馃敟 Popular | Latest

It鈥檚 the end of a decade. I鈥檓 close to 100 profiles. Here are my favorites from the last 6 years of making them.: niftyshadesofjake niftyshadesofjake .... ...... Jake, 27 Jake, 27 O less than a mile away O less than a mile away We may fight, but please don't try and solve the argument with regular soda. It won't take racial inequality to get me down on one knee. I prefer diet; we both know you are all the sugar I need. niftyshadesofjake University of Southern California niftyshadesofjake Scottsdale, Arizona USC CLASS OF 2022 3,401 FRESHME 0% ganted Ethically granted admission APPLICATIO Jake, 29 Jake 28 O less than a mile away less than a mile away I'm not a celebrity. I don't have $500,000 to help I'm having trouble picking a costume. Want to help? my future children become trojans at USC. I am a gentlemen. I have $50 for dinner to ethically boost my chances of getting a trojan into you. Swipe left if you are a fan of ghosting. Swipe right if you are a fan of getting boned. niftyshadesofjake Scottsdale, Arizona niftyshadesofjake Scottsdale, Arizona .. let 6'0" A Caded in 5'6" 5'0" your cave of wonders POLICE DEPT. 4'6" (480) 627-9186 4'0" Yes Please Jake Arredondo 3'6" Jake, 29 Jake, 29 O less than a mile away O less than a mile away Tired of guys lying about their height? Here is government proof I am at least 6ft. I promise that it will take more than a few rubs for anything to come out of my magic lamp. For our first date, you cook our dinner, and I will cook the meth. niftyshadesofjake niftyshadesofjake Scottsdale, Arizona You ok Jake, 29 Still Single O less than a mile away Jake, 27 As a born-again virgin (3-month dry spell). I can relate to the current bachelor. I was feeling 22, but really I am 27 and should probably start taking dating seriously. Swipe right. I too am willing to wait on putting the Pin the V, until I am sure about you and me. Swipe right to fill the blank space in my heart. If you aren't looking for a love story, baby just swipe left. This is the first one I had ever created (bad quality). This joke took 1,000+ hours to m谩ke. niftyshadesofjake et niftyshadesofjake Hmargemadders.com Make America Accessible Again Jake, 24 Jake, 29 O less than a mile away About Jake I am 50% hispanic, so our love could very well be separated by Trump's wall. This is why I am proud to announce my new company, Largeladders.com If we are to go on a date you must wear sandals. No socks. I am pro house elf slavery and i cannot risk gving my elf his freedom. Furthermore, ifu need me to drive, I will have dobby pull me on my scooter and you may ride pigty-back style I do this for the envronment. Bring your nice flip flops if you want me to pay for dinner Political oppression might keep us down, but with my new ladder company, I will have a way to climb right back into your arms. It鈥檚 the end of a decade. I鈥檓 close to 100 profiles. Here are my favorites from the last 6 years of making them.

It鈥檚 the end of a decade. I鈥檓 close to 100 profiles. Here are my favorites from the last 6 years of making them.

Save
feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I鈥檒l tell you why.聽 Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn鈥檛 planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin鈥檚 first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning聽Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.聽 When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:聽 When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn鈥檛 be in the third film, and said there were 鈥渕any reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that鈥 continuing with 鈥淭here are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.鈥 (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn鈥檛 have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was 鈥渄one鈥 with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.聽 鈥淲e wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.鈥 (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor鈥檚 inferior.聽 What鈥檚 ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a 鈥渟orry Jane dumped you鈥 throwaway line to explain Portman鈥檚 absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,聽Feige chose to attack Jane鈥檚 strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.聽 Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi鈥檚 opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige鈥檚 ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane鈥 disguised as聽鈥減romotion鈥 for WAITITI鈥橲 FILM鈥 would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a聽M膩ori father, who had to use his mother鈥檚 maiden name鈥 Cohen鈥 for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren鈥檛 a white man.聽 So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can鈥檛 go to space, or that she鈥檚 not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?聽 He makes her Thor.聽 Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster鈥檚 name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor鈥檚 hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you鈥檙e a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn鈥檛 need words.聽 What a photo. What a film. What a man.聽 : INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I鈥檒l tell you why.聽 Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn鈥檛 planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin鈥檚 first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning聽Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.聽 When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:聽 When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn鈥檛 be in the third film, and said there were 鈥渕any reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that鈥 continuing with 鈥淭here are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.鈥 (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn鈥檛 have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was 鈥渄one鈥 with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.聽 鈥淲e wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.鈥 (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor鈥檚 inferior.聽 What鈥檚 ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a 鈥渟orry Jane dumped you鈥 throwaway line to explain Portman鈥檚 absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,聽Feige chose to attack Jane鈥檚 strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.聽 Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi鈥檚 opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige鈥檚 ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane鈥 disguised as聽鈥減romotion鈥 for WAITITI鈥橲 FILM鈥 would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a聽M膩ori father, who had to use his mother鈥檚 maiden name鈥 Cohen鈥 for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren鈥檛 a white man.聽 So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can鈥檛 go to space, or that she鈥檚 not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?聽 He makes her Thor.聽 Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster鈥檚 name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor鈥檚 hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you鈥檙e a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn鈥檛 need words.聽 What a photo. What a film. What a man.聽
Save
ebonyheartnet: jewishdragon: feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I鈥檒l tell you why.聽 Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn鈥檛 planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin鈥檚 first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning聽Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.聽 When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:聽 When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn鈥檛 be in the third film, and said there were 鈥渕any reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that鈥 continuing with 鈥淭here are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.鈥 (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn鈥檛 have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was 鈥渄one鈥 with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.聽 鈥淲e wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.鈥 (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor鈥檚 inferior.聽 What鈥檚 ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a 鈥渟orry Jane dumped you鈥 throwaway line to explain Portman鈥檚 absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,聽Feige chose to attack Jane鈥檚 strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.聽 Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi鈥檚 opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige鈥檚 ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane鈥 disguised as聽鈥減romotion鈥 for WAITITI鈥橲 FILM鈥 would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a聽M膩ori father, who had to use his mother鈥檚 maiden name鈥 Cohen鈥 for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren鈥檛 a white man.聽 So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can鈥檛 go to space, or that she鈥檚 not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?聽 He makes her Thor.聽 Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster鈥檚 name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor鈥檚 hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you鈥檙e a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn鈥檛 need words.聽 What a photo. What a film. What a man.聽 Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews! : INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM ebonyheartnet: jewishdragon: feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I鈥檒l tell you why.聽 Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn鈥檛 planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin鈥檚 first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning聽Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.聽 When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:聽 When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn鈥檛 be in the third film, and said there were 鈥渕any reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that鈥 continuing with 鈥淭here are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.鈥 (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn鈥檛 have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was 鈥渄one鈥 with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.聽 鈥淲e wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.鈥 (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor鈥檚 inferior.聽 What鈥檚 ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a 鈥渟orry Jane dumped you鈥 throwaway line to explain Portman鈥檚 absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,聽Feige chose to attack Jane鈥檚 strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.聽 Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi鈥檚 opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige鈥檚 ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane鈥 disguised as聽鈥減romotion鈥 for WAITITI鈥橲 FILM鈥 would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a聽M膩ori father, who had to use his mother鈥檚 maiden name鈥 Cohen鈥 for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren鈥檛 a white man.聽 So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can鈥檛 go to space, or that she鈥檚 not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?聽 He makes her Thor.聽 Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster鈥檚 name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor鈥檚 hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you鈥檙e a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn鈥檛 need words.聽 What a photo. What a film. What a man.聽 Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews!
Save
feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I鈥檒l tell you why.聽 Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn鈥檛 planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin鈥檚 first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning聽Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.聽 When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:聽 When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn鈥檛 be in the third film, and said there were 鈥渕any reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that鈥 continuing with 鈥淭here are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.鈥 (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn鈥檛 have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was 鈥渄one鈥 with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.聽 鈥淲e wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.鈥 (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor鈥檚 inferior.聽 What鈥檚 ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a 鈥渟orry Jane dumped you鈥 throwaway line to explain Portman鈥檚 absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,聽Feige chose to attack Jane鈥檚 strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.聽 Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi鈥檚 opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige鈥檚 ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane鈥 disguised as聽鈥減romotion鈥 for WAITITI鈥橲 FILM鈥 would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a聽M膩ori father, who had to use his mother鈥檚 maiden name鈥 Cohen鈥 for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren鈥檛 a white man.聽 So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can鈥檛 go to space, or that she鈥檚 not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?聽 He makes her Thor.聽 Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster鈥檚 name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor鈥檚 hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you鈥檙e a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn鈥檛 need words.聽 What a photo. What a film. What a man.聽 : INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I鈥檒l tell you why.聽 Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn鈥檛 planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin鈥檚 first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning聽Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.聽 When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:聽 When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn鈥檛 be in the third film, and said there were 鈥渕any reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that鈥 continuing with 鈥淭here are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.鈥 (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn鈥檛 have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was 鈥渄one鈥 with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.聽 鈥淲e wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.鈥 (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor鈥檚 inferior.聽 What鈥檚 ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a 鈥渟orry Jane dumped you鈥 throwaway line to explain Portman鈥檚 absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film,聽Feige chose to attack Jane鈥檚 strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.聽 Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi鈥檚 opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige鈥檚 ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane鈥 disguised as聽鈥減romotion鈥 for WAITITI鈥橲 FILM鈥 would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a聽M膩ori father, who had to use his mother鈥檚 maiden name鈥 Cohen鈥 for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren鈥檛 a white man.聽 So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can鈥檛 go to space, or that she鈥檚 not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?聽 He makes her Thor.聽 Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster鈥檚 name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor鈥檚 hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you鈥檙e a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn鈥檛 need words.聽 What a photo. What a film. What a man.聽
Save
profeminist: profeminist: 鈥淎re you excited about going to the White House?鈥澛 Megan Rapinoe: 鈥淚鈥檓 not going to the fucking White House.鈥 Watch the video here Also:聽 US lesbian soccer star refuses to sing national anthem to protest Trump 鈥業鈥檒l probably never put my hand over my heart. I鈥檒l probably never sing the national anthem again,鈥 she said. 鈥業t鈥檚 kind of a good 鈥淔uck you鈥 to any sort of inequality or bad sentiments that the [Trump] administration might have towards people who don鈥檛 look exactly like him,鈥 she also explained.鈥 Megan Rapinoe takes a knee in support of Colin Kaepernick: 鈥淚t鈥檚 the least I can do. Keep the converation going.鈥 Reposting with the memes I wanted to post originally -聽 this way people can share the original story if they want without MY REACTION WATCHING THE VIDEO: : Eight by Eight @8by8mag 88 Follow "I'm not going to the fucking White House." @mPinoe uSA I'M NOT GOING TO THE FUCKING WHITE HOUSE. 11:04 AM 25 Jun 2019 profeminist: profeminist: 鈥淎re you excited about going to the White House?鈥澛 Megan Rapinoe: 鈥淚鈥檓 not going to the fucking White House.鈥 Watch the video here Also:聽 US lesbian soccer star refuses to sing national anthem to protest Trump 鈥業鈥檒l probably never put my hand over my heart. I鈥檒l probably never sing the national anthem again,鈥 she said. 鈥業t鈥檚 kind of a good 鈥淔uck you鈥 to any sort of inequality or bad sentiments that the [Trump] administration might have towards people who don鈥檛 look exactly like him,鈥 she also explained.鈥 Megan Rapinoe takes a knee in support of Colin Kaepernick: 鈥淚t鈥檚 the least I can do. Keep the converation going.鈥 Reposting with the memes I wanted to post originally -聽 this way people can share the original story if they want without MY REACTION WATCHING THE VIDEO:
Save
raspberrymama: viewtiful-kim: solluxisms: systlin: strutsonicely: tomyfancy: systlin: I鈥橫 DYING Day 3 of 5 鈥淒ear Citizen, In order to deliver on our promise to save America, we knew we needed to tackle our country鈥檚 biggest issue: wealth inequality. The richest 0.1% of Americans have as much wealth as the bottom 90%. Our lawyers wouldn鈥檛 let us pursue our first choice - a campaign to eat all the rich people and live in their homes - so we settled for something more achievable. Today, Card Against Humanity has redistributed your wealth. Using the survey you filled out when you signed up, we identified the 100 poorest recipients and sent them each聽 check for $1,000. To see how this $1,000 is impacting these peoples lives, read their stories at CardsAgainstHumanityRedistributesYourWealth.com. The next 10,000 poorest recipients got a $15 refund check. You got nothing. And if you don鈥檛 like it, tough titties. I love you, Cards Against Humanity鈥 I was one of the 100 to get the check from these folks, and holy shit I was CACKLING at the hurt people on Facebook. Some people only cared about their precious $15 when it helped the poor. Congrats! I鈥檓 thrilled that some of my $$$ went to people who needed it.聽 I went to their website for this to see if info on the other days was out, and their FAQ is so perfect I almost choked to death. 鈥淲e鈥檙e Just Being regular correct鈥 D A M I stan one (1) card game : GAINST F SAVES A MERICA DAY THRE Dear Citizen, In order to deliver on our promise to save America, we knew we needed to tackle our country's biggest issue: wealth inequality. The richest 0.1% of Americans have as much wealth as the bottom 90% our lawyers wouldn't let us pursue our first choice - a campaign to eat all the rich Cards Against Humanity has redistributed your wealth Using the survey you filled out when you signed up, we identified the 100 poorest people and live in their houses so we settled for something more achievable. Today recipients and sent them each a check for $1,000. To see how this $1,000 is impacting these people's lives, read their stories at CardsAgainstHumanityRedistributesYourWealth.com The next 10,000 poorest recipients got a $15 refund check. You got nothing. And if you don't like it, tough titties love you, Cards Against Humanity My money stolen by Cards Against Humanity and redistributed to people poorer than me. Oh shit! I just got SAGAINSTHUMANITYSAVESA Cards Against Humanity Cards Against Humanity raspberrymama: viewtiful-kim: solluxisms: systlin: strutsonicely: tomyfancy: systlin: I鈥橫 DYING Day 3 of 5 鈥淒ear Citizen, In order to deliver on our promise to save America, we knew we needed to tackle our country鈥檚 biggest issue: wealth inequality. The richest 0.1% of Americans have as much wealth as the bottom 90%. Our lawyers wouldn鈥檛 let us pursue our first choice - a campaign to eat all the rich people and live in their homes - so we settled for something more achievable. Today, Card Against Humanity has redistributed your wealth. Using the survey you filled out when you signed up, we identified the 100 poorest recipients and sent them each聽 check for $1,000. To see how this $1,000 is impacting these peoples lives, read their stories at CardsAgainstHumanityRedistributesYourWealth.com. The next 10,000 poorest recipients got a $15 refund check. You got nothing. And if you don鈥檛 like it, tough titties. I love you, Cards Against Humanity鈥 I was one of the 100 to get the check from these folks, and holy shit I was CACKLING at the hurt people on Facebook. Some people only cared about their precious $15 when it helped the poor. Congrats! I鈥檓 thrilled that some of my $$$ went to people who needed it.聽 I went to their website for this to see if info on the other days was out, and their FAQ is so perfect I almost choked to death. 鈥淲e鈥檙e Just Being regular correct鈥 D A M I stan one (1) card game
Save
latining: note-a-bear: krockafella: So fucked up. To be clear, a major part of this is that there are very limited avenues to pursue stunt work generally, and those are heavily guarded by a word of mouth network of white men and, more recently, white women. Before anyone talks about the perceived ease of East Asian stunt performers, keep in mind that at least in the US, the vast majority are contracted because of specific proficiency and often as silent fodder for white heroes. That aside, there are plenty of talented performers who lack only the formal guidance to be *safe* and *recognized* stunt actors. There was just a guardian(?) article profiling some of the Black Women breaking into the UK stunt scene. (Previously Gotham was called out for using white stunt doubles for jada pinkett-smith) Here鈥檚 the Guardian article about black stuntwomen and larger problems with inequality in the industry. : April @ReignOfApril Follow Ryan Coogler said finding Black stuntwomen was a challenge for @theblackpanther. But instead of using blackfaced white women (WHICH HAPPENS MORE THAN YOU KNOW), he expanded his reach and cast dancers and athletes. That's how we got @marija_abney as Dora Milaje. #BlackPanther Hollywood Reporter@THR "As difficult as it is for African-American actresses to find work on genre TV, it's even tougher for black stuntwomen" thr.cm/Ln9yex 9:11 AM- 9 Dec 2018 00C鏇层伄 鍙 1,006 Retweets 2,766 Likes 18 1.0K latining: note-a-bear: krockafella: So fucked up. To be clear, a major part of this is that there are very limited avenues to pursue stunt work generally, and those are heavily guarded by a word of mouth network of white men and, more recently, white women. Before anyone talks about the perceived ease of East Asian stunt performers, keep in mind that at least in the US, the vast majority are contracted because of specific proficiency and often as silent fodder for white heroes. That aside, there are plenty of talented performers who lack only the formal guidance to be *safe* and *recognized* stunt actors. There was just a guardian(?) article profiling some of the Black Women breaking into the UK stunt scene. (Previously Gotham was called out for using white stunt doubles for jada pinkett-smith) Here鈥檚 the Guardian article about black stuntwomen and larger problems with inequality in the industry.
Save
siryouarebeingmocked: durkin62: geekinglikeaboss: biryani-barbie: grannypaintiesnchill: We ALL wish it were that easy i cant believe this white boy wrote like 3 sentences and got full credit while (assumedly) his marginalized peers wrote full ass essays to produce the same result if this isn鈥檛 an allegory for how we treat allies who vaguely get it i dont know what is lmao the above, ironically, only increases the validity of his statement. In case anyone still though the education system isnt brainwashing kids. implying this actually happened I am laughing my ass off. We鈥檙e reaching 鈥渢hat happened鈥 levels that shouldn鈥檛 be possible.: @ltMeSpencer i have to write a paper about a time i experienced social inequality buschooeconal.com Social Inequality Fllo Edt Wow Insort Fonmat Toos Table Add ons Hop charges saved in Drive d Share Spencer Busch, Modem U.S. Society, Dr. Pylis M. Goudy Myers I have never experienced, nor wil I ever experience, social inequsity. I am a white male 11/29/15, 8:41 PM Tools Table Add-ons Help All changes saved in Drive mal textArial 11B I 2 Spencer Busch, Modern U.S. Society, Dr. Phyllis M. Goudy Myers I have never experienced, nor will I ever experience, social inequality. I am a white male. @ltMeSpencer @ltMeSpencer bout to hand it in Spencer Busch, Modern U.S. Society, Dr. Phylis M. Goudy Myers I have never experienced, nor will 1 ever experience, social inequality. I am a white male @ltMeSpencer @ltMeSpencer got full credit etnical theories a ere does the value come from? (Instrumenta , numan beings? Or something already existent?) 2. What, according to the utilitarian, is the one and only thing with is the Principle of Utility? What are some criticisms of utilitarianist (here you can also look at page 17 in our text, as well as lert . Happiness is the one and only thing with intrini . Principle of Utility: An ant i Spencer Busch, ModernT O.S. Society, Dr. Phyllis M. Goudy Myers I have never experienced, nor will I ever experience, social inequality. I male ET陌 8 siryouarebeingmocked: durkin62: geekinglikeaboss: biryani-barbie: grannypaintiesnchill: We ALL wish it were that easy i cant believe this white boy wrote like 3 sentences and got full credit while (assumedly) his marginalized peers wrote full ass essays to produce the same result if this isn鈥檛 an allegory for how we treat allies who vaguely get it i dont know what is lmao the above, ironically, only increases the validity of his statement. In case anyone still though the education system isnt brainwashing kids. implying this actually happened I am laughing my ass off. We鈥檙e reaching 鈥渢hat happened鈥 levels that shouldn鈥檛 be possible.
Save