🔥 Popular | Latest

thedamnqueenofhell: thecaptainstevexxx: actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare. I love him  Just wanted to add a more recent awesome post of his. : Ex-WWE star Batista calls Pacquiao 'idiot' over gay remarks By: Mark Giongco Reporter /@MarkGiongcoINQ INQUIRER.net/ 01:06 AM February 21, 2016 LATEST STORIES MOST REA SPORTS Pacers blows out Ca force Game 7 APRIL 28, 2018 11:49 SPORTS own at half, Rapt eliminate Wizards to reserves APRIL 28, 2018 11:44 TECHNOLOGY Scientists shockeda NASA cuts only mo rover APRIL 28, 2018 11:37 TECHNOLOGY Globe users vent ir ICO C Glo service interruptio APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 LIFESTYLE PH bet captures 20 Eco International o APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 AP "My mom happens to be a lesbian so I don'itg take that s**t. I don't think it's funny," said Bautista in an interview with TMZ Sports. 73 "If anyone called my mother an animal I'd stick my foot in his ass." Dave Bautista Following @DaveBautista FUUUUUCK NOOOOOO!!!! Like HELLLL FUCKING NOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKINGGGG 2 the NOOOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKING FUUUUUCKKKK gemma@maña@gemmagema4:3 @DaveBautista I have a question for you..give your endorsement to @realDonaldTrump ???? #peace 2:10 AM 18 Oct 2016 10,393 Retweets 21,962 Likes 9499 10K 22K thedamnqueenofhell: thecaptainstevexxx: actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare. I love him  Just wanted to add a more recent awesome post of his.
Save
thedamnqueenofhell: thecaptainstevexxx: actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare. I love him  Just wanted to add a more recent awesome post of his. : Ex-WWE star Batista calls Pacquiao 'idiot' over gay remarks By: Mark Giongco Reporter /@MarkGiongcoINQ INQUIRER.net/ 01:06 AM February 21, 2016 LATEST STORIES MOST REA SPORTS Pacers blows out Ca force Game 7 APRIL 28, 2018 11:49 SPORTS own at half, Rapt eliminate Wizards to reserves APRIL 28, 2018 11:44 TECHNOLOGY Scientists shockeda NASA cuts only mo rover APRIL 28, 2018 11:37 TECHNOLOGY Globe users vent ir ICO C Glo service interruptio APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 LIFESTYLE PH bet captures 20 Eco International o APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 AP "My mom happens to be a lesbian so I don'itg take that s**t. I don't think it's funny," said Bautista in an interview with TMZ Sports. 73 "If anyone called my mother an animal I'd stick my foot in his ass." Dave Bautista Following @DaveBautista FUUUUUCK NOOOOOO!!!! Like HELLLL FUCKING NOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKINGGGG 2 the NOOOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKING FUUUUUCKKKK gemma@maña@gemmagema4:3 @DaveBautista I have a question for you..give your endorsement to @realDonaldTrump ???? #peace 2:10 AM 18 Oct 2016 10,393 Retweets 21,962 Likes 9499 10K 22K thedamnqueenofhell: thecaptainstevexxx: actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare. I love him  Just wanted to add a more recent awesome post of his.
Save
actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare. : Ex-WWE star Batista calls Pacquiao 'idiot' over gay remarks By: Mark Giongco Reporter /@MarkGiongcoINQ INQUIRER.net/ 01:06 AM February 21, 2016 LATEST STORIES MOST REA SPORTS Pacers blows out Ca force Game 7 APRIL 28, 2018 11:49 SPORTS own at half, Rapt eliminate Wizards to reserves APRIL 28, 2018 11:44 TECHNOLOGY Scientists shockeda NASA cuts only mo rover APRIL 28, 2018 11:37 TECHNOLOGY Globe users vent ir ICO C Glo service interruptio APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 LIFESTYLE PH bet captures 20 Eco International o APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 AP "My mom happens to be a lesbian so I don'itg take that s**t. I don't think it's funny," said Bautista in an interview with TMZ Sports. 73 "If anyone called my mother an animal I'd stick my foot in his ass." Dave Bautista Following @DaveBautista FUUUUUCK NOOOOOO!!!! Like HELLLL FUCKING NOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKINGGGG 2 the NOOOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKING FUUUUUCKKKK gemma@maña@gemmagema4:3 @DaveBautista I have a question for you..give your endorsement to @realDonaldTrump ???? #peace 2:10 AM 18 Oct 2016 10,393 Retweets 21,962 Likes 9499 10K 22K actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare.
Save
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I’m now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn’t want to be here. Okay, @angrybell … actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don’t read that with a tone, don’t read that as an attack. That’s my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn’t translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author’s reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn’t convince you, there’s the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He’s broken literally every one of those rules. He’s openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn’t *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn’t his to distribute. That’s aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that’s treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that’s an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that’s treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he’s on the hook for contempt, if he doesn’t then he’s on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn’t go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he’s committing grand larceny by fraud, because he’s taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, “high crimes and misdemeanors”. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. Trump’s supporters probably believe he’s done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn’t like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they’ve ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. “ His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he’s failing that job. “ I like how Bogleech doesn’t know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It’s not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That’s what ‘above reproach’ means. An impossible standard, considering people “reproach” Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I’ve seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says “merits this”. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets… Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don’t need to know the context, or any other point, when you’re indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump’s execution, we’re 5 paragraphs in and you haven’t even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I’m guessing, because I’m not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-”concocting” a response, and yet you’re waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn’t about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn’t mean they’re criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump’s execution. That’s it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of, “So, click-bait subtitle that you don’t see until you’ve already clicked on the article link out of the way, here’s what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,” could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It’s like… it’s like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like, “Oh, seems you made a typo,” you’d jump in like, “But what about they’re perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They’re lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it”. You and what’s his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y’all keep saying “but what of the context?” when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken. “Sure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.” Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
Save
actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare. : Ex-WWE star Batista calls Pacquiao 'idiot' over gay remarks By: Mark Giongco Reporter /@MarkGiongcoINQ INQUIRER.net/ 01:06 AM February 21, 2016 LATEST STORIES MOST REA SPORTS Pacers blows out Ca force Game 7 APRIL 28, 2018 11:49 SPORTS own at half, Rapt eliminate Wizards to reserves APRIL 28, 2018 11:44 TECHNOLOGY Scientists shockeda NASA cuts only mo rover APRIL 28, 2018 11:37 TECHNOLOGY Globe users vent ir ICO C Glo service interruptio APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 LIFESTYLE PH bet captures 20 Eco International o APRIL 28, 2018 11:36 AP "My mom happens to be a lesbian so I don'itg take that s**t. I don't think it's funny," said Bautista in an interview with TMZ Sports. 73 "If anyone called my mother an animal I'd stick my foot in his ass." Dave Bautista Following @DaveBautista FUUUUUCK NOOOOOO!!!! Like HELLLL FUCKING NOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKINGGGG 2 the NOOOOOOOO!!! HELL 2 the FUCKING FUUUUUCKKKK gemma@maña@gemmagema4:3 @DaveBautista I have a question for you..give your endorsement to @realDonaldTrump ???? #peace 2:10 AM 18 Oct 2016 10,393 Retweets 21,962 Likes 9499 10K 22K actorsallusionpresents: seaofolives: darkarfs: Big Dave. One of the good ones.  guys batista is honestly one of the greatest human beings alive ude Dave Bautista cried when he got the role of Drax in GotG and then threw himself into acting classes to prepare.
Save
So let the events in Europe be a warning to Americans here: progressive policies will slowly but surely work their ruin on any society, and it’s incumbent on conservatives today to counteract this by supporting their own elite and exercising the civic duties responsibly (i.e. voting for good candidates, challenging injustice, and defending essential freedoms). Not only should this be done for posterity, but for the sake of protesters around the world who are fighting for the same things. ▪️The Riots In France Aren’t Just About Gas Taxes, But About The West’s Decline Tag friends & Follow 👣 👉🏻 @unclesamsmisguidedchildren UncleSamsMisguidedChildren trump memes tactical military guns patriotism militarymuscle 2ndamendment Deplorable Gunlife secondammendmen 2A donaldtrump makeamericagreatagain SemperFi usairforce USMC usnavy usarmy ammo uscoastguard conservative gunsofinstagram igmilitia ar15 iggunslingers pewpew republican Pewpewpew: Dec. 3, 2018 Obama endorsement May of 2017 So let the events in Europe be a warning to Americans here: progressive policies will slowly but surely work their ruin on any society, and it’s incumbent on conservatives today to counteract this by supporting their own elite and exercising the civic duties responsibly (i.e. voting for good candidates, challenging injustice, and defending essential freedoms). Not only should this be done for posterity, but for the sake of protesters around the world who are fighting for the same things. ▪️The Riots In France Aren’t Just About Gas Taxes, But About The West’s Decline Tag friends & Follow 👣 👉🏻 @unclesamsmisguidedchildren UncleSamsMisguidedChildren trump memes tactical military guns patriotism militarymuscle 2ndamendment Deplorable Gunlife secondammendmen 2A donaldtrump makeamericagreatagain SemperFi usairforce USMC usnavy usarmy ammo uscoastguard conservative gunsofinstagram igmilitia ar15 iggunslingers pewpew republican Pewpewpew
Save
<p><a href="http://pattern-53-enfield.tumblr.com/post/173343565511/bold-talk-considering-paul-joseph-watson-is-a" class="tumblr_blog">pattern-53-enfield</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Bold talk considering Paul Joseph Watson is a charlatan who actively shills for the anti-soy scaremongers and thinks musicians like Kanye are Destroying Western Civilization. Stop giving these people passes for being broken clocks.</p></blockquote> <p>I fucking swear I almost blocked out the name because I knew I was going to get some dumbass comment like this.</p><p>For the last time, agreeing with a single statement does not mean an endorsement of the person who said it.</p>: Paul Joseph Watson@Prison... 3h OK, let's play the left's game here for a sec. Stephen Colbert (white) & his team of writers (almost all white) using a platform owned by a 94-year-old white billionaire (Sumner Redstone) to lecture a black dude about how he should stay in his lane. Nolte: Stephen Colbert Leads Social Justice Mob Against Kanye West breitbart.com <p><a href="http://pattern-53-enfield.tumblr.com/post/173343565511/bold-talk-considering-paul-joseph-watson-is-a" class="tumblr_blog">pattern-53-enfield</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Bold talk considering Paul Joseph Watson is a charlatan who actively shills for the anti-soy scaremongers and thinks musicians like Kanye are Destroying Western Civilization. Stop giving these people passes for being broken clocks.</p></blockquote> <p>I fucking swear I almost blocked out the name because I knew I was going to get some dumbass comment like this.</p><p>For the last time, agreeing with a single statement does not mean an endorsement of the person who said it.</p>
Save
Cars and guns: shaelit "Cars kill more people than guns! What're you gonna do, regulate cars next?" You idiot. You moron. You utter buffoon Cars ARE regulated The permit test. The permit. The practice year. The regulations on how many hours you have to drive and at what hours and with whom. The driving test. The license. The requirements regarding insurance. License renewals. Road laws. Highway laws. Speed limits. Seatbelt laws. Carseat laws. Laws against drinking and driving and other forms of intoxication. Red lights. Not passing in intersections. Right of way WHO can drive and WHEN and HOW and WHERE are all regulated, because yes, a car in the wrong hands can kill a person. Just like a gun. Oh but wait, there's more! I, as a licensed driver, can't drive anything I want. I can't drivea motorcycle. I can't drive a speedboat. You know what else I can't drive? One of these. To drive a semi-truck, I would need a Commercial Driver's License or CDL There are age limits involved, as well as required hours of training and study. There's a written test and a driving test. There are also medical requirements. And even if I passed all that, you know what I STILL couldn't drive? One of these To drive a semi loaded with hazardous materials, you would have to get a federal H endorsement added to your CDL. And to get that, you have to jump through even MORE hoops, including another written test and a background check. So yeah, guns should be better regulated. Any Joe Blow shouldn't be able to stagger down to a gun show and get himself a sweet piece without some oversight. And ESPECIALLY no one should be getting their hands on a semi-automatic assault rifle like an AR-15, aka the Hazardous Semi Truck of guns. There are professional reasons that a person might need clearance to handle and own such a weapon, but not a civilian. Not an unscreened rando off the street. Try not to be such an utter wanker that you place the mere potential of a power- boner over the lives of actual children like those killed in Parkland, Sandy Hook, and elsewhere prettysicksupply There's also the fact that if I fuck up and njure, or even KILL someone with my vehicle, or another person's vehicle, or a vehicle I'm not even supposed to drive in the first place- I CAN AND WILL BE PUNISHED FOR THAT. I will be made responsible for that damage/death. Insurance exists to help cover the costs of damages- both to cars and people. If my negligence with a vehicle leads to someone's injury or death- my access to vehicles in the future WILL BE COMPROMISED. So yes... we do regulate cars. We also regulate the DAMAGE CAUSED BY THOSE WHO DRIVE THEM chescaleigh also, cars are meant for transportation. sure they can kill people but their sole purpose is not to kill. a gun's ONLY PURPOSE is to maim or kill its target. you can't take a road trip on a gun or load up a gun with groceries. fuck outta here with this bullshit comparison. Cars and guns
Save
Steph Curry Changes A Kid’s Life With a Brita Pitcher and An Awful Song In New Ad- blogged by @MsJennyb ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ After making headlines over the release of his signature Under Armor shoe, StephCurry has once again gone viral for another incredibly awful endorsement. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On Friday, Curry took to Twitter to share his new Brita ad, however, things took a turn for the worse when users clicked the sound icon on the video. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ To start, the commercial introduces us to a random dude, who has New Year’s resolutions to ditch bottled water, work out, eat healthy and be a better boyfriend (which is at the very end of the list). After 24 hours of bad decisions, Curry appears and proceeds to help the kid change his life around and it all starts with the Brita pitcher. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ But, things take a turn for the absolute worse when the beat drops. The two go into a jingle of sorts, singing about how Curry changed the kid’s life. “First name Stephen, last name Curry, he came into my life now everything is less blurry.” Problem is, Curry’s first name isn’t even Stephen. Secondly, the song is awful, so awful that it’s catchy and now I can’t stop singing it! ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Anyway, after Curry helped the kid out with all of his issues, turns out it was all a figment of the boy’s imagination. Basically, he made the changes on all his own and it all started with Brita pitcher. However, sources say it was meant to be painfully awful to start dialogue. So, i guess it worked.: Steph Curry Changes A Kid's Life With a Brita Pitcher and An Awful Song In New Ad @balleralert Steph Curry Changes A Kid’s Life With a Brita Pitcher and An Awful Song In New Ad- blogged by @MsJennyb ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ After making headlines over the release of his signature Under Armor shoe, StephCurry has once again gone viral for another incredibly awful endorsement. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On Friday, Curry took to Twitter to share his new Brita ad, however, things took a turn for the worse when users clicked the sound icon on the video. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ To start, the commercial introduces us to a random dude, who has New Year’s resolutions to ditch bottled water, work out, eat healthy and be a better boyfriend (which is at the very end of the list). After 24 hours of bad decisions, Curry appears and proceeds to help the kid change his life around and it all starts with the Brita pitcher. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ But, things take a turn for the absolute worse when the beat drops. The two go into a jingle of sorts, singing about how Curry changed the kid’s life. “First name Stephen, last name Curry, he came into my life now everything is less blurry.” Problem is, Curry’s first name isn’t even Stephen. Secondly, the song is awful, so awful that it’s catchy and now I can’t stop singing it! ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Anyway, after Curry helped the kid out with all of his issues, turns out it was all a figment of the boy’s imagination. Basically, he made the changes on all his own and it all started with Brita pitcher. However, sources say it was meant to be painfully awful to start dialogue. So, i guess it worked.
Save