Who's going to talk for him now that Scalia is gone?
🔥 Popular | Latest
femestella:
Since her days testifying for Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings, Anita Hill has become a fierce advocate for sexual assault survivors.
The professor recently gave the commencement speech at Wellesley College and discussed how sexual assault deniers enable men to keep doing what they’re doing.
Read it here
: Anita Hill On Taking Down Sexual
Assaulters: They May Be Loud But We're
Louder
MOST READ
Leonardo DiCaprio's Dating Habits Are Gros
People Qut-And For Good Reason
'Good Girls: Loving Beth and Rio's Relations
Makes Me Feel Like a Bad Feminist
5 Women on What It's Like to Be Raped by
Boyfriend
Reconciling My Love of Drake With His
Problematic History With Underage Girls
When They See Us: Everything You Need t
Know About the Central Park Five
femestella:
Since her days testifying for Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings, Anita Hill has become a fierce advocate for sexual assault survivors.
The professor recently gave the commencement speech at Wellesley College and discussed how sexual assault deniers enable men to keep doing what they’re doing.
Read it here
![femestella:
Since her days testifying for Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings, Anita Hill has become a fierce advocate for sexual assault survivors.
The professor recently gave the commencement speech at Wellesley College and discussed how sexual assault deniers enable men to keep doing what they’re doing.
Read it here
: Anita Hill On Taking Down Sexual
Assaulters: They May Be Loud But We're
Louder
MOST READ
Leonardo DiCaprio's Dating Habits Are Gros
People Qut-And For Good Reason
'Good Girls: Loving Beth and Rio's Relations
Makes Me Feel Like a Bad Feminist
5 Women on What It's Like to Be Raped by
Boyfriend
Reconciling My Love of Drake With His
Problematic History With Underage Girls
When They See Us: Everything You Need t
Know About the Central Park Five
femestella:
Since her days testifying for Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings, Anita Hill has become a fierce advocate for sexual assault survivors.
The professor recently gave the commencement speech at Wellesley College and discussed how sexual assault deniers enable men to keep doing what they’re doing.
Read it here]()
femestella: Since her days testifying for Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearings, Anita Hill has become a fierce advocate for sexual assa...
In a rare public appearance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he’s exhausted with how everyone seems to consider themselves a victim these days.: fAt some
point we're
going to be
fatigued with
everybody
being a
victim.”
-Justice
Clarence Ihomas
FOX
NEWS
In a rare public appearance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he’s exhausted with how everyone seems to consider themselves a victim these days.
![In a rare public appearance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he’s exhausted with how everyone seems to consider themselves a victim these days.: fAt some
point we're
going to be
fatigued with
everybody
being a
victim.”
-Justice
Clarence Ihomas
FOX
NEWS
In a rare public appearance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he’s exhausted with how everyone seems to consider themselves a victim these days.]()
In a rare public appearance, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he’s exhausted with how everyone seems to consider themselves a v...
![ATTENTION GUN OWNERS! 2ND AMENDMENT UNDER ATTACK. READ MORE... Cold Dead Hands
Yes my fellow Patriots, you read that correctly. They agreed that any person concealing a handgun outside the home, must show “good reason” to do so before they can acquire a state license to conceal.
They concluded with; “The protection of the Second Amendment - whatever the scope of that protection may be - simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public.”
They have also declined to say whether the Constitution protects the right to openly carry a firearm in public, stating that the question was not an issue in this particular case.
Gun owners in two California counties are now challenging the requirement of showing “good cause” as will be defined by local county sheriffs, before they can get a concealed carry permit.
It has been stated that the justices took the time to trace the rights of gun ownership from medieval England to the founding of the United States through the Civil War and found that local laws almost universally prohibited carrying concealed firearms in public. Of course this is an absolutely ludicrous statement, considering they call themselves scholars.
Quoting an antiquated and since overruled U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1897 that states; “the right of the people to bear arms is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons.”
The appeals court stated that it used typical U.S. Supreme Court methods of looking to our history to resolve gun rights issues, although I believe the history they used was taken out of context.
They stated; “ Because the Second Amendment does not protect in any degree the right to carry concealed firearms in public, any prohibition or restriction a state may choose to impose on concealed carry - including the requirement to “good cause” however defined - is necessary allowed by the Amendment.”
Of course there many states that have similar restrictions on concealed carry, and as seen by Supreme Court ruling those lower courts are divided as to whether this violates the Second Amendment. In many articles supporting the decision, they refer back to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2008 Heller vs DC, stating that this was the last time they have heard a Second Amendment case.
What these slanted, media-hype articles fail to include is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC district ruled that; “the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms” also stating that the right was “premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad).”
The U.S. Court of Appeals DC district furthermore stated; “that though the right to bear arms also helped preserve the citizen militia, the activities [the Amendment] protects are not limited to militia service, nor is an individual’s enjoyment of the right contingent upon his or her continued or intermittent enrollment in the militia.” The court determined that handguns are “Arms” and concluded that as thus, they may not be banned by the District of Columbia.
In DC v Heller, the Supreme Court upheld the U.S. Court of Appeals DC decision, and our late Justice Antonin Scalia handed down their prolific opinion which was supported by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. In the home or not, We the People have a right to protect ourselves, period.: THE SUPREME COURT WILL NOW
RULE ON THE THE RIGHT TO CARRY A
GUN THAT WAS THE GOAL OF THE
ANTI-GUN COURT RULING TODAY
ALLOW HILLARY
IF YOU
CLINTON TO BE ELECTED BECAUSE OF
YOUR PETTY DIFFERENCES WITH
THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE
YOU WILL BE MAKING A
HISTORICAL MISTAKE
PLEASE LIKE & SHARE
ATTENTION GUN OWNERS! 2ND AMENDMENT UNDER ATTACK. READ MORE... Cold Dead Hands
Yes my fellow Patriots, you read that correctly. They agreed that any person concealing a handgun outside the home, must show “good reason” to do so before they can acquire a state license to conceal.
They concluded with; “The protection of the Second Amendment - whatever the scope of that protection may be - simply does not extend to the carrying of concealed firearms in public by members of the general public.”
They have also declined to say whether the Constitution protects the right to openly carry a firearm in public, stating that the question was not an issue in this particular case.
Gun owners in two California counties are now challenging the requirement of showing “good cause” as will be defined by local county sheriffs, before they can get a concealed carry permit.
It has been stated that the justices took the time to trace the rights of gun ownership from medieval England to the founding of the United States through the Civil War and found that local laws almost universally prohibited carrying concealed firearms in public. Of course this is an absolutely ludicrous statement, considering they call themselves scholars.
Quoting an antiquated and since overruled U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1897 that states; “the right of the people to bear arms is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons.”
The appeals court stated that it used typical U.S. Supreme Court methods of looking to our history to resolve gun rights issues, although I believe the history they used was taken out of context.
They stated; “ Because the Second Amendment does not protect in any degree the right to carry concealed firearms in public, any prohibition or restriction a state may choose to impose on concealed carry - including the requirement to “good cause” however defined - is necessary allowed by the Amendment.”
Of course there many states that have similar restrictions on concealed carry, and as seen by Supreme Court ruling those lower courts are divided as to whether this violates the Second Amendment. In many articles supporting the decision, they refer back to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2008 Heller vs DC, stating that this was the last time they have heard a Second Amendment case.
What these slanted, media-hype articles fail to include is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC district ruled that; “the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms” also stating that the right was “premised on the private use of arms for activities such as hunting and self-defense, the latter being understood as resistance to either private lawlessness or the depredations of a tyrannical government (or a threat from abroad).”
The U.S. Court of Appeals DC district furthermore stated; “that though the right to bear arms also helped preserve the citizen militia, the activities [the Amendment] protects are not limited to militia service, nor is an individual’s enjoyment of the right contingent upon his or her continued or intermittent enrollment in the militia.” The court determined that handguns are “Arms” and concluded that as thus, they may not be banned by the District of Columbia.
In DC v Heller, the Supreme Court upheld the U.S. Court of Appeals DC decision, and our late Justice Antonin Scalia handed down their prolific opinion which was supported by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., and Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. In the home or not, We the People have a right to protect ourselves, period.](https://pics.me.me/thumb_the-supreme-court-will-now-rule-on-the-the-right-24412101.png)
Resourceful: Guy Puts Meme in Presentation to Mask Own Unpreparedness
These TikTok memes are an ode to the boys Lizzo loves
The Best Witch Memes on Instagram
Prabhas- Shraddha Kapoor's 'Saaho' unleashes a meme fest on Twitter—See inside
The Most Horrifying Scene In 'Cats' Has Become A Massive New Meme
Kendall Jenner snaps back at NBA player meme
Elizabeth Gillies' Video Of Her Walking Has Become Relatable Meme And She Has Acknowledged It
West Shamokin: Spirit Week highlights popular social media trends
PSA: The Best Mona Kattan Memes On Instagram
EXCLUSIVE: Arjun Kapoor on Panipat trolls: Even Virat Kohli gets trolled BUT sad to see memes ...
