Enjoys
Enjoys

Enjoys

Ex
Ex

Ex

While
While

While

Important
Important

Important

Killing It
Killing It

Killing It

By Myself
By Myself

By Myself

Fucked
Fucked

Fucked

Meetings
Meetings

Meetings

U Ok
U Ok

U Ok

And
And

And

🔥 | Latest

Aladdin, Definitely, and Disney: Scott "Hug Honey" Fearichs Fun fact: I once asked Jeff Goode (creator of Jake Long: American Dragon) at a furry con, "How do you feel about people making lewcd art of your characters?" He said, "Oh, Disney sat me down and showed me a bunch of Kim Possible porn and said, This will happen to your show. 050 PM-26 201 thedarksideoflim Theee things find hilanious about this 1 Jef Goode goes to Furry Cons 2 Disney acknowledges and prepares show creators that their show will, most definidely, become pon 3 Disney has examples on hand of how said show will, most definitely, become pom Disney doesot just have examples of said pom Ok story time. Yeaaaars ago i dated an animator chick During that short time together we ran around a lot and met a bunch of industry people in our area One of them used to work for Disney So we are hanging out at his apartment and conversation being what it is he kinda says hold on and goes of to dig in the closet He comes back and sets down a couple STACKS (and im talking foot high) of printe paper What followed were a couple hours of hysterical laughing as we paged theough a history of Disney animation pom edition" See Disney has this weird rule in their artist contracts everything you create while in their employ is THEIRS Even in the of time. its one of the reasons they are rewled ih the industry But the rule was set in place to basically steal good ideas from their staf or force them to ONLY work on Disney ip's while employed The jokes on them though. They didn't count on most atists being giant perverts tell me drawing smut will ruin your at caee his story is also why i laugh when people Sol Disney being bastards ended up eaning them smut of everything they ve ever created And also per their policies they had to keep it Every artist knew about the smut vault and our buddy here had photocopied a chunk of it Yes 2-3 feet of smut was just a chunk of it Snow white? Rescue rangers? Goofy? Minnie? Micky? Beauty and the beast? Aladdin? Yup you name it it was there Some of t was mild The topless little memaid stuf made sense at least. Some was raunchy as hell ALL OF I7 in the animation style of the fims and shows So yes, not only does Disney know there will be pom, have the pom, but they official pom You're welcome gagzilla.info 65 Friday Funny Pictures

65 Friday Funny Pictures

Bad, Beautiful, and College: 5 hrs Ok. This is NOT a joke. We paid a photographer, who claimed to be a professional, $250 for a family photo shoot. Please see these FOR REAL photos she delivered to us....She said the shadows were really bad on the beautiful, clear, sunny day and that her professor never taught her to retouch photos. Feel Magery by Lesa Hall C 2017 Magery by Lesa Hall IMagery by Lesa Hall O 2017 willow-wanderings: libertarirynn: r3druger: tiffanarchy: libertarirynn: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: Holy shit she NPC’d them! You get what you pay for… Since when is $250 considered “cheap” for a family photo? what lol When you value a freelancer’s actual talent enough to pay then real money for doing a real job. Yeah, $250 is definitely on the lower end for professional photographs. I have quite a few photographer friends. As a mercenary soul-caputurer myself, yeah, you get what you fucking pay for. Photography has the same costs as any other business. The price you charge has to cover the cost of materials (film if you’re shooting old school, prints, maintenance for your camera whether analog or digital), labor (time spent setting up and shooting), and overhead (gas, food, website hosting costs, etc. if you need it to do some part of the job, it’s in your overhead). Now those are just your operating costs, if you want to actually make money you have to add a percentage for profit (e.g. operating costs + 20%). Let me give you non-photographers a frame of reference here. Paying $250 for a single-day private photo session on location (which means travel costs on top of everything else), is the equivalent of paying $50 for a huge ornate wedding cake you ordered the day before the wedding.This ‘tog is still severely unprofessional and unqualified, though. I consider myself still a beginner but taking good photos in bright sunlight isn’t hard, I do it all the time. Like literally three-quarters of my flickr is all natural light shoots, it’s easier than studio shoots in some ways (light source, directionality, and intensity is constant on a clear day; you don’t have to worry about flash timing; the only thing you need to control for is your camera settings, etc.). I really don’t understand how they screwed this shoot so badly.Other things wrong with this cheap shoot:Out of focusLow contrastLow saturationBad white balanceGrainyThere’s really no excuse for this, it’s all very basic stuff. I took ONE photography class in college and I’ve only been shooting off and on for a couple of years, and I could still do a better shoot than this. It’s not that this person’s professor didn’t teach them how to retouch photos, their professor didn’t teach them how to shoot at all.

willow-wanderings: libertarirynn: r3druger: tiffanarchy: libertarirynn: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: Holy shit she NPC’d them! ...