🔥 Popular | Latest

Apparently, Brains, and Confidence: bidoof change.org Trending petition Matt-There's a new petition taking off on Change.org, and we think you might be interested in signing it. Change.org - Petition To Hire 1,000,000 People To Put Their Fingers In The Shoot Hole Of Peoples' Guns So They Can't Shoot Them thetwinkerbell It's still gonna shoot... And they're gonna lose a finger ssj14goku No. The finger blocks the bullet. We can do this domozillla This is a gun we're talking about. The projectile is fired using an explosion, not by compressed air of a toy gun or the elastic forces of a sling shot. People would be lucky if they only lost their finger. ssj14goku The finger blocks it dildomuncher3000 The finger won't block it the shaft is only there for keeping the bullet straight, all the propulsion happens behind the bullet. The bullet would rip through the finger, not that many would actually fit without the victim being a child, and beyond. ssj14goku The bullet would go forward a little and then hit the finger and stop it's not that hard to understand lgbltsandwitch People are going to lose their hands. Go watch Mythbusters. They did an episode on this, the hand fucking exploded. hungwy No, the bullet would start to go but stop at the finger. Thats basic physics. Also hands dont explode normally they did something wrong. blipblerp Why the dingleknockers would you even consider sticking your finger in the barrel of a loaded gun?? the amount of force propelling the bullet at that close of range would shatter the finger at the very least; this is a petition for 1,000,000 people to loose the use of their hands. If a bullet explodes the back of a persons skull when they shoot it in their mouth it sure as hell will explode a finger. gorps No the finger would stop it jorycancrochet I'm loving the idiocy of this post. Ppl with brains: ummm finger go boom... Others: no bullet stop. U no kno fisics >:V snakegay no the finger would stop it indianworiorprincess You guy who think the bullet would stop at the finger have never shot a gun and can volunteer to it their fingers in the barrel of my 9 mil and I'Il I'll the trigger and see if it will stop the bullet Dumdasses egay sna the finger would stop it meatswitch raptorific Apparently for dudes who've got a compulsive need to be the smartest person in the room, "someone who's wrong in a really stupid way who has unshakable confidence that they're smarter than you" is their kryptonite. You can play dumb on almost any subject and their ego, their staunch belief that the masses are so far below them, will blind them to the fact that you're just fucking with them, and as long as you don't admit you're fucking with them or acknowledge that there's anything Off about what you're saying, they won't be able to stop themselves trying to get you to Respect Their Authority, and they won't be able to see that will literally never happen. lynati The finger is smooth in all directions. That's why it can stop the bullet.
Save
Beautiful, Bodies , and Books: Marching for Life, Mother Teresa, and Mrs. Clinto t1 SEAN FITZPATRICK "Why do you think we haven't had a woman as president yet"Fist Lad Hillary Rodham Clinton asked her guest over their lunch at the White House The little woman sitting at table with Mrs. Clinton did not hesitate in her reply "Because she has probably been aborted," said Mother Teresa prochoice-or-gtfo: prochoice-or-gtfo: egalitarianaquagirl: prochoice-or-gtfo: cissypc: #Repost @catholic_truth with @repostapp ・・・ “Why do you think we haven’t had a woman as president yet?” First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton asked her guest over their lunch at the White House. — The little woman sitting at table with Mrs. Clinton did not hesitate in her reply. — “Because she has probably been aborted,” said Mother Teresa. — Read what took place 22 years ago on January 22, 1994 at the National Prayer Breakfast. The keynote speaker was Mother Teresa. Before President and First Lady Clinton, Mother Teresa spoke about the cultural corruption that arises out of crimes against the unborn. The article found here👉🏼👉🏼👉🏼www.crisismagazine.com/2016/marching-for-life-mother-teresa-and-mrs-clinton Mother Teresa was such fucking trash.-V That is so untrue. I disagree with Teresa about Abortion, but she wasn’t trash at all. Let’s play a fun game called “everything you know about Mother Teresa is shit.”She baptized Hindu and Muslim people on their death beds, regardless of their wishes.She supported Haitian dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier and his family, who ran Haiti as a police state, who she said “loved their poor” even when he had stolen tens of millions of dollars from them. She was friends with Charles Keating, a Catholic fundamentalist who was convicted of fraud, racketeering and conspiracy for his involvement in a scam where customers were deceived into buying worthless junk bonds, resulting in many of them losing their life savings. Even though she renounced money, Keating donated $1.25 million to her in the 80′s, and she wrote a letter to the court on his behalf asking for clemency. The prosecuting attorney wrote her back, encouraging her to return the money as it was stolen, but she never replied.When the International Health Organization honoured Teresa in 1989, she spoke at length against abortion and contraception and called AIDS a “just retribution for improper sexual conduct”. Similarly, when Teresa was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979, she proclaimed in her acceptance speech that abortion was the greatest threat to peace in the world. In 1992, she appeared at an open-air Mass in Ireland and said, “Let us promise Our Lady who loves Ireland so much that we will never allow in this country a single abortion. And no contraceptives.” She also campaigned in Ireland to oppose the successful 1995 referendum to legalize divorce in that predominantly Catholic country.Only 7% of the funds donated to her went to her were used for charity. The rest were funnelled into secret bank accounts or used to build more missions. There are reports of unruly children being strapped to beds and being beaten. Outdated equipment was not replaced. Needles were reused, even in areas with high HIV transmission rates like Haiti, until they were so blunt that they caused pain. Many sisters and volunteers at her Home for Dying Destitutes in Calcutta had no medical training and were required to make important patient care decisions due to the lack of doctors. Her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients, meaning that people who could otherwise survive were at risk of dying from infections and a lack of treatment. Some facilities lacked strong analgesics, and needles were rinsed in warm water, leaving them inadequately sterilised. Patients with tuberculosis were not quarantined. Some missions wouldn’t buy food for the people who needed their help, relying instead solely on donated food. The first home that she set up had a mortality rate of 40%.The motivations of her charity work are questionable. None of the eight facilities run by the Missionaries of Charity in Papua New Guinea have any residents in them, and are solely there for the purpose of converting local people to Catholicism. At a 1981 press conference, she was asked: “Do you teach the poor to endure their lot?” She replied, “I think it is very beautiful for the poor to accept their lot, to share it with the passion of Christ. I think the world is being much helped by the suffering of the poor people.”In 2013, in a comprehensive review covering 96% of the literature on Mother Teresa, a group of Université de Montréal academics reinforced the foregoing criticism, detailing, among other issues, the missionary’s practice of “caring for the sick by glorifying their suffering instead of relieving it, … her questionable political contacts, her suspicious management of the enormous sums of money she received, and her overly dogmatic views regarding, in particular, abortion, contraception, and divorce”. Questioning the Vatican’s motivations for ignoring the mass of criticism, the study concluded that Mother Teresa’s “hallowed image—which does not stand up to analysis of the facts—was constructed, and that her beatification was orchestrated by an effective media relations campaign engineered by the anti-abortion BBC journalist Malcolm Muggeridge.Historian Vijay Prashad wrote, “Mother Teresa is the quintessential image of the white woman in the colonies, working to save the dark bodies from their own temptations and failures. […] The Euro-American-dominated international media continue to harbor the colonial notion that white peoples are somehow especially endowed with the capacity to create social change. When nonwhite people labor in this direction, the media typically search for white benefactors or teachers, or else, for white people who stand in the wings to direct the nonwhite actors. Dark bodies cannot act of their own volition to stretch their own capacity, for they must wait, the media seem to imply, for some colonial administrator, some technocrat from IBM or the IMF to tell them how to do things. When it comes to saving the poor, the dark bodies are again invisible, for the media seem to celebrate only the worn out platitudes of such as Mother Teresa and ignore the struggles of those bodies for their own liberation. To open the life of someone like Mother Teresa to scrutiny, therefore, is always difficult. […] Mother Teresa’s work was part of a global enterprise for the alleviation of bourgeois guilt, rather than a genuine challenge to those forces that produce and maintain poverty.”So yeah, sorry. I’m going to call trash trash when I see it.-V Reblogging in case anyone wants to read about what Mother Teresa really did.-V Drag that prune! And lmao @ Catholics for making her a saint lmao omg
Save
Alive, Crazy, and Drugs: NEWS NEWS 24/ 5:46 How Stephen Hawking Has Lived So Long With ALS 1 day ago Stephen Hawking died and the person portraying him is a fake...look at pictures of the real Hawking and this newer version...they are not the same person. 1 day ago He's a fake. A puppet that is manipulated to say anything the Establishment want him to say. The truth being that Hawking does not have ALS, but rather is kept in that chair against his will by way of drugs. Hawking is a face, a face that sells a religion to the masses. 1 day ago Theoretical Physics Never have to be right. 1 day ago Well, where is he? You know that a voice synthesizer can keep Hawking talking even though Hawking is dead. Hawking can be the first person to have his person hijacked. 2 days ago (edited) Stephen Hawking is a Godless schmuck, Satan keeps him alive. 1 day ago Hawking died years ago. This is just a puppet that has no idea what he is saying. How can anyone with ALS live that long? They don't. Do the research. 1 day ago t he is a fiction-whos voice is that anyway 1 day ago C how can we trust papers written by a man who has no control over his motor neurons? He has no control over his faculties, which means the shit he writes is wrong by default. There is no proof of any of this shit. 1 day ago The dude is in the Big bang Theory. The tv show 1 day ago I hope Mr. Hawking knows The Most High is real... YAH, saves, not science.. 2 days ago I would prefer to see Mr. Hawking commit funds to benefiting those here on Planet Earth rather than looking for extraterrestrials 1 day ago The big bang is still in dispute. 1 day ago He s brain dead In that chair, they just keep him alive and wheel him out co's we believe what he says, let the poor fucker die who knows what he's feeling 3 days ago He is a puppet of the elite satanistsHe is there mouth piece on science" to push their lies. The universe was created by God, not by some random event which they call the big bang theory... Call me crazy if are want, put one day the truth will be undeniable. That day is coming soon! 2 days ago He should do the ALS ice bucket challenge. Reply 1 memehumor: I was wrong to expect intelligent comments on a YouTube video about Stephen Hawking.
Save
Bad, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton: TRENDING Bernie's campaign is fizzling. only attracts 21.00o people to rally in Sacramento By Preston Hemmerich May 10, 2015 5.7K f SHARE y TWEET SHARE SHARE 15 COMMENTS 0 203 Reactions We're sorry to be the bearer of bad news to Bernie Sanders supporters, but his campaign seems to be struggling mightily to maintain its grassroots support. At an event in Sacramento on May 9, the Sanders campaign was only able to attract 21,0o0o attendees liberals are coal Liberals Are Cool @LiberalsAreCool Follow The media bias against Bernie is legit. He was in front of 21,000 people in Sacramento! Hillary NEVER had 21K iberalsarecool its-salah: 21,000 people came to see Bernie at his rally in Sacramento. Something neither the liberal or conservative media care about. "The media bias against Ber. liberalsarecool.com RETWEETS LIKES 9 Joel Franco @Official JoelF Follow 21,000+ people packed a stadium in Sacramento, CA to hear Bernie Sanders speak. RETWEETS LIKES 27 37 Khaled Beydoun @KhaledBeydoun Follow 15,000-20,000 packed in Sacramento, CA stadium for #Bernie. media coverage #WV Primary RETWEETS LIKES nama–slay: 4mysquad: That’s 20950 more people than Hillary Clinton rallies! 0 media coverage. I was there, like 10,000 people couldn’t even get in. How can people say that he doesn’t have a chance? Clinton was touted by the media as the inevitable democratic nominee even when she and Sanders had the same number of won states and delegates. I found this to be ridiculous and believe this type pro-Hillary reporting was because the corporations who own the media (Comcast, etc) support Hillary. When the masses repeatedly hear from the major media that Sanders chances of winning are over, they start believing it and get discouraged. feelthebern this whole election is rigged…

nama–slay: 4mysquad: That’s 20950 more people than Hillary Clinton rallies! 0 media coverage. I was there, like 10,000 peopl...

Save
Bad, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton: TRENDING Bernie's campaign is fizzling. only attracts 21.00o people to rally in Sacramento By Preston Hemmerich May 10, 2015 5.7K f SHARE y TWEET SHARE SHARE 15 COMMENTS 0 203 Reactions We're sorry to be the bearer of bad news to Bernie Sanders supporters, but his campaign seems to be struggling mightily to maintain its grassroots support. At an event in Sacramento on May 9, the Sanders campaign was only able to attract 21,0o0o attendees liberals are coal Liberals Are Cool @LiberalsAreCool Follow The media bias against Bernie is legit. He was in front of 21,000 people in Sacramento! Hillary NEVER had 21K iberalsarecool its-salah: 21,000 people came to see Bernie at his rally in Sacramento. Something neither the liberal or conservative media care about. "The media bias against Ber. liberalsarecool.com RETWEETS LIKES 9 Joel Franco @Official JoelF Follow 21,000+ people packed a stadium in Sacramento, CA to hear Bernie Sanders speak. RETWEETS LIKES 27 37 Khaled Beydoun @KhaledBeydoun Follow 15,000-20,000 packed in Sacramento, CA stadium for #Bernie. media coverage #WV Primary RETWEETS LIKES namaslay: 4mysquad: That’s 20950 more people than Hillary Clinton rallies! 0 media coverage. I was there, like 10,000 people couldn’t even get in. How can people say that he doesn’t have a chance? Clinton was touted by the media as the inevitable democratic nominee even when she and Sanders had the same number of won states and delegates. I found this to be ridiculous and believe this type pro-Hillary reporting was because the corporations who own the media (Comcast, etc) support Hillary. When the masses repeatedly hear from the major media that Sanders chances of winning are over, they start believing it and get discouraged. feelthebern this whole election is rigged…

namaslay: 4mysquad: That’s 20950 more people than Hillary Clinton rallies! 0 media coverage. I was there, like 10,000 people...

Save
America, Bad, and Bernie Sanders: TRENDING Bernie's campaign is fizzling. only attracts 21.00o people to rally in Sacramento By Preston Hemmerich May 10, 2015 5.7K f SHARE y TWEET SHARE SHARE 15 COMMENTS 0 203 Reactions We're sorry to be the bearer of bad news to Bernie Sanders supporters, but his campaign seems to be struggling mightily to maintain its grassroots support. At an event in Sacramento on May 9, the Sanders campaign was only able to attract 21,0o0o attendees liberals are coal Liberals Are Cool @LiberalsAreCool Follow The media bias against Bernie is legit. He was in front of 21,000 people in Sacramento! Hillary NEVER had 21K iberalsarecool its-salah: 21,000 people came to see Bernie at his rally in Sacramento. Something neither the liberal or conservative media care about. "The media bias against Ber. liberalsarecool.com RETWEETS LIKES 9 Joel Franco @Official JoelF Follow 21,000+ people packed a stadium in Sacramento, CA to hear Bernie Sanders speak. RETWEETS LIKES 27 37 Khaled Beydoun @KhaledBeydoun Follow 15,000-20,000 packed in Sacramento, CA stadium for #Bernie. media coverage #WV Primary RETWEETS LIKES mnthonyaaiden: 4mysquad: That’s 20950 more people than Hillary Clinton rallies! 0 media coverage. I was there, like 10,000 people couldn’t even get in. How can people say that he doesn’t have a chance? Clinton was touted by the media as the inevitable democratic nominee even when she and Sanders had the same number of won states and delegates. I found this to be ridiculous and believe this type pro-Hillary reporting was because the corporations who own the media (Comcast, etc) support Hillary. When the masses repeatedly hear from the major media that Sanders chances of winning are over, they start believing it and get discouraged. feelthebern I was there and it was one of the most amazing experiences of my life. To hear from a man that actually cares about what is needed to fix our COUNTLESS issues and what we can do as citizens to take control and be more involved in making america great…rather than “great again” because that as a few of us know; is some straight up bullshit. 
Save