🔥 Popular | Latest

Advice, Ariel, and Head: ooo AT&T 1:55 PM mobile.twitter.com Open in app Sign up Log in shon faye Ф @shonfaye one of the cutest/saddest things I ever did was write out the legal ways Ariel could have annulled her contract with Ursula The Sea Witch into a contract with Ursula as a minor the contract is voidable at any time- after being unsuccessful in winning the heart of Prince Eric she could have voided the contract and walked (swam) away with her voice 2. Given that Ariel's voice is given as consideration for her legs, Ursula's condition that, if she does not kiss Eric in 3 days she must also give her soul as penalty is, arguably, onerous and unreasonable - like the maritime equivalent of PPl Insurance or overdraft charges. Ariel may be able to sever that clause of the contract or have recourse to the appropriate ombudsman. Even if said duty, express or implied, does not arise and Ariel remains in breach of contract, she and Triton would be liable only in damages-though query any ascertainable head of loss to Ursula anyway. Perhaps merely the funds required to make her potion? Ursula has no right to specific performance of her contract because this is an equitable remedy and the equitable maxim "he who comes to equity shall come with clean hands" applies-Ursula's hands are dirty, she has been manifestly dishonest. No court in the sea would grant her this remedy 3. Depending on the common law of the sea it, it may be that Ursula has a contractual duty to act in good faith- by deliberately obstructing Ariel's ability to perform agents to capsize her boat just as she is about kiss Eric and by becoming Vanessa and enchanting the 4. The sea seems to be an absolute monarchy in which all three constitutional branches reside in the Crown, therefore Triton has absolute power to declare the contract void ab initio on the grounds of public policy or to pass primary legislation retrospectively voiding it. her obligations by means of sending 479 People talking 000 AT&T 1:53 PM mobile.twitter.com 1. Ariel, at 16, is a minor and while she can enter into a contract with Ursula as a minor the contract is voidable at any time- after being unsuccessful in winning the heart of Prince Eric she could have voided the contract and 'walked' (swam) away with her voice. 2. Given that Ariel's voice is given as consideration for her legs, Ursula's condition that, if she does not kiss Eric in 3 days she must also give her soul as penalty is, arguably, onerous and unreasonable like the maritime equivalent of PPI Insurance or overdraft charges. Ariel may be able to sever that clause of the contract or have recourse to the appropriate ombudsman. 3. Depending on the common law of the sea it, it may be that Ursula has a contractual duty to act in good faith - by deliberately obstructing Ariel's ability to perform her obligations by means of sending agents to capsize her boat just as she is about kiss Eric and by becoming Vanessa and enchanting the Prince into a marriage under magical duress, Ursula has breached this duty. 8,576 ·14.9K 479 People talking 1:54 PM mobile.twitter.com & Share Even if said duty, express or implied, does not arise and Ariel remains in breach of contract, she and Triton would be liable only in damages-though query any ascertainable head of loss to Ursula anyway. Perhaps merely the funds required to make her potion? Ursula has no right to specific performance of her contract because this is an equitable remedy and the equitable maxim "he who comes to equity shall come with clean hands" applies -Ursula's hands are dirty, she has been manifestly dishonest. No court in the sea would grant her this remedy 4. The sea seems to be an absolute monarchy in which all three constitutional branches reside in the Crown, therefore Triton has absolute power to declare the contract void ab initio on the grounds of public policy or to pass primary legislation retrospectively voiding it. ALWAYS GET INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE.
Save