๐Ÿ”ช  Get Out Meme

โ˜•๏ธ  Kermit the Frog Memes

๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ  No Meme

๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ  Facepalm Meme

๐Ÿง™โ€โ™‚๏ธ  Harry Potter Memes

๐Ÿ•  Dog Memes

dead baby Memes

Deadly
Deadly
A Wall
A Wall
Its
Its
Older Sister
Older Sister
No Yes
No Yes
Whenever I
Whenever I
Opposive
Opposive
Justice League Memes
Justice League Memes
choking
choking
my room
my room 

    
                    

                

            
        
    

    
    
    






            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    
                    
                    

                        


	


    ๐Ÿ”ฅ Popular | Latest






    

    
    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        <p><a href="http://krungle.tumblr.com/post/171933983002/libertarirynn-matt-ruins-your-shit" class="tumblr_blog">krungle</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171933218134/matt-ruins-your-shit-kajiosblog-this" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5p3fvAsQ11rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="">
 โ€œ babies diagnosed with fatal illnesses

โ€œ</p>
<p>That is a pretty high bar if you ask me. The kid will die anyway, sometimes destroying the organs in the process and often involving massive pain while being kept alive for enormous sums of money on machines. At least in this way the poor kid doesnโ€™t have to suffer and some other kid gets a chance to end their suffering, as well, when they receive their transplants.</p>
<p>The entire conversation on this started with fetuses that developed with no brain.</p>
<p>You all that say this is wrong because of โ€˜compassionโ€™ are showing no compassion for either the pain and suffering of the baby or the pain and suffering of the kids who will be able to live a much more normal and longer life once they get transplants. It isnโ€™t โ€˜compassionโ€™ you are showing but a strict adherence to a moral code and be damned how much pain and suffering it causes others.</p>
<p>You people would show more compassion for your dog than you would for another human being.<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>โ€œNo YOU guys are actually the cruel ones for not wanting to murder sick babies to harvest them for parts!โ€œ</p><p>Are you fucking serious? First of all apparently itโ€™s no longer possible to harvest organs after natural death despite the fact that itโ€™s done all the time? โ€œTheyโ€™re going to die eventually anywayโ€œ Iโ€™ve got a newsflash for you pal, so are you. I like how you think this is completely justified based on your assumption that all babies born with fatal illnesses are in constant pain and should therefore be exterminated for their own sake. This is post is a hot mess in every way.</p>: Barber: "what you want?"
 Him: "give me the most
 dystopian shit possible"
 Barber: "got ya fam"
 LifeNews
 com
 LifeNews.com
 @LifeNewsHQ
 Follow
 British Govt Encouraging Women to Give
 Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei
 Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo
<p><a href="http://krungle.tumblr.com/post/171933983002/libertarirynn-matt-ruins-your-shit" class="tumblr_blog">krungle</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171933218134/matt-ruins-your-shit-kajiosblog-this" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5p3fvAsQ11rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="">
 โ€œ babies diagnosed with fatal illnesses

โ€œ</p>
<p>That is a pretty high bar if you ask me. The kid will die anyway, sometimes destroying the organs in the process and often involving massive pain while being kept alive for enormous sums of money on machines. At least in this way the poor kid doesnโ€™t have to suffer and some other kid gets a chance to end their suffering, as well, when they receive their transplants.</p>
<p>The entire conversation on this started with fetuses that developed with no brain.</p>
<p>You all that say this is wrong because of โ€˜compassionโ€™ are showing no compassion for either the pain and suffering of the baby or the pain and suffering of the kids who will be able to live a much more normal and longer life once they get transplants. It isnโ€™t โ€˜compassionโ€™ you are showing but a strict adherence to a moral code and be damned how much pain and suffering it causes others.</p>
<p>You people would show more compassion for your dog than you would for another human being.<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>โ€œNo YOU guys are actually the cruel ones for not wanting to murder sick babies to harvest them for parts!โ€œ</p><p>Are you fucking serious? First of all apparently itโ€™s no longer possible to harvest organs after natural death despite the fact that itโ€™s done all the time? โ€œTheyโ€™re going to die eventually anywayโ€œ Iโ€™ve got a newsflash for you pal, so are you. I like how you think this is completely justified based on your assumption that all babies born with fatal illnesses are in constant pain and should therefore be exterminated for their own sake. This is post is a hot mess in every way.</p>
        

            
            

                
                
                    <p><a href="http://krungle.tumblr.com/post/171933983002/libertarirynn-matt-ruins-your-shit" class="tumblr_blog">krungle</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171933218134/matt-ruins-your-shit-kajiosblog-this" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5p3fvAsQ11rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="">
 โ€œ babies diagnosed with fatal illnesses

โ€œ</p>
<p>That is a pretty high bar if you ask me. The kid will die anyway, sometimes destroying the organs in the process and often involving massive pain while being kept alive for enormous sums of money on machines. At least in this way the poor kid doesnโ€™t have to suffer and some other kid gets a chance to end their suffering, as well, when they receive their transplants.</p>
<p>The entire conversation on this started with fetuses that developed with no brain.</p>
<p>You all that say this is wrong because of โ€˜compassionโ€™ are showing no compassion for either the pain and suffering of the baby or the pain and suffering of the kids who will be able to live a much more normal and longer life once they get transplants. It isnโ€™t โ€˜compassionโ€™ you are showing but a strict adherence to a moral code and be damned how much pain and suffering it causes others.</p>
<p>You people would show more compassion for your dog than you would for another human being.<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>โ€œNo YOU guys are actually the cruel ones for not wanting to murder sick babies to harvest them for parts!โ€œ</p><p>Are you fucking serious? First of all apparently itโ€™s no longer possible to harvest organs after natural death despite the fact that itโ€™s done all the time? โ€œTheyโ€™re going to die eventually anywayโ€œ Iโ€™ve got a newsflash for you pal, so are you. I like how you think this is completely justified based on your assumption that all babies born with fatal illnesses are in constant pain and should therefore be exterminated for their own sake. This is post is a hot mess in every way.</p>: Barber: "what you want?"
 Him: "give me the most
 dystopian shit possible"
 Barber: "got ya fam"
 LifeNews
 com
 LifeNews.com
 @LifeNewsHQ
 Follow
 British Govt Encouraging Women to Give
 Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei
 Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo
<p><a href="http://krungle.tumblr.com/post/171933983002/libertarirynn-matt-ruins-your-shit" class="tumblr_blog">krungle</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171933218134/matt-ruins-your-shit-kajiosblog-this" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5p3fvAsQ11rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="">
 โ€œ babies diagnosed with fatal illnesses

โ€œ</p>
<p>That is a pretty high bar if you ask me. The kid will die anyway, sometimes destroying the organs in the process and often involving massive pain while being kept alive for enormous sums of money on machines. At least in this way the poor kid doesnโ€™t have to suffer and some other kid gets a chance to end their suffering, as well, when they receive their transplants.</p>
<p>The entire conversation on this started with fetuses that developed with no brain.</p>
<p>You all that say this is wrong because of โ€˜compassionโ€™ are showing no compassion for either the pain and suffering of the baby or the pain and suffering of the kids who will be able to live a much more normal and longer life once they get transplants. It isnโ€™t โ€˜compassionโ€™ you are showing but a strict adherence to a moral code and be damned how much pain and suffering it causes others.</p>
<p>You people would show more compassion for your dog than you would for another human being.<br/></p>
</blockquote>
<p>โ€œNo YOU guys are actually the cruel ones for not wanting to murder sick babies to harvest them for parts!โ€œ</p><p>Are you fucking serious? First of all apparently itโ€™s no longer possible to harvest organs after natural death despite the fact that itโ€™s done all the time? โ€œTheyโ€™re going to die eventually anywayโ€œ Iโ€™ve got a newsflash for you pal, so are you. I like how you think this is completely justified based on your assumption that all babies born with fatal illnesses are in constant pain and should therefore be exterminated for their own sake. This is post is a hot mess in every way.</p>
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        <p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>: Barber: "what you want?"
 Him: "give me the most
 dystopian shit possible"
 Barber: "got ya fam"
 LifeNews
 com
 LifeNews.com
 @LifeNewsHQ
 Follow
 British Govt Encouraging Women to Give
 Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei
 Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>
        

            
            

                
                
                    <p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>: Barber: "what you want?"
 Him: "give me the most
 dystopian shit possible"
 Barber: "got ya fam"
 LifeNews
 com
 LifeNews.com
 @LifeNewsHQ
 Follow
 British Govt Encouraging Women to Give
 Birth to Disabled Babies to Harvest Thei
 Organs buff.ly/2Fuaepo
<p><a href="http://matt-ruins-your-shit.tumblr.com/post/171925993106/kajiosblog-this-articles-title-is-rather" class="tumblr_blog">matt-ruins-your-shit</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://kajiosblog.tumblr.com/post/171917720473/this-articles-title-is-rather-misleading-they" class="tumblr_blog">kajiosblog</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This articleโ€™s title is rather misleading.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs or something like that.ย  They arenโ€™t encouraging anything.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that expecting mothers who find out that their baby will be born with fatal defects will be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate early, in order to allow for organ donation.ย  Note this this is simply an option, and there is no incentive or penalty for either choice.</p>
<p>Source:ย <a href="https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth">https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/650467/NHS-to-harvest-babies-fatal-defect-foetus-donate-organs-mothers-option-terminate-birth</a></p>
</blockquote>
<figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/e52518448e2c705676d57e41594cdcb7/tumblr_inline_p5oc0lNajE1si8t7m_540.gif" data-orig-height="200" data-orig-width="370"/></figure><p>I donโ€™t think a single other person read that headline and thought they wereย โ€œencouraging women to somehow disable their fetuses in order to use them for organs.โ€ Thatโ€™s not why people find it incredibly disturbing and Iโ€™m astounded those were the conclusions you drew and thought it needed to be corrected. No seriously where did you get the idea that it was being claimed that mothers were being told to disable unborn children so they could be harvested? That makes no sense, thatโ€™s like the logic of Ricky from Trailer Park Boys who thinks that as long as you drag stolen goods down to the curb it becomes garbage and itโ€™s not illegal to steal garbage. The very idea of a baby needing to be disabled in order to justify harvesting itโ€™s organs should be offensive, it implies disabled people have less right to be alive and have their organs inside their own fucking bodies. The article title wasnโ€™t misleading your terribly needless strawman explanation of the title was misleading. This is the exact reason I hate โ€œfact checkersโ€ you need fact checkers for the fact checkers they can be so bogged down in spin and semantics and dumb bullshit like this. The problem is with the harvesting of organs from disabled babies full stop. I didnโ€™t think this needed to be explained but here goes.</p>
<p>First of all it turns human life into a commodity, and not just a commodity but a commodity that would be controlled by the medical system of an increasingly fascist socialist government. What could go wrong?</p>
<p>Like for example it hasnโ€™t even happened yet and already there seems to be confusion about what exactly constitutes fatal defects. A system that always is going to want more organs is going to determine for themselves what is disabled enough? And what level of disabled is enough that you should be determined as scrap parts instead of a person? How do you know the baby will die? Doctors tell people their kids will be born dead or will die soon all the time that live full lives. One of my best friends parents were told he wouldnโ€™t make it past a few weeks and heโ€™s in his late twenties now. Really glad this wasnโ€™t the policy back then.</p>
<p>โ€œwill be given the option to carry out the birth, rather than terminate earlyโ€ No, carrying out the pregnancy has always been an option itโ€™s the harvesting of organs that would be the new factor here. If itโ€™s as you said that they are being given the option to carry out the pregnancy does that mean that right now women are being forced to have abortions? No giving birth is and always has been the default option. I find it gross that you think the only thing people do when they find out a baby will have serious defects is just abort it. These fatal defects represent a percentage chance of survival not a guarantee, so while yes a lot of people just say fuck it and abort at any sign of a problem there are also lots of people that take the risk give birth because worst case scenario the baby dies naturally best case scenario it survives. Medium case scenario it survives but raising it is costly and they have a lower quality of lifeโ€ฆbut itโ€™s still a life and it should be up to a person to decide if their quality of life is low enough that they would rather not have it at all.ย <br/></p>
<p>The horrifying part is they are not talking about stillborns, theyโ€™re not talking about babies that died in the womb. Theyโ€™re talking about babies they believe will die eventually after being born. Who makes that determination? You trust the NHSโ€ฆ a system so shitty they amputate the wrong limbs on people to decide what babies are basically done for before theyโ€™re even born. Especially when they will benefit from every single baby a parent decides to allow be harvested. If there is room for corruption there will be corruption.</p>
<p>ย So what happens once those babies are born and theyโ€™re alive? Do they start up a daycare center thats whole purpose is to wait for babies to die so they can be harvested? Iโ€™m sure the care there would be super humane and hospitable. What do they do with the ones that survive? By that point they would have become property of the NHS because theyโ€™re not babies theyโ€™re just living organ donations that havenโ€™t had the courtesy to die naturally yet. Do they call up the mother and say hey so remember when you told us we could harvest your dead babyโ€ฆwell can you come by and pick up your two year oldโ€ฆ that fucker is being really stubborn about not dying like we promised. Or much more likely theyโ€™ll just kill the babies immediately to avoid that burden and complication and not give them the chance to survive. Iโ€™ve already heard the term post birth abortion or as someone with a soul left would call it baby murder.ย </p>
<p>They try to get around this by claiming the harvesting wont be an option until they are told the mother wants to have an abortion. What a great failsafe right? Well except that they can tell the mother whatever they want to get her to say she wants an abortion. They can tell her that her baby will definitely die when it might have a good chance of living. Which happens already without the added incentive of wanting to harvest the organs.</p>
<p>Where would the oversight be. The NHS is already overwhelmed you think thereโ€™s going to be someone checking to make sure nobody is telling mothers their babies have fetal defects when they donโ€™t? You think the system is going to check every single case, especially when every single case is going to benefit them? What fairy tale world do you live in. Itโ€™s the setup for a system where you give a doctor the power to say to himself this baby has a 10-60% chance of survival this mother is being a real bitchโ€ฆand weโ€™re in need of organs right nowโ€ฆmaybe I tell her the lowest number in that estimate. Which is all it will beโ€ฆfucking estimates. I have a member of my family that was pronounced dead four times and lived another twenty years. These people canโ€™t even figure out when a person is dead and you want to give them 100% authority to determine who will die. Fuck that, fuck this. If they do this there will be horror stories rolling out within the week.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Imagine fucking reading this and being like โ€œno guys you donโ€™t understand nobodyโ€™s asking the motherโ€™s to disable the babies, just to give birth to disabled babies instead of murdering them in the womb so we can chop them up for parts! Because thatโ€™s so much better!โ€</p>
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        Another selfie with flowers around your face, Are you bettering the human race? More dick pics, or pics of pricks next to cars, Yet children in Iraq and Syria starve... Y'all are where? With your squad turntup! Did you care about Pakistani children burntup? By drones flown with sat phones into brown homes in no fly zones, deaths grown from cell phones while you watch me write sad poems. Another picture of your food, you serious? Chaka are you a mad lad & a bit delirious? You know that people don't have food to eat, That's why I save food by not eating meat Think of all the crops wasted on feeding lambs, All the water saved by boycotting protein scams Yeah but keep eating your fruits from across the planet. You're part of the problem causing damage. I'm out here trying to solve what I can manage, Not part of the murder yet they call me savage. Keep miming songs of the celebrities Keep cooning while there's children in need Keep buying up stores of french companies Keep videoing lynchings but drink responsibility, Honestly your privilege means the death of kids, It bothers me that village was where people lived, Your god says if you forgive you will go to heaven, So you said sorry as your purchased your iPhone 7, I'm not out here trying to guilt trip, Just sick of the cracking whip of bullsh*t, & self indulgence that reigns down on them daily, She's asking some god to save me, hypocrisy in policy and more dead babies. Am I doing my best? Life is providing a test... Let me ask you the same question, do something now, don't regret unlearned lessons. There are many possibilities, we live in close proximity, to the billionaires and millionaires with no accountability, they cause more fatalities on families, social media watches passively. By default we are complicit tacitly, I don't care about your promotion in a corporation, It's our fault our own vanity only fancies we, He's got no air like fish in an ocean of infestation, the guy who filmed his death is facing prison, freedom of speech isn't a place for wisdom. You don't get dead for chatting sh*t, you get killed for speaking accurate, more slaves more massacres, chakabars: R.I.P. TO ALL THE PEOPLE
 WHO DIE EVERYDAY AND
 ARENT ACKNOWLEDGED
 BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT
 CELEBRITIES
Another selfie with flowers around your face, Are you bettering the human race? More dick pics, or pics of pricks next to cars, Yet children in Iraq and Syria starve... Y'all are where? With your squad turntup! Did you care about Pakistani children burntup? By drones flown with sat phones into brown homes in no fly zones, deaths grown from cell phones while you watch me write sad poems. Another picture of your food, you serious? Chaka are you a mad lad & a bit delirious? You know that people don't have food to eat, That's why I save food by not eating meat Think of all the crops wasted on feeding lambs, All the water saved by boycotting protein scams Yeah but keep eating your fruits from across the planet. You're part of the problem causing damage. I'm out here trying to solve what I can manage, Not part of the murder yet they call me savage. Keep miming songs of the celebrities Keep cooning while there's children in need Keep buying up stores of french companies Keep videoing lynchings but drink responsibility, Honestly your privilege means the death of kids, It bothers me that village was where people lived, Your god says if you forgive you will go to heaven, So you said sorry as your purchased your iPhone 7, I'm not out here trying to guilt trip, Just sick of the cracking whip of bullsh*t, & self indulgence that reigns down on them daily, She's asking some god to save me, hypocrisy in policy and more dead babies. Am I doing my best? Life is providing a test... Let me ask you the same question, do something now, don't regret unlearned lessons. There are many possibilities, we live in close proximity, to the billionaires and millionaires with no accountability, they cause more fatalities on families, social media watches passively. By default we are complicit tacitly, I don't care about your promotion in a corporation, It's our fault our own vanity only fancies we, He's got no air like fish in an ocean of infestation, the guy who filmed his death is facing prison, freedom of speech isn't a place for wisdom. You don't get dead for chatting sh*t, you get killed for speaking accurate, more slaves more massacres, chakabars
        

            
            

                
                
                    Another selfie with flowers around your face, Are you bettering the human race? More dick pics, or pics of pricks next to cars, Yet children in Iraq and Syria starve... Y'all are where? With your squad turntup! Did you care about Pakistani children burntup? By drones flown with sat phones into brown homes in no fly zones, deaths grown from cell phones while you watch me write sad poems. Another picture of your food, you serious? Chaka are you a mad lad & a bit delirious? You know that people don't have food to eat, That's why I save food by not eating meat Think of all the crops wasted on feeding lambs, All the water saved by boycotting protein scams Yeah but keep eating your fruits from across the planet. You're part of the problem causing damage. I'm out here trying to solve what I can manage, Not part of the murder yet they call me savage. Keep miming songs of the celebrities Keep cooning while there's children in need Keep buying up stores of french companies Keep videoing lynchings but drink responsibility, Honestly your privilege means the death of kids, It bothers me that village was where people lived, Your god says if you forgive you will go to heaven, So you said sorry as your purchased your iPhone 7, I'm not out here trying to guilt trip, Just sick of the cracking whip of bullsh*t, & self indulgence that reigns down on them daily, She's asking some god to save me, hypocrisy in policy and more dead babies. Am I doing my best? Life is providing a test... Let me ask you the same question, do something now, don't regret unlearned lessons. There are many possibilities, we live in close proximity, to the billionaires and millionaires with no accountability, they cause more fatalities on families, social media watches passively. By default we are complicit tacitly, I don't care about your promotion in a corporation, It's our fault our own vanity only fancies we, He's got no air like fish in an ocean of infestation, the guy who filmed his death is facing prison, freedom of speech isn't a place for wisdom. You don't get dead for chatting sh*t, you get killed for speaking accurate, more slaves more massacres, chakabars: R.I.P. TO ALL THE PEOPLE
 WHO DIE EVERYDAY AND
 ARENT ACKNOWLEDGED
 BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT
 CELEBRITIES
Another selfie with flowers around your face, Are you bettering the human race? More dick pics, or pics of pricks next to cars, Yet children in Iraq and Syria starve... Y'all are where? With your squad turntup! Did you care about Pakistani children burntup? By drones flown with sat phones into brown homes in no fly zones, deaths grown from cell phones while you watch me write sad poems. Another picture of your food, you serious? Chaka are you a mad lad & a bit delirious? You know that people don't have food to eat, That's why I save food by not eating meat Think of all the crops wasted on feeding lambs, All the water saved by boycotting protein scams Yeah but keep eating your fruits from across the planet. You're part of the problem causing damage. I'm out here trying to solve what I can manage, Not part of the murder yet they call me savage. Keep miming songs of the celebrities Keep cooning while there's children in need Keep buying up stores of french companies Keep videoing lynchings but drink responsibility, Honestly your privilege means the death of kids, It bothers me that village was where people lived, Your god says if you forgive you will go to heaven, So you said sorry as your purchased your iPhone 7, I'm not out here trying to guilt trip, Just sick of the cracking whip of bullsh*t, & self indulgence that reigns down on them daily, She's asking some god to save me, hypocrisy in policy and more dead babies. Am I doing my best? Life is providing a test... Let me ask you the same question, do something now, don't regret unlearned lessons. There are many possibilities, we live in close proximity, to the billionaires and millionaires with no accountability, they cause more fatalities on families, social media watches passively. By default we are complicit tacitly, I don't care about your promotion in a corporation, It's our fault our own vanity only fancies we, He's got no air like fish in an ocean of infestation, the guy who filmed his death is facing prison, freedom of speech isn't a place for wisdom. You don't get dead for chatting sh*t, you get killed for speaking accurate, more slaves more massacres, chakabars
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://handmadegift-ideas.tumblr.com/post/142202777589">handmadegift-ideas</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial">https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial</a><br/></p>
<p>

Our unisex t-shirts are high quality and guaranteed made in the USA, fits like a well-loved favorite. Features a crew neck, short sleeves and superior combed made from 100% combed and ring-spun cotton.<br/><br/></p>
</blockquote>: SPOILE
 ALERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 AND THE
 OSCAR
 GOES TO
 BEAR
 The Revenant

 SPOILER
 ALERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 THERE
 IS NO
 TYLER
 DURDEN
 Fight Club

 POILER
 ERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate
 HER
 HEAD IS
 IN THE
 BOX.
 Se7en

 SPOILER
 ALERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 KEYSER
 SPACEY
 The Usual Suspects

 SPOILER
 ALERT!
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 ZED'S
 DEAD
 BABY,
 ZED'S DEAD
 Pulp Fiction
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://handmadegift-ideas.tumblr.com/post/142202777589">handmadegift-ideas</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial">https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial</a><br/></p>
<p>

Our unisex t-shirts are high quality and guaranteed made in the USA, fits like a well-loved favorite. Features a crew neck, short sleeves and superior combed made from 100% combed and ring-spun cotton.<br/><br/></p>
</blockquote>
        

            
            

                
                
                    <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://handmadegift-ideas.tumblr.com/post/142202777589">handmadegift-ideas</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial">https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial</a><br/></p>
<p>

Our unisex t-shirts are high quality and guaranteed made in the USA, fits like a well-loved favorite. Features a crew neck, short sleeves and superior combed made from 100% combed and ring-spun cotton.<br/><br/></p>
</blockquote>: SPOILE
 ALERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 AND THE
 OSCAR
 GOES TO
 BEAR
 The Revenant

 SPOILER
 ALERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 THERE
 IS NO
 TYLER
 DURDEN
 Fight Club

 POILER
 ERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate
 HER
 HEAD IS
 IN THE
 BOX.
 Se7en

 SPOILER
 ALERT
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 KEYSER
 SPACEY
 The Usual Suspects

 SPOILER
 ALERT!
 The T-shirt you love to hate.
 ZED'S
 DEAD
 BABY,
 ZED'S DEAD
 Pulp Fiction
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://handmadegift-ideas.tumblr.com/post/142202777589">handmadegift-ideas</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial">https://www.etsy.com/il-en/shop/SpoilerAlertOfficial</a><br/></p>
<p>

Our unisex t-shirts are high quality and guaranteed made in the USA, fits like a well-loved favorite. Features a crew neck, short sleeves and superior combed made from 100% combed and ring-spun cotton.<br/><br/></p>
</blockquote>
                    
                
            

            
                
                
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://handmadegift-ideas.tumblr.com/post/142202777589">handmadegift-ideas</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a hr...

                
            
            
        

    

    

        
Save