🔥 Popular | Latest

rose-colored-candies: likethewaterandwind: that-crazy-australian: omghotmemes: Why isnt anyone talking about this? To google! …… Holy shit. Is this fucking real? it’s not fake, but it is absolutely untrue. note: the headline says the heat wave melted 20% of an ISLAND IN ANTARCTICA, not all of Antarctica.  The island in question is Eagle Island, located near the southernmost point of South America. So no, Antarctica did not lose 20% of it’s ice in nine days. Eagle Island did, however, reach “record high temperatures” (69 degrees Fahrenheit) from February 3-13, 2020.  This is due to climate change, of course, but please remember, a headline is not an article, and please don’t be alarmist for no reason. Thank you for sharing this information! Really helping with the stress I had, and others probs too. I know this is still scary and due to climate change, but we can’t let headlines get the best of us, so it’s good to have the info : rose-colored-candies: likethewaterandwind: that-crazy-australian: omghotmemes: Why isnt anyone talking about this? To google! …… Holy shit. Is this fucking real? it’s not fake, but it is absolutely untrue. note: the headline says the heat wave melted 20% of an ISLAND IN ANTARCTICA, not all of Antarctica.  The island in question is Eagle Island, located near the southernmost point of South America. So no, Antarctica did not lose 20% of it’s ice in nine days. Eagle Island did, however, reach “record high temperatures” (69 degrees Fahrenheit) from February 3-13, 2020.  This is due to climate change, of course, but please remember, a headline is not an article, and please don’t be alarmist for no reason. Thank you for sharing this information! Really helping with the stress I had, and others probs too. I know this is still scary and due to climate change, but we can’t let headlines get the best of us, so it’s good to have the info
Save
captain-snark: kedreeva: kedreeva: Sigh. It’s February 16th. They made it 2 weeks longer than last year at least. I have been explaining to them that it’s FEBRUARY and that February is NOT the time to lay eggs and they had been doing REALLY GOOD and not laying any eggs and then SARK went out today and let them out and told them it was warming up, time to lay eggs, and I shit you not, I walked out tonight to lock them up and found this in the nest box. I’m going to crack this over his head while he sleeps, for betraying me like this :| Because the temperatures outside are currently below freezing, which means that the eggs either freeze or at least get cold enough that the gametes die and the eggs cannot be hatched. Since peafowl only lay a few eggs a year (each hen will lay…. maybe 30 eggs in a year), it’s bad to lose a good portion of them to cold for no reason. me: it’s a duck!also me: …egg…it’s a eggalso me: S’not even a duck egg: captain-snark: kedreeva: kedreeva: Sigh. It’s February 16th. They made it 2 weeks longer than last year at least. I have been explaining to them that it’s FEBRUARY and that February is NOT the time to lay eggs and they had been doing REALLY GOOD and not laying any eggs and then SARK went out today and let them out and told them it was warming up, time to lay eggs, and I shit you not, I walked out tonight to lock them up and found this in the nest box. I’m going to crack this over his head while he sleeps, for betraying me like this :| Because the temperatures outside are currently below freezing, which means that the eggs either freeze or at least get cold enough that the gametes die and the eggs cannot be hatched. Since peafowl only lay a few eggs a year (each hen will lay…. maybe 30 eggs in a year), it’s bad to lose a good portion of them to cold for no reason. me: it’s a duck!also me: …egg…it’s a eggalso me: S’not even a duck egg
Save
raven-system: melomelochan: flerponius: ncrussell: theycallmeparrot: estebanwaseaten: moyaofthemist: ilovecharts: The total area of solar panels it would take to power the world, Europe, and Germany “In just six hours, the world’s deserts receive more energy from the sun than humankind consumes in a year. (x) I don’t care how many times I see this I will always reblog it Stop spending money on war and lies and start spending it on ways to make this planet better. I saw someone’s argument against trying to stop global warming and it was literally “What if global warming is fake and we make the world a better place for no reason?” I knew that my contry was hot … but not that much : raven-system: melomelochan: flerponius: ncrussell: theycallmeparrot: estebanwaseaten: moyaofthemist: ilovecharts: The total area of solar panels it would take to power the world, Europe, and Germany “In just six hours, the world’s deserts receive more energy from the sun than humankind consumes in a year. (x) I don’t care how many times I see this I will always reblog it Stop spending money on war and lies and start spending it on ways to make this planet better. I saw someone’s argument against trying to stop global warming and it was literally “What if global warming is fake and we make the world a better place for no reason?” I knew that my contry was hot … but not that much

raven-system: melomelochan: flerponius: ncrussell: theycallmeparrot: estebanwaseaten: moyaofthemist: ilovecharts: The total area...

Save
thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things? Like, if I ever had a kid, I wouldn’t spank their ass raw or something like that. But a bop on the mouth or the ear pull or a smack upside the head? Yea. Those are behavior modifiers. Except they’re not. The studies done by the trained psychologists in this joke show that little kids don’t associate being hit with the thing they’ve done wrong. Very small children only understand consequences that are directly caused by the thing they did. Steal a biscuit, biscuit tastes good. Then for no reason mummy hit me. Very different to stole a biscuit, now no biscuit after dinner because I stole a biscuit. And they also show that when a child is old enough to understand why they are being hit that non-physical punishment is equally as effective and less mentally harmful in the long run. Do you know who benefits the most from hitting as a punishment? The parent. It gives a satisfaction rush. Parents do it because it makes them feel good. Basically kids have two stages: too young to understand why they are being hit so physical punishment is useless for anything other than teaching a child that bigger stronger people can hit you whenever they like (Which sounds like the same lesson you would learn from abuse) And the second stage is old enough to be reasoned with so many punishment options are available and you chose physical violence because it makes *you* feel better, which is an abusive action. The only time a person should ever use violence against another human being, of any age, is to stop that person from being violent themselves. : thebaconsandwichofregret: asexual-not-asexual-detective: Am I the only one who thinks that hitting a kid and abuse are different things? Like, if I ever had a kid, I wouldn’t spank their ass raw or something like that. But a bop on the mouth or the ear pull or a smack upside the head? Yea. Those are behavior modifiers. Except they’re not. The studies done by the trained psychologists in this joke show that little kids don’t associate being hit with the thing they’ve done wrong. Very small children only understand consequences that are directly caused by the thing they did. Steal a biscuit, biscuit tastes good. Then for no reason mummy hit me. Very different to stole a biscuit, now no biscuit after dinner because I stole a biscuit. And they also show that when a child is old enough to understand why they are being hit that non-physical punishment is equally as effective and less mentally harmful in the long run. Do you know who benefits the most from hitting as a punishment? The parent. It gives a satisfaction rush. Parents do it because it makes them feel good. Basically kids have two stages: too young to understand why they are being hit so physical punishment is useless for anything other than teaching a child that bigger stronger people can hit you whenever they like (Which sounds like the same lesson you would learn from abuse) And the second stage is old enough to be reasoned with so many punishment options are available and you chose physical violence because it makes *you* feel better, which is an abusive action. The only time a person should ever use violence against another human being, of any age, is to stop that person from being violent themselves.
Save