🔥 Popular | Latest

Child Support, Community, and Fucking: Chronic Sex @ChronicSexChat Chronic Sex *Psst* Marriage equality doesn't exist anywhere unless disabled people can marry without losing their benefits Pass it orn 5/21/18, 7:03 AM actualmythicalcreature: somecunttookmyurl: tyse-has-unpopular-opinions: juxtapoesition: oistrong: I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so focused on that no one knows about this problem. W…wait Thats a thing???? Yep! The man I refer to as my husband? We aren’t actually married. We can’t be. If I married him, the government would literally expect me to care for him and be his sole source of income. He would lose all of his benefits, including SSDI. Spouses are expected to share income and that effects ALL of his benefits, even his health insurance. We simply can’t afford to be married. But it goes even further than that. If I were disabled, our incomes would STILL be combined, meaning BOTH of us would have our benefits cut. For people reviving supplemental income, their benefits can be cut anywhere from 25% of their current income all the way down to 0% In fact, one of the stipulations of receiving income under the adult disabled child program (which provides benefits for people who were disabled before age 22) is that they LITERALLY never be married. I normally don’t link to blog posts as resources, but since social service resource sites like to dress this problem up and make it seem smaller than it really is, I’m gonna call it appropriate! Check it out! https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/06/29/op-ed-why-no-matter-what-i-still-cant-marry-my-girlfriend I’m upset about the situation in case you couldn’t tell. Disabled people in the UK do not have marriage equality. If you so much as LIVE with a partner you lose a massive chunk of income Disabled Canadian chiming in - it’s the same here. I can even be kicked off disability for living with a romantic partner for longer than 6 months because then I’m considered common-law, and said partners income is deducted dollar for dollar from my benefits. Things like alimony, spousal support, and child support are also deducted dollar for dollar from my benefits - so you also get in shit for having previous relationships. If I have a roommate, they can request I PROVE that I’m not in a relationship with them by getting character references to swear it. Essentially, anyone whose unlucky enough to love me, is considered my financial caretaker. It fucking sucks.
Save
Community, Lgbt, and Marriage: Chronic Sex @ChronicSexChat Chronic Sex *Psst* Marriage equality doesn't exist anywhere unless disabled people can marry without losing their benefits Pass it orn 5/21/18, 7:03 AM tyse-has-unpopular-opinions: juxtapoesition: oistrong: I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so focused on that no one knows about this problem. W…wait Thats a thing???? Yep! The man I refer to as my husband? We aren’t actually married. We can’t be. If I married him, the government would literally expect me to care for him and be his sole source of income. He would lose all of his benefits, including SSDI. Spouses are expected to share income and that effects ALL of his benefits, even his health insurance. We simply can’t afford to be married. But it goes even further than that. If I were disabled, our incomes would STILL be combined, meaning BOTH of us would have our benefits cut. For people reviving supplemental income, their benefits can be cut anywhere from 25% of their current income all the way down to 0% In fact, one of the stipulations of receiving income under the adult disabled child program (which provides benefits for people who were disabled before age 22) is that they LITERALLY never be married. I normally don’t link to blog posts as resources, but since social service resource sites like to dress this problem up and make it seem smaller than it really is, I’m gonna call it appropriate! Check it out! https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/06/29/op-ed-why-no-matter-what-i-still-cant-marry-my-girlfriend I’m upset about the situation in case you couldn’t tell.

tyse-has-unpopular-opinions: juxtapoesition: oistrong: I’m all for fighting for marriage equality in the LGBT community. But we’re so foc...

Save
Bitch, Books, and Crime: IF MY VAGINA SHOT BULLETS IT WOULD HAVE LESS REGULATION <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://logicd.tumblr.com/post/97610683721">logicd</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://carrierudzinski.tumblr.com/post/97591375976/just-saying">carrierudzinski</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Just saying.</p> </blockquote> <p>Stupid pissy bitch please<br/><br/>Which agencies monitors what you do with your uterus the way the ATF does with guns? What are the fines and penalties?<br/><br/>What are the federal cunt equivalents of the following:<br/><br/>-National Firearms Act (1934)<br/>    &gt;imposes a statutory excise tax on the manufacture and transfer of certain firearms <br/>    &gt;mandates the registration of those firearms through the NFA registry<br/><br/>-Federal Firearms Act of 1938<br/>    &gt;imposed a federal license requirement on gun manufacturers, importers, and persons in the business of selling firearms<br/>    &gt;law required FFL’s to maintain customer records, and made illegal the transfer of firearms to certain classes of persons, such as convicted felons<br/><br/>-Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968<br/>    &gt;set up the LEAA<br/>    &gt;prohibited interstate trade in handguns<br/>    &gt;increased the minimum age to 21 for buying handguns<br/><br/>-Gun Control Act of 1968 (led to a lot of abuse by the ATF)<br/>    &gt;regulates interstate commerce in firearms by prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except among licensed manufacturers, dealers and importers<br/>    &gt;set up points based import restrictions<br/>    &gt;mandated serial numbers on firearms<br/><br/>-Firearm Owners Protection Act (1986)<br/>    &gt;addressed issues of the GCA 1968<br/>    &gt;put ban on machine guns through last minute amendment<br/>    &gt;lengthy and costly process to to acquire machine guns though fees and skyrocketing machine gun prices<br/><br/>-Undetectable Firearms Act (1988)<br/>    &gt;illegal to manufacture, import, sell, ship, deliver, possess, transfer, or receive any firearm that is not as detectable by walk-through metal         detection as a security exemplar containing 3.7 oz of steel, or any firearm with major components that do not generate an accurate image before standard airport imaging technology<br/><br/>-Gun-Free School Zones Act (1990)<br/>    &gt;prohibits any unauthorized individual from knowingly possessing a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone<br/>    &gt;prohibited vehicle, open, and conceal carry in gun free school zones, including off duty officers<br/><br/>-Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (1993)<br/>    &gt;instituted federal background checks on firearm purchasers in the United States (NICS) maintained by the FBI<br/><br/>-Federal Assault Weapons Ban (1994–2004) (expired)<br/>    &gt;restricted the manufacture and transfer of certain newly manufactured semi-automatic firearms and magazines through cosmetic features<br/>    <br/>    Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:<br/><br/>        Folding or telescoping stock<br/>        Pistol grip<br/>        Bayonet mount<br/>        Flash suppressor, or threaded barrel designed to accommodate one<br/>        Grenade launcher mount<br/><br/>    Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:<br/><br/>        Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip<br/>        Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor<br/>        Barrel shroud safety feature that prevents burns to the operator<br/>        Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more<br/>        A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm.<br/><br/>    Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:<br/><br/>        Folding or telescoping stock<br/>        Pistol grip<br/>        Fixed capacity of more than 5 rounds<br/>        Detachable magazine.<br/><br/>And this is just some of what the federal laws have done. <br/><br/>But what about state laws? What equivalent laws are on the books regulating your vagina? City laws? County ordinances? What other hundreds of laws and restrictions and fees and fines and stipulations does your vagina have the way guns do? In what way does your vagina compare to guns in how its treated and vilified by the media and politicians and people in general?<br/><br/><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_the_United_States_by_state">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_the_United_States_by_state</a><br/><br/>Go have a fucking look and learn something.<br/><br/>&gt;muh liberal values and thinking with muh vagina waa womyns rights waa patriarchy waa guns<br/><br/>Lol when has this ever led to something good.</p> <p>&gt;guns having less regulations than vaginas</p> <p>Stupid cunts everywhere</p> </blockquote> <p>I personally despise the &ldquo;C&rdquo; word, but good points. </p>
Save