Conservative & Rightwing Memes

🔥 Popular | Latest

d3vilr4t: karpad: i-am-loco: queer-anna: nebula-bf: psiotechniqa: charityforrichpeople: yuuki-mishima: yuuki-mishima: totallynotreimuhakurei: nicy-v: transpopuko: totallynotreimuhakurei: transpopuko: transpopuko: transpopuko: Bro what the fuck Of all the fucking things you could do, of all the fucking numbers you could pick Yall are fucking heartless monsters in case yall are a bit in the dark abt the number, the trans suicide rate has been recorded at 41% Heartbeat sucks and fuck transphones but I’m pretty sure the discounts are set my steam’s algorithm and not the developer iirc devs control their own sales and discounts It was intentional @transpopuko Oh nevermind fuck this game and it’s shitty devs Went to check their twitter to see what else they tweeted and, not seeing any white supremacy anything - just sounds like a conservative who doesn’t believe in gender reassignment surgery or transtrender BS Ok brony. Don’t forget that the average live expectancy for trans woc is 35. Both sales are intentional also this points out that the 35% has more than one malicious meaning well this is just disgusting. please do not buy their shitty game. what the fuck. i remember seeing previews of this game and thinking its cute style wise and im glad i didnt buy it. fuck this guy Fucking disgusting pieces of shit: Buy HEARTBEAT SPECIAL PROMOTION! Offer ends in 47:11:06 $14.99 -35% $9.74 Add to Cart Buy HEARTBEAT+Soundtrack Includes 2 items: HEART BEAT, HEARTBEAT Soundtrack $21.98 40% -41% $12.86 Bundle info Add to Cart d3vilr4t: karpad: i-am-loco: queer-anna: nebula-bf: psiotechniqa: charityforrichpeople: yuuki-mishima: yuuki-mishima: totallynotreimuhakurei: nicy-v: transpopuko: totallynotreimuhakurei: transpopuko: transpopuko: transpopuko: Bro what the fuck Of all the fucking things you could do, of all the fucking numbers you could pick Yall are fucking heartless monsters in case yall are a bit in the dark abt the number, the trans suicide rate has been recorded at 41% Heartbeat sucks and fuck transphones but I’m pretty sure the discounts are set my steam’s algorithm and not the developer iirc devs control their own sales and discounts It was intentional @transpopuko Oh nevermind fuck this game and it’s shitty devs Went to check their twitter to see what else they tweeted and, not seeing any white supremacy anything - just sounds like a conservative who doesn’t believe in gender reassignment surgery or transtrender BS Ok brony. Don’t forget that the average live expectancy for trans woc is 35. Both sales are intentional also this points out that the 35% has more than one malicious meaning well this is just disgusting. please do not buy their shitty game. what the fuck. i remember seeing previews of this game and thinking its cute style wise and im glad i didnt buy it. fuck this guy Fucking disgusting pieces of shit
Save
tsunderepup: randomslasher: pastel-selkie: lesbianshepard: stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of human life Reblog if you would burn down the statue of liberty to save a life Here’s the thing, though. If you asked a conservative “Would you let the statue of liberty burn to save one life?” they’d probably scoff and say no, it’s a national landmark, a treasure, a piece of too much historical importance to let it be destroyed for the sake of one measly life.  But if you asked, “Would you let the statue of liberty burn in order to save your child? your spouse? someone you loved a great deal?” the tune abruptly changes. At the very least, there’s a hesitation. Even if they deny it, I’m willing to bet that gun to their head, the answer would be “yes.”   The basic problem here is that people have a hard time seeing outside their own sphere of influence, and empathizing beyond the few people who are right in front of them. You’ve got your immediate family, whom you love; your friends, your acquaintances, maybe to a certain degree the people who share a status with you (your religion, your race, etc.)–but beyond that? People aren’t real. They’re theoretical.  But a national monument? That’s real. It stands for something. The value of a non-realized anonymous life that exists completely outside your sphere of influence is clearly worth less than something that represents freedom and prosperity to a whole nation, right? People who think like this lack the compassion to realize that everyone is in someone’s immediate sphere of influence–that everyone is someone’s lover, or brother, or parent. Everyone means the world to someone. And it’s the absolute height of selfishness to assume that their lives don’t have value just because they don’t mean the world to you.  P.S. I would let the statue of liberty burn to save a pigeon.  : anarchy404x 1d You must understand the weird logic of the left. To them life is priceless and should always be prioritised over property. They would literally let the statue of Liberty burn to save one person. Through inaction let one person starve? You monster, you literally murdered them. Reply Vote tsunderepup: randomslasher: pastel-selkie: lesbianshepard: stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of human life Reblog if you would burn down the statue of liberty to save a life Here’s the thing, though. If you asked a conservative “Would you let the statue of liberty burn to save one life?” they’d probably scoff and say no, it’s a national landmark, a treasure, a piece of too much historical importance to let it be destroyed for the sake of one measly life.  But if you asked, “Would you let the statue of liberty burn in order to save your child? your spouse? someone you loved a great deal?” the tune abruptly changes. At the very least, there’s a hesitation. Even if they deny it, I’m willing to bet that gun to their head, the answer would be “yes.”   The basic problem here is that people have a hard time seeing outside their own sphere of influence, and empathizing beyond the few people who are right in front of them. You’ve got your immediate family, whom you love; your friends, your acquaintances, maybe to a certain degree the people who share a status with you (your religion, your race, etc.)–but beyond that? People aren’t real. They’re theoretical.  But a national monument? That’s real. It stands for something. The value of a non-realized anonymous life that exists completely outside your sphere of influence is clearly worth less than something that represents freedom and prosperity to a whole nation, right? People who think like this lack the compassion to realize that everyone is in someone’s immediate sphere of influence–that everyone is someone’s lover, or brother, or parent. Everyone means the world to someone. And it’s the absolute height of selfishness to assume that their lives don’t have value just because they don’t mean the world to you.  P.S. I would let the statue of liberty burn to save a pigeon. 

tsunderepup: randomslasher: pastel-selkie: lesbianshepard: stupid leftists and their belief in *checks notes* the intrinsic value of hu...

Save
thoughts-of-an-x-factor: biokitty: Also, Twitter is not the government. It is a private company and has the right to disallow certain speech on its platform, ban any user it wants, and monitor the content users are sharing. Twitter banning you is not a violation of freedom of speech.  I want to remind people that Trump has routinely attempted to demonize any media outlets that disagree with him and/or his inner circle. He has gone as far as attempting to have certain news outlets banned from his presidential press conferences. He has actively sought to suppress free speech in the USA…. but now he intends to invoke it because a private company refuses to provide a platform to nazis?: ll Verizon LTE 9:11 AM 54% Tweet Donald J. Trump @realDonaldT... 3h Twitter should let the banned Conservative Voices back onto their platform, without restriction. It's called Freedom of Speech, remember. You are making a Giant Mistake! L219.3K 15.1K 64.8K Tony Posnanski @tonyposnanski Replying to @realDonaldTrump You blocked me for saying Miracle Whip was more popular than you and I had to sue you to get unblocked... Let's slow down on "Freedom Of Speech" 5:50 AM 6/9/19. Twitter for iPhone 963 Retweets 7,289 Likes Tweet your reply thoughts-of-an-x-factor: biokitty: Also, Twitter is not the government. It is a private company and has the right to disallow certain speech on its platform, ban any user it wants, and monitor the content users are sharing. Twitter banning you is not a violation of freedom of speech.  I want to remind people that Trump has routinely attempted to demonize any media outlets that disagree with him and/or his inner circle. He has gone as far as attempting to have certain news outlets banned from his presidential press conferences. He has actively sought to suppress free speech in the USA…. but now he intends to invoke it because a private company refuses to provide a platform to nazis?
Save
gahdamnpunk: Why is conservative logic pretty much “you can live on a minimum wage if you cut out LIVING”??: Jakè Neidert Follow @Jakeandbake336 Fact: minimum wage is livable if you cut out entertainment, alcohol, drug, and eating out costs. Minimum wage isn't supposed to support a 6 figure lifestyle 4:27 AM-20 May 2019 480 Retweets 2,549 Likes AlwaysAshley @AshleyFrankly Follow Replying to @Jakeandbake336 Sit down, big boy. "A full-time minimum- wage job doesn't pay well enough to afford rent. In Kansas, where the state minimum wage is $7.25, you'd need to make $10.53 an hour to afford a studio. To rent a one- bedroom at minimum wage, you'd need to work 67 hours a week." 10:41 AM - 21 May 2019 397 Retweets 8,477 Likes Pé Resists Follow @4everNeverTrump Replying to @Jakeandbake336 Okay... let's try this in your city, Waco: Full-time minimum wage: $14,500/year. Splitting a 2 bedroom apartment in Waco: $5400/year. Utilities: $1500/year. Car (because it's TX): $6000/year. Income tax: $1400 WITHOUT FOOD, you're already at $14,300 in yearly expenses. 4:30 PM 21 May 2019 881 Retweets 7,612 Likes Pé Resists Follow @4everNeverTrump Replying to @4everNeverTrump @Jakeandbake336 Nor does this account for healthcare, pets, clothes, hygiene products, Mother's Day and Xmas gifts, etc. There's a reason why people work 60-80 hours/week at minimum (or close to minimum) wage jobs: BECAUSE IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO LIVE ON A MINIMUM WAGE. 4:34 PM -21 May 2019 296 Retweets 5,270 Likes Katherine Soutar Artist Follow @Kate_Dancingcat Replying to @Jakeandbake336 This Sometimes the poor are praised for being thrifty. But to recommend thrift to the poor is both grotesque and insulting. It is like advising a man who is starving to eat less. Oscar Wilde www.m ne 6:42 AM 21 May 2019 1,010 Retweets 7,459 Likes gahdamnpunk: Why is conservative logic pretty much “you can live on a minimum wage if you cut out LIVING”??

gahdamnpunk: Why is conservative logic pretty much “you can live on a minimum wage if you cut out LIVING”??

Save
lily-peet: urulokid: nevaehtyler: blackfemalescientist: sniffyjenkins: mideast-nrthafrica-cntrlasia: explainguncontrolandsafespaces: It’s like millennials do not understand that middle east has been at war for 1000′s of years. That we intervened on behalf of Kuwait. That without “bombing” people that want to kill and oppress others, millions will be murdered and tortured. “at war for 1000′s of years” you clearly know nothing about Afghanistan nor the middle east here’s Afghanistan in the 1950′s, 60′s, 70′s if you really want to know what caused all the instability growth of extremist groups I suggest you take a look at the US foreign policy towards Afghanistan during the 80′s It’s interesting to note that when the communist government came to power in Afghanistan in the late 70′s, one of the first things they did was declare equality of the sexes, made education for girls mandatory, banned child marriages. The conservative tribal leaders who the US armed funded ( who later became the Taliban) declared this to be a “war on Islam” fought against the central government. The US had no problem back then with encouraging the growth of Islamic conservatism to counter socialism/communism. You created your biggest enemy you have no one to blame but yourselves. BLESS THIS POST its crazy to me how the US talks about war in the middle east as if its this ancient problem inherent to the area instead of a recent problem created by western countries to further their own interests. ☕️☕️☕️ the CIA took out the democratically elected leader of Iran in the 1970s over oil and that set off an entire chain of events leading to ISIS, here’s more about multiple other countries we’ve fucked over  The United States: Fucking monsters. : fatima @fatimafiroz1 Follow Maybe if the US didn't bomb the country for the last 15 years there'd be more athletes Laura laura @jaureguihug how countries like afghanistan were walking in front of us with like 5 athletes and we came out with 400 lily-peet: urulokid: nevaehtyler: blackfemalescientist: sniffyjenkins: mideast-nrthafrica-cntrlasia: explainguncontrolandsafespaces: It’s like millennials do not understand that middle east has been at war for 1000′s of years. That we intervened on behalf of Kuwait. That without “bombing” people that want to kill and oppress others, millions will be murdered and tortured. “at war for 1000′s of years” you clearly know nothing about Afghanistan nor the middle east here’s Afghanistan in the 1950′s, 60′s, 70′s if you really want to know what caused all the instability growth of extremist groups I suggest you take a look at the US foreign policy towards Afghanistan during the 80′s It’s interesting to note that when the communist government came to power in Afghanistan in the late 70′s, one of the first things they did was declare equality of the sexes, made education for girls mandatory, banned child marriages. The conservative tribal leaders who the US armed funded ( who later became the Taliban) declared this to be a “war on Islam” fought against the central government. The US had no problem back then with encouraging the growth of Islamic conservatism to counter socialism/communism. You created your biggest enemy you have no one to blame but yourselves. BLESS THIS POST its crazy to me how the US talks about war in the middle east as if its this ancient problem inherent to the area instead of a recent problem created by western countries to further their own interests. ☕️☕️☕️ the CIA took out the democratically elected leader of Iran in the 1970s over oil and that set off an entire chain of events leading to ISIS, here’s more about multiple other countries we’ve fucked over  The United States: Fucking monsters.
Save