🔥 Popular | Latest

celticpyro: fandomsandfeminism: sofiama: cr1mson5thestranger: rosietheamazon: deadhoneybadger: Yeah that’s why they all died at 30 because they were so unhealthy but cool Pretty sure it was the plague not heart disease. Pretty sure it was the Plague, childbirth, food spoiling, maltreated infections, smallpox, pneumonia, and/or generally unsanitary living conditions (such as dumping sewage and waste in the streets) and not health conditions caused by excess body fat. Not to mention that the Renaissance standard of female beauty being plumpness and full-figured forms came from the fact that it was a status symbol. Plump, pale, full-figured women were wealthy women who didn’t have to spend their days in hard labor or raising children (or both) and stood a better chance of bearing healthy babies than commoner women did. Cultural “Oh Snap” I hate it so much when people pull out the “unhealthy” excuse for having a reason to body shame a person. “Women died young in the 1700s because they were fat” is an amazingly ignorant statement Okay that one response was dumb but first of all there’s absolutely no way the woman in that painting is 190-200 lbs unless she’s on the taller side. Yeah Renaissance women were full-figured but they weren’t obese.Secondly, it was a beauty standard because it was a sign you were rich enough to eat a lot and not have to work off the extra calories. So it wasn’t that women typically looked like that, it was an equally unrealistic standard back then as it is today because most women didn’t have the means to put on extra weight unless they were filthy rich. But hey let’s glorify beauty standards when it personally benefits you, right?Third, you’re really gonna put someone down for body-shaming when the woman painting is also body-shaming? Anorexia is a mental disorder not a body type and if you conflate the two you’re body-shaming. Using “anorexic” as a synonym for “skinny” is basically the same as using “diabetic” as a synonym for “fat.”So in conclusion, this whole post is garbage. It’s like when they try to label Marilyn Monroe and other of her contemporaries as “plus size”. Just stop. She was curvy yes, but she was absolutely not anything approaching the modern concept of “plus sized“ or obese.One of these things is not like the other: Jesuswhat's she weign in at buck 90, 200? Renaissance women weren't forced to starve themselves into an anorexic fashion na uStry marketing version of female sexuality celticpyro: fandomsandfeminism: sofiama: cr1mson5thestranger: rosietheamazon: deadhoneybadger: Yeah that’s why they all died at 30 because they were so unhealthy but cool Pretty sure it was the plague not heart disease. Pretty sure it was the Plague, childbirth, food spoiling, maltreated infections, smallpox, pneumonia, and/or generally unsanitary living conditions (such as dumping sewage and waste in the streets) and not health conditions caused by excess body fat. Not to mention that the Renaissance standard of female beauty being plumpness and full-figured forms came from the fact that it was a status symbol. Plump, pale, full-figured women were wealthy women who didn’t have to spend their days in hard labor or raising children (or both) and stood a better chance of bearing healthy babies than commoner women did. Cultural “Oh Snap” I hate it so much when people pull out the “unhealthy” excuse for having a reason to body shame a person. “Women died young in the 1700s because they were fat” is an amazingly ignorant statement Okay that one response was dumb but first of all there’s absolutely no way the woman in that painting is 190-200 lbs unless she’s on the taller side. Yeah Renaissance women were full-figured but they weren’t obese.Secondly, it was a beauty standard because it was a sign you were rich enough to eat a lot and not have to work off the extra calories. So it wasn’t that women typically looked like that, it was an equally unrealistic standard back then as it is today because most women didn’t have the means to put on extra weight unless they were filthy rich. But hey let’s glorify beauty standards when it personally benefits you, right?Third, you’re really gonna put someone down for body-shaming when the woman painting is also body-shaming? Anorexia is a mental disorder not a body type and if you conflate the two you’re body-shaming. Using “anorexic” as a synonym for “skinny” is basically the same as using “diabetic” as a synonym for “fat.”So in conclusion, this whole post is garbage. It’s like when they try to label Marilyn Monroe and other of her contemporaries as “plus size”. Just stop. She was curvy yes, but she was absolutely not anything approaching the modern concept of “plus sized“ or obese.One of these things is not like the other

celticpyro: fandomsandfeminism: sofiama: cr1mson5thestranger: rosietheamazon: deadhoneybadger: Yeah that’s why they all died at 30...

Save
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://officialcyndilauper.tumblr.com/post/134496773841">officialcyndilauper</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://zonecassette.tumblr.com/post/134496456781">zonecassette</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://league-of-legends-christmas-boys.tumblr.com/post/134496234568">league-of-legends-christmas-boys</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Here we see the difference between a greedy bastard and a kind loving king. Tubbs, the ever greedy, takes the entire bowl and pays you with 20-60 fish. Xerxes IX, the generous and caring royalty, gives nearly the same amount of fish for merely the amount of food that a normal cat consumes. Proof that tubbs is good for nothing.</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, I already proved this dumbass theory wrong <a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://memeshirt.tumblr.com/post/134485380396/zonecassette-memeshirt-xerxes-gives-me-45-50">here</a>. But if you’re too stubborn to even click the link:</p> <blockquote> <p>Xerxes is a king, and Tubbs is a commoner. While I certainly appreciate the gifts that Xerxes brings, Tubbs is making a much larger sacrifice. I recall the story of The Widow and the Two Mites from the Gospel of Mark:</p> <p><i><sup>41</sup>And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.<sup> 42</sup>And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.<sup> 43</sup>And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury: <sup>44</sup>For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.</i></p> </blockquote> <p>Eat shit. Tubbs gives so much, and Xerxes gives so little.<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>Tubbs is the common working cat taking back what this wretched society has cruelly taken from him. He cannot eat nearly the same amount that he is owed. He is a revolutionary.</p> </blockquote>: <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://officialcyndilauper.tumblr.com/post/134496773841">officialcyndilauper</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://zonecassette.tumblr.com/post/134496456781">zonecassette</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://league-of-legends-christmas-boys.tumblr.com/post/134496234568">league-of-legends-christmas-boys</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Here we see the difference between a greedy bastard and a kind loving king. Tubbs, the ever greedy, takes the entire bowl and pays you with 20-60 fish. Xerxes IX, the generous and caring royalty, gives nearly the same amount of fish for merely the amount of food that a normal cat consumes. Proof that tubbs is good for nothing.</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, I already proved this dumbass theory wrong <a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://memeshirt.tumblr.com/post/134485380396/zonecassette-memeshirt-xerxes-gives-me-45-50">here</a>. But if you’re too stubborn to even click the link:</p> <blockquote> <p>Xerxes is a king, and Tubbs is a commoner. While I certainly appreciate the gifts that Xerxes brings, Tubbs is making a much larger sacrifice. I recall the story of The Widow and the Two Mites from the Gospel of Mark:</p> <p><i><sup>41</sup>And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.<sup> 42</sup>And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.<sup> 43</sup>And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury: <sup>44</sup>For all they did cast in of their abundance; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living.</i></p> </blockquote> <p>Eat shit. Tubbs gives so much, and Xerxes gives so little.<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>Tubbs is the common working cat taking back what this wretched society has cruelly taken from him. He cannot eat nearly the same amount that he is owed. He is a revolutionary.</p> </blockquote>
Save