🔥 Popular | Latest

mooncaps: drtanner: chakrabot: slitheringink: artofcarmen: fyeahwhovians: raygender: themediafix: Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist. In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites. I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely. Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well. Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain. -Morgan P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able. “ limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG. As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier.  This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet. This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all. Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay. This may be the thing that finally makes me leave this shithole country.: VERDICT! NET NEUTRALITY IS DEAD For now mooncaps: drtanner: chakrabot: slitheringink: artofcarmen: fyeahwhovians: raygender: themediafix: Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist. In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites. I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely. Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well. Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain. -Morgan P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able. “ limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more  limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG. As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier.  This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet. This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all. Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay. This may be the thing that finally makes me leave this shithole country.
Save
<p><a href="http://wheremyscalesslither.tumblr.com/post/163054164138/nanotorb-deans-got-pie-kajuki460" class="tumblr_blog">wheremyscalesslither</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://nanotorb.tumblr.com/post/163030930122/deans-got-pie-kajuki460" class="tumblr_blog">nanotorb</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://deans-got-pie.tumblr.com/post/163028457109/kajuki460-mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw" class="tumblr_blog">deans-got-pie</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://kajuki460.tumblr.com/post/162979763773/mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw-polararts" class="tumblr_blog">kajuki460</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw.tumblr.com/post/162977664113/polararts-drtanner-chakrabot" class="tumblr_blog">mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://polararts.tumblr.com/post/97158626219/drtanner-chakrabot-slitheringink" class="tumblr_blog">polararts</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://drtanner.tumblr.com/post/97085128050" class="tumblr_blog">drtanner</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://chakrabot.tumblr.com/post/76651798332/slitheringink-artofcarmen-fyeahwhovians" class="tumblr_blog">chakrabot</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://slitheringink.tumblr.com/post/76456673019/artofcarmen-sheepuppy-korriganbleedingink" class="tumblr_blog">slitheringink</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://artofcarmen.tumblr.com/post/76413006169/sheepuppy-korriganbleedingink" class="tumblr_blog">artofcarmen</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://fyeahwhovians.tumblr.com/post/73567489980/pumpkinskull-raygender-pumpkinskull" class="tumblr_blog">fyeahwhovians</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://irrayditation.co.vu/post/73567024346/pumpkinskull-themediafix-breaking-news-the" class="tumblr_blog">raygender</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://themediafix.tumblr.com/post/73318711676/breaking-news-the-d-c-appeals-court-just-killed" class="tumblr_blog">themediafix</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.<br/><br/>This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. <br/><br/>Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: <a href="http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe">http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe</a></p> </blockquote> <p>they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that</p> </blockquote> <p>This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American</p> </blockquote> <p>I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist.</p> <p>In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites.</p> <p>I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely.</p> <p>Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well.</p> </blockquote> <p>Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b> is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain.</p> <p>-Morgan</p> <p>P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able.</p> </blockquote> <p>“ <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p><b>DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG.</b></p> </blockquote> <p>As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier. </p> <p>This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet.</p> <p>This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all.</p> <p>Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay.</p> </blockquote> <p>Maybe you guys are sick of this post but It’s really important to freelance artists and pretty much everyone who uses the internet, so here it is again.  \o0o/</p> </blockquote> <p>trump era is gonna be hell</p> </blockquote> <p>i dont want to pay for my memes.</p> </blockquote> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mGxC5ZztcfIaHwc3csAM85g">@wheremyscalesslither</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mIJ8_wrCXsufezeOd9hyGWQ">@huskyhuddle</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mRj4qnViTBEI6mJO96LL6FA">@toothless-the-betta-fish</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mXXRksbHsyCtmHF0Hyw5cmw">@comraderabbit</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mTZU-Tn0PH1zkSiVUjtBCRQ">@elemental-kiss</a> Guys Im pretty sure you guys have a lot of followers please boost this!</blockquote> <p>so who fucking profits from net neutrality being gone or is it just old people not understanding the internet</p> </blockquote> <p>things are weird when one of toyr favorite artists reblogs a comment chain with your username attached. also tumblr never even told me about the tag</p> <p><br/>anyhow this is really fucking important. the USA us already wntirely run in corproate greed. I cant imagine what it would be like to have to pay for all of this wonderful knowledge and access to communication across the world. <br/>Think about this- youre interested in purchasing a new species of snake so you want to start researching- contacting breeders, keepers, and looking up care sheets but you cant because you dont pay for the right package OR worse, the company cant afford to pay and you lose out on an incredible chance to learn and improve animals’ lives.</p> <p>In this day and age access to educational resources, even those on social media sites is a RIGHT not a privilege.</p> <p>There is NO REASON anyone should be able to gain more money off of the internet for no fucking reason.</p> </blockquote>: VERDICT! NET NEUTRALITY IS DEAD For now <p><a href="http://wheremyscalesslither.tumblr.com/post/163054164138/nanotorb-deans-got-pie-kajuki460" class="tumblr_blog">wheremyscalesslither</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://nanotorb.tumblr.com/post/163030930122/deans-got-pie-kajuki460" class="tumblr_blog">nanotorb</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://deans-got-pie.tumblr.com/post/163028457109/kajuki460-mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw" class="tumblr_blog">deans-got-pie</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://kajuki460.tumblr.com/post/162979763773/mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw-polararts" class="tumblr_blog">kajuki460</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw.tumblr.com/post/162977664113/polararts-drtanner-chakrabot" class="tumblr_blog">mr-tektites-sfm-blog-nsfw</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://polararts.tumblr.com/post/97158626219/drtanner-chakrabot-slitheringink" class="tumblr_blog">polararts</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://drtanner.tumblr.com/post/97085128050" class="tumblr_blog">drtanner</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://chakrabot.tumblr.com/post/76651798332/slitheringink-artofcarmen-fyeahwhovians" class="tumblr_blog">chakrabot</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://slitheringink.tumblr.com/post/76456673019/artofcarmen-sheepuppy-korriganbleedingink" class="tumblr_blog">slitheringink</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://artofcarmen.tumblr.com/post/76413006169/sheepuppy-korriganbleedingink" class="tumblr_blog">artofcarmen</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://fyeahwhovians.tumblr.com/post/73567489980/pumpkinskull-raygender-pumpkinskull" class="tumblr_blog">fyeahwhovians</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://irrayditation.co.vu/post/73567024346/pumpkinskull-themediafix-breaking-news-the" class="tumblr_blog">raygender</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://themediafix.tumblr.com/post/73318711676/breaking-news-the-d-c-appeals-court-just-killed" class="tumblr_blog">themediafix</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.<br/><br/>This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. <br/><br/>Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: <a href="http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe">http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe</a></p> </blockquote> <p>they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that</p> </blockquote> <p>This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American</p> </blockquote> <p>I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist.</p> <p>In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites.</p> <p>I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely.</p> <p>Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well.</p> </blockquote> <p>Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b> is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain.</p> <p>-Morgan</p> <p>P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able.</p> </blockquote> <p>“ <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p> <b>limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more</b></p> <p><b>DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG.</b></p> </blockquote> <p>As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier. </p> <p>This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet.</p> <p>This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all.</p> <p>Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay.</p> </blockquote> <p>Maybe you guys are sick of this post but It’s really important to freelance artists and pretty much everyone who uses the internet, so here it is again.  \o0o/</p> </blockquote> <p>trump era is gonna be hell</p> </blockquote> <p>i dont want to pay for my memes.</p> </blockquote> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mGxC5ZztcfIaHwc3csAM85g">@wheremyscalesslither</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mIJ8_wrCXsufezeOd9hyGWQ">@huskyhuddle</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mRj4qnViTBEI6mJO96LL6FA">@toothless-the-betta-fish</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mXXRksbHsyCtmHF0Hyw5cmw">@comraderabbit</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mTZU-Tn0PH1zkSiVUjtBCRQ">@elemental-kiss</a> Guys Im pretty sure you guys have a lot of followers please boost this!</blockquote> <p>so who fucking profits from net neutrality being gone or is it just old people not understanding the internet</p> </blockquote> <p>things are weird when one of toyr favorite artists reblogs a comment chain with your username attached. also tumblr never even told me about the tag</p> <p><br/>anyhow this is really fucking important. the USA us already wntirely run in corproate greed. I cant imagine what it would be like to have to pay for all of this wonderful knowledge and access to communication across the world. <br/>Think about this- youre interested in purchasing a new species of snake so you want to start researching- contacting breeders, keepers, and looking up care sheets but you cant because you dont pay for the right package OR worse, the company cant afford to pay and you lose out on an incredible chance to learn and improve animals’ lives.</p> <p>In this day and age access to educational resources, even those on social media sites is a RIGHT not a privilege.</p> <p>There is NO REASON anyone should be able to gain more money off of the internet for no fucking reason.</p> </blockquote>
Save
Why it’s called feminism and not equalism: Misogynist Misandrist Feminist Legit question, I'm not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they're for equality? castiel-knight-of-hell: That's a very good question and thank you for asking so politely The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren't allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they'd be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money most of them unsavory. You know the idiom "rule of thumb"? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier's time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn't any thicker than his thumb. The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that's what's being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we're focusing only women. Men are belittled and called "less of a man" anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn't happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It's called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That's not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it's on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don't want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. Stay awake at FUNsubstance.com Why it’s called feminism and not equalism

Why it’s called feminism and not equalism

Save
Why its called feminism and not equalism: Misogynist Misandrist Feminist Legit question, I'm not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they're for equality? That's a very good question and thank you for asking so politely The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren't allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they'd be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money most of them unsavory. You know the idiom rule of thumb? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier's time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn't any thicker than his thumb The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been givena lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that's what's being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we're focusing only women. Men are belittled and called "less of a man" anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn't happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It's called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That's not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it's on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don't want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. Stay awake at FUNSubstance.com Why its called feminism and not equalism

Why its called feminism and not equalism

Save
Woman gets the perfect revenge on a creep sending d*ck pics: her phone to see 5he'd been added by stranger on Srephat. The ran in quntiondidnt hold backat al, immedalelysending wonds a true gereleman him at ths point,shewas fed up and Where do u live ? and do u live alone1 Ilive with my friend she'll be joining us are u for real yh? Send me some pics of you girl I'm daf un for that tho 0 then heariounlymesseged the post code af Buckinghw Elaabeth iof Palace the Landan residence of Queen Send me ur postcode, ll check how far u are, and I'll drive down Sw1a 1aa Oh u ain't far You live in south London l live in Croydon. 20 min drive at this time Brill see you in 20 her temale triend up at the tourit landmark aher putting the address into his Sathb I'm near Buckingham palace I'm on spur road?? Can't hear any of that babe text it I said I didn't realise u lived by Buckingham I'm on spur road baby Yes babe It is the state rooms You need to come to the gates What car are you in to Buckingham palace gates ? I'm driving a white ford sport by twopalace officersthat he reslized there wesn't sometningnet quhe righe with his lane nighe booty cal | Inside in my can't even be parked where I was apparently Two officers have just told me two offices with guns They said state rooms, are used by family of the royal family This sounds abit fishy I'li have to park my car on tho side. And just come down to get me My car is attracting too much attention t wassofunnyI coudd cope Tera said. Wienhe mas 1 then sent hima lannyphono ofte queen smiäing and he s didrt understand he hadbeenpranked she said yeah at's he finaly I'm parked on spur road, because I got told I can't be parked right by the palace Opened for real? Why wud u do something ike dis And make me drive and waste fuel And leave my house and drive all around What kinda sick game you playin at? YOUVE MADE ME DRIVE ALL THE WAY TO AN IMAGINARY PLACE. I KNEW SOMETHING WAS FISHY AS SOON ASI SAW BUCKINGHAM PALACE 1 am sosickoman seeingwomen as otjects and although this was wery cancerning factar of sthe added t is end women d sgusting.naied photos of shenselves Woman gets the perfect revenge on a creep sending d*ck pics
Save
anotherdayinthe-life: sarcastic-monkeys: thebutterghost: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000: dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely.  The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb.  The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  !!!!!!!!!!!!!IMPORTANTHOLYSHIT!!!!!!!! THANK YOU This needs more notes : Misogynist Misandrist Feminist anotherdayinthe-life: sarcastic-monkeys: thebutterghost: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000: dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely.  The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb.  The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  !!!!!!!!!!!!!IMPORTANTHOLYSHIT!!!!!!!! THANK YOU This needs more notes
Save
kyraneko: ambris: rae-is-trash: shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000: dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? castiel-knight-of-hell: That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely.  The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb.  The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS. THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you! Show this to my old english teacher who tried to tell me that feminism wasn’t equality because of the root word “fem” Okay so my first thought was “ALL OF THIS, THANK YOU” but then I noticed I literally already reblogged this and with those words and I’ve since forgotten. Welp, always good to reblog It’s named after the group whose status they have been trying to raise to achieve equality. It’s not about the end goal, it’s identifying the ones whose disadvantage they’re trying to erase. Someone send this to English teacher who thinks feminism = misandry: Misogynist Misandrist Feminist kyraneko: ambris: rae-is-trash: shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000: dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? castiel-knight-of-hell: That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely.  The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb.  The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS. THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you! Show this to my old english teacher who tried to tell me that feminism wasn’t equality because of the root word “fem” Okay so my first thought was “ALL OF THIS, THANK YOU” but then I noticed I literally already reblogged this and with those words and I’ve since forgotten. Welp, always good to reblog It’s named after the group whose status they have been trying to raise to achieve equality. It’s not about the end goal, it’s identifying the ones whose disadvantage they’re trying to erase. Someone send this to English teacher who thinks feminism = misandry

kyraneko: ambris: rae-is-trash: shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problem...

Save
rae-is-trash: shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000: dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? castiel-knight-of-hell: That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely.  The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb.  The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS. THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you! Show this to my old english teacher who tried to tell me that feminism wasn’t equality because of the root word “fem” : Misogynist Misandrist Feminist rae-is-trash: shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000: dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? castiel-knight-of-hell: That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely.  The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb.  The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS. THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you! Show this to my old english teacher who tried to tell me that feminism wasn’t equality because of the root word “fem”

rae-is-trash: shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilo...

Save
7 years after Dragonball Evolution’, Screenwriter Ben Ramsey Writes A Sincere Apology: I knew that it would eventually come down to this one day. Dragonball Evolution marked a very painful creative point in my life. To have something with my name on it as the writer be so globally reviled is gut wrenching. To receive hate mail from all over the world is heartbreaking. I spent so many years trying to deflect the blame, but at the end of the day it all comes down to the written word on page and I take full responsibility for what was such a disappointment to so many fans. I did the best I could, but at the end of the day, I dropped the dragon ball I went into the project chasing after a big payday, not as a fan of the franchise but as a businessman taking on an assignment. I have learned that when you go into a creative endeavor without passion you come out with sub-optimal results, and sometimes flat out2 garbage. So l'm not blaming anyone for Dragonball but myself. As a fanboy of other series, I know what it's like to have something you love and anticipate be so disappointing. To all the Dragon Ball fans out there, I sincerely apologize I hope I can make it up to you by creating something really cool and entertaining that you will like and that is also something I am passionate about. That's the only work I do now. Best, Ben I'm Sorry! 7 years after Dragonball Evolution’, Screenwriter Ben Ramsey Writes A Sincere Apology

7 years after Dragonball Evolution’, Screenwriter Ben Ramsey Writes A Sincere Apology

Save
drewsinead: rainfelt: drackiszunk: littlesoulking: yahoonews: Hillary/Bernie 2016 Favorite moment from that rebate. Civility, decency and comradeship can exist amongst competitors. It’s heartening to see. We need to remember this no matter the outcome of the primary. I think – no, I know – we forget. We get so caught up in all the good things Hillary probably won’t do – like campaign finance reform, like affordable colleges, like doing something about police brutality – and it gets very easy to feel like electing her won’t help anyone. But we forget about the bad things she won’t do. We forget that things can get not only better, but worse. We forget that the Republican platform has shrunk over the years to just a few things. Anti-welfare, anti-abortions, anti-tax reform, anti-immigration reform, pro-war instead of just not enough against it, pro-police brutality. Ayn Rand is popular reading over there. And they will all feel obligated to at least try to destroy Obamacare. They will get to choose FOUR Supreme Court justices, and if you didn’t like it when the Voting Rights Act was gutted, you’ll have a lot more of that to look forward to. With eight conservative justices, it will be easy to destroy this country. Things can get worse. We could all be Flint, with deregulation. We could all see our wages and benefits evaporate with anti-union legislation. Hillary Clinton might not improve things enough to make any of us happy. She might not improve things much at all. But she won’t send us careening off the cliff. If you’re still feeling torn, still thinking “both parties are corrupt, what difference does it make” – harken back to the 2000 elections, and understand that people felt the same way then. Everyone thought George W would be pretty harmless. Lots of us on the left decided to vote third-party. Without Nader voters, it would never have come down to fraud in Florida. So let’s not make the same mistake twice within my lifetime, okay? I will vote for Bernie in the Primaries.. But if Hillary ends up winning the nomination you bet your ass I’ll be at the polls come November voting for her.. I DO NOT want any of those republican candidates in office. : NSNE LIVE MSNBC DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES DEBATE drewsinead: rainfelt: drackiszunk: littlesoulking: yahoonews: Hillary/Bernie 2016 Favorite moment from that rebate. Civility, decency and comradeship can exist amongst competitors. It’s heartening to see. We need to remember this no matter the outcome of the primary. I think – no, I know – we forget. We get so caught up in all the good things Hillary probably won’t do – like campaign finance reform, like affordable colleges, like doing something about police brutality – and it gets very easy to feel like electing her won’t help anyone. But we forget about the bad things she won’t do. We forget that things can get not only better, but worse. We forget that the Republican platform has shrunk over the years to just a few things. Anti-welfare, anti-abortions, anti-tax reform, anti-immigration reform, pro-war instead of just not enough against it, pro-police brutality. Ayn Rand is popular reading over there. And they will all feel obligated to at least try to destroy Obamacare. They will get to choose FOUR Supreme Court justices, and if you didn’t like it when the Voting Rights Act was gutted, you’ll have a lot more of that to look forward to. With eight conservative justices, it will be easy to destroy this country. Things can get worse. We could all be Flint, with deregulation. We could all see our wages and benefits evaporate with anti-union legislation. Hillary Clinton might not improve things enough to make any of us happy. She might not improve things much at all. But she won’t send us careening off the cliff. If you’re still feeling torn, still thinking “both parties are corrupt, what difference does it make” – harken back to the 2000 elections, and understand that people felt the same way then. Everyone thought George W would be pretty harmless. Lots of us on the left decided to vote third-party. Without Nader voters, it would never have come down to fraud in Florida. So let’s not make the same mistake twice within my lifetime, okay? I will vote for Bernie in the Primaries.. But if Hillary ends up winning the nomination you bet your ass I’ll be at the polls come November voting for her.. I DO NOT want any of those republican candidates in office.
Save
shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000:dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely. The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb. The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS.THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you!: Misogynist Misandrist Feminist shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000:dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely. The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb. The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS.THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you!

shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url:...

Save
shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000:dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely. The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb. The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS.THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you!: Misogynist Misandrist Feminist shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url: basilsilos: pennman9000:dil-howlters-uncreative-username: WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND So for all you feminists out their who think that all men should die, remember, you are not a feminist. reblogging for the last comment Yes Legit question, I’m not trying to hate on feminists or anything. Why is it called feminist if they’re for equality? That’s a very good question and thank you for asking so politely. The word feminism was coined by Charles Fourier in 1837, a French philosopher who advocated for the emancipation of women because he believed society treated women as slaves. We weren’t allowed to vote, own anything, or work a real job. Women were ruled by their fathers/household patriarch until they married at which time they’d be under the rule of their husband. If a woman did not belong to male household she was shunned by society and had very little means to make money, most of them unsavory. You know the idiom “rule of thumb”? That comes from a running joke that started in the 1600s, and was still around in Fourier’s time, that said it was okay for a man to beat a woman with a stick as long as it wasn’t any thicker than his thumb. The point of the word feminist, and the feminist movement, has never been to say that women are better than men. The point is that women and things associated with women have been given a lesser place in society and we want to bring those things up to a place of equality. The focus is on the feminine because that’s what’s being pushed down. However, focusing on the feminine does not mean we’re focusing only women. Men are belittled and called “less of a man” anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Feminism is about raising up things associated with females to have an equal place in society as the things associated with males. It’s called feminism, not equalism, because the focus is on raising up not tearing down. Equalism would suggest that male things need to come down to a lower level so that female things can meet it in the middle. That’s not the point. The point is to raise up the feminine so that it’s on the same playing field that the masculine is already on. We don’t want men to lower themselves, we just want them to make room for us. This needs to be spread far and wide to everyone on tumblr.  ALL OF THIS.THANK YOU This is very thorough explanation, thank you!

shortcuttothestars: ambris-art: glenn-griffon: the-walking-tardis: castiel-knight-of-hell: xtheycallmeslimshadyx: problematic-url:...

Save