Definitally
Definitally

Definitally

not really
 not really

not really

support
support

support

loves
loves

loves

pleased
pleased

pleased

texted
texted

texted

in the house
in the house

in the house

winning
winning

winning

happening
happening

happening

companies
companies

companies

🔥 | Latest

Apparently, Asian, and Bitch: Detroit Rep. Bettie Cook Scott orn Asian opponent: Don't vote for the ching-chong! by Violet lkonomova August 16, 2018 at 11:09 AM comment v bizarre-transmission: thettasigma: ferventfox: awesome-everyday: internetdumpsterfires: Black people can’t be racist. Ugh, okay. The remark by this black woman was disrespectful and based on race. It was rude, bigoted and uncalled for. But no, in an anti black world, black people do not have the social, political or systemic financial power to be racist. Racism implies that beyond hurting and insulting that asian woman that this black woman is connected to a system that has the power to negatively impact this woman’s existence. That dark skinned black woman who’s an incumbent running for state office likely has about the same amount of systemic power as i do. And furthermore, there could be an argument made that deteoit is chocolate city and perhaps she does have that infrastructure of black networks to truly effect her opponent, but idk I was in Detroit last year and it looks a lot like Brooklyn does now. White and gentrified. White people with money, who control our political systems, finances, and predominant social narratives are claiming urban space like they’re colonizing pioneers looking to take the new world. Detroit isn’t the same anymore. Anyway, black people can be shitty insensitive bigots but we do not have the social capital to be racist, particularly not in the united states. “That dark skinned black woman who’s an incumbent running for state office likely has about the same amount of systemic power as i do.”  Ahahaha: No. A congressperson is the definition of systemic power. You can’t bitch about lack of political power when we are talking about elected politician.  Clearly the world isn’t so anti-black that it couldn’t vote her in.  Chang is also a first generation American, while Scott, to my knowledge, is not, and she specifically made anti-immigrant comments. She also has “power” within the context of her own ethnic community and she used that power to direct racism towards other African-Americans who supported Chang by implying they were somehow traitors, essentially dictating how they ought to act based on their race, particularly Chang’s husband for his interracial marriage (I don’t give a flying fuck what race you are, negative comments about interracial marriage and mixed race people are racist. period. end of story).  Even if I did accept the prejudice + power model or racism (which I don’t as that is neither the etymology or common usage of the word) Cook’s comments would certainly fit the bill. She made race based attacks on people based on types of marginalization that she is exempt from; and did so from a position of power partially gained by the fact that she is exempt from these types of discrimination.   It’s racist. Stop making excuses.  “That dark skinned woman who’s an incumbent running for office likely has about the same amount of systematic power as I do.” Is this person on drugs? They’re claiming that… A political person… A congresswoman… Has no power in the country in which she was elected… By the populace… As a politician. That, or they’re a politician too. Apparently we can say anything now and it makes sense. Huh. Also these remarks are the absolute epitomy of racism and if anyone refuses to see it, they’re not purely misinformed. They are delusional. *literally calls an Asian person ching chong*“How dare you say I’m being racist??” Thank you for attending today’s lecture on cognitive dissonance.

bizarre-transmission: thettasigma: ferventfox: awesome-everyday: internetdumpsterfires: Black people can’t be racist. Ugh, okay. The rem...

Facebook, Instagram, and Internet: MAKE Early Golden age meme (pinwheel background Impact Text) MORE MEMES MAKE Golden Age memes use specific photos which have specific memetic "translations of Late Golden age (Just Photo, Impact Text) Transitional meme (Photo from tumblr, instagram, twitter or facebook, with an accompanying text, often added just for emphasis) At the transitional stage, memes here include "reactions" that encourage the reader into what it means or how it is 1'm sure this means something, but don ask me what dog When you show your mom a pic on your phone and she starts swiping Silver Age meme When Back to School commercials start coming on but you're not a teacher or a kid so you don't give a shit (photo with text in arial-design is reminiscent of a twitter post) At this age, the photo is the supplement rather than the defining characteristic. The text, rather than the photo, provides meaning. UBER eats New Age meme (Photos only, very little text) At this age, the meme no longer requires text for definitive suppliment. The meaning is expressed by memetic definition and The photos are self-explanatoriy and the meaning is expressed by multiple connected frames. Text, if used, gives context only Are you smart? Spelit Late Stage meme (nuked memes, deep fried memes, surreal memes These are not meant to pass on memetic meaning, but instead are entirely based on absurd and contextual humor They are often not made to communicate thought. No only be on ou ust I am currently studying memes academically. I thought you might enjoy the current proposed ages of internet memes via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2L5D3XW

I am currently studying memes academically. I thought you might enjoy the current proposed ages of internet memes via /r/memes https://ift.t...

Dude, Ironic, and Money: erin i you literally are a billionaire literally it is not ironic in any way Follow you weren't called a billionaire until you were... a billionaire if you think it's is a negative label, maybe it's because it means that you're hoarding money and resources from the rest of the world Elon Musk O Delonmusk Replying to blake,kistler @88CWorld ronically, the "billionaire label, when used by media, is almost always meant to devalue & denigrate the subject. I wasnt called that until my companies got to a certain size, but reality is that I still do the same science & engineeing as before. Just the scale has changed. 0:03 AM-10 Jul 2018 Elon Musk @elonmusk Following Replying to Geehouls No, it means I created jobs for 50,000 people directly and, through parts suppliers & supporting professions, 250,000 people indirectly, thus supporting half a million families. What have you done? 10:12 AM-10 Jul 2018 <p><a href="http://goat-yells-at-everything.tumblr.com/post/175791702726/libertarirynn-and-erin-there-is-a-perfect" class="tumblr_blog">goat-yells-at-everything</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/175791082409" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="280" data-tumblr-attribution="wendywilliamsgifs:gMu_B-ehUbLQbft6mYwVBg:Zn6VAn2F5H4ei"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/afb66cbf4ca5ebfb018b4780256bd5fa/tumblr_oh6qj0cx8U1tfn6k7o1_500.gifv" data-orig-width="500" data-orig-height="280"/></figure></blockquote> <p>And Erin there is a perfect example of what Musk was talking about in his original tweet.</p> <p>“Billionaire” IS used in a very negative way by a LOT of people. Especially those who don’t realize it doesn’t mean “someone who literally sits on a vault of cash and swims in it like Scrooge McDuck.” Most Billionaires don’t just have money lying around. It’s tied up in a million different kinds of assets including his employee roster.</p> </blockquote><p>Exactly. And I’m surprisingly Hank Green is on his high horse snarking at Musk and offering a creative re-definition of “job creation“</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="785" data-orig-width="750"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/ce07c8ec6880c76d43d18140978c281c/tumblr_pbq2563wUL1rw09tq_540.jpg" data-orig-height="785" data-orig-width="750"/></figure><p>Like dude… You are quite literally a job creator if you run a company that has employees. It’s not mutually exclusive with recognizing the contributions of other people, but if all being a billionaire means is literally having over $1 billion, then If you literally create jobs you are literally a Job creator. </p><p>The irony of not seeing “billionaire” used as a slur but then balking at the concept of being called a “job creator” is laughable.</p>

<p><a href="http://goat-yells-at-everything.tumblr.com/post/175791702726/libertarirynn-and-erin-there-is-a-perfect" class="tumblr_blog">goat...