🔥 Popular | Latest

Don’t do crack kids: Tos pm Telstra 0 Can your job pay trom my crack addiction. Il be your friend or A more if you want to? Only if my repayment is you fuel my crack addiction My address is 122 Thomas St. Dandenong Vic 3175 So how did you want me to sneak in?l assume they've got guards around the place Dress up as a ninja turtle and tell them your here to entertain me And than give me my crack so we can smoke together. I know a place Send Typea esage 705 pm Telstra 0 Okay but which one?1 think if came as the wrong one it' blow our cover Attention to detail is how we pull this off Raphaet Iike em tough Rough Only if I can tie you up using my red face mask smoke your pipe if you do go through with tying me up. And maybe even do more if you play your moves correctly In that case when do you want me there by Tre eage Send Tatatre 40 708 pm 3am wear your best jocks Kidding me?i won't be weanng any Much better expect you to be already undressed when t get there as we may heed to move quickly I only fuck with socks on. Miss me with that gay shit m I can work with that Remember though for payment t need my fair share of your crack I thought your bringing the crack Type mesage Send Teletra 0 106 pm bring the crack But i want your ass as my payment Oh you'll have that in spades Perfect. Sounds lika a fine date to me see you there So who are you really Lmao Some bloke on her tryn to catfish some mother fuckers I'm a Nigerian prince just here to have some fun Typeeage Send Telstre 40 706 pm 12% Must be pretty rich then d Are you actually addicted to crack? Fuck no. Woukdr't even have the taintest of idea of where to get it Are you? I got peer pressured to smoke sum in year 7 haven't been the same since Should definitely see someone bout it Shit fucks your ife up which I'm sure you've found out Ive been clean for about 3 years now but considered doing it A again after my recent break up Tye a meage Send Tatutre 40 708 pm now Dur consIoerea aong it again after my recent break up Nah nah don't do it. 3 years is an accomplishment a lot of peosle dream of achieving Honestly, if that's actualy you in that photo (which r'm highly doubiting nether less), they're missing out big time. Thank you for our conversation. You're a genuine guy and I hope you do find someone who likes you for you. Don't give up on love! Thank you very much, appreciate that Good luck with everything for you ype age Send Don’t do crack kids
Save
Graph Theory can Save Relationships: 11:50 Add Question Q Quora Notifs Home Open Qs More FRitam Chatterjee upvoted this 19 Nov I like girl A. We are very good friends. A's best friend B likes me. Also, A likes a guy C who is my best bro and C likes another girl D who is in a relationship with another guy. What should we do? Priyanka Dhaka 10.7k upvotes by Ritam Chatterjee, Mukesh Sharma, (more) You can apply Bipartite Matching algorithm of Graph Theory. All you have to do is: 1. Put all girls as vertices (a's) in Part A, and boys as vertices (b's) in Part B. 2. Draw an edge between vertex a to vertex b if a likes b. 3. It will be a bipartite graph (there are no edges within vertices of Part A, and same for Part B) unless your friends are not straight. 4. Then find maximum matching for this bipartite graph. (refer this link Maximum Bipartite Matching-GeeksforGeeks) 5. You will get maximum matching as output and the matched edges will be the pairs who should be together. 6. You can apply weighted bipartite matching algorithm if you know how much they love/like each other. In that case, assign weights according to their amount of love. and repeat step 4 and 5. Thanks for asking this question. Finally I have found a real life problem which can be solved by what Prof Panda has been teaching us for 2-3 years. P.S.I can provide you code for both weighted and unweighted maximum bipartite matching which I made for my project. Updated 28 Jul. Graph Theory can Save Relationships

Graph Theory can Save Relationships

Save
The delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores: factfiction emiliusthegreat Follow partybarackisinthehousetonight releases pack of dads into home depot* go....be free hotcommunist invasive species encroach on lesbian territory dreaming-shark This is a common misconception because they're such similar environments, but you should be aware that dads are native to Home Depot, while lesbians are actually native to Lowe's. At this point, however, both dads and lesbians have made themselves at home in both Home Depot and Lowe's to the point that trying to separate them back into their original ranges would probably do more harm than good to the delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores. ailithnight A properly raised and socialized Dad will be perfectly comfort- able cohabiting with Lesbians. Its not really "encroaching on another's territory". You wouldn't say that about foxes in a forest that also homes bobcats, would you? No. It's just two different species that have both evolved to live in similar/the same environment. As long as they recognize each other as equals, Dads and Lesbians are more than capable of cohabitation. Now, if you were to release a pack of Lumberjacks into a or Home Depot, that's where chaos will reign. Being adap far harsher and more demanding environment, the Lumberjacks would simply push Dads and Lesbians both out and also consume far more than a sustainable amount of resources. It would be like releasing bears at a country club. chequerootlurks As a former timber-harveste... I feel this is potentially accurate in theory. But highly improbable in actuality. Lumberjacks, like most megafauna species generally require more space than the average hardware store, even a big box store could provide. The misconception is that Lumberjacks are a social species because of how they often work and live together. This is a matter of necessity, not preference, and a survival technique for thriving under the Log Boss. A "pack" of Lumberjacks, if not under the environmental pressure of a Log Boss will naturally disperse until they each have a wide territory Lumberjacks rarely fight for territory. One on one, a Lumberjack could drive out a Dad or Lesbian, however the latter tend to travel in social packs. Lumberjacks will passively retreat on the presence of large numbers of people. Kind of like Sasquatch Getting a "pack" of Lumberjacks assembled would be hard enough unless they were forced into a Hardware Store by a LogBoss. In that case, they would already be in a heightened and potentially agitated state far above their natural behavior. This artificial scenario can be likened to a circus animal running amok If it had been in the wild, the incident would not have occurred. Free-roaming Lumberjacks are the cryptids of the Hardware system. They are surprisingly quiet and unobtrusive Please stop labeling Lumberjacks as dangerous roving social predators. They are intermediate level omnivores and remarkably peaceful unless threatened. katy-l-wood As a hardware store worker I can say that this is all 100% accurate. The delicate ecosystem of large chain hardware stores
Save
J.K. Rowling Apologised For Killing Off Another Character This Year: Today, 2 May 2017, marks the 19th anniversary of the Battle of Hogwarts,during which lves were lost and hearts were broken imeparably.Aho good teiumphed over evil and al was well and stulf But most importantly, the deaths And it's become kindol a tradtion in recent years for JK Rowing to apologise, on the anniversary of their death, foe killing off one af the charecters who died during the battle iJ.K Rowling Today I would just like to say: I'm really sorry about Fred. "Bows head in acceptance of your reasonable ire 8,955 54,970 Back in 2015, she apologised for kiling Fred Weasley And I thinkl can speak for all of us when I say: It'ssNnotOK№ Last year, she epologised for kiling Bernus Lupn Also not OK you're wondering 1JK. Rowling Arthur Ived, so Lupin had to de. Im sorry. Iddnt enjoy doing t The only sme my ecnor ever saw me cry was over the fate o Toddy. 37 PM-2May 2016 h 17 33,449 64210 And the tradtion lives on because JK.just tweeted an apology for another death Who could in be? I hear you ary OK, here it is. Please don't start flame wars over it, but this year ld ike to apologise for kiling whispers). Snape. "runs for cover 32,442 74,689 ALWAYS And, Ox some people love Snape and were sad when he died ka Pdont star fans wars over & butis year Td K rowing Why wouid you even bring that up? 18 PM-2May 201 ®İX.rowing m sti very sad about but hanks for the apolagy 31 PM 2 May 21 and miss him everyday But mostly people just think, in that case justice was served, And there are characters more deserving of apologies. ,e s Plse on' t wars over t.bur thi d Joanne Harris V Follow 2 May 2017 k rowing you realy ciantneed to apo ogise for that one t's 11 PM-2 Moy 2017 start fane wans emma lord k rowing I'd like to apolog e louder on your behaor one Lty Evara Potter 2PM-2 May 8017 Waits patiently until next year, wen someone more deserving cf an apology will be remembered.Whet do you think Is Snape deserving of an apology,or did he get what was coming to him o have Your nnother S J.K. Rowling Apologised For Killing Off Another Character This Year

J.K. Rowling Apologised For Killing Off Another Character This Year

Save
theamericanatheistblog: Reblog and follow. Visit https://www.youtube.com/user/Mentaloutlawstudios?sub_confirmation=1 for the best atheist Comedy/Humor Christian apologetics of the evidentialist kind rely on scientific ignorance and appeal to mystery: I's photo. Ishared I love his reasoning - perfect! C.S. Lewis on Reasoning to Atheism "Supposing there was no intelligence behind the universe, no creative mind. In that case, nobody designed my brain for the purpose of thinking. It is merely that when the atoms inside my skull happen, for physical or chemical reasons, to arrange themselves in a certain way, this gives me, as a by-product, the sensation I call thought. But, if so, how can I trust my own thinking to be true? it's like upsetting a milk jug and hoping that the way it splashes itself will give you a map of London. But if I can't trust my own thinking, of course I can't trust the arguments leading to Atheism, and therefore have no reason to be an Atheist, or anything else. Unless I believe in God, I cannot believe in thought: so I can never use thought to disbelieve in God." -C.S. Lewis The Case for Christionity,p 32 | this is great!! Like · Comment · Unfollow post · Share · 20:04 (about a minute ago) · 12 Except that the brain is not just a random jumble of chemical and physical components of which thinking is a random by- product. It is the result of millions of years of adaptation and honing. As we don't have big daws, natural armor or wings, humans rely on thinking for survival. If there were massive errors in the way we process information and make judgements upon which our survival hangs, we wouldn't be able to live and reproduce, and thus the human race would not exist. 20:15 (2 seconds ago) · Like - Reply |We can rely on our thinking to be true by observing the world, forming a hypothesis, testing it and looking at the results. If the results differ from our hypothesis, we adjust our thinking to account for the new information. If the results match our hypothesis, then our thinking was accurate. Huzzuh! 20:19 (2 seconds ago) · Like - Reply Write a comment... theamericanatheistblog: Reblog and follow. Visit https://www.youtube.com/user/Mentaloutlawstudios?sub_confirmation=1 for the best atheist Comedy/Humor Christian apologetics of the evidentialist kind rely on scientific ignorance and appeal to mystery

theamericanatheistblog: Reblog and follow. Visit https://www.youtube.com/user/Mentaloutlawstudios?sub_confirmation=1 for the best atheis...

Save