🔥 Popular | Latest

Bodies , Fire, and Life: WHAT A REAL HERO LOOKS LIKE @dakotameyer0317 On this day in 2009, near Ganjgal, Afghanistan, Marine Corporal Dakota Meyer charged into heavy gunfire multiple times to rescue comrades under attack from the Taliban. Over the course of the six-hour firefight, Meyer killed at least eight Taliban, personally evacuated 12 friendly wounded, and provided cover for another 24 Marines and soldiers. For "his extraordinary heroism, presence of mind amidst chaos and death, and unselfish devotion to his comrades in the face of great danger," Meyer was awarded the Medal of Honor in September 2011. Read his full citation here: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the repeated risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty as a member of Marine Embedded Training Team 2-8, Regional Corps Advisory Command 3-7, in Kunar Province, Afghanistan, on 8 September 2009. When the forward element of his combat team began to be hit by intense fire from roughly 50 Taliban insurgents dug-in and concealed on the slopes above Ganjgal village, Corporal Meyer mounted a gun-truck, enlisted a fellow Marine to drive, and raced to attack the ambushers and aid the trapped Marines and Afghan soldiers. During a six-hour firefight, Corporal Meyer single-handedly turned the tide of the battle, saved 36 Marines and soldiers and recovered the bodies of his fallen brothers. Four separate times he fought the kilometer up into the heart of a deadly U-shaped ambush. During the fight he killed at least eight Taliban, personally evacuated 12 friendly wounded, and provided cover for another 24 Marines and soldiers to escape likely death at the hands of a numerically superior and determined foe. On his first foray, his lone vehicle drew machine gun, mortar, rocket grenade and small arms fire while he rescued five wounded soldiers. His second attack disrupted the enemy’s ambush and he evacuated four more wounded Marines. Switching to another gun-truck because his was too damaged they again sped in for a third time, and as turret gunner killed several Taliban attackers at point blank range and suppressed enemy fire so 24 Marines and soldiers could break-out. (Continue in the comments)

WHAT A REAL HERO LOOKS LIKE @dakotameyer0317 On this day in 2009, near Ganjgal, Afghanistan, Marine Corporal Dakota Meyer charged into heavy...

Save
Bailey Jay, Chicago, and Gif: T. Lee @curvegawdess Following This is kinda the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. WHY WASNT THERE ANY LIGHTER SKIN BLACK WOMEN IN WAKANDA? CHICAGO DC A. 7:26 AM-24 Feb 2018 from Florida, USA 1,601 Retweets 4,436 Likes Alice. @CoffeeCreamGirl Follow Well to answer the question, Wakanda was uncolonized meaning there were no slaves being raped by owners to create light skinned citizens. Dark people reproducing with each other creates more Dark people usually, any other questions or can we enjoy the movie in peace now? T. Lee @curvegawdess This is kinda the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. Show this thread 11:30 AM-24 Feb 2018 958 Retweets 15,281 Likes Alice. @CoffeeCreamGirl Follow I said the word usually for inclusion of things like genetic mutations and diicereni geographic: clirns. Period point blank it'd be a rarity it's not suppose to blatantly stand out 5:00 PM- 24 Feb 2018 <p><a href="https://whyyoustabbedme.tumblr.com/post/171275993402/lets-not-forget-that-lighter-people-arealways" class="tumblr_blog">whyyoustabbedme</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Let’s not forget that lighter people are/always have had more representation in movies so there’s really no reason to be pressed.</p><figure data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="272"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ccc524a144963cb5e5877e21a6b1a934/tumblr_inline_p4pumamigq1vrw6x9_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="272"/></figure></blockquote> <p>Is anyone on earth capable of just enjoying things anymore?</p>

whyyoustabbedme: Let’s not forget that lighter people are/always have had more representation in movies so there’s really no reason to be p...

Save
Bad, Children, and Comfortable: SWeet Cakes We lost everything' Christian bakers fined $135K for refusing to make lesbian couple's wedding cake chaotic-tides: xaldien: startlememe-trash: karadin: trueheart46: plaidandredlipstick: hussyknee: I love how they left out the part about them giving out the lesbian couple’s personal information to send them death threats, running them out of their home, and encouraging other fundies to petition to have their children taken away. **examines fingernails** Also the fact that they raised half million dollars from other raging homophobes to fund this bigotry. I hope the dickholes lose the shirts off their backs and have to live out of a van. But that’s too much to hope for. I just wanna add that the lesbian couple were getting married because their mutual friend had just died of cancer and they were adopting her two daughters… and that the death threats were so bad that they had to quit their jobs and move. it’s never just about a cake. it’s about the precedent you set when you allow ppl to discriminate. it’s about all the disgusting bigots that crawl out of the woodwork when they feel like they have the right to hate. Yeah I mean if they don’t feel comfortable making the cake due to their beliefs then a polite decline is fine. It’s when, as previous stated, people try to discriminate especially so aggressively that things start to escalate. No, trueheart, a polite decline is NOT FINE. Let me explain why, when you operate a business, you are licensed  in your state, county and city. To get a license you agree that you will not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, religion, gender and sexuality. When you decline service for these reasons (not for example, that the customer was rude, or bounced a check) you are breaking the law and you will be fined. The way to avoid this is to a) operate your business without a license or b) move to where the group you want to discriminate against is not protected by law. I would agree but, freedom of religion is a thing, if the bakery was solely owned by them, they would have the right to decline. If it was a mass produced workplace like McDonald’s it would be a different story. You should not force someone to do something against their religion, which is why this discussion is hard to decide for many people. Oh, fuck you. They’re a business and have to follow business laws. The courts found that freedom of religion does not apply to a law that specifically says denial of service based on sexual orientation is illegal. Point blank. If you don’t know how business laws work, don’t open a business.
Save
Bad, Definitely, and Facts: FACT #353 DOOMSDAY IGI @MARVELOCF FACTS DOOMSDAYISA VERY ANCIENT BEING CREATED TO BE THE PERFECT ORGANISM TO SURVIVE. HE ISINFAMOUSLY KNOWN AS THE KILLER OF SUPERMAN DOOMSDAY HASNO "WEAKNESSES" AND CANNOT TRULY DIE. EVERYTIME HE IS KILLED (WHICH IS EXTREMELY HARD TO DO). HE ALWAYS REGENERATES COMES BACK. AND CAN NEVER BE KILLEO THE SAME WAY TWICE. HE DOES NOT NEEO TO EAT DRINK. OR BREATHE TO SURVIVE. HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF OVERI MILLION GREEN LANTERNS AND HE HAS BEATEN THE ENTIRE UUSTICE LEAGUE SINGLEHANDEDLY. BEATEN DARKSEID UNCONSCIOUS SURVIVED DARKSEID'S OMEGA BEAMS FROM POINT BLANK RANGE WITH NO HARM AT ALL, AND GRABBEO THE FLASH WHILE HE WAS IN MOTION SLIGHT CORRECTION. It was THOUSANDS of Green Lanterns no millions. My bad guys. I'm not sure of the specific time period but it was definitely ancient when Doomsday was created. A scientist named Bertron was creating a lifeform that could survive in any environment. The experiment failed everytime and the scientist had to go and collect the remains each time from Krypton. At this time, Krypton was very young and had a harsh environment. Bertron eventually got the experiment right and Doomsday survived. He ended up killing his creator and moving to different worlds.😂👍🏼 - QOTD: Who is your favorite villain of all time? Comment below!💥⬇️ - AOTD: Eobard Thawne AKA Reverse Flash.⚡️ - doomsday superman batmanvsuperman detectivecomics dccomics dcuniverse dcextendeduniverse dcentertainment dc dcu dceu marveldcfacts_

SLIGHT CORRECTION. It was THOUSANDS of Green Lanterns no millions. My bad guys. I'm not sure of the specific time period but it was definite...

Save
Arguing, Friends, and God: in a relationship you can't just do what you want, you always have to think about the other person and that's what people don't understand Here's the thing about sooo many single women nowadays, they always think they know, but they don't know WHAT IT TAKES to be married and stay faithful. Married folks tell us they put their spouse first, whether their spouse asked or not, this ain't about control, they took these actions out of respect for their other half, they distanced themselves from male friends, they compromised, they learned how to cook, the list goes on and on but no YOU are adamant you still gonna act like a single person in a relationship. Carry on👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽😑The level of selfishness is amazing. You're there boasting about doing what you want, yet have the audacity to make demands on top. Really? "I want a man who provides..." "I want a man who is consistent..." 😩and just the simple act of dropping your male friends (who are only there to boost your ego anyway) cooking for a hungry man, putting him first, you refuse to do point blank period. You got allll this attitude yet you're single!!! There's nothing wrong with being single btw but be humble!!!! Don't miss the message trying to prove that your single self can do what you want in a relationship because guess what... you will stay single. And that's not what God intended for you. A marriage takes more than a pretty face honey you have to GIVE. Now you can see why men hit it & quit...would you date you? Seriously. There are TONS of single women out here, the ones who get married are the ones who are HUMBLE and willing to listen. If this post doesn't relate to you pls keep scrolling it's way too early to argue. Blackcitygirl

Here's the thing about sooo many single women nowadays, they always think they know, but they don't know WHAT IT TAKES to be married and sta...

Save
Amber Rose, Bless Up, and Memes: PHOTOS OF PUPPIES TAKEN WITH A FISH-EYE LENS Drsmashlove Say Bruh shout to u girls that use the word 'hoe'. 'Slut'. 'Thot'. 'Turbo thot' <- my lil homegirl calls herself this. (Actually that's a lie. She calls herself an 'OG Turbo Thot' 😩 WifeMaterial 😂). In any event, I applaud y'all. Y'all have taken terms devised by shitty little men with shitty little PPs and owned them, repurposed them, and redeployed them in a manner that undermines the nefarious original intent behind such terms. I respect y'all. A woman has a right to conduct her sexual affairs as she fucking wishes! Nobody could control her body but her! Bam! Point blank period! But men lemme warn y'all. Some of y'all think that just because u went to the women's march and have a "I feel the Bern" pin, now y'all down with the cause and can use these words. NO. TREAD WITH CAUTION. U gon fuck around and use these words around women who don't know u and get a bottle cracked over your head. It's 2017 Bruh. Amber rose got these ladies empowered. And one of them gon empower a Heineken skrate to your temple. It's like the white dude Timmy who gets to college and starts hanging with the brothers and one night gets drunk + confident and he's like "N*GGA WHAT?!? 😂" and then Troy the friendly black male pulls Timmy to the side like "aye Timmy I fucks with you but if you use that word again I'm not gonna be here to defend you" and then Timmy learns his lesson. Don't be Timmy, u get me? If u a man, just stop using these terms. English language got millions of words. U don't need these. Caveat: gay males can use these words and it's hilarious. Like Timmy the straight male can't be all "lol Stephanie that SLUT" or he'll catch a bottle. However Bruce the friendly, fabulous gay male can say - to Stephanie - "OMG STEPHANIE YOU SUCKED HIM OFF AGAIN? AFTER YOU BROKE UP? STOP IT YOU SLUT LOL LOLOL." For some reason this is not offensive 🤔. In any event, happy Friday and bless up 😍😂😂😂
Save
Anaconda, Bailey Jay, and Food: How smart are you?.....A lady walks in the store and steals $100 bill from the register without the owners knowledge. She comes back 5 mins later and buys $70 worth of goods with the $100 bill. The owner gives her $30 in change, how much did the owner lose???? A. $30 B。$70 C. $100 D. $130 E. $170 F. $200 DO NOT OVER THINK IT! Again do not over think it... Yes. With the same 100. Cause it's already missing. Then your till thinks u took in another 100. But u gace 30 back. Trust me... t's 130 then. They sent me to a class to learn how to steal. Lol Like Reply 18 hrs But what it the stores net loss? When all is said and done they are out the $70 worth of food, and the $30 cash, for a total of $100. The store ultimately got the $100 bill bachk Like Reply 3 hrs Nope cause the 100 was taken out of thw drawer. So that makes them automatically 100 short b4 the theif even shops Like Reply 1 hr But after she leaves they have the $100 back. She doesnt have it anymore Like Reply 1 hr Doesn't matter. It's already gone. So there's 100 n then she uses the 100 n gets the 30 back. But 70 of items. So the person drawer is gonna b 130 short. N the store as a whole is 200 short as a whole in the end Like Reply 1 hr Lol no Say you have a $100, $20 and $10 bill, for a total of $130 cash. Now let's also say you are selling an item for $70. Between the cash and the item you are in possession of $200 worth of stuff She steals the $100 bill, so now all you have is See More Like Reply 1 hr 200. Point blank. 100 was rang threw the pos n then another 100 which is still missing. Come to my work n i can show u how as in play money like teaching a 2 yr old. I have been a sm for years. Thats how it works on a corp world Like Reply 9 mins She spent the $100 she stole to get the $70 item and S30 cash. After that transaction the store has the original $100 she stole and she no longer has it at that point. All she has walking out that she didn't have walking in is the $70 item and $30 cash... See More Like Reply 5 mins She walks put with only 100. The cashier is out 130. The store is out 200 Like Reply 3 mins N the register thinks they took in 200 because they took the 100 what was already rang in. Then rang it again n doesn't have the other 100. So that means a fired employee Like Reply 2 mins How can you think that is possible? It is basic algebra When you add to one side it is because an equal number was subtracted on the other side. How can she walk out of the store $100 richer because of her actions, yet the store is somehow $200 poorer because of her actions? Like Reply Just now Lmao.. Hope u never have to run a store. Ask another person cause i am done dealing with u. I have described it over n over Like Reply Just now The store took in that $100 from someone else, sure But at the end of the day the store still has that $100 but is short ofa $70 item and $30 cash Like Reply Just now memehumor: They gave a few answers, but never C

memehumor: They gave a few answers, but never C

Save