Nstagram
Nstagram

Nstagram

Grandmas
Grandmas

Grandmas

Fearful
Fearful

Fearful

These
These

These

Boning
Boning

Boning

I Passed
I Passed

I Passed

When Your
When Your

When Your

The
The

The

Your Mother
Your Mother

Your Mother

First Of All
First Of All

First Of All

🔥 | Latest

America, Mood, and New York: valeriekeefe: libertarirynn: fluorescent-air-fresheners: libertarirynn: daddyschlongleg: i was in the mood for some r76 c; can be a really young R76 before everything or an AU, take your pick  if you like what I do, consider buying me a coffee. ♥commissions Until I saw the overwatch tags I honestly thought this was fan art of cap and killmonger and I was like “well there’s a ship I haven’t seen yet…” I thought this was Tony Stark and Captain America actually but Killmonger and Cap…. (AU where T’Challa was able to explain things to Killmonger and they arrived at a peaceful solution) Killmonger: Hey, cuz, did I tell you I got a date to you and Nakia’s wedding? T’Challa: That is wonderful, cousin. I am glad to see you adjusting so well to things. Killmonger: Yeah we met last time I was in New York. Turns out he’s a vet, too. We hit it of trading war stories. Knows a lot about Wakanda too, even has a little vibranium. T’Challa: *raises brow* Oh? That is rather strange… Killmonger: He should be here soon. Says he’s got a buddy that’s been hanging out with Shuri and he was wanting to catch up with them before the wedding. Oh hey, there he is! Cap: Uh… hey T’Challa. I was gonna say something earlier… T’Challa: …This is unexpected. Again, I don’t understand why Cap isn’t fighting for Regime Change in this fic but… I dunno, you do you. That’s the next chapter.

valeriekeefe: libertarirynn: fluorescent-air-fresheners: libertarirynn: daddyschlongleg: i was in the mood for some r76 c; can be a rea...

College, Crazy, and Jeb Bush: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!” It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I read it.  An alleged Constitutional scholar completely dismisses an entire amendment.   Except he doesn’t. He explicitly explained the argument that one would use against that amendment. And again he uses a Republican example too (Jeb Bush/George Bush) so he absolutely did not say “it would be OK if liberals did it“. He didn’t say would be “OK” with him at all, he was just laying out the argument. Y’all need to learn that theoretical arguments are not endorsements. The law is full of crazy loopholes that people literally spend years arguing back-and-forth as a career. You don’t get to just throw up your hands and say “that sounds stupid so it’s not real”. It’s insanely stupid, and it disturbs me that anyone would even consider this idea.  Crazy Uncle Joe would be an absolutely horrible President, even more of a puppet than Obama.   Friend, buddy, pal, chum. I am not even sort of saying that this would be a good idea and I don’t even think it’s on the table. Biden has shown no interest in running, much less appointing Obama as VP. He would be an idiot to do that because it almost certainly wouldn’t make it through the electoral college. This is just a thought exercise, nothing more.

coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The...

College, Crazy, and Jeb Bush: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 All the WaPo article means is that “It’s okay when Democrats violate the Constitution!” It literally does not say that at all and I question if you even read it. I read it.  An alleged Constitutional scholar completely dismisses an entire amendment.   Except he doesn’t. He explicitly explained the argument that one would use against that amendment. And again he uses a Republican example too (Jeb Bush/George Bush) so he absolutely did not say “it would be OK if liberals did it“. He didn’t say would be “OK” with him at all, he was just laying out the argument. Y’all need to learn that theoretical arguments are not endorsements. The law is full of crazy loopholes that people literally spend years arguing back-and-forth as a career. You don’t get to just throw up your hands and say “that sounds stupid so it’s not real”.

coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: coolmanfromthepast: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likel...