šŸ¤Æ  Depression Memes

šŸ‘©ā€šŸ«  Teacher Memes

šŸ¤Ŗ  Hilarious Memes

šŸ‘¾  Aliens Memes

šŸ‘«  Relationship Memes

šŸ¦ƒ  Thanksgiving Memes

A Dumb Memes

Look Like
Look Like
Official
Official
Its
Its
The
The
Todays
Todays
Not
Not
But
But
That
That
When
When
Response
Response 

    
                    

                

            
        
    

    
    
    






            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    
                    
                    

                        


	


    šŸ”„ Popular | Latest






    

    
        
            
                

                    

                        
                    

                    
                    

                        
                            Twitter glimpses the blazing wonder of a lightning-struck tree, turns it into a dumb meme
                        
                    

                    
                

            
        
    
        
            
                

                    

                        
                    

                    
                    

                        
                            Zsuzsanna Anderson ā€“ When Quiverfull Use Porn Memes to Illustrate a Dumb Point
                        
                    

                    
                

            
        
    
    






    

    
    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^

Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^

Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.
        

            
            

                
                
                    libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^

Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
libertarirynn:

vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^

Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^
        

            
            

                
                
                    vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^: Alyssa Milano
 @Alyssa_Milano
 Follow
 Ns
 NEWS
 MARIJU
 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018
 MAKEMAT
 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes
 äø»äøŽēŽ‰äø°äø°
 --
vaporwavevocap:

cheshireinthemiddle:
napoleonbonerfarte:


cheshireinthemiddle:

pseudopupil:


cheshireinthemiddle:

hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:


hardboiledoldman:


cheshireinthemiddle:
But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. 
Youā€™re an unfathomably dumb cunt.


At least I have a good argument. 
And since iā€™ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. 


A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isnā€™t the same thing as making a good one, and youā€™ve made a bad argument cause youā€™re a dumb as fuck bootlicker.
We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesnā€™t mean we have to think itā€™s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesnā€™t make it reasonable or good. Youā€™re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit.


A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. 
Your counterargument isā€¦insults. 
You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. ā€œI personally dont find an. Issue with this lawā€ is not a defense. 
If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). 
And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. 

You are such an idiot and coward.Ā ā€œBreaking the law is illegalā€ is the entirety of what youā€™re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic youā€™re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.
Ā If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony youā€™d defend people being locked away only because they ā€œbroke the lawā€. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug.


Another person who just insults and doesnt read. 
The argument isnt ā€œbreaking the law is illegalā€, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. 
If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. 
You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. 
The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as ā€œharmlessā€. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. 
ā€œI will break this law because i personally dont like it/think itā€™s harmlessā€ is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. 

ā€œmaybe if those jews didnā€™t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldnā€™t have been jewish in poland.ā€ thatā€™s exactly what you sound like lmao. Iā€™m really not sure what argument youā€™re trying to go for right now?


Oh, iā€™m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. 
There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. 
If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. 

It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution.

What she said ^
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        legitimatelala:

lokiwtf:

gallizfrey:

anneriawings:

siphersaysstuff:

honey-andrevolution:

sashayed:

silvermoon424:

poppypicklesticks:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

cosmicallycosmopolitan:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

james-winston:

TheĀ Titanoboa, is aĀ 48ft longĀ snake dating from aroundĀ 60-58million years ago. It hadĀ a rib cage 2ft wide, allowing it to eat whole crocodiles, and surrounding the ribcage were muscles so powerful thatĀ it could crush a rhino.Ā Titanoboa was so big it couldnā€™t even spend long amounts of time on land, because the force of gravity acting on it would cause it to suffocate under its own weight.

Iā€™m so glad they arenā€™t around

omg me too. Iā€™m scared enough of 26 ft long anacondas. Iā€™m so happy Megalodons, those giant sharks, arenā€™t alive either

Praise natural selection

I remember watching Walking with Beasts or something similar, or some British tv show about evolution
The subject was something like a 12 foot long water scorpion
I was so startled by its sudden appearance and narration that I yelped: ā€œ12 fucking feet?!?! Ā Iā€™m fucking glad itā€™s extinct!ā€Ā 

Dude, prehistory was home to some fuckingĀ TERRIFYINGĀ creatures. For some reason, everything back then was enormous and scary. Extinction doesnā€™t always have to be a bad thing!
And Poppy, what you saw was an arthropod known asĀ Pterygotus (it was actually featured in Walking With Monsters). Not only was it as big (or maybe even bigger) than your average human, it had a stinger the size of a lightbulb. REALLY glad that bugger isnā€™t around anymore.

Also, Megalodon deserves to be mention again, because just hearing its name makes me want to never be submerged in water ever again.


GOD, I HATE THIS POST. HOW DO WE EVEN KNOW THAT SHIT ISNā€™T STILL AROUND? LURKING? EVOLVING? WE DONā€™T. WE DONā€™T KNOW SHIT ABOUT SHIT DOWN THERE. THE OCEAN IS A PRIMEVAL HELLSCAPE NIGHTMARE AND WE ALL JUST DIP OUR STUPID FRAGILE UNPROTECTED FETUS BODIES AROUND THE EDGES OF IT LIKE THATā€™S NORMAL. FUCK THE OCEAN.

this is so relevant to my interestsĀ 

It wasnā€™t just the predators. North Carolina was once home to giant ground slothsā€¦

THAT IS A GODDAMNED LEAF-EATING SLOTH.
Weā€™ve got a skeleton of one of these fuckers at the museum downtown, and man, just being NEAR it is unsettling.


DONā€™T FORGET PREHISTORIC WHALES, SOME OF THOSE FUCKERS WERE TERRIFYING
AMBULOCETUSĀ WAS AMPHIBIOUS AND PRETTY BADASS

BASILOSAURUS WAS THIS GIANT REPTILIAN CETACEAN THAT PROBABLY SWAM LIKE A DUMB EEL BECAUSE OF ITS TINY FLUKES BUT THIS FUCKER WAS 60 FEET LONG AND AT THE TOP OF THE MARINE FOOD CHAIN
AND THEN THEREā€™S MY FAVORITE,Ā ZYGOPHYSETER,Ā WHICH WAS THIS HUGE EARLY SPERM WHALE THAT ATE SHARKS AND OTHER WHALES
IT WAS NOTHING BUT TEETH



The reason why the animals in the prehistoric times were so big was because there was much more oxygen in the atmosphere if I recall correctly. Because there was so much oxygen and so few carbon gasses, life on earth was able to grow to terrifying lengths and heights, donā€™t forget how giant the bugs were.


I have never seen so much prime nope in a single post


*Goes on Tumblr at 5am to help me go back to sleep for a bit longer*
*Never sleeps again*


Dammit I was born to late for all the fun: mithsonian smithchan.com/monsters nake
 CHANNELmanstersrake
 02012 SNUSI Networks LL.C. All rights reserved Smithson
legitimatelala:

lokiwtf:

gallizfrey:

anneriawings:

siphersaysstuff:

honey-andrevolution:

sashayed:

silvermoon424:

poppypicklesticks:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

cosmicallycosmopolitan:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

james-winston:

TheĀ Titanoboa, is aĀ 48ft longĀ snake dating from aroundĀ 60-58million years ago. It hadĀ a rib cage 2ft wide, allowing it to eat whole crocodiles, and surrounding the ribcage were muscles so powerful thatĀ it could crush a rhino.Ā Titanoboa was so big it couldnā€™t even spend long amounts of time on land, because the force of gravity acting on it would cause it to suffocate under its own weight.

Iā€™m so glad they arenā€™t around

omg me too. Iā€™m scared enough of 26 ft long anacondas. Iā€™m so happy Megalodons, those giant sharks, arenā€™t alive either

Praise natural selection

I remember watching Walking with Beasts or something similar, or some British tv show about evolution
The subject was something like a 12 foot long water scorpion
I was so startled by its sudden appearance and narration that I yelped: ā€œ12 fucking feet?!?! Ā Iā€™m fucking glad itā€™s extinct!ā€Ā 

Dude, prehistory was home to some fuckingĀ TERRIFYINGĀ creatures. For some reason, everything back then was enormous and scary. Extinction doesnā€™t always have to be a bad thing!
And Poppy, what you saw was an arthropod known asĀ Pterygotus (it was actually featured in Walking With Monsters). Not only was it as big (or maybe even bigger) than your average human, it had a stinger the size of a lightbulb. REALLY glad that bugger isnā€™t around anymore.

Also, Megalodon deserves to be mention again, because just hearing its name makes me want to never be submerged in water ever again.


GOD, I HATE THIS POST. HOW DO WE EVEN KNOW THAT SHIT ISNā€™T STILL AROUND? LURKING? EVOLVING? WE DONā€™T. WE DONā€™T KNOW SHIT ABOUT SHIT DOWN THERE. THE OCEAN IS A PRIMEVAL HELLSCAPE NIGHTMARE AND WE ALL JUST DIP OUR STUPID FRAGILE UNPROTECTED FETUS BODIES AROUND THE EDGES OF IT LIKE THATā€™S NORMAL. FUCK THE OCEAN.

this is so relevant to my interestsĀ 

It wasnā€™t just the predators. North Carolina was once home to giant ground slothsā€¦

THAT IS A GODDAMNED LEAF-EATING SLOTH.
Weā€™ve got a skeleton of one of these fuckers at the museum downtown, and man, just being NEAR it is unsettling.


DONā€™T FORGET PREHISTORIC WHALES, SOME OF THOSE FUCKERS WERE TERRIFYING
AMBULOCETUSĀ WAS AMPHIBIOUS AND PRETTY BADASS

BASILOSAURUS WAS THIS GIANT REPTILIAN CETACEAN THAT PROBABLY SWAM LIKE A DUMB EEL BECAUSE OF ITS TINY FLUKES BUT THIS FUCKER WAS 60 FEET LONG AND AT THE TOP OF THE MARINE FOOD CHAIN
AND THEN THEREā€™S MY FAVORITE,Ā ZYGOPHYSETER,Ā WHICH WAS THIS HUGE EARLY SPERM WHALE THAT ATE SHARKS AND OTHER WHALES
IT WAS NOTHING BUT TEETH



The reason why the animals in the prehistoric times were so big was because there was much more oxygen in the atmosphere if I recall correctly. Because there was so much oxygen and so few carbon gasses, life on earth was able to grow to terrifying lengths and heights, donā€™t forget how giant the bugs were.


I have never seen so much prime nope in a single post


*Goes on Tumblr at 5am to help me go back to sleep for a bit longer*
*Never sleeps again*


Dammit I was born to late for all the fun
        

            
            

                
                
                    legitimatelala:

lokiwtf:

gallizfrey:

anneriawings:

siphersaysstuff:

honey-andrevolution:

sashayed:

silvermoon424:

poppypicklesticks:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

cosmicallycosmopolitan:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

james-winston:

TheĀ Titanoboa, is aĀ 48ft longĀ snake dating from aroundĀ 60-58million years ago. It hadĀ a rib cage 2ft wide, allowing it to eat whole crocodiles, and surrounding the ribcage were muscles so powerful thatĀ it could crush a rhino.Ā Titanoboa was so big it couldnā€™t even spend long amounts of time on land, because the force of gravity acting on it would cause it to suffocate under its own weight.

Iā€™m so glad they arenā€™t around

omg me too. Iā€™m scared enough of 26 ft long anacondas. Iā€™m so happy Megalodons, those giant sharks, arenā€™t alive either

Praise natural selection

I remember watching Walking with Beasts or something similar, or some British tv show about evolution
The subject was something like a 12 foot long water scorpion
I was so startled by its sudden appearance and narration that I yelped: ā€œ12 fucking feet?!?! Ā Iā€™m fucking glad itā€™s extinct!ā€Ā 

Dude, prehistory was home to some fuckingĀ TERRIFYINGĀ creatures. For some reason, everything back then was enormous and scary. Extinction doesnā€™t always have to be a bad thing!
And Poppy, what you saw was an arthropod known asĀ Pterygotus (it was actually featured in Walking With Monsters). Not only was it as big (or maybe even bigger) than your average human, it had a stinger the size of a lightbulb. REALLY glad that bugger isnā€™t around anymore.

Also, Megalodon deserves to be mention again, because just hearing its name makes me want to never be submerged in water ever again.


GOD, I HATE THIS POST. HOW DO WE EVEN KNOW THAT SHIT ISNā€™T STILL AROUND? LURKING? EVOLVING? WE DONā€™T. WE DONā€™T KNOW SHIT ABOUT SHIT DOWN THERE. THE OCEAN IS A PRIMEVAL HELLSCAPE NIGHTMARE AND WE ALL JUST DIP OUR STUPID FRAGILE UNPROTECTED FETUS BODIES AROUND THE EDGES OF IT LIKE THATā€™S NORMAL. FUCK THE OCEAN.

this is so relevant to my interestsĀ 

It wasnā€™t just the predators. North Carolina was once home to giant ground slothsā€¦

THAT IS A GODDAMNED LEAF-EATING SLOTH.
Weā€™ve got a skeleton of one of these fuckers at the museum downtown, and man, just being NEAR it is unsettling.


DONā€™T FORGET PREHISTORIC WHALES, SOME OF THOSE FUCKERS WERE TERRIFYING
AMBULOCETUSĀ WAS AMPHIBIOUS AND PRETTY BADASS

BASILOSAURUS WAS THIS GIANT REPTILIAN CETACEAN THAT PROBABLY SWAM LIKE A DUMB EEL BECAUSE OF ITS TINY FLUKES BUT THIS FUCKER WAS 60 FEET LONG AND AT THE TOP OF THE MARINE FOOD CHAIN
AND THEN THEREā€™S MY FAVORITE,Ā ZYGOPHYSETER,Ā WHICH WAS THIS HUGE EARLY SPERM WHALE THAT ATE SHARKS AND OTHER WHALES
IT WAS NOTHING BUT TEETH



The reason why the animals in the prehistoric times were so big was because there was much more oxygen in the atmosphere if I recall correctly. Because there was so much oxygen and so few carbon gasses, life on earth was able to grow to terrifying lengths and heights, donā€™t forget how giant the bugs were.


I have never seen so much prime nope in a single post


*Goes on Tumblr at 5am to help me go back to sleep for a bit longer*
*Never sleeps again*


Dammit I was born to late for all the fun: mithsonian smithchan.com/monsters nake
 CHANNELmanstersrake
 02012 SNUSI Networks LL.C. All rights reserved Smithson
legitimatelala:

lokiwtf:

gallizfrey:

anneriawings:

siphersaysstuff:

honey-andrevolution:

sashayed:

silvermoon424:

poppypicklesticks:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

cosmicallycosmopolitan:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

james-winston:

TheĀ Titanoboa, is aĀ 48ft longĀ snake dating from aroundĀ 60-58million years ago. It hadĀ a rib cage 2ft wide, allowing it to eat whole crocodiles, and surrounding the ribcage were muscles so powerful thatĀ it could crush a rhino.Ā Titanoboa was so big it couldnā€™t even spend long amounts of time on land, because the force of gravity acting on it would cause it to suffocate under its own weight.

Iā€™m so glad they arenā€™t around

omg me too. Iā€™m scared enough of 26 ft long anacondas. Iā€™m so happy Megalodons, those giant sharks, arenā€™t alive either

Praise natural selection

I remember watching Walking with Beasts or something similar, or some British tv show about evolution
The subject was something like a 12 foot long water scorpion
I was so startled by its sudden appearance and narration that I yelped: ā€œ12 fucking feet?!?! Ā Iā€™m fucking glad itā€™s extinct!ā€Ā 

Dude, prehistory was home to some fuckingĀ TERRIFYINGĀ creatures. For some reason, everything back then was enormous and scary. Extinction doesnā€™t always have to be a bad thing!
And Poppy, what you saw was an arthropod known asĀ Pterygotus (it was actually featured in Walking With Monsters). Not only was it as big (or maybe even bigger) than your average human, it had a stinger the size of a lightbulb. REALLY glad that bugger isnā€™t around anymore.

Also, Megalodon deserves to be mention again, because just hearing its name makes me want to never be submerged in water ever again.


GOD, I HATE THIS POST. HOW DO WE EVEN KNOW THAT SHIT ISNā€™T STILL AROUND? LURKING? EVOLVING? WE DONā€™T. WE DONā€™T KNOW SHIT ABOUT SHIT DOWN THERE. THE OCEAN IS A PRIMEVAL HELLSCAPE NIGHTMARE AND WE ALL JUST DIP OUR STUPID FRAGILE UNPROTECTED FETUS BODIES AROUND THE EDGES OF IT LIKE THATā€™S NORMAL. FUCK THE OCEAN.

this is so relevant to my interestsĀ 

It wasnā€™t just the predators. North Carolina was once home to giant ground slothsā€¦

THAT IS A GODDAMNED LEAF-EATING SLOTH.
Weā€™ve got a skeleton of one of these fuckers at the museum downtown, and man, just being NEAR it is unsettling.


DONā€™T FORGET PREHISTORIC WHALES, SOME OF THOSE FUCKERS WERE TERRIFYING
AMBULOCETUSĀ WAS AMPHIBIOUS AND PRETTY BADASS

BASILOSAURUS WAS THIS GIANT REPTILIAN CETACEAN THAT PROBABLY SWAM LIKE A DUMB EEL BECAUSE OF ITS TINY FLUKES BUT THIS FUCKER WAS 60 FEET LONG AND AT THE TOP OF THE MARINE FOOD CHAIN
AND THEN THEREā€™S MY FAVORITE,Ā ZYGOPHYSETER,Ā WHICH WAS THIS HUGE EARLY SPERM WHALE THAT ATE SHARKS AND OTHER WHALES
IT WAS NOTHING BUT TEETH



The reason why the animals in the prehistoric times were so big was because there was much more oxygen in the atmosphere if I recall correctly. Because there was so much oxygen and so few carbon gasses, life on earth was able to grow to terrifying lengths and heights, donā€™t forget how giant the bugs were.


I have never seen so much prime nope in a single post


*Goes on Tumblr at 5am to help me go back to sleep for a bit longer*
*Never sleeps again*


Dammit I was born to late for all the fun
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save