What Meme
What Meme

What Meme

me me me
me me me

me me me

What Is A Meme
What Is A Meme

What Is A Meme

meme definition
meme definition

meme definition

Define Meme
Define Meme

Define Meme

What Does Meme Mean
What Does Meme Mean

What Does Meme Mean

why meme
why meme

why meme

Art History Memes
Art History Memes

Art History Memes

nerd meme
nerd meme

nerd meme

Tumblr Memes
Tumblr Memes

Tumblr Memes

🔥 | Latest

Anaconda, Crazy, and Energy: e 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) F. The world trade center was 100% brought down by planted demolition charges, NOT from the jet impact or fires. I am a physicist. I have studied how matter, energy, and forces work for decades. I will say with 100% certainty that it is physically impossible for the heat generated by burning jet fuel in those conditions to structurally weaken steel anywhere near the point of collapse. They are specifically engineered to endure brutal fires AND the structural damage of a few missing supports (which were lost in the impact). Never in the history of humanity has a skyscraper collapsed from a fire. Also, the only way a building could possibly collapse neatly into their footprints (like they did) would be if the damage was perfectly symmetric, and all support beams in the foundation gave way at exactly the same time That is not possible at all without timed explosives. Also, building 7 was not even hit by a jet but still collapsed. It was already rigged and ready to go when the third plane was supposed to hit it. But the passengers of that plane heroically overtook it from the hijackers and crashed it into a field in Pennsylvania. The deep state orchestrators still had to proceed with the demolition of building 7 though that plane did not make it there, else engineers would have found the rigged explosives during subsequent safety checks. The evidence had to be destroyed, in other words I will also say that dozens of government-employed scientists also do not believe a word of the official story. Anyone that knows physics at a moderate level will realize the official story is impossible. In fact, the government forbade any physicist or engineer (aside from the ones at NIST who were told exactly what to say from above) from independently investigating anything, or from questioning the official story, because they knew we'd call bullshit on it. So naturally we looked into it, we met up on weekends, we built models and ran simulations. The official story is 100% bullshit. Not many people in academia have called bullshit because they're afraid of being branded a "crazy conspiracy theorist", losing funding, and losing their jobs This has nothing to do with my political beliefs. This is purely a matter of physics. The buildings were rigged with explosives. I am in no way disrespecting anyone that died on that day, and i have the utmost respect for the heroes that put the lives of others before themselves. The public deserves to know what the deep state, government, and CIA did that day permalink source embed save save-RES report give gold reply hide child comments ↑
Anaconda, Crazy, and Energy: e 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
 F.
 The world trade center was 100% brought down by planted demolition charges, NOT from the jet impact or fires. I am
 a physicist. I have studied how matter, energy, and forces work for decades. I will say with 100% certainty that it is
 physically impossible for the heat generated by burning jet fuel in those conditions to structurally weaken steel
 anywhere near the point of collapse. They are specifically engineered to endure brutal fires AND the structural damage
 of a few missing supports (which were lost in the impact). Never in the history of humanity has a skyscraper collapsed
 from a fire. Also, the only way a building could possibly collapse neatly into their footprints (like they did) would be if
 the damage was perfectly symmetric, and all support beams in the foundation gave way at exactly the same time
 That is not possible at all without timed explosives. Also, building 7 was not even hit by a jet but still collapsed. It was
 already rigged and ready to go when the third plane was supposed to hit it. But the passengers of that plane
 heroically overtook it from the hijackers and crashed it into a field in Pennsylvania. The deep state orchestrators still
 had to proceed with the demolition of building 7 though that plane did not make it there, else engineers would have
 found the rigged explosives during subsequent safety checks. The evidence had to be destroyed, in other words
 I will also say that dozens of government-employed scientists also do not believe a word of the official story. Anyone
 that knows physics at a moderate level will realize the official story is impossible. In fact, the government forbade any
 physicist or engineer (aside from the ones at NIST who were told exactly what to say from above) from independently
 investigating anything, or from questioning the official story, because they knew we'd call bullshit on it. So naturally
 we looked into it, we met up on weekends, we built models and ran simulations. The official story is 100% bullshit.
 Not many people in academia have called bullshit because they're afraid of being branded a "crazy conspiracy
 theorist", losing funding, and losing their jobs
 This has nothing to do with my political beliefs. This is purely a matter of physics. The buildings were rigged with
 explosives. I am in no way disrespecting anyone that died on that day, and i have the utmost respect for the heroes
 that put the lives of others before themselves. The public deserves to know what the deep state, government, and CIA
 did that day
 permalink source embed save save-RES report give gold reply hide child comments
 ↑
9gag, Ass, and Ignorant: MehGyver @AndrewNadeau Running was invented in 1612 by Thomas Running when he tried to walk twice at the same time. 4/10/17, 3:36 PM unconvenientfox 396 Points 21h Bullshit. Runing was actually invented by R Unner in 1957 as an cheap alternative to the bycicle for poor people REPLY widdlyjscuds 168 Points 21h @unconvenientfox Wrong. Running was actually invented by S. Printer in 1842 as a way to not getting caught by the local police REPLY + unconvenientfox 83 Points 21h @widdlyjscuds thats is incorect. S. Printer only used the work of Walker B. Fast, a sailor that invented running as "the fastest way to swim in dry area" REPLY kftfggf 18 Points 19h @widdlyjscuds Wrong, S. Printer invented Ass printing technique which is currently using in offices worldwide as he was inspired by his female colleague once photocopying her ass and caught up by him in 1975 REPLY otoozbeer 24 Points 7h @kftfggf Are you troll or ignorant? Simon Printer invented ass-printing. He is talking about Samuel Printer who invented running in 19th century REPLY craygenjohnston 2 Points 5h @kapicha wrong running was invented by the first black persons to see somethingg shiny REPLY + lenahurrdy 6 Points 5h @unconvenientfox false. Running was invented by Lance Corporal Haste Walker of the British Army in 1916 as a means to avoid German artillery barrage. The previous means of infantry movement invented by Luoen Le Quickstep during the Napoleonic wars became obsolete after Haste Walker's invention, revolutionizing warfare forever REPLY + milesmtl 2 Points 3h @lenahurrdy galse. Running is the most famous contribution by women in history. It was inveted by Celerity Fäst, a german women in 1505 when she was caught out of the kitchen. As she needed to get back and make an apologiy sandwhich before her husband get the word of her escape. REPLY gazeinhaze 1 Point 3h @unconvenientfox this comments are gold xDd Stitch It
9gag, Ass, and Ignorant: MehGyver
 @AndrewNadeau
 Running was invented in 1612 by
 Thomas Running when he tried to
 walk twice at the same time.
 4/10/17, 3:36 PM
 unconvenientfox 396 Points 21h
 Bullshit. Runing was actually invented by R
 Unner in 1957 as an cheap alternative to the
 bycicle for poor people
 REPLY
 widdlyjscuds 168 Points 21h
 @unconvenientfox Wrong. Running was
 actually invented by S. Printer in 1842 as a
 way to not getting caught by the local
 police
 REPLY
 +
 unconvenientfox 83 Points 21h
 @widdlyjscuds thats is incorect. S. Printer
 only used the work of Walker B. Fast, a
 sailor that invented running as "the fastest
 way to swim in dry area"
 REPLY
 kftfggf 18 Points 19h
 @widdlyjscuds Wrong, S. Printer invented
 Ass printing technique which is currently
 using in offices worldwide as he was
 inspired by his female colleague once
 photocopying her ass and caught up by
 him in 1975
 REPLY
 otoozbeer 24 Points 7h
 @kftfggf Are you troll or ignorant? Simon
 Printer invented ass-printing. He is talking
 about Samuel Printer who invented running
 in 19th century
 REPLY
 craygenjohnston 2 Points 5h
 @kapicha wrong running was invented by
 the first black persons to see somethingg
 shiny
 REPLY
 +
 lenahurrdy 6 Points 5h
 @unconvenientfox false. Running was
 invented by Lance Corporal Haste Walker of
 the British Army in 1916 as a means to avoid
 German artillery barrage. The previous
 means of infantry movement invented by
 Luoen Le Quickstep during the Napoleonic
 wars became obsolete after Haste Walker's
 invention, revolutionizing warfare forever
 REPLY
 +
 milesmtl 2 Points 3h
 @lenahurrdy galse. Running is the most
 famous contribution by women in history. It
 was inveted by Celerity Fäst, a german
 women in 1505 when she was caught out
 of the kitchen. As she needed to get back
 and make an apologiy sandwhich before
 her husband get the word of her escape.
 REPLY
 gazeinhaze 1 Point 3h
 @unconvenientfox this comments are gold
 xDd
 Stitch It