: rainbowmonkeysinspace: pesthouse: classic-ash: wtfokcreepy: poppunkvampire: well I found my high school rapist on okcupid which allows me to out this fucker this man is named Ian Dickinson. he lives in Vancouver WA and he is 24 years old. when I was 16 and he was 19, he and an accomplice (who I will not out for personal reasons) assaulted me in his bed while I cried and begged them to stop. when I told him afterwards that what he had done wasn’t ok, he told me I shouldn’t have worn the skirt I had on and I deserved it, and then he laughed. we were both sober. he’s studying Engineering at Clark Community College in Vancouver. stay away from him. Stay safe, ladies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I live on the other side of the continent, but I’m still reblogging this because this man is a straight up cunt and deserves to be signal boosted. I hope you never have sex again. Ian Dickinson do not employ Ian Dickinson he is a rapist use his name as many times as possible so this post shows up when you google him So when his employer googles him they will see Ian Dickinson is a rapist Ian Dickinson rapes women Ian Dickinson is a criminal Ian Dickinson should have an arrest warrant Ian Dickinson should not have a job Ian Dickinson is in Vancouver WA Ian Dickinson is a cunt. Ian Dickinson should be charged as a rapist BASED ON FUCKING WHAT??? A nameless, faceless Tumblr user (who by the way I noticed has deactivated) puts up some random person’s picture and claims he’s a racist, and you morons gobble it up like fresh baked pie. I can’t fucking believe what I’m seeing right now. Thousands of notes of people eager as fuck to label this man a rapist despite ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to say that he is one. OP could be angry girlfriend, hell an angry BOYfriend. OP could’ve gotten that picture off the Internet. OP could be a fucking 40-year-old man and you dipshits wouldn’t know one way or another because a random Tumblr account puts up a picture and says “this guy is a rapist“ and nobody ever lies on the Internet, right? Seriously use your fucking brain for 2.5 seconds I am begging you. I would like to argue this. There are the specific ages that the two were, the recount of there being a third party and recounting excatly what the accused said. I mean that’s pretty solid evidence if you ask me. They even told us the man’s college! That’s SOILD evidence. Change my mind. @libertarirynn @the-fallen-storyteller raped me. I was 19 and they were 24. There was somebody else there (who I will leave out for personal reasons). Afterward they said “sucks to suck, buttercup“. They’re studying mathematics at the university of California. Stay away from them. ——————- There. According to you that’s a completely believable story with SOLID evidence. Honestly your statement is so ridiculous that I’m willing to consider maybe you were joking. Hell I hope you were joking. But just in case you weren’t that’s my rebuttal. @libertarirynn Sorry sweetie, you wrote wrong. The man was 19, currently 24, and the victim was 16 years old. The victim found the accused on okcupid, a dating site, you don’t just out someone for no reason. Maybe it could have been a vengeful girlfriend, maybe. The victim recalled the incident. I bet if you ask them for the full details, they can recall the ENTIRE experience. Are you fucking serious right now? Like are you actually, fucking serious right now? Do you believe literally everything you read on the Internet? Do you believe that hot Russian singles are in your area? Do you believe that “doctors hate him”? Do you believe that you can stop paying car insurance with one weird trick? Like I honestly don’t even have enough jokes for how asinine what you’re saying is. Your entire argument boils down to “this is true because someone on the Internet said that it was true“ and that’s literally it. You don’t have any proof she saw this picture on OkCupid. You don’t have any proof the ages are accurate. You don’t have any proof the person who made this isn’t a 45-year-old man living in Japan. This is honestly the fucking stupidest thing I’ve read all day and that’s saying a lot.: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: the-fallen-storyteller: libertarirynn: existentialist3: rainbowmonkeysinspace: pesthouse: classic-ash: wtfokcreepy: poppunkvampire: well I found my high school rapist on okcupid which allows me to out this fucker this man is named Ian Dickinson. he lives in Vancouver WA and he is 24 years old. when I was 16 and he was 19, he and an accomplice (who I will not out for personal reasons) assaulted me in his bed while I cried and begged them to stop. when I told him afterwards that what he had done wasn’t ok, he told me I shouldn’t have worn the skirt I had on and I deserved it, and then he laughed. we were both sober. he’s studying Engineering at Clark Community College in Vancouver. stay away from him. Stay safe, ladies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I live on the other side of the continent, but I’m still reblogging this because this man is a straight up cunt and deserves to be signal boosted. I hope you never have sex again. Ian Dickinson do not employ Ian Dickinson he is a rapist use his name as many times as possible so this post shows up when you google him So when his employer googles him they will see Ian Dickinson is a rapist Ian Dickinson rapes women Ian Dickinson is a criminal Ian Dickinson should have an arrest warrant Ian Dickinson should not have a job Ian Dickinson is in Vancouver WA Ian Dickinson is a cunt. Ian Dickinson should be charged as a rapist BASED ON FUCKING WHAT??? A nameless, faceless Tumblr user (who by the way I noticed has deactivated) puts up some random person’s picture and claims he’s a racist, and you morons gobble it up like fresh baked pie. I can’t fucking believe what I’m seeing right now. Thousands of notes of people eager as fuck to label this man a rapist despite ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to say that he is one. OP could be angry girlfriend, hell an angry BOYfriend. OP could’ve gotten that picture off the Internet. OP could be a fucking 40-year-old man and you dipshits wouldn’t know one way or another because a random Tumblr account puts up a picture and says “this guy is a rapist“ and nobody ever lies on the Internet, right? Seriously use your fucking brain for 2.5 seconds I am begging you. I would like to argue this. There are the specific ages that the two were, the recount of there being a third party and recounting excatly what the accused said. I mean that’s pretty solid evidence if you ask me. They even told us the man’s college! That’s SOILD evidence. Change my mind. @libertarirynn @the-fallen-storyteller raped me. I was 19 and they were 24. There was somebody else there (who I will leave out for personal reasons). Afterward they said “sucks to suck, buttercup“. They’re studying mathematics at the university of California. Stay away from them. ——————- There. According to you that’s a completely believable story with SOLID evidence. Honestly your statement is so ridiculous that I’m willing to consider maybe you were joking. Hell I hope you were joking. But just in case you weren’t that’s my rebuttal. @libertarirynn Sorry sweetie, you wrote wrong. The man was 19, currently 24, and the victim was 16 years old. The victim found the accused on okcupid, a dating site, you don’t just out someone for no reason. Maybe it could have been a vengeful girlfriend, maybe. The victim recalled the incident. I bet if you ask them for the full details, they can recall the ENTIRE experience. Are you fucking serious right now? Like are you actually, fucking serious right now? Do you believe literally everything you read on the Internet? Do you believe that hot Russian singles are in your area? Do you believe that “doctors hate him”? Do you believe that you can stop paying car insurance with one weird trick? Like I honestly don’t even have enough jokes for how asinine what you’re saying is. Your entire argument boils down to “this is true because someone on the Internet said that it was true“ and that’s literally it. You don’t have any proof she saw this picture on OkCupid. You don’t have any proof the ages are accurate. You don’t have any proof the person who made this isn’t a 45-year-old man living in Japan. This is honestly the fucking stupidest thing I’ve read all day and that’s saying a lot.
Save
rockyrz: libertarirynn: siryouarebeingmocked: grumpy-goompa: siryouarebeingmocked: skeleton-jack: cookingwithroxy: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: siryouarebeingmocked: theunnamedstranger: siryouarebeingmocked: theindependentconservative: siryouarebeingmocked: friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt: triggeredmedia: Bad acting and bad characters? other actors in those movies/franchises got shit from trolls too. melissa mccarthy. hayden christiansen. jake lloyd. laura dern. the difference is that all these media outlets didnt declare it a public crises keep reporting on it months after it was news.  in fact, jake lloyd probably got it worse than anyone, being an actual child at the time being traumatized for years because of bullying, but no one cared at the time now it only gets brought up as a tacked on example when talking about those awful modern star wars fans. hes a straight white man. what on earth could explain this? in leslie jones case, she turned it into an internet slap fight drew much more attention to her when before that she was getting no more shit than the other leads. look, we should always separate the actor from their role people who attack an actor personally for a role are scumbags, but stop injecting racism sexism into everything then using it as a shield against actual valid criticism. Not to mention Adam Driver. He’s still getting crapped on. People complained that he was playing a Jewish guy infiltrating the Klan in a historical Spike Lee movie, even though he isn’t Jewish, which is apparently Not Allowed. These are popular franchises. If a fraction of a percent of their fans are knob-ends who harass people, that would seem overwhelming to the person on the receiving end. Not to mention Rey’s a Mary Sure now and everyone called it. You do remember that I disagree with the majority opinion, right? Also, people were calling her a Mary Sue from the first movie. Sometimes based on things that literally didn’t happen, like “being a better pilot than Han”. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life until she could pilot it BETTER than someone who’s had it forever.That’s bullshit. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life You mean the ship that she explicitly called “junk”? The one she says she advised against certain modifications for? The one owned by the Quarter Portion guy, who used to be her guardian, as we see in the flashback? How does Rey fly the ship better than Han? Please, I haven’t seen a single piece of evidence for this in over two and a half years, but it’s treated as gospel.  Heck, he didn’t even “have it forever”, he lost it years, maybe decades ago. Better than Han is less important than outflying two Ties on her first attempt. Only due to home ground advantage, vs. two fighters designed mainly for space combat with horrible aerodynamics, and even then, she got Finn’s turret shot. Also, she’s all-but-explicitly shown to be using The Force. The dialogue draws attention to the fact that she’s flying better than she expects. ‘somebody did a thing that is entirely understandable given the context of the prior movies and the actual text of the movie at hand. But for some reason I missed these obvious things so yarrr!’ No I fully accept the explanations for it. I still think it was poorly done and added to Rey’s perception as a Mary Sue who faces no real challenges and succeeds at everything. That there’s an explanation for what she’s doing and how she’s doing it doesn’t change that I and many people think she shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. So, shedloads of people apparently ignored or missed the clear on-screen evidence to complain about this aspect of the movie, but it’s still the movie’s fault that they’re wrong, even when they’re making claims which they could not have reasonably arrived at (EG Rey’s a better pilot than Han.), and the only possible explanation is “fandom misconceptions”? just because she succeeded (lived) doesn’t mean Rey herself experienced these things as ‘easy’. how many movies out there does the hero do something unexpectedly and benefit from the results? like maybe all of them? movies would be boring if characters are powerless the entire time until the exact one moment they need to win. they need to succeed and stumble a little bit along the way. little wins and little losses until the end. if she got her arm cut off, would that remove people’s mary sue label? Thing is, people ignore the actual struggles she went through just because they have a Narrative. She didn’t just beat Kylo, he knocked her out pretty much instantly, and then Fin bought her time, and then she temporarily forced Ben back (IIRC, the book says she tapped into the Dark Side). We don’t even know if he would’ve been able to win if he got up, or even if he could get up. And this was while Kylo was bleeding out from a high-powered weapon, which the movie takes pain to remind us of. But the fanbase acts like Rey apparently beat Ben with one hand tied behind her back, wearing a blindfold, while suffering from some hideous space-combination of Avian Flu and Ebola Zaire. I’m so glad I’m not crazy. I thought I was the only one in the more conservative camp that doesn’t agree that Rey is a Mary Sue. There is lots of in-text explanation for why she excels at certain things as well as the time honored “because the Force“ answer which has applied to a lot of characters besides her. And she absolutely does have struggles even if they are primarily in emotional conflict and wrestling with her untapped strength and insecurities about her origins. These are what make the character. Calling the whole character a Mary Sue because “she fight too good“ is kind of asinine. And don’t get me started on how they bitch about her beating Kylo and forget that he was mortally wounded at the time, and bitch about her knowing something about the Millennium Falcon and mechanical engineering despite the fact that she was A PROFESSIONAL JUNKER and the ship had been on her planet probably most of her life giving her plenty of time to explore it. But yeah pretending that only the minority actors/actresses get harrassed is bullshit. Rey is 100% a Mary Sue. No training yet managed to beat Kylo Ren, flew a ship across space despite no experience, etc. @rockyrz did you read literally one word from the post above you or are you just gonna keep shouting “she’s a Mary Sue!“ and ignore all evidence to the contrary?“Managed to beat Kylo Ren”BECAUSE HE WAS FUCKING MORTALLY WOUNDED.“flew a ship across space”BECAUSE SHE HAD JUST STATED SHE WAS A PILOT.Like seriously it’s fine if you don’t like the movie but you seem kind of dumb if you just straight up ignore the evidence even it’s right in front of your face so you can keep saying the same thing over and over.: Sean T. Collins Follow @theseantcollins weird that the person they went after from Ghostbusters was Leslie Jones. weird that the person they went after from Star Wars was Kelly Marie Tran. what on earth could explain this 5:29 AM 5 Jun 2018 7,482 Retweets 31,087 Likes rockyrz: libertarirynn: siryouarebeingmocked: grumpy-goompa: siryouarebeingmocked: skeleton-jack: cookingwithroxy: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: siryouarebeingmocked: theunnamedstranger: siryouarebeingmocked: theindependentconservative: siryouarebeingmocked: friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt: triggeredmedia: Bad acting and bad characters? other actors in those movies/franchises got shit from trolls too. melissa mccarthy. hayden christiansen. jake lloyd. laura dern. the difference is that all these media outlets didnt declare it a public crises keep reporting on it months after it was news.  in fact, jake lloyd probably got it worse than anyone, being an actual child at the time being traumatized for years because of bullying, but no one cared at the time now it only gets brought up as a tacked on example when talking about those awful modern star wars fans. hes a straight white man. what on earth could explain this? in leslie jones case, she turned it into an internet slap fight drew much more attention to her when before that she was getting no more shit than the other leads. look, we should always separate the actor from their role people who attack an actor personally for a role are scumbags, but stop injecting racism sexism into everything then using it as a shield against actual valid criticism. Not to mention Adam Driver. He’s still getting crapped on. People complained that he was playing a Jewish guy infiltrating the Klan in a historical Spike Lee movie, even though he isn’t Jewish, which is apparently Not Allowed. These are popular franchises. If a fraction of a percent of their fans are knob-ends who harass people, that would seem overwhelming to the person on the receiving end. Not to mention Rey’s a Mary Sure now and everyone called it. You do remember that I disagree with the majority opinion, right? Also, people were calling her a Mary Sue from the first movie. Sometimes based on things that literally didn’t happen, like “being a better pilot than Han”. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life until she could pilot it BETTER than someone who’s had it forever.That’s bullshit. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life You mean the ship that she explicitly called “junk”? The one she says she advised against certain modifications for? The one owned by the Quarter Portion guy, who used to be her guardian, as we see in the flashback? How does Rey fly the ship better than Han? Please, I haven’t seen a single piece of evidence for this in over two and a half years, but it’s treated as gospel.  Heck, he didn’t even “have it forever”, he lost it years, maybe decades ago. Better than Han is less important than outflying two Ties on her first attempt. Only due to home ground advantage, vs. two fighters designed mainly for space combat with horrible aerodynamics, and even then, she got Finn’s turret shot. Also, she’s all-but-explicitly shown to be using The Force. The dialogue draws attention to the fact that she’s flying better than she expects. ‘somebody did a thing that is entirely understandable given the context of the prior movies and the actual text of the movie at hand. But for some reason I missed these obvious things so yarrr!’ No I fully accept the explanations for it. I still think it was poorly done and added to Rey’s perception as a Mary Sue who faces no real challenges and succeeds at everything. That there’s an explanation for what she’s doing and how she’s doing it doesn’t change that I and many people think she shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. So, shedloads of people apparently ignored or missed the clear on-screen evidence to complain about this aspect of the movie, but it’s still the movie’s fault that they’re wrong, even when they’re making claims which they could not have reasonably arrived at (EG Rey’s a better pilot than Han.), and the only possible explanation is “fandom misconceptions”? just because she succeeded (lived) doesn’t mean Rey herself experienced these things as ‘easy’. how many movies out there does the hero do something unexpectedly and benefit from the results? like maybe all of them? movies would be boring if characters are powerless the entire time until the exact one moment they need to win. they need to succeed and stumble a little bit along the way. little wins and little losses until the end. if she got her arm cut off, would that remove people’s mary sue label? Thing is, people ignore the actual struggles she went through just because they have a Narrative. She didn’t just beat Kylo, he knocked her out pretty much instantly, and then Fin bought her time, and then she temporarily forced Ben back (IIRC, the book says she tapped into the Dark Side). We don’t even know if he would’ve been able to win if he got up, or even if he could get up. And this was while Kylo was bleeding out from a high-powered weapon, which the movie takes pain to remind us of. But the fanbase acts like Rey apparently beat Ben with one hand tied behind her back, wearing a blindfold, while suffering from some hideous space-combination of Avian Flu and Ebola Zaire. I’m so glad I’m not crazy. I thought I was the only one in the more conservative camp that doesn’t agree that Rey is a Mary Sue. There is lots of in-text explanation for why she excels at certain things as well as the time honored “because the Force“ answer which has applied to a lot of characters besides her. And she absolutely does have struggles even if they are primarily in emotional conflict and wrestling with her untapped strength and insecurities about her origins. These are what make the character. Calling the whole character a Mary Sue because “she fight too good“ is kind of asinine. And don’t get me started on how they bitch about her beating Kylo and forget that he was mortally wounded at the time, and bitch about her knowing something about the Millennium Falcon and mechanical engineering despite the fact that she was A PROFESSIONAL JUNKER and the ship had been on her planet probably most of her life giving her plenty of time to explore it. But yeah pretending that only the minority actors/actresses get harrassed is bullshit. Rey is 100% a Mary Sue. No training yet managed to beat Kylo Ren, flew a ship across space despite no experience, etc. @rockyrz did you read literally one word from the post above you or are you just gonna keep shouting “she’s a Mary Sue!“ and ignore all evidence to the contrary?“Managed to beat Kylo Ren”BECAUSE HE WAS FUCKING MORTALLY WOUNDED.“flew a ship across space”BECAUSE SHE HAD JUST STATED SHE WAS A PILOT.Like seriously it’s fine if you don’t like the movie but you seem kind of dumb if you just straight up ignore the evidence even it’s right in front of your face so you can keep saying the same thing over and over.
Save
siryouarebeingmocked: grumpy-goompa: siryouarebeingmocked: skeleton-jack: cookingwithroxy: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: siryouarebeingmocked: theunnamedstranger: siryouarebeingmocked: theindependentconservative: siryouarebeingmocked: friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt: triggeredmedia: Bad acting and bad characters? other actors in those movies/franchises got shit from trolls too. melissa mccarthy. hayden christiansen. jake lloyd. laura dern. the difference is that all these media outlets didnt declare it a public crises keep reporting on it months after it was news.  in fact, jake lloyd probably got it worse than anyone, being an actual child at the time being traumatized for years because of bullying, but no one cared at the time now it only gets brought up as a tacked on example when talking about those awful modern star wars fans. hes a straight white man. what on earth could explain this? in leslie jones case, she turned it into an internet slap fight drew much more attention to her when before that she was getting no more shit than the other leads. look, we should always separate the actor from their role people who attack an actor personally for a role are scumbags, but stop injecting racism sexism into everything then using it as a shield against actual valid criticism. Not to mention Adam Driver. He’s still getting crapped on. People complained that he was playing a Jewish guy infiltrating the Klan in a historical Spike Lee movie, even though he isn’t Jewish, which is apparently Not Allowed. These are popular franchises. If a fraction of a percent of their fans are knob-ends who harass people, that would seem overwhelming to the person on the receiving end. Not to mention Rey’s a Mary Sure now and everyone called it. You do remember that I disagree with the majority opinion, right? Also, people were calling her a Mary Sue from the first movie. Sometimes based on things that literally didn’t happen, like “being a better pilot than Han”. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life until she could pilot it BETTER than someone who’s had it forever.That’s bullshit. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life You mean the ship that she explicitly called “junk”? The one she says she advised against certain modifications for? The one owned by the Quarter Portion guy, who used to be her guardian, as we see in the flashback? How does Rey fly the ship better than Han? Please, I haven’t seen a single piece of evidence for this in over two and a half years, but it’s treated as gospel.  Heck, he didn’t even “have it forever”, he lost it years, maybe decades ago. Better than Han is less important than outflying two Ties on her first attempt. Only due to home ground advantage, vs. two fighters designed mainly for space combat with horrible aerodynamics, and even then, she got Finn’s turret shot. Also, she’s all-but-explicitly shown to be using The Force. The dialogue draws attention to the fact that she’s flying better than she expects. ‘somebody did a thing that is entirely understandable given the context of the prior movies and the actual text of the movie at hand. But for some reason I missed these obvious things so yarrr!’ No I fully accept the explanations for it. I still think it was poorly done and added to Rey’s perception as a Mary Sue who faces no real challenges and succeeds at everything. That there’s an explanation for what she’s doing and how she’s doing it doesn’t change that I and many people think she shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. So, shedloads of people apparently ignored or missed the clear on-screen evidence to complain about this aspect of the movie, but it’s still the movie’s fault that they’re wrong, even when they’re making claims which they could not have reasonably arrived at (EG Rey’s a better pilot than Han.), and the only possible explanation is “fandom misconceptions”? just because she succeeded (lived) doesn’t mean Rey herself experienced these things as ‘easy’. how many movies out there does the hero do something unexpectedly and benefit from the results? like maybe all of them? movies would be boring if characters are powerless the entire time until the exact one moment they need to win. they need to succeed and stumble a little bit along the way. little wins and little losses until the end. if she got her arm cut off, would that remove people’s mary sue label? Thing is, people ignore the actual struggles she went through just because they have a Narrative. She didn’t just beat Kylo, he knocked her out pretty much instantly, and then Fin bought her time, and then she temporarily forced Ben back (IIRC, the book says she tapped into the Dark Side). We don’t even know if he would’ve been able to win if he got up, or even if he could get up. And this was while Kylo was bleeding out from a high-powered weapon, which the movie takes pain to remind us of. But the fanbase acts like Rey apparently beat Ben with one hand tied behind her back, wearing a blindfold, while suffering from some hideous space-combination of Avian Flu and Ebola Zaire. I’m so glad I’m not crazy. I thought I was the only one in the more conservative camp that doesn’t agree that Rey is a Mary Sue. There is lots of in-text explanation for why she excels at certain things as well as the time honored “because the Force“ answer which has applied to a lot of characters besides her. And she absolutely does have struggles even if they are primarily in emotional conflict and wrestling with her untapped strength and insecurities about her origins. These are what make the character. Calling the whole character a Mary Sue because “she fight too good“ is kind of asinine. And don’t get me started on how they bitch about her beating Kylo and forget that he was mortally wounded at the time, and bitch about her knowing something about the Millennium Falcon and mechanical engineering despite the fact that she was A PROFESSIONAL JUNKER and the ship had been on her planet probably most of her life giving her plenty of time to explore it.But yeah pretending that only the minority actors/actresses get harrassed is bullshit.: Sean T. Collins Follow @theseantcollins weird that the person they went after from Ghostbusters was Leslie Jones. weird that the person they went after from Star Wars was Kelly Marie Tran. what on earth could explain this 5:29 AM 5 Jun 2018 7,482 Retweets 31,087 Likes siryouarebeingmocked: grumpy-goompa: siryouarebeingmocked: skeleton-jack: cookingwithroxy: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: siryouarebeingmocked: theunnamedstranger: siryouarebeingmocked: theindependentconservative: siryouarebeingmocked: friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt: triggeredmedia: Bad acting and bad characters? other actors in those movies/franchises got shit from trolls too. melissa mccarthy. hayden christiansen. jake lloyd. laura dern. the difference is that all these media outlets didnt declare it a public crises keep reporting on it months after it was news.  in fact, jake lloyd probably got it worse than anyone, being an actual child at the time being traumatized for years because of bullying, but no one cared at the time now it only gets brought up as a tacked on example when talking about those awful modern star wars fans. hes a straight white man. what on earth could explain this? in leslie jones case, she turned it into an internet slap fight drew much more attention to her when before that she was getting no more shit than the other leads. look, we should always separate the actor from their role people who attack an actor personally for a role are scumbags, but stop injecting racism sexism into everything then using it as a shield against actual valid criticism. Not to mention Adam Driver. He’s still getting crapped on. People complained that he was playing a Jewish guy infiltrating the Klan in a historical Spike Lee movie, even though he isn’t Jewish, which is apparently Not Allowed. These are popular franchises. If a fraction of a percent of their fans are knob-ends who harass people, that would seem overwhelming to the person on the receiving end. Not to mention Rey’s a Mary Sure now and everyone called it. You do remember that I disagree with the majority opinion, right? Also, people were calling her a Mary Sue from the first movie. Sometimes based on things that literally didn’t happen, like “being a better pilot than Han”. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life until she could pilot it BETTER than someone who’s had it forever.That’s bullshit. On a ship she had literally never seen before in her life You mean the ship that she explicitly called “junk”? The one she says she advised against certain modifications for? The one owned by the Quarter Portion guy, who used to be her guardian, as we see in the flashback? How does Rey fly the ship better than Han? Please, I haven’t seen a single piece of evidence for this in over two and a half years, but it’s treated as gospel.  Heck, he didn’t even “have it forever”, he lost it years, maybe decades ago. Better than Han is less important than outflying two Ties on her first attempt. Only due to home ground advantage, vs. two fighters designed mainly for space combat with horrible aerodynamics, and even then, she got Finn’s turret shot. Also, she’s all-but-explicitly shown to be using The Force. The dialogue draws attention to the fact that she’s flying better than she expects. ‘somebody did a thing that is entirely understandable given the context of the prior movies and the actual text of the movie at hand. But for some reason I missed these obvious things so yarrr!’ No I fully accept the explanations for it. I still think it was poorly done and added to Rey’s perception as a Mary Sue who faces no real challenges and succeeds at everything. That there’s an explanation for what she’s doing and how she’s doing it doesn’t change that I and many people think she shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. So, shedloads of people apparently ignored or missed the clear on-screen evidence to complain about this aspect of the movie, but it’s still the movie’s fault that they’re wrong, even when they’re making claims which they could not have reasonably arrived at (EG Rey’s a better pilot than Han.), and the only possible explanation is “fandom misconceptions”? just because she succeeded (lived) doesn’t mean Rey herself experienced these things as ‘easy’. how many movies out there does the hero do something unexpectedly and benefit from the results? like maybe all of them? movies would be boring if characters are powerless the entire time until the exact one moment they need to win. they need to succeed and stumble a little bit along the way. little wins and little losses until the end. if she got her arm cut off, would that remove people’s mary sue label? Thing is, people ignore the actual struggles she went through just because they have a Narrative. She didn’t just beat Kylo, he knocked her out pretty much instantly, and then Fin bought her time, and then she temporarily forced Ben back (IIRC, the book says she tapped into the Dark Side). We don’t even know if he would’ve been able to win if he got up, or even if he could get up. And this was while Kylo was bleeding out from a high-powered weapon, which the movie takes pain to remind us of. But the fanbase acts like Rey apparently beat Ben with one hand tied behind her back, wearing a blindfold, while suffering from some hideous space-combination of Avian Flu and Ebola Zaire. I’m so glad I’m not crazy. I thought I was the only one in the more conservative camp that doesn’t agree that Rey is a Mary Sue. There is lots of in-text explanation for why she excels at certain things as well as the time honored “because the Force“ answer which has applied to a lot of characters besides her. And she absolutely does have struggles even if they are primarily in emotional conflict and wrestling with her untapped strength and insecurities about her origins. These are what make the character. Calling the whole character a Mary Sue because “she fight too good“ is kind of asinine. And don’t get me started on how they bitch about her beating Kylo and forget that he was mortally wounded at the time, and bitch about her knowing something about the Millennium Falcon and mechanical engineering despite the fact that she was A PROFESSIONAL JUNKER and the ship had been on her planet probably most of her life giving her plenty of time to explore it.But yeah pretending that only the minority actors/actresses get harrassed is bullshit.
Save
<p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/176323034267/russiansupport" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://russian--support.tumblr.com/post/176322915232/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch" class="tumblr_blog">russian–support</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/176322834387/russiansupport-theidledrifter" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://russian--support.tumblr.com/post/176322727632/theidledrifter-russiansupport" class="tumblr_blog">russian–support</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://theidledrifter.tumblr.com/post/176322572207/russiansupport-lightofliberty" class="tumblr_blog">theidledrifter</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://russian--support.tumblr.com/post/176321705962/lightofliberty-arielsqueaks-i-tweeted-this-a" class="tumblr_blog">russian–support</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://lightofliberty.tumblr.com/post/176320875866/arielsqueaks-i-tweeted-this-a-few-months-ago" class="tumblr_blog">lightofliberty</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://arielsqueaks.tumblr.com/post/176163540856/i-tweeted-this-a-few-months-ago-edit-allow-me" class="tumblr_blog">arielsqueaks</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>I tweeted this a few months ago</p> <p> Edit: Allow me to be more specific. You don’t need an ak-47 or an ar-15 for that </p> </blockquote> <p>U can’t even get an AK-47 anywhere &amp; I need whichever gun I want. 🙄</p> </blockquote><p>So OP wants me to use only a bolt action rifle which typically fires a 7.62x51mm/.308 or a shotgun, both of which cause greater damage to the target and/or the surrounding area than say a 9mm or a .223/5.56x45mm? </p><p>I would prefer to kill the intruder and only them than to also potentially kill my neighbor or anyone in the adjacent rooms. I’d like the round to bounce around inside my enemy and not go through him.</p><p>Picture below to help you understand the big numbers, OP</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="666" data-orig-width="1200"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/2d56e0c01b5cf39f3f5fa1425de78888/tumblr_pci6rxnmD61sy3zw7_540.jpg" data-orig-height="666" data-orig-width="1200"/></figure></blockquote> <p>OP, many home invasions are with teams of 3 to 4 criminals. An AR15 means I can use one magazine to fight them off without reloading. Despite what fiction says. It can take multiple shots to stop someone. Even if such shots are rifle rounds. Also they do make AR carbines chambered for pistol cartridges. </p></blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450" data-tumblr-attribution="machetelanding:omZd8w4032xPbS8BoYTajw:ZNlj6l1k6MJEt"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/72517c98a24fa35fa2400a9a24828c59/tumblr_nnw4zlexW01uphxvgo1_500.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote> <p>None of these jusrifications are necessary. Get whatever gun you want cuz it brings you happiness. No more reason needed.</p></blockquote> <p>Necessary, no, but it helps to be articulated against retards like OP.</p><p>Also excellent for home defense:</p><p><br/></p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="164" data-orig-width="300" data-tumblr-attribution="monarchofmurder:DoEOMvCoE0nboHenRkxmVA:ZEcbtr2YKY9o6"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e04c6c36fc910b5b305cf432313e4b11/tumblr_p9dait21VJ1sunravo1_400.gif" data-orig-height="164" data-orig-width="300"/></figure></blockquote> <p>I just get very frustrated sometimes when people feel the need to provide reasons why their rights should be respected.</p><p>It’s not something that needs to be reasoned.</p></blockquote> <p>I agree that rights shouldn’t have to be legitimized because they are simply rights. But it is nice to argue against the asinine “you don’t need that gun for that thing!” argument that’s almost always from people who don’t know shit about guns to begin with. I could shoot a much much bigger round with - hunting gun then with an AR 15, but only the big black scary one is the one that they’re convinced is a death machine.</p>: 12:26 PM Tweet Ariel Celeste @arielsqueaks "but I nEED To OWn GUNs iN CASe I HavE To DEfEND MYself AgAINST AN İNtruDER" ok but I'm.pretty certain you don't need a automatic. 2/20/18, 10:58 PM for that View Tweet activity 2 Likes Add another Tweet <p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/176323034267/russiansupport" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://russian--support.tumblr.com/post/176322915232/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch" class="tumblr_blog">russian–support</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/176322834387/russiansupport-theidledrifter" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://russian--support.tumblr.com/post/176322727632/theidledrifter-russiansupport" class="tumblr_blog">russian–support</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://theidledrifter.tumblr.com/post/176322572207/russiansupport-lightofliberty" class="tumblr_blog">theidledrifter</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://russian--support.tumblr.com/post/176321705962/lightofliberty-arielsqueaks-i-tweeted-this-a" class="tumblr_blog">russian–support</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://lightofliberty.tumblr.com/post/176320875866/arielsqueaks-i-tweeted-this-a-few-months-ago" class="tumblr_blog">lightofliberty</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://arielsqueaks.tumblr.com/post/176163540856/i-tweeted-this-a-few-months-ago-edit-allow-me" class="tumblr_blog">arielsqueaks</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>I tweeted this a few months ago</p> <p> Edit: Allow me to be more specific. You don’t need an ak-47 or an ar-15 for that </p> </blockquote> <p>U can’t even get an AK-47 anywhere &amp; I need whichever gun I want. 🙄</p> </blockquote><p>So OP wants me to use only a bolt action rifle which typically fires a 7.62x51mm/.308 or a shotgun, both of which cause greater damage to the target and/or the surrounding area than say a 9mm or a .223/5.56x45mm? </p><p>I would prefer to kill the intruder and only them than to also potentially kill my neighbor or anyone in the adjacent rooms. I’d like the round to bounce around inside my enemy and not go through him.</p><p>Picture below to help you understand the big numbers, OP</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="666" data-orig-width="1200"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/2d56e0c01b5cf39f3f5fa1425de78888/tumblr_pci6rxnmD61sy3zw7_540.jpg" data-orig-height="666" data-orig-width="1200"/></figure></blockquote> <p>OP, many home invasions are with teams of 3 to 4 criminals. An AR15 means I can use one magazine to fight them off without reloading. Despite what fiction says. It can take multiple shots to stop someone. Even if such shots are rifle rounds. Also they do make AR carbines chambered for pistol cartridges. </p></blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450" data-tumblr-attribution="machetelanding:omZd8w4032xPbS8BoYTajw:ZNlj6l1k6MJEt"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/72517c98a24fa35fa2400a9a24828c59/tumblr_nnw4zlexW01uphxvgo1_500.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote> <p>None of these jusrifications are necessary. Get whatever gun you want cuz it brings you happiness. No more reason needed.</p></blockquote> <p>Necessary, no, but it helps to be articulated against retards like OP.</p><p>Also excellent for home defense:</p><p><br/></p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="164" data-orig-width="300" data-tumblr-attribution="monarchofmurder:DoEOMvCoE0nboHenRkxmVA:ZEcbtr2YKY9o6"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e04c6c36fc910b5b305cf432313e4b11/tumblr_p9dait21VJ1sunravo1_400.gif" data-orig-height="164" data-orig-width="300"/></figure></blockquote> <p>I just get very frustrated sometimes when people feel the need to provide reasons why their rights should be respected.</p><p>It’s not something that needs to be reasoned.</p></blockquote> <p>I agree that rights shouldn’t have to be legitimized because they are simply rights. But it is nice to argue against the asinine “you don’t need that gun for that thing!” argument that’s almost always from people who don’t know shit about guns to begin with. I could shoot a much much bigger round with - hunting gun then with an AR 15, but only the big black scary one is the one that they’re convinced is a death machine.</p>
Save
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/174006802139/jlongbone-libertarirynn-a-few-observations" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://jlongbone.tumblr.com/post/174006323874/libertarirynn-a-few-observations-1-that-was" class="tumblr_blog">jlongbone</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/174005844262/a-few-observations-1-that-was-some-of-the-most" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p><blockquote> <p>A few observations:<br/> 1. That was some of the most white bread unseasoned uncoordinated hot mess fighting I’ve ever seen in my life. It’s embarrassing enough that you’re grown ass men fighting in a McDonald’s, but you’re not even doing it well. Pink shirt guy almost took himself out on the kiosk after missing 15 punches.</p> <p>2. If that had been my friend in the white shirt watching me get jumped like that and not doing shit except trying to play Dr. Phil with the two psychos that did it I would be looking for a new friend. You better get your ass in here and fight with me.</p> <p>3. I deeply relate to that guy in the background just eating his burger like “that ain’t got nothing to do with me” 😂</p> <p><a href="https://tmblr.co/m0If3wg4Y-iGkel9dTadFYQ">@jlongbone</a></p> </blockquote> <p style="">i’m the glasses<br/></p></blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="332"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c0fe43d39488853f7abba29d9bfa215c/tumblr_inline_p8wjajvNkM1rw09tq_500.gif" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="332"/></figure></blockquote> <p>Re-blogging this again free of the asinine argument I let myself get sucked into.</p>: <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/174006802139/jlongbone-libertarirynn-a-few-observations" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://jlongbone.tumblr.com/post/174006323874/libertarirynn-a-few-observations-1-that-was" class="tumblr_blog">jlongbone</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/174005844262/a-few-observations-1-that-was-some-of-the-most" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p><blockquote> <p>A few observations:<br/> 1. That was some of the most white bread unseasoned uncoordinated hot mess fighting I’ve ever seen in my life. It’s embarrassing enough that you’re grown ass men fighting in a McDonald’s, but you’re not even doing it well. Pink shirt guy almost took himself out on the kiosk after missing 15 punches.</p> <p>2. If that had been my friend in the white shirt watching me get jumped like that and not doing shit except trying to play Dr. Phil with the two psychos that did it I would be looking for a new friend. You better get your ass in here and fight with me.</p> <p>3. I deeply relate to that guy in the background just eating his burger like “that ain’t got nothing to do with me” 😂</p> <p><a href="https://tmblr.co/m0If3wg4Y-iGkel9dTadFYQ">@jlongbone</a></p> </blockquote> <p style="">i’m the glasses<br/></p></blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="332"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c0fe43d39488853f7abba29d9bfa215c/tumblr_inline_p8wjajvNkM1rw09tq_500.gif" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="332"/></figure></blockquote> <p>Re-blogging this again free of the asinine argument I let myself get sucked into.</p>
Save
<p><a href="http://this-is-cthulhu-privilege.tumblr.com/post/173838501512/liberals-believe-that-women-who-defend-themselves" class="tumblr_blog">this-is-cthulhu-privilege</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Liberals believe that women who defend themselves are criminals.</p></blockquote> <p>“Why did she feel the need to draw her weapon?“ bitch did you not see he had a fucking gun pointed at her? How can anybody be this fucking asinine?</p>: The Firearm Project FOLLOW I He thought he picked a group of helpless victims. He was wrong. Follow us for more... See More 7.6K 1.8K Comments 141K Views Like Comment Share The Firearm Project 1 hr S FOLLOW: He thought he picked a group of helpless victims. He was wrong. Follow us for more... See More O 中 7.6K 1.8K Comments 141K Views Like Comment Share 8ギ{ 49E all 77% a 2:51 PM Comments Let me ask you a question? Why did she feel the need draw her weapon? Was her life threatened? Did she intend to kill him? With the crowd of people could an innocent persorn have been hurt? Right now she's looking at aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, discharging a fire arm in a public place minimum. I hope this lady hast a lot of cash in her bag, she going to need it in the civil trial. Did what she do make sense? That is not the question. How much of what she did was legal? That's the question. And how much $ does she have in order to prove her innocence. I'm no lawyer but I do know a case Like this could tak a 5-10 days in court. And a half decent attorney gets $7,500 /day in court. If found guilty she could do 3-5 years minimum per felony offense. Being a hero doesn't come without cost. 29m 10 New Comments Write a rel.. GIF <p><a href="http://this-is-cthulhu-privilege.tumblr.com/post/173838501512/liberals-believe-that-women-who-defend-themselves" class="tumblr_blog">this-is-cthulhu-privilege</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Liberals believe that women who defend themselves are criminals.</p></blockquote> <p>“Why did she feel the need to draw her weapon?“ bitch did you not see he had a fucking gun pointed at her? How can anybody be this fucking asinine?</p>
Save
<p><a href="http://snow-lives--matter.tumblr.com/post/171940862248/libertarirynn-this-isnt-having-an-opinion" class="tumblr_blog">snow-lives&ndash;matter</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938189669/this-isnt-having-an-opinion-about-being-shot" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>This isn’t “having an opinion about being shot“ you fucking moron. It’s actively trying to change laws they know nothing about.</p></blockquote> <p>It’s quite disingenuous to pretend that no one knows what they’re protesting for. Yes, some people are ignorant to what exact policies are and what ones they want changed, and that’s awful, but most people are fully aware of the issue and that’s exactly why they want change. Pretending everyone who disagrees with you is an uninformed brat doesn’t exactly make you look great. </p> </blockquote> <p>“Pretending everyone who disagrees with you is an uninformed brat doesn’t exactly make you look great.”</p><p>Well then I guess it’s a good thing I didn’t do that. I’m specifically calling out these pubescent protesters, many of whom have verbalized these asinine arguments. Of course there are people who understand existing laws. But the majority of the most popular anti-gun arguments show an astounding lack of knowledge for the current laws in place. Calling for things like mental health checks, background checks, and minimum age requirements when all of those things already exist with varying levels of severity depending on the state. Calling certain weapons “assault rifles” because they look scary despite functioning in much the same way as “less threatening” guns. Exaggerating and at times outright lying about the number of fatal gun incidents in this country and the success of gun control in other countries.</p><p>Yes there are people who know what they’re talking about. But they are disturbingly lacking in the majority of these pop arguments that inundate the news cycle.</p>: HE TH TREVOR NO SHOW "IF THEYRE TOO YOUNG TO BUY GUNS, WHY SHOULD THEY BE MAKING MY GUN LAWS?" IF KIDS ARE OLD ENOUGH TO BE SHOT, THEY'RE OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE AN OPINION ABOUT BEING SHOT <p><a href="http://snow-lives--matter.tumblr.com/post/171940862248/libertarirynn-this-isnt-having-an-opinion" class="tumblr_blog">snow-lives&ndash;matter</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938189669/this-isnt-having-an-opinion-about-being-shot" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>This isn’t “having an opinion about being shot“ you fucking moron. It’s actively trying to change laws they know nothing about.</p></blockquote> <p>It’s quite disingenuous to pretend that no one knows what they’re protesting for. Yes, some people are ignorant to what exact policies are and what ones they want changed, and that’s awful, but most people are fully aware of the issue and that’s exactly why they want change. Pretending everyone who disagrees with you is an uninformed brat doesn’t exactly make you look great. </p> </blockquote> <p>“Pretending everyone who disagrees with you is an uninformed brat doesn’t exactly make you look great.”</p><p>Well then I guess it’s a good thing I didn’t do that. I’m specifically calling out these pubescent protesters, many of whom have verbalized these asinine arguments. Of course there are people who understand existing laws. But the majority of the most popular anti-gun arguments show an astounding lack of knowledge for the current laws in place. Calling for things like mental health checks, background checks, and minimum age requirements when all of those things already exist with varying levels of severity depending on the state. Calling certain weapons “assault rifles” because they look scary despite functioning in much the same way as “less threatening” guns. Exaggerating and at times outright lying about the number of fatal gun incidents in this country and the success of gun control in other countries.</p><p>Yes there are people who know what they’re talking about. But they are disturbingly lacking in the majority of these pop arguments that inundate the news cycle.</p>
Save
mamafox18: room-where-it-happens: Paul Musgrave from the University of Massachusetts - Amherst, with a list of some of the questions anyone wanting to “arm teachers” must begin to answer if they wish to offer a serious policy proposal. Every. Single. One. Of these questions and more needs to be asked AND answered if this asinine proposal actually goes anywhere. : Paul Musgrave @profmusgrave Following Which teachers get guns? Where will the guns be stored? Who decides when guns can be brandished? What penalties will apply if teachers mishandle a weapon? Will teachers volunteer for gun duty? Can teachers refuse it? Who will audit their adherence to regulations? 12:06 PM -18 Feb 2018 701t 3.3K 7.7K Tweet your reply Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will students know which teachers have weapons? Who will be liable if the teacher with the gun becomes the shooter? What will be the consequences when students are accidentally shot by a teacher? How will armed teachers communicate in a tactical situation? 937 l 396 1.7K Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will teachers with a history of mental illness be allowed to use weapons? Will teachers be required to disclose any history of mental illness? Will teachers be issued a weapon? Reimbursed for purchase? For ammunition? Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 How will administrators conduct non-weapon-related discipline against a teacher? Will there be armed assistance available to deter workplace shootings? Who will shepherd the armed teacher's classroom while the teacher is attempting to locate the active shooter? Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 What happens when a teacher misidentifies a student as a threat in good faith? Will teachers who do not carry lethal weapons be offered non lethal alternatives? If an armed teacher is shot, can another teacher employ his or her weapon? Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 How will armed teachers identify themselves to arriving first responders? Will armed teachers be required to learn how to give first-response medicine? Will armed teachers be required to attempt an arrest before using lethal force? Under what circumstances? 20 32 1.3K Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will proficiency training on weapons count for teachers' continuing education and professional development? How will insurers adjust health and other rates to account for the presence of armed employees? Will teachers receive additional pay for being armed? 291 Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 how often will armed teachers be re-evaluated for licensing purposes? Will armed teachers leading field trips deposit their weapons in a personally owned vehicle or school-owned transport? Will one teacher per wing of a school building receive weapons? Two? Three? 15 269 1.2K Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Exactly which standards will count for proficiency-greater than a big-city police department, State Police, FBl, hobbyist, marksman? In training scenarios, how will using force against innocents be penalized? Will racial sensitivity courses be required? Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Do parents have a right to refuse to send their kids to schools with guns? Will students have to sign waivers? Will parents? What if a parent signs a waiver for a minor student who, when that student turns 18, refuses to abide by its provisions? 10 t 267 1.2K Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will teachers on probation be allowed to carry weapons? What about teachers with active union grievances? Complaints about sexual harassment? Anger management? Divorce proceedings? Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will armed teachers wear holsters? Will they be stationed strategically during pep rallies or other gatherings? Wil armed or unarmed? Il they participate in lockdown drills as if they were 15 249 1.1K Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will funding for the policies outlined above be distributed according to local budgets, statewide formulas, or national formulas? Will schools in high-risk neighborhoods receive more or less funding? Suburban schools? 9 10 th 234 Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 What is the right ratio of armed:unarmed teachers by grade level? What is the procedure for debriefing and assessing armed teachers' performance during a crisis? Can an armed teacher who flinches be fired? Can an armed teacher who breaks protocol be rewarded? 11 t233 1.1K Paul Musgrave@profmusgrave Feb 18 Will preschool teachers have guns? Will teachers in "juvie" (high risk) schools have guns? Will the teacher or the school be liable if their gun is stolen? Can administrators carry weapons? Can they do so in disciplinary situations? mamafox18: room-where-it-happens: Paul Musgrave from the University of Massachusetts - Amherst, with a list of some of the questions anyone wanting to “arm teachers” must begin to answer if they wish to offer a serious policy proposal. Every. Single. One. Of these questions and more needs to be asked AND answered if this asinine proposal actually goes anywhere.

mamafox18: room-where-it-happens: Paul Musgrave from the University of Massachusetts - Amherst, with a list of some of the questions anyo...

Save
allhailthemightyglowingcloud: dukeofbookingham: thepandanni: xbreezepleeze: goneseriesblog: kotten-not-cotton: Thank you Michael Grant for understanding Guys can we get this to 1500?  this man summed up everything i’ve been thinking for years I used to go to a school where the principal purposely made sure we were assigned more homework than normal so that we would be “learning” instead of “on the streets acting like hooligans”. And they wonder why that entire city is known for their drug addicted rich kids. This is so fucking important. “10 hour days” no. Its usually more. All 4 years of highschool I got up at 5:30am to catch the school bus at 6, get to school at 7, school started at 730, ended at like 230pm, wouldn’t get home till 4 or later, homework took sometimes hours upon hours, sometimes until midnight or later, plus you have to figure in eating and this is all with NO social interaction AT ALL. Its a fucked system. Dont miss it at all and feel bad for kids still there. : Michael Grant When I see my kids deal with school I really feel justified in dropping out myself. They come home depressed, angry and exhausted. And these are good schools, some of the best. And still there is something profoundly wrong with the way they work. That's not a knock on teachers, the teachers are the least of the problem. The regimentation, the testing obsession, the college application pressure, the dragging kids out of bed at 7 AM, high school kids working 10 hour days by the time they're done with homework, the fact that there isn't even any minimal co-ordination on homework to keep teachers from all piling on at once. It's deeply fucked up. Its wrong Things are much worse today than they were when Katherine and I were kids. Many days we feel sick to our stomachs dropping our kids off at school. I feel I'm betraying them. And when they come home at the end of another day of enduring this asinine, soul-crushing system, I feel like I should hand them a drink. I'd sure as hell be having one. Let me put it this way: I get paid to do what I do, and I control my own schedule, and I use cigars, caffeine and alcohol to take the edge off a work day that is shorter and easier than what my kids endure. I don't do half the work Jake does You want to know why kids use drugs? We're driving them to it, that's why. And we're doing it for reasons of status, for bullshit credentialing, for the sake of posturing politicians and reckless, stupid adults. Unlike Comment Share 12 hours ago allhailthemightyglowingcloud: dukeofbookingham: thepandanni: xbreezepleeze: goneseriesblog: kotten-not-cotton: Thank you Michael Grant for understanding Guys can we get this to 1500?  this man summed up everything i’ve been thinking for years I used to go to a school where the principal purposely made sure we were assigned more homework than normal so that we would be “learning” instead of “on the streets acting like hooligans”. And they wonder why that entire city is known for their drug addicted rich kids. This is so fucking important. “10 hour days” no. Its usually more. All 4 years of highschool I got up at 5:30am to catch the school bus at 6, get to school at 7, school started at 730, ended at like 230pm, wouldn’t get home till 4 or later, homework took sometimes hours upon hours, sometimes until midnight or later, plus you have to figure in eating and this is all with NO social interaction AT ALL. Its a fucked system. Dont miss it at all and feel bad for kids still there.
Save
<p><a href="https://fortidogi.tumblr.com/post/165816475531/libertarirynn-coca-cola-official" class="tumblr_blog">fortidogi</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/165816355024/coca-cola-official-libertarirynn-they-are-in" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://coca-cola-official.tumblr.com/post/165816302871/libertarirynn-they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking" class="tumblr_blog">coca-cola-official</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/165816145554/they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking-moron" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>They are in swimsuits you fucking moron. </p></blockquote> <p>Yeah, but that doesn’t invalidate her point</p> </blockquote> <p>Except it completely does. There are different standards for swimwear than there are for regular clothes. I’m not going to get to a big debate on whether or not her picture is truly inappropriate, but the school is allowed to set their clothing standards. It’s like complaining that an underwear model gets to wear fewer clothes than a lawyer wears in the courtroom.</p> Plus she’s obviously trying to make this a “different standards for boys than for girls” thing but that’s not what’s going on at all. I’m sure the women’s swim team has the equivalent of bra straps showing because that’s how the suits are made. The complaint is asinine.</blockquote> <p>I think the point she’s making is that the clothing standards set by the school are BS, but the comparison to the swim team IS kind of silly. Im in her camp, but it coulda been done better.</p> </blockquote> <p>If that’s her point she’s making it in the stupidest way possible. And the fact that she specifically calls out the boys team makes me think she’s definitely trying to make this a gender thing. </p><p>The swim team is wearing swim trunks because that’s what swimmers wear. It’s not like the boys are coming to class shirtless. Female volleyball players wear spandex panties. It has nothing to do with modesty being unfairly imposed on women and not men. Men aren’t supposed to come to school with their pants around their ankles. Women aren’t supposed to come with their bras hanging out. Is to set a professional dress standard and has nothing to do with the intrinsic value of those clothes or the people wearing them. Certain clothes are appropriate for certain things. The school gets to decide what’s appropriate.</p>: eleanor @elfitzwilliams here's my senior picture. because you can see my part of my brallette, it was "too inappropriate". yet, here's the boys swim team picture. <p><a href="https://fortidogi.tumblr.com/post/165816475531/libertarirynn-coca-cola-official" class="tumblr_blog">fortidogi</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/165816355024/coca-cola-official-libertarirynn-they-are-in" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://coca-cola-official.tumblr.com/post/165816302871/libertarirynn-they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking" class="tumblr_blog">coca-cola-official</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/165816145554/they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking-moron" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>They are in swimsuits you fucking moron. </p></blockquote> <p>Yeah, but that doesn’t invalidate her point</p> </blockquote> <p>Except it completely does. There are different standards for swimwear than there are for regular clothes. I’m not going to get to a big debate on whether or not her picture is truly inappropriate, but the school is allowed to set their clothing standards. It’s like complaining that an underwear model gets to wear fewer clothes than a lawyer wears in the courtroom.</p> Plus she’s obviously trying to make this a “different standards for boys than for girls” thing but that’s not what’s going on at all. I’m sure the women’s swim team has the equivalent of bra straps showing because that’s how the suits are made. The complaint is asinine.</blockquote> <p>I think the point she’s making is that the clothing standards set by the school are BS, but the comparison to the swim team IS kind of silly. Im in her camp, but it coulda been done better.</p> </blockquote> <p>If that’s her point she’s making it in the stupidest way possible. And the fact that she specifically calls out the boys team makes me think she’s definitely trying to make this a gender thing. </p><p>The swim team is wearing swim trunks because that’s what swimmers wear. It’s not like the boys are coming to class shirtless. Female volleyball players wear spandex panties. It has nothing to do with modesty being unfairly imposed on women and not men. Men aren’t supposed to come to school with their pants around their ankles. Women aren’t supposed to come with their bras hanging out. Is to set a professional dress standard and has nothing to do with the intrinsic value of those clothes or the people wearing them. Certain clothes are appropriate for certain things. The school gets to decide what’s appropriate.</p>
Save
<p><a href="https://coca-cola-official.tumblr.com/post/165816302871/libertarirynn-they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking" class="tumblr_blog">coca-cola-official</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/165816145554/they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking-moron" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>They are in swimsuits you fucking moron. </p></blockquote> <p>Yeah, but that doesn’t invalidate her point</p> </blockquote> <p>Except it completely does. There are different standards for swimwear than there are for regular clothes. I’m not going to get to a big debate on whether or not her picture is truly inappropriate, but the school is allowed to set their clothing standards. It’s like complaining that an underwear model gets to wear fewer clothes than a lawyer wears in the courtroom.</p> Plus she&rsquo;s obviously trying to make this a &ldquo;different standards for boys than for girls&rdquo; thing but that&rsquo;s not what&rsquo;s going on at all. I&rsquo;m sure the women&rsquo;s swim team has the equivalent of bra straps showing because that&rsquo;s how the suits are made. The complaint is asinine.: eleanor @elfitzwilliams here's my senior picture. because you can see my part of my brallette, it was "too inappropriate". yet, here's the boys swim team picture. <p><a href="https://coca-cola-official.tumblr.com/post/165816302871/libertarirynn-they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking" class="tumblr_blog">coca-cola-official</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/165816145554/they-are-in-swimsuits-you-fucking-moron" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>They are in swimsuits you fucking moron. </p></blockquote> <p>Yeah, but that doesn’t invalidate her point</p> </blockquote> <p>Except it completely does. There are different standards for swimwear than there are for regular clothes. I’m not going to get to a big debate on whether or not her picture is truly inappropriate, but the school is allowed to set their clothing standards. It’s like complaining that an underwear model gets to wear fewer clothes than a lawyer wears in the courtroom.</p> Plus she&rsquo;s obviously trying to make this a &ldquo;different standards for boys than for girls&rdquo; thing but that&rsquo;s not what&rsquo;s going on at all. I&rsquo;m sure the women&rsquo;s swim team has the equivalent of bra straps showing because that&rsquo;s how the suits are made. The complaint is asinine.
Save
odinsblog: Yes, these are real life Nazis, and NO, we aren’t going to defeat them with “love and tolerance” OTHER LIES you will be hearing from Nazi sympathizers: 1. you should respect a Nazi’s freedom of speech (NO—nobody owes respect to racists or Nazis and hate speech that incites violence is not protected under the 1st Amendment) 2. you’re no better or “the same” as them for fighting back (WRONG—this false equivalence would make the side who believes in genocide and enslavement “just as bad” as the side trying not to be the victims of genocide and enslavement) 3. hate breeds hate (NO—injustice, oppression, racism and generations of systematic discrimination is what breeds hate) 4. “both sides” are at fault (WRONG—this is another false equivalency that treats the aggressor, James Alex Fields, as innocently as the victim, Heather Heyer) 5. “Burning the Confederate flag or destroying Confederate monuments are acts of violence, just as bad as violence against people” (NO—that’s asinine and you’re an idiot if you believe that false equivalence, property ≠ people) 6. it’s just a “difference of opinions” and everyone has a right to their opinions (NO—dehumanization, anti-Blackness, antisemitism, Islamophobia, ablism and trans/homophobia are not harmless opinions; they are tools for systems of oppression, and NO, you do not have to blindly give respect to Nazis who are seeking to destroy others for being their innate selves) Many of these are obviously false equivalencies, but what they all have in common is they essentially tell you not to resist, and eternally turn the other cheek and “love” the people attacking or oppressing you It’s like this: Nazis support genocide. They actively support racism and racial discrimination. They literally believe in a “master race”. Their end goal is to either destroy or subjugate all non-white people. Nazis and white supremacists are a cancer to humanity. If you discovered that you had cancer, you wouldn’t try to love or tolerate it or anything else—you would immediately begin doing everything in your power to eradicate it. There is no such thing as having an acceptable amount of cancer. Nazis and white supremacists need to be treated like the cancer they are And please pay close attention to anyone who uses vague “both sides” language to avoid assigning blame to anyone, or worse, ask you to “try to understand” the Nazis’ side, as if the only two sides aren’t right vs. the side the Nazis are on: evil : Keegan Stephan @KeeganNYC The left just calls anyone who disagrees with them a nazi." odinsblog: Yes, these are real life Nazis, and NO, we aren’t going to defeat them with “love and tolerance” OTHER LIES you will be hearing from Nazi sympathizers: 1. you should respect a Nazi’s freedom of speech (NO—nobody owes respect to racists or Nazis and hate speech that incites violence is not protected under the 1st Amendment) 2. you’re no better or “the same” as them for fighting back (WRONG—this false equivalence would make the side who believes in genocide and enslavement “just as bad” as the side trying not to be the victims of genocide and enslavement) 3. hate breeds hate (NO—injustice, oppression, racism and generations of systematic discrimination is what breeds hate) 4. “both sides” are at fault (WRONG—this is another false equivalency that treats the aggressor, James Alex Fields, as innocently as the victim, Heather Heyer) 5. “Burning the Confederate flag or destroying Confederate monuments are acts of violence, just as bad as violence against people” (NO—that’s asinine and you’re an idiot if you believe that false equivalence, property ≠ people) 6. it’s just a “difference of opinions” and everyone has a right to their opinions (NO—dehumanization, anti-Blackness, antisemitism, Islamophobia, ablism and trans/homophobia are not harmless opinions; they are tools for systems of oppression, and NO, you do not have to blindly give respect to Nazis who are seeking to destroy others for being their innate selves) Many of these are obviously false equivalencies, but what they all have in common is they essentially tell you not to resist, and eternally turn the other cheek and “love” the people attacking or oppressing you It’s like this: Nazis support genocide. They actively support racism and racial discrimination. They literally believe in a “master race”. Their end goal is to either destroy or subjugate all non-white people. Nazis and white supremacists are a cancer to humanity. If you discovered that you had cancer, you wouldn’t try to love or tolerate it or anything else—you would immediately begin doing everything in your power to eradicate it. There is no such thing as having an acceptable amount of cancer. Nazis and white supremacists need to be treated like the cancer they are And please pay close attention to anyone who uses vague “both sides” language to avoid assigning blame to anyone, or worse, ask you to “try to understand” the Nazis’ side, as if the only two sides aren’t right vs. the side the Nazis are on: evil
Save
<p><a href="http://ranma-official.tumblr.com/post/164625620435/libertarirynn-just-when-i-think-headlines-have" class="tumblr_blog">ranma-official</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/164624505829/just-when-i-think-headlines-have-reached-the-peak" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Just when I think headlines have reached the peak of how asinine they can be, someone manages to surprise me.</p></blockquote> <p>A black white supremacist is black but thinks white people are better than black people. Given your knowledge of history and economics, or rather lack thereof, it’s understandable that you don’t understand basic words.</p></blockquote> <p>I understand the words perfectly, I also understand that they&rsquo;re bullshit. But thanks for your brilliant input.</p>: THE ROOT Charles Barkley Is a Great Example of a Black White Supremacist Michael Harriot Monday 11:35am Filed to: STUPID NEGROES Drew Angerer/Getty Images f Share Tweet <p><a href="http://ranma-official.tumblr.com/post/164625620435/libertarirynn-just-when-i-think-headlines-have" class="tumblr_blog">ranma-official</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/164624505829/just-when-i-think-headlines-have-reached-the-peak" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Just when I think headlines have reached the peak of how asinine they can be, someone manages to surprise me.</p></blockquote> <p>A black white supremacist is black but thinks white people are better than black people. Given your knowledge of history and economics, or rather lack thereof, it’s understandable that you don’t understand basic words.</p></blockquote> <p>I understand the words perfectly, I also understand that they&rsquo;re bullshit. But thanks for your brilliant input.</p>
Save
thatvegancosplayer: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 👏 THE 👏 FUCK 👏 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child’s parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible—and then]  …and then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn’t pertain to you. I’m sorry — White teacher: —you know what, I’m sorry -I’m sorry… Black student: —No, no, no…I let you talk -I let you talk, you’re gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I’m sorry that this is the way that it is. You’re right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything…and that’s not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we’re complaining or we’re ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about ‘Oh, I don’t want—there’s too many Latinos and there’s too many—’ White teacher: I didn’t say that— [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don’t want this to turn into a Latin country because there’ll be too many  White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept— White teacher: Don’t tell me I’m closed-minded— Black student: Everything you’ve said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I’m closed-minded. Black student: You don’t need to agree—I -I’ve had conversations with people that don’t agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept—you’re not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right— White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything….who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF  Other Random: GO OFF– *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON’T SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I’m mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! This is one of the best videos I have ever seen in my life. : thatvegancosplayer: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 👏 THE 👏 FUCK 👏 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child’s parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible—and then]  …and then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn’t pertain to you. I’m sorry — White teacher: —you know what, I’m sorry -I’m sorry… Black student: —No, no, no…I let you talk -I let you talk, you’re gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I’m sorry that this is the way that it is. You’re right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything…and that’s not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we’re complaining or we’re ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about ‘Oh, I don’t want—there’s too many Latinos and there’s too many—’ White teacher: I didn’t say that— [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don’t want this to turn into a Latin country because there’ll be too many  White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept— White teacher: Don’t tell me I’m closed-minded— Black student: Everything you’ve said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I’m closed-minded. Black student: You don’t need to agree—I -I’ve had conversations with people that don’t agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept—you’re not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right— White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything….who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF  Other Random: GO OFF– *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON’T SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I’m mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! This is one of the best videos I have ever seen in my life.
Save
goldpapaya: ratedmirr: herdreadsrock: imjihlitmoe: aaliyah-appollonia: somethingaboutsterek: complementary-halves: standbyyourmantis: cookienun: mockingbirdie: geosynthetic: Just a casual reminder that Jennifer Lawrence is a horrible person who mocks and disrespects the culture of the disenfranchised JFC how could you not even be aware of how asinine you’re being? ok but chris pratt pressing his fists he was ready Didn’t Chris Pratt used to live in Hawaii before he got famous? He did! He was also homeless during that time of his life. that’s….that’s fucking disgusting Why didn’t he take the opportunity to correct her? He sat there. Don’t take screenshots to prove he’s a good guy. Good guys speak up. Who cares about his fists?? ^^^^^ ^^ It’s because 😬😬 we’re all just so used to coddling white women’s feelings. He would’ve said something to her, E News and all the blogs would call him a woman beater. Let’s not act like y'all don’t know how these types of things go i was gonna say christ pratt looked so fucking annoyed…god shes awful : We were filming in Hawaii and there were sacred rocks. goldpapaya: ratedmirr: herdreadsrock: imjihlitmoe: aaliyah-appollonia: somethingaboutsterek: complementary-halves: standbyyourmantis: cookienun: mockingbirdie: geosynthetic: Just a casual reminder that Jennifer Lawrence is a horrible person who mocks and disrespects the culture of the disenfranchised JFC how could you not even be aware of how asinine you’re being? ok but chris pratt pressing his fists he was ready Didn’t Chris Pratt used to live in Hawaii before he got famous? He did! He was also homeless during that time of his life. that’s….that’s fucking disgusting Why didn’t he take the opportunity to correct her? He sat there. Don’t take screenshots to prove he’s a good guy. Good guys speak up. Who cares about his fists?? ^^^^^ ^^ It’s because 😬😬 we’re all just so used to coddling white women’s feelings. He would’ve said something to her, E News and all the blogs would call him a woman beater. Let’s not act like y'all don’t know how these types of things go i was gonna say christ pratt looked so fucking annoyed…god shes awful 
Save
I love that smile 😂😂😂 I wish I could hear all the asinine and ludicrous things these law enforcement officers have to hear... so entertaining to me 😂 protestors protesting trumpprotest bluelivesmatter liberals libbys libtards liberallogic liberal ccw247 conservative constitution presidenttrump nobama stupidliberals merica america stupiddemocrats donaldtrump trump2016 patriot trump yeeyee presidentdonaldtrump draintheswamp makeamericagreatagain trumptrain maga Add me on Snapchat and get to know me. Don't be a stranger: thetypicallibby Partners: @tomorrowsconservatives 🇺🇸 @too_savage_for_democrats 🐍 @thelastgreatstand 🇺🇸 @always.right 🐘 TURN ON POST NOTIFICATIONS! Make sure to check out our joint Facebook - Right Wing Savages Joint Instagram - @rightwingsavages Joint Twitter - @wethreesavages Follow my backup page: @the_typical_liberal_backup: How police fee @donutoperator IIIIIIIII I love that smile 😂😂😂 I wish I could hear all the asinine and ludicrous things these law enforcement officers have to hear... so entertaining to me 😂 protestors protesting trumpprotest bluelivesmatter liberals libbys libtards liberallogic liberal ccw247 conservative constitution presidenttrump nobama stupidliberals merica america stupiddemocrats donaldtrump trump2016 patriot trump yeeyee presidentdonaldtrump draintheswamp makeamericagreatagain trumptrain maga Add me on Snapchat and get to know me. Don't be a stranger: thetypicallibby Partners: @tomorrowsconservatives 🇺🇸 @too_savage_for_democrats 🐍 @thelastgreatstand 🇺🇸 @always.right 🐘 TURN ON POST NOTIFICATIONS! Make sure to check out our joint Facebook - Right Wing Savages Joint Instagram - @rightwingsavages Joint Twitter - @wethreesavages Follow my backup page: @the_typical_liberal_backup
Save
what-the-hecky-heck: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 👏 THE 👏 FUCK 👏 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child’s parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible—and then]  …and then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn’t pertain to you. I’m sorry — White teacher: —you know what, I’m sorry -I’m sorry… Black student: —No, no, no…I let you talk -I let you talk, you’re gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I’m sorry that this is the way that it is. You’re right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything…and that’s not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we’re complaining or we’re ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about ‘Oh, I don’t want—there’s too many Latinos and there’s too many—’ White teacher: I didn’t say that— [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don’t want this to turn into a Latin country because there’ll be too many  White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept— White teacher: Don’t tell me I’m closed-minded— Black student: Everything you’ve said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I’m closed-minded. Black student: You don’t need to agree—I -I’ve had conversations with people that don’t agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept—you’re not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right— White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything….who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF  Other Random: GO OFF– *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON’T SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I’m mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! I don’t want this girl to ever loose her fire. Protect her : what-the-hecky-heck: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 👏 THE 👏 FUCK 👏 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child’s parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible—and then]  …and then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn’t pertain to you. I’m sorry — White teacher: —you know what, I’m sorry -I’m sorry… Black student: —No, no, no…I let you talk -I let you talk, you’re gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I’m sorry that this is the way that it is. You’re right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything…and that’s not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we’re complaining or we’re ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about ‘Oh, I don’t want—there’s too many Latinos and there’s too many—’ White teacher: I didn’t say that— [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don’t want this to turn into a Latin country because there’ll be too many  White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept— White teacher: Don’t tell me I’m closed-minded— Black student: Everything you’ve said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don’t agree with you doesn’t mean I’m closed-minded. Black student: You don’t need to agree—I -I’ve had conversations with people that don’t agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept—you’re not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right— White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything….who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN’T HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF  Other Random: GO OFF– *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON’T SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I’m mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! I don’t want this girl to ever loose her fire. Protect her
Save
<p><a href="http://conservativecathy444.tumblr.com/post/151486391527/ourpresidenttrump-the-striking-similarities" class="tumblr_blog">conservativecathy444</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://ourpresidenttrump.tumblr.com/post/141448628774">ourpresidenttrump</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>The striking similarities between Trump and one of the greatest Presidents of all time.</p> </blockquote> <p>I take exception to this meme as highly insulting to Reagan.</p><p>* I voted for Reagan and I do not remember anyone calling not conservative enough - there were complaints of things that happened in California as Governor but he did not have a choice for most of it - others were deals that actually helped in the long run.</p><p>* Reagan was a movie and TV personality - he did not promote himself but in reality he was Governor of California before President.<br/></p><p>* Reagan was a Democrat when he was young became a Republican after the war and was the strongest supporter for Goldwater.  He never switched back and forth and always stood on principle/ideals.</p><p>* Reagan used the phrase make America great again in a few speeches but it was not a slogan and when stated it was with full explanation of what was meant - not a slogan with no meaning.<br/></p><p>* Reagan did use straight talk and humor.  He also spoke in an intelligent educated manner - not in simplistic platitudes that never go over a 4th grade level.  And he never was so condescending to insult people and degrade them.  He also never put himself up as a God or the only one that could solve problems.</p><p>* Reagan may have been the first President to have a divorce but it was not for philandering/unfaithfulness.  Jayne Wyaman made a decision when he was getting so involved in politics that is not the life that she wanted so she asked for the divorce.  He then met and married Nancy and they stayed together the rest of his life again with no cheating.</p><p>I would love to see this accusation provided that he was not considered conservative enough - my God you can not get more conservative then Goldwater and Reagan really got involved at that point and admired/supported him.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>THANK. These &ldquo;Trump is like Regan&rdquo; posts are beyond asinine.</p>: RONALD REAGAN DONALD TRUMP -Mocked and not considered to be a serious candidate before winning the Presidency -Mocked and not considered to be a serious candidate despite being the GOP frontrunner - Was a TV celebrity before running for office -Was a Democrat before switching to Was a TV celebrity before running for office Was a Democrat before switching to Republican Republican - Used "Make America Great Again" as his -Using "Make America Great Again" as his campaign slogan campaign slogan Attacked by a protester at the podium during a-Attacked by a protester at the podium during a speech speech - Used straight talk and humor to communicate - Uses straight talk and humor to communicate with supporters Became the oldest President elected - 1st President that had a divorce Suceeded a Democrat President - Pro immigration but strongly against illegal with supporters -Would become the oldest President if elected - Would be the 2nd President that had a divorce Would suceed a Democrat President -Pro Immigration but strongly against illegal immigration immigration -Pro life, Pro 2nd Ammendment, and Pro tax reduction -Pro life, Pro 2nd Ammendment, and Pro tax reduction Initialy considered to "not be a true Considered to "not be a true conservative" by conservative" by the Establishment but increased the establishment but has increased GOP voter GOP voter turnout and became a Republican Party icon and beloved President turnout considerably from the last two elections and can potentially become a Republican Party Icon and beloved President <p><a href="http://conservativecathy444.tumblr.com/post/151486391527/ourpresidenttrump-the-striking-similarities" class="tumblr_blog">conservativecathy444</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://ourpresidenttrump.tumblr.com/post/141448628774">ourpresidenttrump</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>The striking similarities between Trump and one of the greatest Presidents of all time.</p> </blockquote> <p>I take exception to this meme as highly insulting to Reagan.</p><p>* I voted for Reagan and I do not remember anyone calling not conservative enough - there were complaints of things that happened in California as Governor but he did not have a choice for most of it - others were deals that actually helped in the long run.</p><p>* Reagan was a movie and TV personality - he did not promote himself but in reality he was Governor of California before President.<br/></p><p>* Reagan was a Democrat when he was young became a Republican after the war and was the strongest supporter for Goldwater.  He never switched back and forth and always stood on principle/ideals.</p><p>* Reagan used the phrase make America great again in a few speeches but it was not a slogan and when stated it was with full explanation of what was meant - not a slogan with no meaning.<br/></p><p>* Reagan did use straight talk and humor.  He also spoke in an intelligent educated manner - not in simplistic platitudes that never go over a 4th grade level.  And he never was so condescending to insult people and degrade them.  He also never put himself up as a God or the only one that could solve problems.</p><p>* Reagan may have been the first President to have a divorce but it was not for philandering/unfaithfulness.  Jayne Wyaman made a decision when he was getting so involved in politics that is not the life that she wanted so she asked for the divorce.  He then met and married Nancy and they stayed together the rest of his life again with no cheating.</p><p>I would love to see this accusation provided that he was not considered conservative enough - my God you can not get more conservative then Goldwater and Reagan really got involved at that point and admired/supported him.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>THANK. These &ldquo;Trump is like Regan&rdquo; posts are beyond asinine.</p>

<p><a href="http://conservativecathy444.tumblr.com/post/151486391527/ourpresidenttrump-the-striking-similarities" class="tumblr_blog">con...

Save
<p><a href="http://officeroppai.tumblr.com/post/148467625567/proudgayconservative-lovethebomb" class="tumblr_blog">officeroppai</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://proudgayconservative.tumblr.com/post/148458154952">proudgayconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://lovethebomb.tumblr.com/post/148438233315">lovethebomb</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://afloweroutofstone.tumblr.com/post/148429715852">afloweroutofstone</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Imagine Donald Trump winning and being the most transparent president in decades entirely due to his inability to not brag about things</p> </blockquote> <p>Area 51. We got aliens. The best aliens. More aliens than Russia and China. And Mexico is gonna pay for it.</p> </blockquote> <p>I know that this is supposed to be you guys being funny, but isn’t exposing classified information exactly what we are supposed to be pissed at Clinton for doing?<br/><br/>But when Trump does it “oh guys, he’ll be the most transparent president ever because he doesn’t care about keeping classified information classified as long as it gives him a cool story to brag about, haha, so cool.”</p> </blockquote> <p>Clinton wasnt exposing classified information to the public she was putting them at risk for outside threats to obtain them. If you reveal information to the public you get a good thing and a bad thing: the good is transperacy and the bad is that the enemy knows it too. In thee case of clinton the public didnt have access to those emails only the enemies did. If you are trying to imply that clinton is in any way transparent with all her backdoor deals and promises through her husband and other means tou are being insane. There is a huge difference between transparacy and being a lying scheming pile of trash. Trump being the former and hillary the latter. <br/>Additionally arent you the camp calling trump a facist? How hipocritical are you to say you want small limited government and then say that transparacy is somehow bad? We would know all the “evil facist nazi” things trump is up to.</p> </blockquote> <p><b>“Clinton wasnt exposing classified information to the public she was putting them at risk for outside threats to obtain them. If you reveal information to the public you get a good thing and a bad thing: the good is transperacy and the bad is that the enemy knows it too. In thee case of clinton the public didnt have access to those emails only the enemies did. If you are trying to imply that clinton is in any way transparent with all her backdoor deals and promises through her husband and other means tou are being insane.”</b></p><p>Are you daft? The end result is the enemy potentially knowing classified information either way. How is Trump releasing it any better just because he “also releases it to the public”? If anything it makes it even easier for enemies to get ahold of the information. They don’t even have to try.</p><p><b>“There is a huge difference between transparacy and being a lying scheming pile of trash. Trump being the former and hillary the latter.”</b></p><br/><p>Actually, Trump is both. Largely the steaming pile of trash bit.<br/>
<br/><b>&ldquo;Additionally arent you the camp calling trump a facist? How hipocritical are you to say you want small limited government and then say that transparacy is somehow bad? We would know all the “evil facist nazi” things trump is up to.“</b></p><p>What the hell does your so-called &quot;transparency” have to do with a limited government?</p><p>What I’m seeing here is a Trump supporter who thinks releasing classified information is dangerous when Hillary does it and “transparency” when Trump does it with even more asinine vigor.</p>: HUFFPOST Trump Boasts About Watching 'Top Secret' Iran Video Immediately After Becoming Eligible To Receive Classified Briefings His vivid description raised questions about whether he disclosed classified material O 4 hours ago Updated 2 hours ago Christina Wilkie National Political Reporter, The Huffington Post Jessica Schulberg Foreign Affairs Reporter, The Huffington Post <p><a href="http://officeroppai.tumblr.com/post/148467625567/proudgayconservative-lovethebomb" class="tumblr_blog">officeroppai</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://proudgayconservative.tumblr.com/post/148458154952">proudgayconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://lovethebomb.tumblr.com/post/148438233315">lovethebomb</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://afloweroutofstone.tumblr.com/post/148429715852">afloweroutofstone</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Imagine Donald Trump winning and being the most transparent president in decades entirely due to his inability to not brag about things</p> </blockquote> <p>Area 51. We got aliens. The best aliens. More aliens than Russia and China. And Mexico is gonna pay for it.</p> </blockquote> <p>I know that this is supposed to be you guys being funny, but isn’t exposing classified information exactly what we are supposed to be pissed at Clinton for doing?<br/><br/>But when Trump does it “oh guys, he’ll be the most transparent president ever because he doesn’t care about keeping classified information classified as long as it gives him a cool story to brag about, haha, so cool.”</p> </blockquote> <p>Clinton wasnt exposing classified information to the public she was putting them at risk for outside threats to obtain them. If you reveal information to the public you get a good thing and a bad thing: the good is transperacy and the bad is that the enemy knows it too. In thee case of clinton the public didnt have access to those emails only the enemies did. If you are trying to imply that clinton is in any way transparent with all her backdoor deals and promises through her husband and other means tou are being insane. There is a huge difference between transparacy and being a lying scheming pile of trash. Trump being the former and hillary the latter. <br/>Additionally arent you the camp calling trump a facist? How hipocritical are you to say you want small limited government and then say that transparacy is somehow bad? We would know all the “evil facist nazi” things trump is up to.</p> </blockquote> <p><b>“Clinton wasnt exposing classified information to the public she was putting them at risk for outside threats to obtain them. If you reveal information to the public you get a good thing and a bad thing: the good is transperacy and the bad is that the enemy knows it too. In thee case of clinton the public didnt have access to those emails only the enemies did. If you are trying to imply that clinton is in any way transparent with all her backdoor deals and promises through her husband and other means tou are being insane.”</b></p><p>Are you daft? The end result is the enemy potentially knowing classified information either way. How is Trump releasing it any better just because he “also releases it to the public”? If anything it makes it even easier for enemies to get ahold of the information. They don’t even have to try.</p><p><b>“There is a huge difference between transparacy and being a lying scheming pile of trash. Trump being the former and hillary the latter.”</b></p><br/><p>Actually, Trump is both. Largely the steaming pile of trash bit.<br/>
<br/><b>&ldquo;Additionally arent you the camp calling trump a facist? How hipocritical are you to say you want small limited government and then say that transparacy is somehow bad? We would know all the “evil facist nazi” things trump is up to.“</b></p><p>What the hell does your so-called &quot;transparency” have to do with a limited government?</p><p>What I’m seeing here is a Trump supporter who thinks releasing classified information is dangerous when Hillary does it and “transparency” when Trump does it with even more asinine vigor.</p>

<p><a href="http://officeroppai.tumblr.com/post/148467625567/proudgayconservative-lovethebomb" class="tumblr_blog">officeroppai</a>:</p>...

Save
<p>“See, here’s the thing. Every time one of y'all tries to defend this horrible you have the right to keep your doors locked bill with &ldquo;but what about thieves who could break into our homes and steal our things?,” all I hear is, “I want to make decent people just looking for shelter unsafe because of the bad behavior of criminals.”</p> <p>Don’t come at me like you’re making a common sense safety argument. You are supporting legislation that punishes and threatens homeless people because criminals may cause problems. Go fix criminals. Then get back to me.“</p> <p>That’s about how asinine OP sounds. Also, real clever how are he equated men with rapists.</p>: Snuff Shock 3 mins See, here's the thing. Every time one of y'all tries to defend this horrible bathroom bill with "But what about perverts in dresses just pretending to be transwomen?," all I hear is, "I want to make transwomen unsafe because of the bad behavior of cis-men." Don't come at me like you are making a feminist argument. You are supporting legislation that punishes and threatens women because men may cause problems. Go fix men. Then get back to me Love Comment Share <p>“See, here’s the thing. Every time one of y'all tries to defend this horrible you have the right to keep your doors locked bill with &ldquo;but what about thieves who could break into our homes and steal our things?,” all I hear is, “I want to make decent people just looking for shelter unsafe because of the bad behavior of criminals.”</p> <p>Don’t come at me like you’re making a common sense safety argument. You are supporting legislation that punishes and threatens homeless people because criminals may cause problems. Go fix criminals. Then get back to me.“</p> <p>That’s about how asinine OP sounds. Also, real clever how are he equated men with rapists.</p>

<p>“See, here’s the thing. Every time one of y'all tries to defend this horrible you have the right to keep your doors locked bill with &...

Save
bedpartymakeover: c-bassmeow: Says the Bitch who judges “ghetto” aka black sounding names in the present. Girl why are you insinuating yourself into a conversation about internalized antiblackness. 1. because my family is part black and the older people in my family who are more black ironically are the most anti-black ones. my great grandmother who was Zamba (black and indigenous although we dont know for sure) would say “negro ni mi caballo” which means “not even my horse will be black” … i have always been against the old colonial spanish attitude that is still prevalent in many older people in spanish speaking countries  that indigenous and black = ugly and undesirable and i stand by my opposition to that and always will regardless of how light skinned i am 2. myob - IMO just because im not black doesnt mean i cant condemn Raven Symone’s asinine comments. So with your dumb ass logic can I not condemn anti-semitic statements cus im not jewish? can i not defend women if i am not a women? like, tumblr’s “rules” on how to conduct yourself sometimes backfire but whatever 3. im tired of you reblogging my shit with cheap ass comments trying to call me out on random shit, its failing 4. did you mean inserting ? : Basic as fuck Dumb bitch she think she cute making up words n shit wtf is a zetus lepetus I hate yo white ass bedpartymakeover: c-bassmeow: Says the Bitch who judges “ghetto” aka black sounding names in the present. Girl why are you insinuating yourself into a conversation about internalized antiblackness. 1. because my family is part black and the older people in my family who are more black ironically are the most anti-black ones. my great grandmother who was Zamba (black and indigenous although we dont know for sure) would say “negro ni mi caballo” which means “not even my horse will be black” … i have always been against the old colonial spanish attitude that is still prevalent in many older people in spanish speaking countries  that indigenous and black = ugly and undesirable and i stand by my opposition to that and always will regardless of how light skinned i am 2. myob - IMO just because im not black doesnt mean i cant condemn Raven Symone’s asinine comments. So with your dumb ass logic can I not condemn anti-semitic statements cus im not jewish? can i not defend women if i am not a women? like, tumblr’s “rules” on how to conduct yourself sometimes backfire but whatever 3. im tired of you reblogging my shit with cheap ass comments trying to call me out on random shit, its failing 4. did you mean inserting ? 
Save
<p><a href="http://factsoverfeels.tumblr.com/post/127241837411/proudblackconservative-xobaddestbitchez" class="tumblr_blog">factsoverfeels</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/127219129379/xobaddestbitchez-hoe2015-dear-white-people" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://xobaddestbitchez.tumblr.com/post/109150188162/hoe2015-dear-white-people-2014" class="tumblr_blog">xobaddestbitchez</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://hoe2015.tumblr.com/post/109048320111/dear-white-people-2014" class="tumblr_blog">hoe2015</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear White People (2014)</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>So I guess Africans in power who murder white people aren’t being racist? Seriously think for more than 2.5 seconds before you say something. It might make you sound less American centric and asinine.</p></blockquote> <p>Prejudiced against any race, even if it’s white people is still racism you dumbasses.</p></blockquote> <p>&ldquo;Prejudice against someone solely for their race is only racist when that someone is black because reasons.&rdquo; -Tumblr</p>: Black people can't oe racist. Prejudiced, yes, but not racist Racism describes a system of disadvantage based on race Black people can't be racist, because we don't stand to benefit from such a system. <p><a href="http://factsoverfeels.tumblr.com/post/127241837411/proudblackconservative-xobaddestbitchez" class="tumblr_blog">factsoverfeels</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/127219129379/xobaddestbitchez-hoe2015-dear-white-people" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://xobaddestbitchez.tumblr.com/post/109150188162/hoe2015-dear-white-people-2014" class="tumblr_blog">xobaddestbitchez</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://hoe2015.tumblr.com/post/109048320111/dear-white-people-2014" class="tumblr_blog">hoe2015</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear White People (2014)</p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>So I guess Africans in power who murder white people aren’t being racist? Seriously think for more than 2.5 seconds before you say something. It might make you sound less American centric and asinine.</p></blockquote> <p>Prejudiced against any race, even if it’s white people is still racism you dumbasses.</p></blockquote> <p>&ldquo;Prejudice against someone solely for their race is only racist when that someone is black because reasons.&rdquo; -Tumblr</p>
Save