25+ Best Assertion Memes | 5 Minute Memes, His Memes, About Memes

Anaconda, Dank, and Memes: wikiHoW How to Increase Your Socia Status at School Assert your dominance. going three steps at a time will let other students know you are superior Dominance 100 by iRealretard MORE MEMES

Dominance 100 by iRealretard MORE MEMES

Save

Instagram, Memes, and Lost: INSTAGRAM | @lFACTS.DAILY Bubbles keep your bath water warmer longer. According to the physics, the answer is clear: air is a wonderful insulator, and so a thick layer of air trapped inside soap should keep more heat in the tub for longer. Most of the heat lost during a bath isn’t through the interaction between water surface and air, but through the walls of the tub (cast iron tubs suffer especially). One of the scientists even confirmed the assertion with an experiment. Filling two identical bowls with an identical amount of water, he measured the temperature over time for each, one covered with a layer of bubbles, one without suds. The water with the layer of bubbles lost less heat over time, almost 50 percent less. And because this small scale result should scale up, that means a bubble bath should stay hotter, longer.

According to the physics, the answer is clear: air is a wonderful insulator, and so a thick layer of air trapped inside soap should keep mor...

Save

Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER TheAew JJork Eimes TheAewJjorkTimes FACT CHECK CALIFORNIA TODAY California Today: 100 Million Dead Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires Trump's Misleading Claims About California's Fire Mismanagement' Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif By Thomas Fuller lan. 19, 2018 By Kendra Pierre-Louis This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an infernos on forest management... intensity that California has never seen Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead coming into home areas, starting more fires.".. Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires... author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting the land be logged... overload of vegetation. Unbiased Amer BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT Editorial by Kevin Ryan The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing. But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false. A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’” Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump. In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.” “‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’” The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“ And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management. “President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.” That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year. And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long. Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers. But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president. SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures

BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT Editorial by Kevi...

Save

Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER TheAew JJork Eimes TheAewJjorkTimes FACT CHECK CALIFORNIA TODAY California Today: 100 Million Dead Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires Trump's Misleading Claims About California's Fire Mismanagement' Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif By Thomas Fuller lan. 19, 2018 By Kendra Pierre-Louis This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an infernos on forest management... intensity that California has never seen Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead coming into home areas, starting more fires.".. Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires... author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting the land be logged... overload of vegetation. Unbiased Amer BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT Editorial by Kevin Ryan The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing. But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false. A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’” Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump. In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.” “‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’” The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“ And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management. “President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.” That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year. And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long. Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers. But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president. SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures

BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT Editorial by Kevi...

Save

Bad, Martin, and Memes: "If you're having Pope problems I feel bad for you son, I got 95 theses and the assertion that indulgences are not necessary for Christians to receive all the benefits provided by Christ is one" - Martin Luther CLASSICAL ART MEMES ficebook.com/classicalartmemes

Save

Dank, Marriage, and Memes: MARKIACEYOu NEVER ASK ME WHAT Ou ALWAYS TELL ME WHAT YOu'D LIKE TO DO AND WE DO IT. I DON'T HAVE MUCH AGENCY. IS BLISS 'D HKE TO DO WITH ouR WEEKENDS. WHAT? OK, WHAT WOULD You LKE TO DO THI WEEKEND? WE ARE GOING TO THE CARPET STORE. CAN I WAIT IN THE CAR? 'O HIKE TO GO TO THE FLEA MARKET TO 5HOP FOR RARE HE-MAN FIGURES YES THANK ou When I try to assert myself in my marriage by mibcomix MORE MEMES

When I try to assert myself in my marriage by mibcomix MORE MEMES

Save

Dank, Friends, and Memes: dankmemeking assert your dominance by calling your friends by their student ID number Source: dankmemeking 321.061 notes meirl by Guard1anMeme MORE MEMES

meirl by Guard1anMeme MORE MEMES

Save

America, cnn.com, and Crime: NEW STUDY DEBUNKS NARRATIVE THAT MASS SHOOTINGS DON'T HAPPEN OUSIDE U.S. Victims of Mass Shootings (4 or More Killed) by Country Victims/100k population 0.06 0.06 >=0.15 0.33 >=1 Gray areas had no incidents or data was not available 97% of mass shootings between 1998 and 2012 occurred outside the U.S. Unbiased America HOW A BOTCHED STUDY MISLED THE WORLD ABOUT THE U.S. SHARE OF MASS PUBLIC SHOOTINGS By Kevin Ryan In 2015, President Obama made a claim following a mass shooting that has since become a widely accepted narrative: “I say this every time we’ve got one of these mass shootings; this just doesn’t happen in other countries… We have a pattern now of mass shootings in this country that has no parallel anywhere else in the world.” The White House followed up the assertion by pointing to a then-unpublished paper by criminologist Adam Lankford claiming that the United States had 31% of public mass shooters between 1966 and 2012, despite having less than 5% of the world population. It concluded that our high rate of firearm ownership was to blame. The press ate it up. “Americans make up about 4.4% of the global population but own 42% of the world’s guns. From 1966 to 2012, 31% of the gunmen in mass shootings worldwide were American, according to a study by Adam Lankford, a professor at the University of Alabama.” reported the New York Times. The Washington Post: “American exceptionalism and the ‘exceptionally American’ problem of mass shootings”. Time magazine: “Why the US has 31% of the World’s Mass Shootings”. CNN: “Why the US has the most mass shootings”. The Los Angeles Times - “Why the U.S. is No. 1—in mass shootings”. Similar stories were published in hundreds of outlets around the world. And they’re all wrong. New research indicates that, not only does America not have the most mass shootings, we actually have far fewer as a percent of our population than the rest of the world. The study finds that, despite having 4.6% of the world’s population and 40% of the world’s firearms, just 2.88% of the world’s mass shootings take place here. Researchers used the same criteria that the original paper purported to use: a mass shooting which killed four or more victims in public places such as malls, schools, places of worship, businesses, government buildings, etc., motivated by hate or terror or crime etc. They excluded shootings that resulted from gang or drug violence or were the government sponsored (ie. war). Unlike the original paper, which only used an FBI database and a search of english language websites, the new research used multiple crime databases, Nexis, and media searches for mass shootings, and hired people who spoke Chinese, French, Polish, Russian, Spanish, and other languages to scour international sources. Their findings obliterate the narrative that mass shootings are a uniquely American problem. Mass shootings between 1998 to 2012: • United States: 43 • The rest of the world: 1,448 In other words, just 2.9% of mass shootings happen in America. 97.1% of them happen elsewhere. Some of the countries that have higher rates of mass shootings than America include Finland, Norway, Russia, Israel, Yugoslavia, and Slovakia. 57 in all. 61 countries have more killed per capita in mass shootings than the U.S. And since the paper only looked at up to 2012, it doesn’t include the more recent terror related mass shootings that would likely put France and other European countries on the list. As for why the original paper that claimed 31% of mass shootings happened in the U.S. was so off isn’t known, because, incredibly, its author refuses to share his data with researchers or the media. And yet it’s been the basis of so much uncritical media coverage, and continues to be the widely cited to this day. The new study thoroughly debunks its methods, here: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=269126002097094117099097073097081068122032049015054052117086127094066078121116113101033022034012040098112080068108119121118115111029057079021093027067064066100027053073116123005071023070021087026115070031105064116090004118077022121116117125118103&EXT=pdf SOURCES: http://national.suntimes.com/national-world-news/7/72/2212215/obama-paris-mass-shootings-dont-happen-countries http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/01/study-claiming-us-is-home-one-third-mass-shooters-worldwide-debunked-figure-less-than-3-percent.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/world/americas/mass-shootings-us-international.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/08/27/american-exceptionalism-and-the-exceptionally-american-problem-of-mass-shootings/ http://time.com/4007909/gun-violence-mass-shootings/ https://www.cnn.com/2015/08/27/health/u-s-most-mass-shootings/index.html http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-united-states-mass-shooting-20150824-story.html

Save

Life, School, and Tumblr: wiki How How to Increase Your Social Status at School Assert your dominance. T-posing will let other students know you are superior. selfdeprecatingmemer: n-breezii:Now am cool kid with lot friend This is what I have been doing wrong my whole life

selfdeprecatingmemer: n-breezii:Now am cool kid with lot friend This is what I have been doing wrong my whole life

Save

Children, Family, and Heaven: Peter Pan was an angel that held kid's hands when on their way to heaven (Neverland). That's why they never grew up. All those kids were dead. BOOM CHILDHOOD RUINED perferizado Counter assertion: Peter Pan was a magical creature who led children away from their families. but because he was an immortal he never aged. When he saw the children start to grow up he would kill them, the ones who escaped went on to be pirates. Captain Hook for instance escaped, losing a hand in the process. That's why he pursues him so fervently, Peter Pan took him away from a loving family, stole his childhood and robbed him of his hand. Fuck Peter Pan

Save

School, How To, and Wiki: wiki How How to Increase Your Social Status at School Assert your dominance. T-posing will let other students know you are superior.

Save

Be Like, Lol, and Love: motomenorahkent tumblr Follow rockboci steel-kurn Name a conspiracy theory superior in raw power to "there are no actual forests on Earth" imma need some context on that cause WHAT? steel-kurn torests minuscule form of what trees on Earth can be, basically saplings mesas- not landforms, but petrified ancient tree trunks IIRC the theory goes that all forests on Earth were destroyed ages ago and it takes them ridiculous times to regrow, with those giant mammoth redwood trees just being the oldest ones that have grown the most maxeth evidence 1 This conspiracy theory is absolutely wild and includes the assertion that all rocks are left over remnants of plants/trees from a "silicon era". Although it's obviously not true.. they really have some amazing photos that feed your imagination of a fantasy worid, r've compiled their best do you think giant trees would have proportionally giant branhes or would they just be like furry green spears? LOL trisshawkeye l love how the implication is that the flat tops of mesas were caused by something equally enormous cUTTING THEM DOWN Paul Bunyan Source steel-kun 160,915 notes Ive found my new favorite conspiracy theory and its amazing

Ive found my new favorite conspiracy theory and its amazing

Save

Be Like, Lol, and Love: motomenorahkent tumblr Follow rockboci steel-kurn Name a conspiracy theory superior in raw power to "there are no actual forests on Earth" imma need some context on that cause WHAT? steel-kurn torests minuscule form of what trees on Earth can be, basically saplings mesas- not landforms, but petrified ancient tree trunks IIRC the theory goes that all forests on Earth were destroyed ages ago and it takes them ridiculous times to regrow, with those giant mammoth redwood trees just being the oldest ones that have grown the most maxeth evidence 1 This conspiracy theory is absolutely wild and includes the assertion that all rocks are left over remnants of plants/trees from a "silicon era". Although it's obviously not true.. they really have some amazing photos that feed your imagination of a fantasy worid, r've compiled their best do you think giant trees would have proportionally giant branhes or would they just be like furry green spears? LOL trisshawkeye l love how the implication is that the flat tops of mesas were caused by something equally enormous cUTTING THEM DOWN Paul Bunyan Source steel-kun 160,915 notes Ive found my new favorite conspiracy theory and its amazing

Ive found my new favorite conspiracy theory and its amazing

Save

Save

How To, How, and Whale: How to assert dominance using only whale noises

Save

Arguing, Parents, and School: TWITTER/CRYSTAL RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL Exclusive: Florida Public School Teacher Has A White Nationalist Podcast Dayanna Volitich suggests Muslims be eradicated from the earth, believes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and teaches middle school social studies. By Christopher Mathias, Jenna Amatulli and Rebecca Klein Mar 03, 2018 I Updated 7 hours ago odinsblog: Dayanna Volitich, a 25-year-old social studies teacher at Crystal River Middle School in Florida, has been secretly hosting the white nationalist podcast “Unapologetic” under the pseudonym “Tiana Dalichov” and bragging about teaching her views in a public school, HuffPost has discovered. In her most recent podcast on Feb. 26, a guest railed against diversity in schools, dismissing the idea that “a kid from Nigeria and a kid who came from Sweden are supposed to learn exactly the same” and have the “same IQ.” Volitich enthusiastically agreed with the guest, and went on to argue that “science” has proven that certain races are smarter than others. In the same episode, Volitich boasted about bringing her white nationalist beliefs into the classroom and hiding her ideology from administrators. She said that when parents complained to the school’s principal about how she is injecting political bias into the classroom, Volitich lied to the principal and said it was not true. “She believed me and backed off,” she said. Volitich also agreed with her guest’s assertion that more white supremacists need to infiltrate public schools and become teachers. “They don’t have to be vocal about their views, but get in there!” her guest said. “Be more covert and just start taking over those places.” “Right,” Volitich said. “I’m absolutely one of them.” (continue reading)

odinsblog: Dayanna Volitich, a 25-year-old social studies teacher at Crystal River Middle School in Florida, has been secretly hosting the w...

Save

Super Bowl, Tom Brady, and Bowl: TELL HIMO Tom Brady ASSERT YOURSELF THATSMY SUPER BOWL GREAT NOW LET IMHAVEIT YOU CAN HAVEIT Say, thanks!

Say, thanks!

Save

Save

Life, School, and Shit: Seitan @ohEmmeG I still assert 7th grade is the worst any human will be in their life Stereo Williams @StereoTheSecond People talk about how brutal high school can be, but it's middle school that's really orn some Lord of the Flies type shit 12/11/17, 4:43 PM 4,787 Retweets 11K Likes Name a piece of shit bigger than a middle schooler

Save

Desperate, Dick Pics, and Friends: eo0 Virgin 3:08 pm Hope YOU MATCHED WITH HOPE ON 1/11/17 Can't think of a pickup line but fingers crossed my failed modelling career will be enough to entice you for a few dates before we go our separate ways and forget about each other Yesterday 7:37 am You had me at failed modelling career. If drinks are involved in those dates I'm in We can awkwardly unmatch afterwards and pretend we're strangers when we match again Are you in? Yesterday 10:04 amm Drinks are a given, we'll need them to get past the awkward comment I make about us both having facial moles I'm in, but only if you make me pay and tell your friends you're just doing it for a free meal Yesterday 11:33 am I prefer the term 'beauty mark', you can buy me a drink while you think of a horrible pickup line about it Of course, but only if you tell all your friends I'm at least a 9 when you put a picture of me in the group chat Yesterday 12:53 pm Already done. This is all panning out perfectly, shall we say the 11th of November? Of course you have to flake on the first date to assert your superiority, and I'll let it slide cause I'm desperate to find somebody that will impress my mum Yesterday 5:52 pm That sounds perfect. I'll use my excuse of exams to reschedule last minute so I can start the psychological games And I'll let you use me to impress your mum only because it shows how respectful you are to her and women Yesterday 6:17 pm You're the best, I'd ask for your phone number to arrange this but I can't hold conversations so add me on snap instead - As you know I respect women so of course I won't ask for nudes or send unsolicited dick pics Sent Yesterday 9:46 pm Perfect, we'll arrange this through strategically taken selfies Okay that made me laugh. We'll discuss the nudes arrangement over drinks thern GIF lype a message Send She wanted a name pun

Save

Drunk, Party, and Irl: when ur drunk at the party and the cutie you've been crushing on for the past couple of months starts making out with some rando in their 30's and even though u know that u have no right to be upset over unreciprocated infatuation, u still begin to deeply dissociate, because in having the realization that ur emotional reaction is both immature and unfair towards the person that u claim to have affection towards, u are sent into an infinitely descending pit of upsetting self-reflection, revealing an abyss of divide between the person you are and the person you believe and assert yourself to be me irl

me irl

Save

Club, Run, and Tumblr: NUDESLEEPERS.,WHATIS YOUR PLAN DEFENSE OF IFSOMEONE BREAKS IN? MEMEFUL COM laughoutloud-club: Run at them naked. Assert dominance.

laughoutloud-club: Run at them naked. Assert dominance.

Save

Memes, SpongeBob, and Assertive: Me trying to be assertive TELL HIMOFF,SPONGEBOB! ASSERT YOURSELF! THAT S MYICE CREAM CONE GREAT !:NOW LET : IMİHAVEIT! YOU CANHAVEIT! WeKnow Memes Hey, Thanks!

Hey, Thanks!

Save

Dogs, Sex, and Tumblr: Hot Doll 4 Like 1 Pin it Via: oddee Are you constantly having to pry your promiscuous pooch off the legs of anyone within a few mile radius of your home? Protect your legs (and your dignity) from hump attacks by getting your pooch a Hotdoll. This sex doll for dogs is shaped like another dog and allows your randy pet to go to town as much as his little heart desires while giving your pillows a much-needed rest. <a href="http://goat-yells-at-everything.tumblr.com/post/162493956896/libertarirynn-while-yall-were-all-starting" class="tumblr_blog">goat-yells-at-everything</a>: <blockquote><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/162492323484/while-yall-were-all-starting-discourse-about-the" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:<blockquote>While y'all were all starting discourse about the sex robots somebody was developing a sex doll for dogs.</blockquote> ...SPAY.OR.NEUTER.YOUR.DOGS!</blockquote> I’m pretty sure that doesn’t necessarily stop the humping though. It’s more of an assertion tactic. Even bitches do it.

Save

Bailey Jay, News, and Control: On the evening of 2 May, 1986, six days after a massive explosion devastated the Lenin nuclear power station at Chernobyl, the damaged reactor was sinking and burning through its strengthened concrete floor and was in danger of collapsing into rooms flooded with water. This would trigger a nuclear explosion that would spread radiation across half of Europe and kill tens of millions. Later Soviet scientists suggested that a possible area of contamination could reach 200 km2 (77.2 mi), modern specialists are inclined to assert that it would take about 500 ousand years to eliminate the consequences of radioactive contamination from a potential explosion. Three men volunteered to dive into what they knew were lethally radioactive waters to open a release valve to prevent this from happening. They were the shift supervisor Boris Baranov, senior engineer of the control unit of the turbine shop two Valeri Bespalov and Senior Mechanical Engineer of the reactor department Alexey Ananenko. They are on the photo below: Ananenko and Bespalov Baranov is on the separate photo. pec yoicecmba oup of three men were and swim through the flooded chambers of the basement to the gate valve, twist it open and so allow the trapped water to drain out. It was a "suicide mission". Radiation was at lethal levels A gr r red to suit up in scuba-gear Il three returned to the surface suffering severe radiation poisoning, but were pleased to see their colleagues jump with joy at the news that the valves were nowo ey all died within days and were buried in lead coffins. The monuments to "Those who saved the world" was created in Chernobyl. Those who saved the world

Those who saved the world

Save

Children, Family, and Heaven: Peter Pan was an angel that held kid's hands when on their way to heaven (Neverland). That's why they never grew up. All those kids were dead. BOOM CHILDHOOD RUINED w perferizado Counter assertion: Peter Pan was a magical creature who led children away from their families. but because he was an immortal he never aged. When he saw the children start to grow up he would kill them, the ones who escaped went on to be pirates. Captain Hook for instance escaped, losing a hand in the process. That's why he pursues him so fervently, Peter Pan took him away from a loving family, stole his childhood and robbed him of his hand Fabulous Superheroes.

Fabulous Superheroes.

Save

Black Lives Matter, Black Lives Matter, and Children: Podcast Brothers @PODCASTBROTHERS ' Follow They said this is lil Wavne after his #blacklivesmatter rant AAAA diarrheaworldstarhiphop: libfas: politicaltea: nonviolentanarchistphilosophy: politicaltea: cheshireinthemiddle: twosideman: art-angelsz: bellygangstaboo: I think he was on some heavy drugs during that interview He wasn’t. He just has a different opinion. Respect it. Who is the Racist one now ? . I don’t know much about this, but I assume Lil Wayne brought attention to the rampant homicide and crime rates in black neighborhoods of black people by black people to combat the “police are the most dangerous things to our children” talk and now people are calling him white and a “coon” like they do with us. As usual, they erase a person’s identity for the sake of an opinion. Stay classy, BLM. Lil Wayne basically said he had never personally experienced racism. But when he shot himself in the chest with his mom’s gun there was a white cop who drove him to the hospital because he knew they couldn’t wait on the ambulance. That the fact most of his fans are white is evidence that whites aren’t innately racist. Naturally, black lives matter pounced on the dissenter. Here’s the video if anyone is interested “I don’t know what racism is.” The second video is him refusing to back off the comments. Is he pandering to his white fan base? Maybe a little. But do I believe him? Yeah, I do. I feel like he’s genuine when he talks about this and it’s important to note that people dismissing his opinion because he might be “high”. Regardless if he’s high, or not, he has an opinion just as everyone else. It felt like they were trying to dig to just get something out of him that clearly wasn’t there. Trying to formulate the questions differently and nudging him to agree on this and that, broadening the questions to “So you never experienced.. any offensive behavior from any other color.. or..?”. Why is the white guy trying to get the black guy to agree that he did experience racism when he says he didn’t? How is it not racist or demeaning that the white guy is trying to ‘educate’ the black guy on what he’s experiencing? It’s clear they sat him down with the goal of having Wayne push the narrative and they were upset they didn’t really get what they wanted. that first video is important, particularly for how Shannon Sharpe responds to Wayne. You can tell Sharpe disagrees with wayne’s assertion that there is no racism, but he truly respects wayne’s opinion because, as wayne says, he personally has not experienced anything he can discern as racism, so thus he can not comment on it. Considering that Wayne is from the 17th ward of New Orleans, and his experience is shaped by that. Sharpe commends him for being straight forward and not embellishing and making up something to add to the narrative, and wayne’s honesty on the subject should similarly be respected.Not everyone may feel they experienced racism if they are from a minority background, and if they feel they can’t speak on the issue because of it, then so be it.Similarly, we shouldn’t take Wayne’s opinion that there is no racism and apply that to the lived experience of all minorities simply because he was saved by a white cop and performed infront of a white crowd, because his experience does not speak for others.

diarrheaworldstarhiphop: libfas: politicaltea: nonviolentanarchistphilosophy: politicaltea: cheshireinthemiddle: twosideman: art-ange...

Save

Children, Family, and Heaven: Peter Pan was an angel that held kid's hands when on their way to heaven (Neverland). That's why they never grew up. All those kids were dead. BOOM CHILDHOOD RUINED perferizado Counter assertion Peter Pan was a magical creature who led children away from their families. but because he was an immortal he never aged. When he saw the children start to grow up he would kill them, the ones who escaped went on to be pirates. Captain Hook for instance escaped, losing a hand in the process. That's why he pursues him so fervently, Peter Pan took him away from a loving family, stole his childhood and robbed him of his hand Peter Pan’s Dark Story.

Peter Pan’s Dark Story.

Save

Facebook, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and True: If you want to assert a truth, first make sure it's not just an opinion that you desperately want to be true. (0 Neil degrasse Tyson facebook.com/AtheistCosmos great-quotes: “If you want to assert a truth…” – Neil deGrasse Tyson [615x342]MORE COOL QUOTES!

great-quotes: “If you want to assert a truth…” – Neil deGrasse Tyson [615x342]MORE COOL QUOTES!

Save

Omg, Tumblr, and Camera: *makes eye contact with security cameras to assert dominance* Source: regkvjlnsaerkgjnaerkjgnaer to every security camera everomg-humor.tumblr.com

to every security camera everomg-humor.tumblr.com

Save

Save

Tumblr, Aesthetic, and Blog: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH <a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/129614904182/anarchyinblack-redbloodedamerica-i-found" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>: <blockquote><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://anarchyinblack.tumblr.com/post/129611829063">anarchyinblack</a>: <blockquote> <a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/129587486405">redbloodedamerica</a>: <blockquote> I found this embarrassing piece of propaganda artwork on imgur today. I couldn’t help but notice that it reminded me of other art I’ve seen in the past: <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="347" data-orig-width="500"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/33979b029f026b169c4358ab7018df9f/tumblr_inline_nv14sqrtbB1r1jtxd_540.jpg" data-orig-height="347" data-orig-width="500"/></figure><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="361" data-orig-width="500"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/3fce532109d357014263e7378e20a2be/tumblr_inline_nv14szRA341r1jtxd_540.jpg" data-orig-height="361" data-orig-width="500"/></figure> The more things change, the more they stay the same. </blockquote> Democrats are not new to overt communist imagery. <figure data-orig-width="506" data-orig-height="322" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="506" data-orig-height="322" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/b82fb9b670af36f9362bdcb78e28d391/tumblr_inline_nv24091vT21qcebhq_540.jpg"/></figure><figure data-orig-width="350" data-orig-height="458" class="tmblr-full"><img data-orig-width="350" data-orig-height="458" src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/760059c4e9c74952e7fdfc0a18aba27f/tumblr_inline_nv23s4fXLu1qcebhq_540.jpg"/></figure>I sometimes wonder if they don’t even do it on purpose, and it’s just a natural aesthetic inclination that’s incidental with being easily indoctrinated by leftist ideology. </blockquote> I almost threw that Hillary one up there for good measure. I believe you are correct in your assertion that it is a natural inclination of the left to be attracted to these designs. It matches their ideology of worshiping a cult of personality. That and these designs are easy to screen print.</blockquote>

redbloodedamerica: anarchyinblack: redbloodedamerica: I found this embarrassing piece of propaganda artwork on imgur today. I couldn’t h...

Save

Bad, Feminism, and Huh: WE HAVEA NOTRUE SCOTSMAN FOUL PLAYER ATTEMPTED TOCOUNTER REFUTATION WITH RHETORIC atlip.com <a href="http://ineedfeminismbecuz.tumblr.com/post/124366255960/but-those-arent-real-feminists-yes-yes-they" class="tumblr_blog">ineedfeminismbecuz</a>: <blockquote>“But those aren’t real feminists!” Yes. Yes they are. Allow me to present the dictionary definition that is so often spoken of on tumblr: fem·i·nism ˈfeməˌnizəm/ noun the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men. Huh. That’s weird. It looks like the definition is not “literally equality”. I’ve been lied to! But I digress. Anyway, if that’s what defines a feminist, then anyone who advocates women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men is a feminist. That’s it. That’s the only requirement. Being concerned for men’s rights really isn’t a necessity for being a feminist. You just need to seek equality with men, whatever that would mean for you. Now I have a few problems with that, the biggest one being the fact that acknowledging men’s needs or fighting for men’s rights simply is not included in the definition of feminism. In fact, seeking equality with men assumes that men have all the rights they could ever possibly want and thus need no one to fight for them. Feminism does not, at its core, fight for men. Now if only there was some sort of ideology that fought for all genders equally. Something that fought for people in general rather than needing to specify gender and subsequently make another gender seem as though they had all their rights taken care of… Something like… Hmmmm… Oh! Egalitarianism noun Advocacy of the equality of all people, especially in political, social, and economic life. There we go. There is a word for “literally equality” and it’s egalitarianism, not feminism. The definition of egalitarianism necessitates fighting for all rights, the definition of feminism does not. Now you may be saying “Hey! Feminists fight for men’s rights too!” And you’d be right, at least partially. Some people who identify as feminists do fight for men’s rights, but that is the perfect segue into my discussion about the No true Scotsman fallacy. From a Wikipedia summary: “No true Scotsman is an informal fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion. When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim (“no Scotsman would do such a thing”), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule (“no true Scotsman would do such a thing”).” This is why you can’t just shrug your shoulders at “crazy feminists” who don’t fight for men’s rights by saying they aren’t “real feminists” or “true” feminists if you will. As long as they fulfill that rather short list of requirements listed above, they are true feminists, even if you don’t like or agree with them. Fighting for men’s rights simply isn’t part of the necessary equation. Meanwhile, egalitarianism *is* by definition the advocacy of rights for all. Do you not like the term egalitarianism because somebody who called themselves egalitarian wasn’t fair to women? Well it can be truly said that they were not true egalitarians, since they don’t adhere to the very definition of the word which does, unlike feminism, require equal advocacy. So when somebody tells you they’re an egalitarian rather than a feminist, don’t act so shocked and offended and try to shoot them down by saying that feminism “literally means equality” and that the people they’ve had bad experiences with “aren’t real feminists” because they are, whether you like it or not.</blockquote>

ineedfeminismbecuz: “But those aren’t real feminists!” Yes. Yes they are. Allow me to present the dictionary definition that is so often s...

Save

Bad, Feminism, and Huh: WE HAVEA NOTRUE SCOTSMAN FOUL PLAYER ATTEMPTED TOCOUNTER REFUTATION WITH RHETORIC atlip.com <a href="http://ineedfeminismbecuz.tumblr.com/post/124366255960/but-those-arent-real-feminists-yes-yes-they" class="tumblr_blog">ineedfeminismbecuz</a>: <blockquote>“But those aren’t real feminists!” Yes. Yes they are. Allow me to present the dictionary definition that is so often spoken of on tumblr: fem·i·nism ˈfeməˌnizəm/ noun the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men. Huh. That’s weird. It looks like the definition is not “literally equality”. I’ve been lied to! But I digress. Anyway, if that’s what defines a feminist, then anyone who advocates women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men is a feminist. That’s it. That’s the only requirement. Being concerned for men’s rights really isn’t a necessity for being a feminist. You just need to seek equality with men, whatever that would mean for you. Now I have a few problems with that, the biggest one being the fact that acknowledging men’s needs or fighting for men’s rights simply is not included in the definition of feminism. In fact, seeking equality with men assumes that men have all the rights they could ever possibly want and thus need no one to fight for them. Feminism does not, at its core, fight for men. Now if only there was some sort of ideology that fought for all genders equally. Something that fought for people in general rather than needing to specify gender and subsequently make another gender seem as though they had all their rights taken care of… Something like… Hmmmm… Oh! Egalitarianism noun Advocacy of the equality of all people, especially in political, social, and economic life. There we go. There is a word for “literally equality” and it’s egalitarianism, not feminism. The definition of egalitarianism necessitates fighting for all rights, the definition of feminism does not. Now you may be saying “Hey! Feminists fight for men’s rights too!” And you’d be right, at least partially. Some people who identify as feminists do fight for men’s rights, but that is the perfect segue into my discussion about the No true Scotsman fallacy. From a Wikipedia summary: “No true Scotsman is an informal fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion. When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim (“no Scotsman would do such a thing”), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule (“no true Scotsman would do such a thing”).” This is why you can’t just shrug your shoulders at “crazy feminists” who don’t fight for men’s rights by saying they aren’t “real feminists” or “true” feminists if you will. As long as they fulfill that rather short list of requirements listed above, they are true feminists, even if you don’t like or agree with them. Fighting for men’s rights simply isn’t part of the necessary equation. Meanwhile, egalitarianism *is* by definition the advocacy of rights for all. Do you not like the term egalitarianism because somebody who called themselves egalitarian wasn’t fair to women? Well it can be truly said that they were not true egalitarians, since they don’t adhere to the very definition of the word which does, unlike feminism, require equal advocacy. So when somebody tells you they’re an egalitarian rather than a feminist, don’t act so shocked and offended and try to shoot them down by saying that feminism “literally means equality” and that the people they’ve had bad experiences with “aren’t real feminists” because they are, whether you like it or not.</blockquote>

ineedfeminismbecuz: “But those aren’t real feminists!” Yes. Yes they are. Allow me to present the dictionary definition that is so often s...

Save

America, Ass, and Confused: and forget to focus on our journey Caitlyn Cannon I need feminism because I intend on marrying rich and I can't do that if my wife and I are making .75 cent for every dollar a man makes." pos <a href="http://prolifefemale.tumblr.com/post/120637855733/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">prolifefemale</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120637234809/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120637029739/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120636836054/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120636051884/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>:<blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120621125644/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black-my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120069782599/my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote>MY JAW DROPPED</blockquote> At how terribly confused she is? Or how she said “.75 cent”?</blockquote> Oh god, a typo! SHE’S OBVIOUSLY A FUCKING RETARD. Right <a href="http://tmblr.co/mZHrjydhp9oUbxMGBDJA8rw">proudblackconservative</a>?! Also she’s obviously not confused, she’s a fucking genius. This quote is brilliant.</blockquote> I’m literally laughing out loud right now. You think this quote is brilliant? Despite its blatant statement of lies? The typo is isn’t what made the comment stupid, it’s the assertion that women get paid .75 cents (Which FYI would mean .75 of a cent, when I’m sure she means $.75 on the dollar, so the real typo here is a complete miscommunication of the number she wants to convey and she just graduated high school I would hope she understood how decimals work by now). And besides all that, the wage gap has been debunked countless times. She just quoted a whole bunch of often repeated bullshit and now she’s getting called “brilliant” by dummies on tumblr who don’t bother to research anything.</blockquote> Yeah okay Sweetie ;) The wage gap is a fact for every industry in America. That’s why so many people care about solving it and closing that gap. So try pulling your head out of your ass.</blockquote> *sigh* I know it’s probably like talking to a wall at this point, but I’ll give it one more try:<a href="http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/">http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/</a>And that is TIME Magazine, not some conservative media.</blockquote> <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-yearly-reminder-that-the-gender-wage-gap-is-due-to-choice-not-discrimination/article/2563010">http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-yearly-reminder-that-the-gender-wage-gap-is-due-to-choice-not-discrimination/article/2563010</a> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/">http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/</a> <a href="http://blog.independent.org/2015/04/07/the-gender-wage-gap-a-myth-that-just-wont-die/">http://blog.independent.org/2015/04/07/the-gender-wage-gap-a-myth-that-just-wont-die/</a><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/">http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/</a> <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-77-cent-exaggeration/">http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-77-cent-exaggeration/</a> <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html">http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2013/08/gender_pay_gap_the_familiar_line_that_women_make_77_cents_to_every_man_s.html</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html</a> Seriously, it’s like that person didn’t even try. </blockquote> Here’s some more links for you, <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/m62GcQYi76aVSgjP7PT8V4Q">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>, or does Jesus still have to come down so you can stop being delusional?

Save

America, Ass, and Confused: and forget to focus on our journey Caitlyn Cannon I need feminism because I intend on marrying rich and I can't do that if my wife and I are making .75 cent for every dollar a man makes." pos <a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120637572089/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120637234809/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120637029739/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120636836054/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120636051884/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>:<blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120621125644/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black-my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120069782599/my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote>MY JAW DROPPED</blockquote> At how terribly confused she is? Or how she said “.75 cent”?</blockquote> Oh god, a typo! SHE’S OBVIOUSLY A FUCKING RETARD. Right <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mZHrjydhp9oUbxMGBDJA8rw">proudblackconservative</a>?! Also she’s obviously not confused, she’s a fucking genius. This quote is brilliant.</blockquote> I’m literally laughing out loud right now. You think this quote is brilliant? Despite its blatant statement of lies? The typo is isn’t what made the comment stupid, it’s the assertion that women get paid .75 cents (Which FYI would mean .75 of a cent, when I’m sure she means $.75 on the dollar, so the real typo here is a complete miscommunication of the number she wants to convey and she just graduated high school I would hope she understood how decimals work by now). And besides all that, the wage gap has been debunked countless times. She just quoted a whole bunch of often repeated bullshit and now she’s getting called “brilliant” by dummies on tumblr who don’t bother to research anything.</blockquote> Yeah okay Sweetie ;) The wage gap is a fact for every industry in America. That’s why so many people care about solving it and closing that gap. So try pulling your head out of your ass.</blockquote> *sigh* I know it’s probably like talking to a wall at this point, but I’ll give it one more try:<a href="http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/">http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/</a>And that is TIME Magazine, not some conservative media.</blockquote> Right of course because of this one article it means it’s not a problem at all and EVERY SINGLE man and woman get paid the same for doing the same job. There are articles debunking Christianity, do you believe those too?</blockquote> First of all, you can’t “debunk” a faith system. Secondly, I could dig up a dozen more articles if I thought it would make a difference. Why don’t you try to prove your claim?

Save

America, Ass, and Confused: and forget to focus on our journey Caitlyn Cannon I need feminism because I intend on marrying rich and I can't do that if my wife and I are making .75 cent for every dollar a man makes." pos <a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120637029739/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120636836054/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120636051884/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>:<blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120621125644/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black-my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120069782599/my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote>MY JAW DROPPED</blockquote> At how terribly confused she is? Or how she said “.75 cent”?</blockquote> Oh god, a typo! SHE’S OBVIOUSLY A FUCKING RETARD. Right <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mZHrjydhp9oUbxMGBDJA8rw">proudblackconservative</a>?! Also she’s obviously not confused, she’s a fucking genius. This quote is brilliant.</blockquote> I’m literally laughing out loud right now. You think this quote is brilliant? Despite its blatant statement of lies? The typo is isn’t what made the comment stupid, it’s the assertion that women get paid .75 cents (Which FYI would mean .75 of a cent, when I’m sure she means $.75 on the dollar, so the real typo here is a complete miscommunication of the number she wants to convey and she just graduated high school I would hope she understood how decimals work by now). And besides all that, the wage gap has been debunked countless times. She just quoted a whole bunch of often repeated bullshit and now she’s getting called “brilliant” by dummies on tumblr who don’t bother to research anything.</blockquote> Yeah okay Sweetie ;) The wage gap is a fact for every industry in America. That’s why so many people care about solving it and closing that gap. So try pulling your head out of your ass.</blockquote> *sigh* I know it’s probably like talking to a wall at this point, but I’ll give it one more try:<a href="http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/">http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/</a>And that is TIME Magazine, not some conservative media.

Save

Confused, Feminism, and Fucking: and forget to focus on our journey Caitlyn Cannon I need feminism because I intend on marrying rich and I can't do that if my wife and I are making .75 cent for every dollar a man makes." pos <a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120636051884/proudblackconservative" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>:<blockquote><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/120621125644/zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black-my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>: <blockquote><a href="http://zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black.tumblr.com/post/120069782599/my-jaw-dropped" class="tumblr_blog">zoe-sarcastic-dressed-in-black</a>: <blockquote>MY JAW DROPPED</blockquote> At how terribly confused she is? Or how she said “.75 cent”?</blockquote> Oh god, a typo! SHE’S OBVIOUSLY A FUCKING RETARD. Right <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mZHrjydhp9oUbxMGBDJA8rw">proudblackconservative</a>?! Also she’s obviously not confused, she’s a fucking genius. This quote is brilliant.</blockquote> I’m literally laughing out loud right now. You think this quote is brilliant? Despite its blatant statement of lies? The typo is isn’t what made the comment stupid, it’s the assertion that women get paid .75 cents (Which FYI would mean .75 of a cent, when I’m sure she means $.75 on the dollar, so the real typo here is a complete miscommunication of the number she wants to convey and she just graduated high school I would hope she understood how decimals work by now). And besides all that, the wage gap has been debunked countless times. She just quoted a whole bunch of often repeated bullshit and now she’s getting called “brilliant” by dummies on tumblr who don’t bother to research anything.

Save

🙅‍♂️ No Meme

🌌 Star Wars Memes

💥 Naruto Memes

🏈 Tom Brady Memes

🎣 Fishing Meme

⛹🏽‍♂️ Nick Young Meme

Assertion Memes

Assertion Memes

5 Minute Memes

His Memes

About Memes

With Memes

Thats Memes

About To Memes

The Memes

Love Is Memes

Last Memes

Rly Memes

🔥 Popular | Latest