25+ Best Jane Memes | Mary Jane Memes, Mari Memes, Marijuanas Memes

🔥 Popular | Latest

People Are Dragging And Meme-ing Jane Lynch For Her Tweet About Billionaires

When J Scott Campbell Revisited *That* Mary Jane Cover For Marvel Comics #1000

prydekitty: MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH! By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But such a huge enterprise isn’t without its problems and complications… When a mutant dies, X–Factor is there to investigate how and why to keep the rules of reincarnation. Writer Leah Williams (AMAZING MARY JANE, X–TREMISTS) and artist David Baldeón (DOMINO, WEB WARRIORS) take Northstar, Polaris, Prodigy, Eye-boy, Daken and Prestige into the world of murder and missing persons… : prydekitty: MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH! By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But such a huge enterprise isn’t without its problems and complications… When a mutant dies, X–Factor is there to investigate how and why to keep the rules of reincarnation. Writer Leah Williams (AMAZING MARY JANE, X–TREMISTS) and artist David Baldeón (DOMINO, WEB WARRIORS) take Northstar, Polaris, Prodigy, Eye-boy, Daken and Prestige into the world of murder and missing persons…

prydekitty:

MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH!
By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But such a huge enterprise isn’t without its problems and complications… When a mutant dies, X–Factor is there to investigate how and why to keep the rules of reincarnation. Writer Leah Williams (AMAZING MARY JANE, X–TREMISTS) and artist David Baldeón (DOMINO, WEB WARRIORS) take Northstar, Polaris, Prodigy, Eye-boy, Daken and Prestige into the world of murder and missing persons…
: prydekitty:

MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH!
By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But such a huge enterprise isn’t without its problems and complications… When a mutant dies, X–Factor is there to investigate how and why to keep the rules of reincarnation. Writer Leah Williams (AMAZING MARY JANE, X–TREMISTS) and artist David Baldeón (DOMINO, WEB WARRIORS) take Northstar, Polaris, Prodigy, Eye-boy, Daken and Prestige into the world of murder and missing persons…

prydekitty:

MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH!
By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But such a huge enterprise isn’t without its problems and complications… When a mutant dies, X–Factor is there to investigate how and why to keep the rules of reincarnation. Writer Leah Williams (AMAZING MARY JANE, X–TREMISTS) and artist David Baldeón (DOMINO, WEB WARRIORS) take Northstar, Polaris, Prodigy, Eye-boy, Daken and Prestige into the world of murder and missing persons…
: prydekitty:

MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH!
By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But such a huge enterprise isn’t without its problems and complications… When a mutant dies, X–Factor is there to investigate how and why to keep the rules of reincarnation. Writer Leah Williams (AMAZING MARY JANE, X–TREMISTS) and artist David Baldeón (DOMINO, WEB WARRIORS) take Northstar, Polaris, Prodigy, Eye-boy, Daken and Prestige into the world of murder and missing persons…

prydekitty: MUTANTS HAVE CONQUERED DEATH! By the grace of The Five, the resurrection protocols can bring back any fallen mutant. But suc...

Save

mademoisellelapiquante: Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007: mademoisellelapiquante: Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007

mademoisellelapiquante:
Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007: mademoisellelapiquante:
Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007

mademoisellelapiquante:
Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007: mademoisellelapiquante:
Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007

mademoisellelapiquante: Anne Hathaway as Jane Austen in Becoming Jane - 2007

Save

nestofstraightlines: jabberwockypie: kyraneko: darkmagyk: seananmcguire: nokeek: Dorothy just wanted something that she could believe in,A gray dustbowl girl in a life she was better off leavin’.She made her escape, went from gray into green,And she could have got clear, and she could have got clean,But she chose to be good and go back to the gray Kansas skyWhere color’s a fable and freedom’s a fairy tale lie. Alice got lost, and I guess that we really can’t blame her;They say she got tangled and tied in the lies that became her.They say she went mad, and she never complained,For there’s peace of a kind in a life unconstrained.She gives Cheshire kisses, she’s easy with white rabbit smiles,And she’ll never be free, but she’s won herself safe for a while. Susan and Lucy were queens, and they ruled well and proudly.They honored their land and their lord, rang the bells long and loudly.They never once asked to return to their livesTo be children and chattel and mothers and wives,But the land cast them out in a lesson that only one learned;And one queen said ‘I am not a toy’, and she never returned. Mandy’s a pirate, and Mia weaves silk shrouds for faeries,And Deborah will pour you red wine pressed from sweet poisoned berries.Kate poses riddles and Mary plays tricks,While Kaia builds towers from brambles and sticks,And the rules that we live by are simple and clear:Be wicked and lovely and don’t live in fear Dorothy, Alice and Wendy and Jane, Susan and Lucy, we’re calling your names, All the Lost Girls who came out of the rain And chose to go back on the shelf. Tinker Bell says, and I find I agree You have to break rules if you want to break free. So do as you like — we’re determined to be Wicked girls saving ourselves. For we will be wicked and we will be fairAnd they’ll call us such names, and we really won’t care,So go, tell your Wendys, your Susans, your Janes,There’s a place they can go if they’re tired of chains,And our roads may be golden, or broken, or lost,But we’ll walk on them willingly, knowing the cost — We won’t take our place on the shelves.It’s better to fly and it’s better to dieSay the wicked girls saving ourselves. (Seanan McGuire) This is breathtaking. I heard this poem once a million years ago, I have been looking for it ever since, and had now found it. I love it so much more then I remember. You might be interested to know that she set it to music and it’s also a song. @darkmagyk And people have made fanvids set to it! (The CD is out of print right now - I have it and I love it so much, but I she’s re-printing a different one … soonish?) Mmmmm I get it but I’m not sure about the implication that real life is an inherent punishment for girls, and I find this kind of feminist take a little reactionary and keen to flatten out female characters and their stories into simple terms to make a kind of Yass Queen point. Anyway here’s a video I love examining the differences in feminist-related theming between the book and movie of The Wizard of Oz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz15yFVF1TI And here’s a Hark! A Vagrant comic that is very much that’s-it-that’s the-book re. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland: : TA 轉p ETER PAN PIPPILONGSTOKING+LINDGE ATHE WIZARD ERANK Jot OZ OSAUM the Lion ie i theterdenne C.S. LEWIS HOKEEK.TUMBLR.COM Potter LERBY HED HARRY PLEF nestofstraightlines: jabberwockypie: kyraneko: darkmagyk: seananmcguire: nokeek: Dorothy just wanted something that she could believe in,A gray dustbowl girl in a life she was better off leavin’.She made her escape, went from gray into green,And she could have got clear, and she could have got clean,But she chose to be good and go back to the gray Kansas skyWhere color’s a fable and freedom’s a fairy tale lie. Alice got lost, and I guess that we really can’t blame her;They say she got tangled and tied in the lies that became her.They say she went mad, and she never complained,For there’s peace of a kind in a life unconstrained.She gives Cheshire kisses, she’s easy with white rabbit smiles,And she’ll never be free, but she’s won herself safe for a while. Susan and Lucy were queens, and they ruled well and proudly.They honored their land and their lord, rang the bells long and loudly.They never once asked to return to their livesTo be children and chattel and mothers and wives,But the land cast them out in a lesson that only one learned;And one queen said ‘I am not a toy’, and she never returned. Mandy’s a pirate, and Mia weaves silk shrouds for faeries,And Deborah will pour you red wine pressed from sweet poisoned berries.Kate poses riddles and Mary plays tricks,While Kaia builds towers from brambles and sticks,And the rules that we live by are simple and clear:Be wicked and lovely and don’t live in fear Dorothy, Alice and Wendy and Jane, Susan and Lucy, we’re calling your names, All the Lost Girls who came out of the rain And chose to go back on the shelf. Tinker Bell says, and I find I agree You have to break rules if you want to break free. So do as you like — we’re determined to be Wicked girls saving ourselves. For we will be wicked and we will be fairAnd they’ll call us such names, and we really won’t care,So go, tell your Wendys, your Susans, your Janes,There’s a place they can go if they’re tired of chains,And our roads may be golden, or broken, or lost,But we’ll walk on them willingly, knowing the cost — We won’t take our place on the shelves.It’s better to fly and it’s better to dieSay the wicked girls saving ourselves. (Seanan McGuire) This is breathtaking. I heard this poem once a million years ago, I have been looking for it ever since, and had now found it. I love it so much more then I remember. You might be interested to know that she set it to music and it’s also a song. @darkmagyk And people have made fanvids set to it! (The CD is out of print right now - I have it and I love it so much, but I she’s re-printing a different one … soonish?) Mmmmm I get it but I’m not sure about the implication that real life is an inherent punishment for girls, and I find this kind of feminist take a little reactionary and keen to flatten out female characters and their stories into simple terms to make a kind of Yass Queen point. Anyway here’s a video I love examining the differences in feminist-related theming between the book and movie of The Wizard of Oz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz15yFVF1TI And here’s a Hark! A Vagrant comic that is very much that’s-it-that’s the-book re. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland:

nestofstraightlines:

jabberwockypie:

kyraneko:

darkmagyk:

seananmcguire:

nokeek:

Dorothy just wanted something that she could believe in,A gray dustbowl girl in a life she was better off leavin’.She made her escape, went from gray into green,And she could have got clear, and she could have got clean,But she chose to be good and go back to the gray Kansas skyWhere color’s a fable and freedom’s a fairy tale lie.
Alice got lost, and I guess that we really can’t blame her;They say she got tangled and tied in the lies that became her.They say she went mad, and she never complained,For there’s peace of a kind in a life unconstrained.She gives Cheshire kisses, she’s easy with white rabbit smiles,And she’ll never be free, but she’s won herself safe for a while.
Susan and Lucy were queens, and they ruled well and proudly.They honored their land and their lord, rang the bells long and loudly.They never once asked to return to their livesTo be children and chattel and mothers and wives,But the land cast them out in a lesson that only one learned;And one queen said ‘I am not a toy’, and she never returned.
Mandy’s a pirate, and Mia weaves silk shrouds for faeries,And Deborah will pour you red wine pressed from sweet poisoned berries.Kate poses riddles and Mary plays tricks,While Kaia builds towers from brambles and sticks,And the rules that we live by are simple and clear:Be wicked and lovely and don’t live in fear
Dorothy, Alice and Wendy and Jane, Susan and Lucy, we’re calling your names, All the Lost Girls who came out of the rain And chose to go back on the shelf. Tinker Bell says, and I find I agree You have to break rules if you want to break free. So do as you like

—

we’re determined to be Wicked girls saving ourselves.
For we will be wicked and we will be fairAnd they’ll call us such names, and we really won’t care,So go, tell your Wendys, your Susans, your Janes,There’s a place they can go if they’re tired of chains,And our roads may be golden, or broken, or lost,But we’ll walk on them willingly, knowing the cost

—

We won’t take our place on the shelves.It’s better to fly and it’s better to dieSay the wicked girls saving ourselves.
(Seanan McGuire)

This is breathtaking.

I heard this poem once a million years ago, I have been looking for it ever since, and had now found it.
I love it so much more then I remember.

You might be interested to know that she set it to music and it’s also a song.

@darkmagyk And people have made fanvids set to it! (The CD is out of print right now - I have it and I love it so much, but I she’s re-printing a different one … soonish?)

Mmmmm I get it but I’m not sure about the implication that real life is an inherent punishment for girls, and I find this kind of feminist take a little reactionary and keen to flatten out female characters and their stories into simple terms to make a kind of Yass Queen point. Anyway here’s a video I love examining the differences in feminist-related theming between the book and movie of The Wizard of Oz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz15yFVF1TI
And here’s a Hark! A Vagrant comic that is very much that’s-it-that’s the-book re. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland:
: TA
轉p ETER PAN
PIPPILONGSTOKING+LINDGE
ATHE WIZARD ERANK
Jot OZ OSAUM
the Lion ie i
theterdenne
C.S. LEWIS
HOKEEK.TUMBLR.COM
Potter
LERBY HED
HARRY PLEF
nestofstraightlines:

jabberwockypie:

kyraneko:

darkmagyk:

seananmcguire:

nokeek:

Dorothy just wanted something that she could believe in,A gray dustbowl girl in a life she was better off leavin’.She made her escape, went from gray into green,And she could have got clear, and she could have got clean,But she chose to be good and go back to the gray Kansas skyWhere color’s a fable and freedom’s a fairy tale lie.
Alice got lost, and I guess that we really can’t blame her;They say she got tangled and tied in the lies that became her.They say she went mad, and she never complained,For there’s peace of a kind in a life unconstrained.She gives Cheshire kisses, she’s easy with white rabbit smiles,And she’ll never be free, but she’s won herself safe for a while.
Susan and Lucy were queens, and they ruled well and proudly.They honored their land and their lord, rang the bells long and loudly.They never once asked to return to their livesTo be children and chattel and mothers and wives,But the land cast them out in a lesson that only one learned;And one queen said ‘I am not a toy’, and she never returned.
Mandy’s a pirate, and Mia weaves silk shrouds for faeries,And Deborah will pour you red wine pressed from sweet poisoned berries.Kate poses riddles and Mary plays tricks,While Kaia builds towers from brambles and sticks,And the rules that we live by are simple and clear:Be wicked and lovely and don’t live in fear
Dorothy, Alice and Wendy and Jane, Susan and Lucy, we’re calling your names, All the Lost Girls who came out of the rain And chose to go back on the shelf. Tinker Bell says, and I find I agree You have to break rules if you want to break free. So do as you like

—

we’re determined to be Wicked girls saving ourselves.
For we will be wicked and we will be fairAnd they’ll call us such names, and we really won’t care,So go, tell your Wendys, your Susans, your Janes,There’s a place they can go if they’re tired of chains,And our roads may be golden, or broken, or lost,But we’ll walk on them willingly, knowing the cost

—

We won’t take our place on the shelves.It’s better to fly and it’s better to dieSay the wicked girls saving ourselves.
(Seanan McGuire)

This is breathtaking.

I heard this poem once a million years ago, I have been looking for it ever since, and had now found it.
I love it so much more then I remember.

You might be interested to know that she set it to music and it’s also a song.

@darkmagyk And people have made fanvids set to it! (The CD is out of print right now - I have it and I love it so much, but I she’s re-printing a different one … soonish?)

Mmmmm I get it but I’m not sure about the implication that real life is an inherent punishment for girls, and I find this kind of feminist take a little reactionary and keen to flatten out female characters and their stories into simple terms to make a kind of Yass Queen point. Anyway here’s a video I love examining the differences in feminist-related theming between the book and movie of The Wizard of Oz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz15yFVF1TI
And here’s a Hark! A Vagrant comic that is very much that’s-it-that’s the-book re. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland:

nestofstraightlines:

jabberwockypie:

kyraneko:

darkmagyk:

seananmcguire:

nokeek:

Dorothy just wanted something that she could believe in,A gray dustbowl girl in a life she was better off leavin’.She made her escape, went from gray into green,And she could have got clear, and she could have got clean,But she chose to be good and go back to the gray Kansas skyWhere color’s a fable and freedom’s a fairy tale lie.
Alice got lost, and I guess that we really can’t blame her;They say she got tangled and tied in the lies that became her.They say she went mad, and she never complained,For there’s peace of a kind in a life unconstrained.She gives Cheshire kisses, she’s easy with white rabbit smiles,And she’ll never be free, but she’s won herself safe for a while.
Susan and Lucy were queens, and they ruled well and proudly.They honored their land and their lord, rang the bells long and loudly.They never once asked to return to their livesTo be children and chattel and mothers and wives,But the land cast them out in a lesson that only one learned;And one queen said ‘I am not a toy’, and she never returned.
Mandy’s a pirate, and Mia weaves silk shrouds for faeries,And Deborah will pour you red wine pressed from sweet poisoned berries.Kate poses riddles and Mary plays tricks,While Kaia builds towers from brambles and sticks,And the rules that we live by are simple and clear:Be wicked and lovely and don’t live in fear
Dorothy, Alice and Wendy and Jane, Susan and Lucy, we’re calling your names, All the Lost Girls who came out of the rain And chose to go back on the shelf. Tinker Bell says, and I find I agree You have to break rules if you want to break free. So do as you like

—

we’re determined to be Wicked girls saving ourselves.
For we will be wicked and we will be fairAnd they’ll call us such names, and we really won’t care,So go, tell your Wendys, your Susans, your Janes,There’s a place they can go if they’re tired of chains,And our roads may be golden, or broken, or lost,But we’ll walk on them willingly, knowing the cost

—

We won’t take our place on the shelves.It’s better to fly and it’s better to dieSay the wicked girls saving ourselves.
(Seanan McGuire)

This is breathtaking.

I heard this poem once a million years ago, I have been looking for it ever since, and had now found it.
I love it so much more then I remember.

You might be interested to know that she set it to music and it’s also a song.

@darkmagyk And people have made fanvids set to it! (The CD is out of print right now - I have it and I love it so much, but I she’s re-printing a different one … soonish?)

Mmmmm I get it but I’m not sure about the implication that real life is an inherent punishment for girls, and I find this kind of feminist take a little reactionary and keen to flatten out female characters and their stories into simple terms to make a kind of Yass Queen point. Anyway here’s a video I love examining the differences in feminist-related theming between the book and movie of The Wizard of Oz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz15yFVF1TI
And here’s a Hark! A Vagrant comic that is very much that’s-it-that’s the-book re. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland:
: TA
轉p ETER PAN
PIPPILONGSTOKING+LINDGE
ATHE WIZARD ERANK
Jot OZ OSAUM
the Lion ie i
theterdenne
C.S. LEWIS
HOKEEK.TUMBLR.COM
Potter
LERBY HED
HARRY PLEF
nestofstraightlines:

jabberwockypie:

kyraneko:

darkmagyk:

seananmcguire:

nokeek:

Dorothy just wanted something that she could believe in,A gray dustbowl girl in a life she was better off leavin’.She made her escape, went from gray into green,And she could have got clear, and she could have got clean,But she chose to be good and go back to the gray Kansas skyWhere color’s a fable and freedom’s a fairy tale lie.
Alice got lost, and I guess that we really can’t blame her;They say she got tangled and tied in the lies that became her.They say she went mad, and she never complained,For there’s peace of a kind in a life unconstrained.She gives Cheshire kisses, she’s easy with white rabbit smiles,And she’ll never be free, but she’s won herself safe for a while.
Susan and Lucy were queens, and they ruled well and proudly.They honored their land and their lord, rang the bells long and loudly.They never once asked to return to their livesTo be children and chattel and mothers and wives,But the land cast them out in a lesson that only one learned;And one queen said ‘I am not a toy’, and she never returned.
Mandy’s a pirate, and Mia weaves silk shrouds for faeries,And Deborah will pour you red wine pressed from sweet poisoned berries.Kate poses riddles and Mary plays tricks,While Kaia builds towers from brambles and sticks,And the rules that we live by are simple and clear:Be wicked and lovely and don’t live in fear
Dorothy, Alice and Wendy and Jane, Susan and Lucy, we’re calling your names, All the Lost Girls who came out of the rain And chose to go back on the shelf. Tinker Bell says, and I find I agree You have to break rules if you want to break free. So do as you like

—

we’re determined to be Wicked girls saving ourselves.
For we will be wicked and we will be fairAnd they’ll call us such names, and we really won’t care,So go, tell your Wendys, your Susans, your Janes,There’s a place they can go if they’re tired of chains,And our roads may be golden, or broken, or lost,But we’ll walk on them willingly, knowing the cost

—

We won’t take our place on the shelves.It’s better to fly and it’s better to dieSay the wicked girls saving ourselves.
(Seanan McGuire)

This is breathtaking.

I heard this poem once a million years ago, I have been looking for it ever since, and had now found it.
I love it so much more then I remember.

You might be interested to know that she set it to music and it’s also a song.

@darkmagyk And people have made fanvids set to it! (The CD is out of print right now - I have it and I love it so much, but I she’s re-printing a different one … soonish?)

Mmmmm I get it but I’m not sure about the implication that real life is an inherent punishment for girls, and I find this kind of feminist take a little reactionary and keen to flatten out female characters and their stories into simple terms to make a kind of Yass Queen point. Anyway here’s a video I love examining the differences in feminist-related theming between the book and movie of The Wizard of Oz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz15yFVF1TI
And here’s a Hark! A Vagrant comic that is very much that’s-it-that’s the-book re. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland:

nestofstraightlines: jabberwockypie: kyraneko: darkmagyk: seananmcguire: nokeek: Dorothy just wanted something that she could belie...

Save

I thought I’d peaked before, but I was so, so wrong… This clearly is the best I’ll ever manage. I can’t ever hope to match it: 12:36 o s O NO Sl A 42% 4 < Jane Ari Pralle Chat Yeter 2u You iked Jane's phota Yetering onu I can't resist a good bad Christmas sweater What should your custom poem be about Ooh surprise me But that could be copy pasted and that's no tun Gimme something suuuuper specific And then I need a format choice toa, between Dr. Seuss poem, Shakespearean sonnet, or something custom Yesterty For the spirit of things, that same Christmas sweater. I think sonnet or Seuss style would be Interesting Sommet, final answer Sonnet Veetery 0PM I enjoy al these amusingly specitic soloctionsl Holiday sweaters. are my shit. Sit tight| Engaging ryicality Should Rudolph pause before a red so fine? Esch every handmade brickline laid with care No sweater on this earth match'd her desigrn, Doff polyester now for wool so fair. Nostalgic evenings end by fire's dance, Unending chest nuts roasting on the flame Doth time unerringly from thus advance? Enmesh fair memries in your fabric's frame. Such understated beauty holds the wreath, Just lookl espy her face for beauty more. And yonder ribbons dance and light bequeath, No trash pullover could so highly soar Each hearth lacks warmth in absence of such heart. Ere onto spring l'd never be apart. Tuday AM That was very well thought out, I really, really liked it Trsday M Haha thankall But just wait until you read the first ietter of each ine in the sonnet Taday SAM Dammit You're too clever Ch if anly it ended there. See the message I sent after your requesta, the one about the amusingly specific selections? Resd the first letter of each word in that sentence Tulay aAM Did not see that one coming Taday AM Oh, it only gets worse. The message after that one, starting with "holiday sweaters". Write down the first letter of each word, but than read it backwards Any other coded messages? Keeps on going fm afraid Check out the sonnet again. Read the first letter of the "second" word in each line Fedau AM Well played (at this point she guessed what's ahead and also did this one) I got that one Unsurprisingly there's also a secret message it you read the first letter of the third word in each ine Probably for good measure you could olso read the first letter of every message i sent "after the sonnet Th SENDNODES NE Sthash especttuy the hmanher Degr I thought I’d peaked before, but I was so, so wrong… This clearly is the best I’ll ever manage. I can’t ever hope to match it

I thought I’d peaked before, but I was so, so wrong… This clearly is the best I’ll ever manage. I can’t ever hope to match it: 12:36 o s O
NO Sl
A 42% 4
< Jane Ari
Pralle
Chat
Yeter 2u
You iked Jane's phota
Yetering onu
I can't resist a good bad Christmas sweater
What should your custom poem be about
Ooh surprise me
But that could be copy pasted and that's no tun
Gimme something suuuuper specific
And then I need a format choice toa, between
Dr. Seuss poem, Shakespearean sonnet, or
something custom
Yesterty
For the spirit of things, that same Christmas
sweater. I think sonnet or Seuss style would
be Interesting
Sommet, final answer
Sonnet
Veetery 0PM
I enjoy al these amusingly specitic soloctionsl
Holiday sweaters. are my shit. Sit tight| Engaging
ryicality
Should Rudolph pause before a red so fine?
Esch every handmade brickline laid with care
No sweater on this earth match'd her desigrn,
Doff polyester now for wool so fair.
Nostalgic evenings end by fire's dance,
Unending chest nuts roasting on the flame
Doth time unerringly from thus advance?
Enmesh fair memries in your fabric's frame.
Such understated beauty holds the wreath,
Just lookl espy her face for beauty more.
And yonder ribbons dance and light bequeath,
No trash pullover could so highly soar
Each hearth lacks warmth in absence of such
heart.
Ere onto spring l'd never be apart.
Tuday AM
That was very well thought out, I really,
really liked it
Trsday M
Haha thankall But just wait until you read the first
ietter of each ine in the sonnet
Taday SAM
Dammit
You're too clever
Ch if anly it ended there. See the message I sent
after your requesta, the one about the amusingly
specific selections? Resd the first letter of each
word in that sentence
Tulay aAM
Did not see that one coming
Taday AM
Oh, it only gets worse. The message after that
one, starting with "holiday sweaters". Write down
the first letter of each word, but than read it
backwards
Any other coded messages?
Keeps on going fm afraid Check out the sonnet
again. Read the first letter of the "second" word
in each line
Fedau AM
Well played
(at this point she guessed what's
ahead and also did this one)
I got that one
Unsurprisingly there's also a secret message it
you read the first letter of the third word in each
ine
Probably for good measure you could olso read
the first letter of every message i sent "after the
sonnet
Th
SENDNODES NE
Sthash
especttuy the
hmanher
Degr
I thought I’d peaked before, but I was so, so wrong… This clearly is the best I’ll ever manage. I can’t ever hope to match it

I thought I’d peaked before, but I was so, so wrong… This clearly is the best I’ll ever manage. I can’t ever hope to match it: 12:36 o s O
NO Sl
A 42% 4
< Jane Ari
Pralle
Chat
Yeter 2u
You iked Jane's phota
Yetering onu
I can't resist a good bad Christmas sweater
What should your custom poem be about
Ooh surprise me
But that could be copy pasted and that's no tun
Gimme something suuuuper specific
And then I need a format choice toa, between
Dr. Seuss poem, Shakespearean sonnet, or
something custom
Yesterty
For the spirit of things, that same Christmas
sweater. I think sonnet or Seuss style would
be Interesting
Sommet, final answer
Sonnet
Veetery 0PM
I enjoy al these amusingly specitic soloctionsl
Holiday sweaters. are my shit. Sit tight| Engaging
ryicality
Should Rudolph pause before a red so fine?
Esch every handmade brickline laid with care
No sweater on this earth match'd her desigrn,
Doff polyester now for wool so fair.
Nostalgic evenings end by fire's dance,
Unending chest nuts roasting on the flame
Doth time unerringly from thus advance?
Enmesh fair memries in your fabric's frame.
Such understated beauty holds the wreath,
Just lookl espy her face for beauty more.
And yonder ribbons dance and light bequeath,
No trash pullover could so highly soar
Each hearth lacks warmth in absence of such
heart.
Ere onto spring l'd never be apart.
Tuday AM
That was very well thought out, I really,
really liked it
Trsday M
Haha thankall But just wait until you read the first
ietter of each ine in the sonnet
Taday SAM
Dammit
You're too clever
Ch if anly it ended there. See the message I sent
after your requesta, the one about the amusingly
specific selections? Resd the first letter of each
word in that sentence
Tulay aAM
Did not see that one coming
Taday AM
Oh, it only gets worse. The message after that
one, starting with "holiday sweaters". Write down
the first letter of each word, but than read it
backwards
Any other coded messages?
Keeps on going fm afraid Check out the sonnet
again. Read the first letter of the "second" word
in each line
Fedau AM
Well played
(at this point she guessed what's
ahead and also did this one)
I got that one
Unsurprisingly there's also a secret message it
you read the first letter of the third word in each
ine
Probably for good measure you could olso read
the first letter of every message i sent "after the
sonnet
Th
SENDNODES NE
Sthash
especttuy the
hmanher
Degr
I thought I’d peaked before, but I was so, so wrong… This clearly is the best I’ll ever manage. I can’t ever hope to match it

Save

ybs-lyricsandphilosophy: jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! => GET YOURS HERE <= I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband: ybs-lyricsandphilosophy: jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! => GET YOURS HERE <= I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband

ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband: ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband

ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband: ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband

Save

ybs-lyricsandphilosophy: jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! => GET YOURS HERE <= I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband: ybs-lyricsandphilosophy: jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! => GET YOURS HERE <= I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband

ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband: ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband

ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband: ybs-lyricsandphilosophy:

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:
life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:

What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
=> GET YOURS HERE <=

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

If someone gets me this I’ll cook dinner for them every night for the rest of their life and be their de facto house husband

Save

fandom: 2019’s Top Authors & Poets We wrote a list of the people who’ve written the words you love the most. You’re welcome. Neil Gaiman +10 Terry Pratchett +14 William Shakespeare +1 J.K. Rowling −3 Stephen King +3 Rupi Kaur −4 Rainbow Rowell +5 Cassandra Clare −1 Rick Riordan +1 Sappho Jane Austen −2 Charles Bukowski −7 Oscar Wilde +4 Sylvia Plath Leigh Bardugo +3 Virginia Woolf +4 Juansen Ryne Dizon Sarah J. Maas −15 Edgar Allan Poe Donna Tartt The number in italics indicates how many spots a name moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded names weren’t on the list last year.: tumblr Year in Review Authors & Poets 2019 2019 fandom: 2019’s Top Authors & Poets We wrote a list of the people who’ve written the words you love the most. You’re welcome. Neil Gaiman +10 Terry Pratchett +14 William Shakespeare +1 J.K. Rowling −3 Stephen King +3 Rupi Kaur −4 Rainbow Rowell +5 Cassandra Clare −1 Rick Riordan +1 Sappho Jane Austen −2 Charles Bukowski −7 Oscar Wilde +4 Sylvia Plath Leigh Bardugo +3 Virginia Woolf +4 Juansen Ryne Dizon Sarah J. Maas −15 Edgar Allan Poe Donna Tartt The number in italics indicates how many spots a name moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded names weren’t on the list last year.

fandom:

2019’s Top Authors & Poets

We wrote a list of the people who’ve written the words you love the most. You’re welcome.

Neil Gaiman +10
Terry Pratchett +14
William Shakespeare +1
J.K. Rowling −3
Stephen King +3
Rupi Kaur −4
Rainbow Rowell +5
Cassandra Clare −1
Rick Riordan +1
Sappho
Jane Austen −2
Charles Bukowski −7
Oscar Wilde +4
Sylvia Plath
Leigh Bardugo +3
Virginia Woolf +4
Juansen Ryne Dizon
Sarah J. Maas −15
Edgar Allan Poe
Donna Tartt The number in italics indicates how many spots a name moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded names weren’t on the list last year.: tumblr Year in Review
Authors & Poets
2019
2019
fandom:

2019’s Top Authors & Poets

We wrote a list of the people who’ve written the words you love the most. You’re welcome.

Neil Gaiman +10
Terry Pratchett +14
William Shakespeare +1
J.K. Rowling −3
Stephen King +3
Rupi Kaur −4
Rainbow Rowell +5
Cassandra Clare −1
Rick Riordan +1
Sappho
Jane Austen −2
Charles Bukowski −7
Oscar Wilde +4
Sylvia Plath
Leigh Bardugo +3
Virginia Woolf +4
Juansen Ryne Dizon
Sarah J. Maas −15
Edgar Allan Poe
Donna Tartt The number in italics indicates how many spots a name moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded names weren’t on the list last year.

fandom:

2019’s Top Authors & Poets

We wrote a list of the people who’ve written the words you love the most. You’re welcome.

Neil Gaiman +10
Terry Pratchett +14
William Shakespeare +1
J.K. Rowling −3
Stephen King +3
Rupi Kaur −4
Rainbow Rowell +5
Cassandra Clare −1
Rick Riordan +1
Sappho
Jane Austen −2
Charles Bukowski −7
Oscar Wilde +4
Sylvia Plath
Leigh Bardugo +3
Virginia Woolf +4
Juansen Ryne Dizon
Sarah J. Maas −15
Edgar Allan Poe
Donna Tartt The number in italics indicates how many spots a name moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded names weren’t on the list last year.: tumblr Year in Review
Authors & Poets
2019
2019
fandom:

2019’s Top Authors & Poets

We wrote a list of the people who’ve written the words you love the most. You’re welcome.

Neil Gaiman +10
Terry Pratchett +14
William Shakespeare +1
J.K. Rowling −3
Stephen King +3
Rupi Kaur −4
Rainbow Rowell +5
Cassandra Clare −1
Rick Riordan +1
Sappho
Jane Austen −2
Charles Bukowski −7
Oscar Wilde +4
Sylvia Plath
Leigh Bardugo +3
Virginia Woolf +4
Juansen Ryne Dizon
Sarah J. Maas −15
Edgar Allan Poe
Donna Tartt The number in italics indicates how many spots a name moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded names weren’t on the list last year.

Save

fandom: 2019’s Top Books Wizards. Demigods. Warring cat tribes. Fairies. Assassins. Fairy assassins. This list has ‘em all. The Harry Potter seriesby J.K. Rowling The Warriors series +1by Erin Hunter Percy Jackson & the Olympians −1by Rick Riordan A Song of Ice and Fireby George R. R. Martin Carry On +7by Rainbow Rowell The All for the Game series +3by Nora Sakavic The Six of Crows Duology −3by Leigh Bardugo Pride and Prejudice −1by Jane Austen The Raven Cycle series −4by Maggie Stiefvater The Captive Prince Trilogyby C. S. Pacat The Wicked King, Book 2 of The Folk of the Air Trilogyby Holly Black A Court of Thorns and Roses series −6by Sarah J. Maas The Cruel Prince, Book 1 of The Folk of the Air Trilogy +4by Holly Black The Silmarillion +5by J. R. R. Tolkien The Throne of Glass series −7by Sarah J. Maas Discworldby Terry Pratchett The Secret Historyby Donna Tartt The Mortal Instruments seriesby Cassandra Clare The Outsiders −6by S. E. Hinton The Twilight Sagaby Stephanie Meyer The Dark Artifices Trilogy −1by Cassandra Clare Red, White & Royal Blueby Casey McQuiston The Great Gatsby −2by F. Scott Fitzgerald The Trials of Apollo series −2by Rick Riordan The Wings of Fire series −2by Tui T. Sutherland Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard series −11by Rick Riordan Romeo and Julietby William Shakespeare The Song of Achillesby Madeline Miller Milk and Honey −15by Rupi Kaur Good Omens −19by Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett The number in italics indicates how many spots a title moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded titles weren’t on the list last year.: tumblr Year in Review Books 2019 2019 fandom: 2019’s Top Books Wizards. Demigods. Warring cat tribes. Fairies. Assassins. Fairy assassins. This list has ‘em all. The Harry Potter seriesby J.K. Rowling The Warriors series +1by Erin Hunter Percy Jackson & the Olympians −1by Rick Riordan A Song of Ice and Fireby George R. R. Martin Carry On +7by Rainbow Rowell The All for the Game series +3by Nora Sakavic The Six of Crows Duology −3by Leigh Bardugo Pride and Prejudice −1by Jane Austen The Raven Cycle series −4by Maggie Stiefvater The Captive Prince Trilogyby C. S. Pacat The Wicked King, Book 2 of The Folk of the Air Trilogyby Holly Black A Court of Thorns and Roses series −6by Sarah J. Maas The Cruel Prince, Book 1 of The Folk of the Air Trilogy +4by Holly Black The Silmarillion +5by J. R. R. Tolkien The Throne of Glass series −7by Sarah J. Maas Discworldby Terry Pratchett The Secret Historyby Donna Tartt The Mortal Instruments seriesby Cassandra Clare The Outsiders −6by S. E. Hinton The Twilight Sagaby Stephanie Meyer The Dark Artifices Trilogy −1by Cassandra Clare Red, White & Royal Blueby Casey McQuiston The Great Gatsby −2by F. Scott Fitzgerald The Trials of Apollo series −2by Rick Riordan The Wings of Fire series −2by Tui T. Sutherland Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard series −11by Rick Riordan Romeo and Julietby William Shakespeare The Song of Achillesby Madeline Miller Milk and Honey −15by Rupi Kaur Good Omens −19by Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett The number in italics indicates how many spots a title moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded titles weren’t on the list last year.

fandom:

2019’s Top Books

Wizards. Demigods. Warring cat tribes. Fairies. Assassins. Fairy assassins. This list has ‘em all.

The Harry Potter seriesby J.K. Rowling
The Warriors series +1by Erin Hunter
Percy Jackson & the Olympians −1by Rick Riordan
A Song of Ice and Fireby George R. R. Martin
Carry On +7by Rainbow Rowell
The All for the Game series +3by Nora Sakavic
The Six of Crows Duology −3by Leigh Bardugo
Pride and Prejudice −1by Jane Austen
The Raven Cycle series −4by Maggie Stiefvater
The Captive Prince Trilogyby C. S. Pacat
The Wicked King, Book 2 of The Folk of the Air Trilogyby Holly Black
A Court of Thorns and Roses series −6by Sarah J. Maas
The Cruel Prince, Book 1 of The Folk of the Air Trilogy +4by Holly Black
The Silmarillion +5by J. R. R. Tolkien
The Throne of Glass series −7by Sarah J. Maas
Discworldby Terry Pratchett
The Secret Historyby Donna Tartt
The Mortal Instruments seriesby Cassandra Clare
The Outsiders −6by S. E. Hinton
The Twilight Sagaby Stephanie Meyer
The Dark Artifices Trilogy −1by Cassandra Clare
Red, White & Royal Blueby Casey McQuiston
The Great Gatsby −2by F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Trials of Apollo series −2by Rick Riordan
The Wings of Fire series −2by Tui T. Sutherland
Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard series −11by Rick Riordan
Romeo and Julietby William Shakespeare
The Song of Achillesby Madeline Miller
Milk and Honey −15by Rupi Kaur
Good Omens −19by Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett The number in italics indicates how many spots a title moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded titles weren’t on the list last year.: tumblr Year in Review
Books
2019
2019
fandom:

2019’s Top Books

Wizards. Demigods. Warring cat tribes. Fairies. Assassins. Fairy assassins. This list has ‘em all.

The Harry Potter seriesby J.K. Rowling
The Warriors series +1by Erin Hunter
Percy Jackson & the Olympians −1by Rick Riordan
A Song of Ice and Fireby George R. R. Martin
Carry On +7by Rainbow Rowell
The All for the Game series +3by Nora Sakavic
The Six of Crows Duology −3by Leigh Bardugo
Pride and Prejudice −1by Jane Austen
The Raven Cycle series −4by Maggie Stiefvater
The Captive Prince Trilogyby C. S. Pacat
The Wicked King, Book 2 of The Folk of the Air Trilogyby Holly Black
A Court of Thorns and Roses series −6by Sarah J. Maas
The Cruel Prince, Book 1 of The Folk of the Air Trilogy +4by Holly Black
The Silmarillion +5by J. R. R. Tolkien
The Throne of Glass series −7by Sarah J. Maas
Discworldby Terry Pratchett
The Secret Historyby Donna Tartt
The Mortal Instruments seriesby Cassandra Clare
The Outsiders −6by S. E. Hinton
The Twilight Sagaby Stephanie Meyer
The Dark Artifices Trilogy −1by Cassandra Clare
Red, White & Royal Blueby Casey McQuiston
The Great Gatsby −2by F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Trials of Apollo series −2by Rick Riordan
The Wings of Fire series −2by Tui T. Sutherland
Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard series −11by Rick Riordan
Romeo and Julietby William Shakespeare
The Song of Achillesby Madeline Miller
Milk and Honey −15by Rupi Kaur
Good Omens −19by Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett The number in italics indicates how many spots a title moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded titles weren’t on the list last year.

fandom:

2019’s Top Books

Wizards. Demigods. Warring cat tribes. Fairies. Assassins. Fairy assassins. This list has ‘em all.

The Harry Potter seriesby J.K. Rowling
The Warriors series +1by Erin Hunter
Percy Jackson & the Olympians −1by Rick Riordan
A Song of Ice and Fireby George R. R. Martin
Carry On +7by Rainbow Rowell
The All for the Game series +3by Nora Sakavic
The Six of Crows Duology −3by Leigh Bardugo
Pride and Prejudice −1by Jane Austen
The Raven Cycle series −4by Maggie Stiefvater
The Captive Prince Trilogyby C. S. Pacat
The Wicked King, Book 2 of The Folk of the Air Trilogyby Holly Black
A Court of Thorns and Roses series −6by Sarah J. Maas
The Cruel Prince, Book 1 of The Folk of the Air Trilogy +4by Holly Black
The Silmarillion +5by J. R. R. Tolkien
The Throne of Glass series −7by Sarah J. Maas
Discworldby Terry Pratchett
The Secret Historyby Donna Tartt
The Mortal Instruments seriesby Cassandra Clare
The Outsiders −6by S. E. Hinton
The Twilight Sagaby Stephanie Meyer
The Dark Artifices Trilogy −1by Cassandra Clare
Red, White & Royal Blueby Casey McQuiston
The Great Gatsby −2by F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Trials of Apollo series −2by Rick Riordan
The Wings of Fire series −2by Tui T. Sutherland
Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard series −11by Rick Riordan
Romeo and Julietby William Shakespeare
The Song of Achillesby Madeline Miller
Milk and Honey −15by Rupi Kaur
Good Omens −19by Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett The number in italics indicates how many spots a title moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded titles weren’t on the list last year.: tumblr Year in Review
Books
2019
2019
fandom:

2019’s Top Books

Wizards. Demigods. Warring cat tribes. Fairies. Assassins. Fairy assassins. This list has ‘em all.

The Harry Potter seriesby J.K. Rowling
The Warriors series +1by Erin Hunter
Percy Jackson & the Olympians −1by Rick Riordan
A Song of Ice and Fireby George R. R. Martin
Carry On +7by Rainbow Rowell
The All for the Game series +3by Nora Sakavic
The Six of Crows Duology −3by Leigh Bardugo
Pride and Prejudice −1by Jane Austen
The Raven Cycle series −4by Maggie Stiefvater
The Captive Prince Trilogyby C. S. Pacat
The Wicked King, Book 2 of The Folk of the Air Trilogyby Holly Black
A Court of Thorns and Roses series −6by Sarah J. Maas
The Cruel Prince, Book 1 of The Folk of the Air Trilogy +4by Holly Black
The Silmarillion +5by J. R. R. Tolkien
The Throne of Glass series −7by Sarah J. Maas
Discworldby Terry Pratchett
The Secret Historyby Donna Tartt
The Mortal Instruments seriesby Cassandra Clare
The Outsiders −6by S. E. Hinton
The Twilight Sagaby Stephanie Meyer
The Dark Artifices Trilogy −1by Cassandra Clare
Red, White & Royal Blueby Casey McQuiston
The Great Gatsby −2by F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Trials of Apollo series −2by Rick Riordan
The Wings of Fire series −2by Tui T. Sutherland
Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard series −11by Rick Riordan
Romeo and Julietby William Shakespeare
The Song of Achillesby Madeline Miller
Milk and Honey −15by Rupi Kaur
Good Omens −19by Neil Gaiman & Terry Pratchett The number in italics indicates how many spots a title moved up or down from the previous year. Bolded titles weren’t on the list last year.

Save

He’s looking as fly as ever: History Lovers Club @historylvrsclub Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25, @WILL ENT and 90. rachel jane andelman @rajandelman Gonna say it... Picasso did not age well He’s looking as fly as ever

He’s looking as fly as ever: History Lovers Club
@historylvrsclub
Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25,
@WILL ENT
and 90.
rachel jane andelman
@rajandelman
Gonna say it... Picasso did not age
well
He’s looking as fly as ever

He’s looking as fly as ever: History Lovers Club
@historylvrsclub
Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25,
@WILL ENT
and 90.
rachel jane andelman
@rajandelman
Gonna say it... Picasso did not age
well
He’s looking as fly as ever

He’s looking as fly as ever

Save

Jane: mary jane @gslicee 1d so im texting in traffic and this white lady in the car next to me screams "GET OFF YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say anything back she rolled up her window and sped up and hit the car in front of her LMAO000000 2,102 t373 t You Retweeted DhingusKhan @SkoliosisG Replying to @gslicee Okay but don't text and drive,it's dangerous. 2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone

Jane: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone

Jane: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone

Save

Top 10 anime mysteries: Before Tarzan met Jane, was he a virgin or was he clapping gorilla cheeks? I worry about you sometimes Candace. Top 10 anime mysteries

Top 10 anime mysteries: Before Tarzan met Jane, was he
a virgin or was he clapping gorilla cheeks?
I worry about you sometimes Candace.
Top 10 anime mysteries

Top 10 anime mysteries: Before Tarzan met Jane, was he
a virgin or was he clapping gorilla cheeks?
I worry about you sometimes Candace.
Top 10 anime mysteries

Top 10 anime mysteries

Save

: OLD @oldvx pelo amor de deus mary jane tem mulher aqui nao 14:57 31/10/2019 Twitter for iPhone

: OLD
@oldvx
pelo amor de deus mary jane tem
mulher aqui nao
14:57 31/10/2019 Twitter for iPhone

: OLD
@oldvx
pelo amor de deus mary jane tem
mulher aqui nao
14:57 31/10/2019 Twitter for iPhone

Save

blue hair: amby-jane: let-them-not-weep: I want small children to think I am either a goddess or a faerie but I want grown men to fear me Blue hair blue hair

blue hair: amby-jane:
let-them-not-weep:
I want small children to think I am
either a goddess or a faerie but I
want grown men to fear me
Blue hair
blue hair

blue hair: amby-jane:
let-them-not-weep:
I want small children to think I am
either a goddess or a faerie but I
want grown men to fear me
Blue hair
blue hair

blue hair

Save

awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍

Save

jubberry: school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because drawing her is very relaxing: JUBLERRY jubberry: school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because drawing her is very relaxing

jubberry:

school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because drawing her is very relaxing: JUBLERRY
jubberry:

school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because drawing her is very relaxing

jubberry:

school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because drawing her is very relaxing: JUBLERRY
jubberry:

school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because drawing her is very relaxing

jubberry: school is killing me rn so im trying very hard not to procrastinate… anyway! here is me procrastinating! jane again because dr...

Save

Jane: " was quiet. but was not blind." - Jane Austen

Jane: " was quiet.
but was not blind."
- Jane Austen

Jane: " was quiet.
but was not blind."
- Jane Austen

Save

Precious.: matt umland @matumland reasons why my girlfriend cried on her period today - she knocked the salt shaker off the table "petra from jane the virgin has cute ears" - she saw a duck walking alone - she's "ugly and bloated" - her sisters bunny "looked at her like it doesn't like her" Precious.

Precious.: matt umland
@matumland
reasons why my girlfriend cried on her
period today
- she knocked the salt shaker off the
table
"petra from jane the virgin has cute
ears"
- she saw a duck walking alone
- she's "ugly and bloated"
- her sisters bunny "looked at her like it
doesn't like her"
Precious.

Precious.: matt umland
@matumland
reasons why my girlfriend cried on her
period today
- she knocked the salt shaker off the
table
"petra from jane the virgin has cute
ears"
- she saw a duck walking alone
- she's "ugly and bloated"
- her sisters bunny "looked at her like it
doesn't like her"
Precious.

Precious.

Save

Mary Jane playing the field.: OH, THAT'S ALL RIGHT, MR JAMESON. I CAN'T THINK OF ANYBODY I'D RATHER BE SPLATTERED BY SO KIND OF YOU TO SAY MISS WATSON Mary Jane playing the field.

Mary Jane playing the field.: OH, THAT'S ALL RIGHT, MR
JAMESON. I CAN'T THINK
OF ANYBODY I'D RATHER
BE SPLATTERED BY
SO KIND OF
YOU TO SAY
MISS
WATSON
Mary Jane playing the field.

Mary Jane playing the field.: OH, THAT'S ALL RIGHT, MR
JAMESON. I CAN'T THINK
OF ANYBODY I'D RATHER
BE SPLATTERED BY
SO KIND OF
YOU TO SAY
MISS
WATSON
Mary Jane playing the field.

Mary Jane playing the field.

Save

Okay, Man of the year right here.: mary jane @gslicee 1d so im texting in traffic and this white lady in the car next to me screams "GET OFF YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say anything back she rolled up her window and sped up and hit the car in front of her LMAO000000 2,102 t373 t You Retweeted DhingusKhan @SkoliosisG Replying to @gslicee Okay but don't text and drive,it's dangerous. 2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone Okay, Man of the year right here.

Okay, Man of the year right here.: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone
Okay, Man of the year right here.

Okay, Man of the year right here.: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone
Okay, Man of the year right here.

Okay, Man of the year right here.

Save

Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69 MORE MEMES: mary jane @gslicee 1d so im texting in traffic and this white lady in the car next to me screams "GET OFF YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say anything back she rolled up her window and sped up and hit the car in front of her LMAO000000 2,102 t 373 t You Retweeted DhingusKhan @SkoliosisG Replying to @gslicee Okay but don't text and drive,it's dangerous. 2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69 MORE MEMES

Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69
MORE MEMES: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t 373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone
Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69
MORE MEMES

Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69
MORE MEMES: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t 373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone
Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69
MORE MEMES

Okay, Man of the year right here. by PrisciCa69 MORE MEMES

Save

Okay, Man of the year right here.: mary jane @gslicee 1d so im texting in traffic and this white lady in the car next to me screams "GET OFF YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say anything back she rolled up her window and sped up and hit the car in front of her LMAO000000 2,102 t 373 t You Retweeted DhingusKhan @SkoliosisG Replying to @gslicee Okay but don't text and drive,it's dangerous. 2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone Okay, Man of the year right here.

Okay, Man of the year right here.: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t 373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone
Okay, Man of the year right here.

Okay, Man of the year right here.: mary jane @gslicee 1d
so im texting in traffic and this white lady
in the car next to me screams "GET OFF
YOUR PHONE" nd before i could say
anything back she rolled up her window
and sped up and hit the car in front of
her LMAO000000
2,102
t 373
t You Retweeted
DhingusKhan
@SkoliosisG
Replying to @gslicee
Okay but don't text and drive,it's
dangerous.
2:45 24 Sep 19 Twitter for iPhone
Okay, Man of the year right here.

Okay, Man of the year right here.

Save

awesomesthesia: Imagine ?: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation awesomesthesia: Imagine ?

awesomesthesia:

Imagine ?: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine ?

awesomesthesia:

Imagine ?: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine ?

awesomesthesia: Imagine ?

Save

awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍

Save

awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
awesomesthesia:

Imagine 🦍

awesomesthesia: Imagine 🦍

Save

…that worked?: @ 79% 2:30 PM l Verizon Jane Profile Chat Today, 1:47 PM The best way to ask me out is by Lemme know what you want to check out in the city Dat ass Today, 1:47 PM Jane invited you to start the chat Send a message Send …that worked?

Save

Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰 Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in the NFL, per Ian Rapoport and Jane Slater NFL Network 💵 B/R Gridiron: FRID B-R IRON 21 Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰 Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in the NFL, per Ian Rapoport and Jane Slater NFL Network 💵 B/R Gridiron

Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰

Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in the NFL, per Ian Rapoport and Jane Slater NFL Network

💵 B/R Gridiron: FRID
B-R
IRON
21
Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰

Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in the NFL, per Ian Rapoport and Jane Slater NFL Network

💵 B/R Gridiron

Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰

Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in the NFL, per Ian Rapoport and Jane Slater NFL Network

💵 B/R Gridiron: FRID
B-R
IRON
21
Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰

Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in the NFL, per Ian Rapoport and Jane Slater NFL Network

💵 B/R Gridiron

Breaking: ZEKE GOT PAID 💰 Cowboys sign Ezekiel Elliott to a six-year, $90M extension with “roughly half guaranteed.” Highest-paid RB in...

Save

If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go MORE MEMES: EXON EXON NEED S MAR JANE MARVEL STUDIOS SPIDER MAN HOMELESS If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go MORE MEMES

If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go
MORE MEMES: EXON
EXON
NEED S
MAR JANE
MARVEL STUDIOS
SPIDER MAN
HOMELESS
If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go
MORE MEMES

If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go
MORE MEMES: EXON
EXON
NEED S
MAR JANE
MARVEL STUDIOS
SPIDER MAN
HOMELESS
If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go
MORE MEMES

If she dies I blame Sony by ab-go MORE MEMES

Save

Turn out the lights >:o: Jane the Cappadocian @metakne... 2s Real programmers: Men Women Frontend Devs Backend Devs People who use light-themed IDES or Editors Turn out the lights >:o

Turn out the lights >:o: Jane the Cappadocian @metakne... 2s
Real programmers:
Men
Women
Frontend Devs
Backend Devs
People who use light-themed IDES or
Editors
Turn out the lights >:o

Turn out the lights >:o: Jane the Cappadocian @metakne... 2s
Real programmers:
Men
Women
Frontend Devs
Backend Devs
People who use light-themed IDES or
Editors
Turn out the lights >:o

Turn out the lights >:o

Save

Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network: NFL 4 Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network

Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network: NFL
4
Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network

Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network: NFL
4
Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network

Dak Prescott has turned down a $30M/year deal and is seeking $40M/year, per Jane Slater NFL Network

Save

I NEED ANSWERS!!: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation I NEED ANSWERS!!

I NEED ANSWERS!!: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
I NEED ANSWERS!!

I NEED ANSWERS!!: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
I NEED ANSWERS!!

I NEED ANSWERS!!

Save

feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why. Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was. When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical: When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor. “We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior. What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman. Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man. So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder? He makes her Thor. Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words. What a photo. What a film. What a man. : INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why. Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was. When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical: When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor. “We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior. What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman. Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man. So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder? He makes her Thor. Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words. What a photo. What a film. What a man.

feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.
: INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
SAN DIEGO
AN DIE
ECON CONCON CON
INTERNA
INTER
INTERNATIONAL
1N DIEG0
OIEGO
SAN DIEGO
CON
OUG NO
CON
DIEGO
CON
INTERNATIONAL
ONAL
INTERNATIONAL
IN E WATIONAL
TERNATIONA
SAN DIEGO
CON
SAN OIEG0
0 93
eONCON CO
SAN OIEG
N OIEG
CO
INTERNATIO
COMICE
CO
OM
feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.
: INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
SAN DIEGO
AN DIE
ECON CONCON CON
INTERNA
INTER
INTERNATIONAL
1N DIEG0
OIEGO
SAN DIEGO
CON
OUG NO
CON
DIEGO
CON
INTERNATIONAL
ONAL
INTERNATIONAL
IN E WATIONAL
TERNATIONA
SAN DIEGO
CON
SAN OIEG0
0 93
eONCON CO
SAN OIEG
N OIEG
CO
INTERNATIO
COMICE
CO
OM
feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak just to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

Save

A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212 MORE MEMES: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212 MORE MEMES

A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212
MORE MEMES: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212
MORE MEMES

A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212
MORE MEMES: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212
MORE MEMES

A normal conversation? by ERICHAMMER212 MORE MEMES

Save

A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ

A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ

A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ

A normal conversation? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2LNajaZ

Save

A normal conversation?: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin before he met Jane? or was he clappin' gorilla cheeks? Anormal conversation A normal conversation?

A normal conversation?: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
A normal conversation?

A normal conversation?: "Do you think Tarzan was a virgin
before he met Jane? or was he
clappin' gorilla cheeks?
Anormal conversation
A normal conversation?

A normal conversation?

Save

ebonyheartnet: jewishdragon: feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why. Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was. When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical: When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor. “We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior. What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman. Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man. So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder? He makes her Thor. Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words. What a photo. What a film. What a man. Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews! : INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM ebonyheartnet: jewishdragon: feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why. Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was. When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical: When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor. “We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior. What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman. Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man. So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder? He makes her Thor. Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words. What a photo. What a film. What a man. Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews!

ebonyheartnet:
jewishdragon:

feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews!

: INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
SAN DIEGO
AN DIE
ECON CONCON CON
INTERNA
INTER
INTERNATIONAL
1N DIEG0
OIEGO
SAN DIEGO
CON
OUG NO
CON
DIEGO
CON
INTERNATIONAL
ONAL
INTERNATIONAL
IN E WATIONAL
TERNATIONA
SAN DIEGO
CON
SAN OIEG0
0 93
eONCON CO
SAN OIEG
N OIEG
CO
INTERNATIO
COMICE
CO
OM
ebonyheartnet:
jewishdragon:

feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews!

ebonyheartnet:
jewishdragon:

feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews!

: INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
SAN DIEGO
AN DIE
ECON CONCON CON
INTERNA
INTER
INTERNATIONAL
1N DIEG0
OIEGO
SAN DIEGO
CON
OUG NO
CON
DIEGO
CON
INTERNATIONAL
ONAL
INTERNATIONAL
IN E WATIONAL
TERNATIONA
SAN DIEGO
CON
SAN OIEG0
0 93
eONCON CO
SAN OIEG
N OIEG
CO
INTERNATIO
COMICE
CO
OM
ebonyheartnet:
jewishdragon:

feministscoundrel:

This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

Wiatiti And Portman are also BOTH jewish! Jews lifting up Jews!

Save

feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why. Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was. When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical: When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor. “We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior. What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman. Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man. So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder? He makes her Thor. Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words. What a photo. What a film. What a man. : INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SAN DIEGO AN DIE ECON CONCON CON INTERNA INTER INTERNATIONAL 1N DIEG0 OIEGO SAN DIEGO CON OUG NO CON DIEGO CON INTERNATIONAL ONAL INTERNATIONAL IN E WATIONAL TERNATIONA SAN DIEGO CON SAN OIEG0 0 93 eONCON CO SAN OIEG N OIEG CO INTERNATIO COMICE CO OM feministscoundrel: This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why. Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was. When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical: When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x) Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor. “We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x) Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior. What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman. Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man. So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder? He makes her Thor. Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words. What a photo. What a film. What a man.

feministscoundrel:
This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.
: INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
SAN DIEGO
AN DIE
ECON CONCON CON
INTERNA
INTER
INTERNATIONAL
1N DIEG0
OIEGO
SAN DIEGO
CON
OUG NO
CON
DIEGO
CON
INTERNATIONAL
ONAL
INTERNATIONAL
IN E WATIONAL
TERNATIONA
SAN DIEGO
CON
SAN OIEG0
0 93
eONCON CO
SAN OIEG
N OIEG
CO
INTERNATIO
COMICE
CO
OM
feministscoundrel:
This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

feministscoundrel:
This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.
: INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
SAN DIEGO
AN DIE
ECON CONCON CON
INTERNA
INTER
INTERNATIONAL
1N DIEG0
OIEGO
SAN DIEGO
CON
OUG NO
CON
DIEGO
CON
INTERNATIONAL
ONAL
INTERNATIONAL
IN E WATIONAL
TERNATIONA
SAN DIEGO
CON
SAN OIEG0
0 93
eONCON CO
SAN OIEG
N OIEG
CO
INTERNATIO
COMICE
CO
OM
feministscoundrel:
This photo means a lot to me. And I’ll tell you why.
Natalie Portman, as we know, was shut out of Marvel. She chose not to sign any new contract not just because of the way her character was treated (though there is that) but because Thor: The Dark World was slated to be the first Marvel movie directed by a woman, her friend (and eventual Wonder Woman director) Patty Jenkins. Portman hadn’t planned on being in The Dark World, but lept at the chance to be a part of feminist history and to be directed in what would have beenJenkin’s first film since her 2003 Oscar-winning Monster. Portman signed a new contract with Marvel. They fired Jenkins soon after. Portman was crushed because she essentially had been duped into a contract for a film that would keep her away from her young son and force her back into a one-dimensional role under yet another male director. And we all remember how awful that movie was.
When it came time for the third Thor movie, they tried to get Portman under contract again. And she said no. Marvel decided to spin the story to make it seem like it was all their idea. At first, they went for the lame and nonsensical:
When Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige was asked about why she wouldn’t be in the third film, and said there were “many reasons, many of which are in the film, so you will see that” continuing with “There are only a couple of scenes on Earth in this movie. The majority, 95 percent of the movie, takes place in the cosmos.” (x)
Seeing as The Dark World also took place in space, this answer didn’t have a lot of credibility. When Portman said she was “done” with the Marvel Universe, Feige got vicious in interviews, telling reporters that Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be better than Jane Foster and a better match for Thor.
“We wanted Thor to encounter somebody that was near his equal and that his relationship with Jane may have evolved in unexpected ways in between The Dark World and Ragnarok, and we wanted to pit him against a character who was much more his equal and in many ways his superior.” (x)
Feige implies that A) Valkyrie was in Ragnorak to be a romantic interest for Thor, B) Valkyrie is better and more powerful than Jane Foster, and C) Jane Foster was always Thor’s inferior.
What’s ridiculous is that Ragnorak had a “sorry Jane dumped you” throwaway line to explain Portman’s absence. And instead of saying that Jane and Thor broke up in interviews, a line that does not spoil literally anything about the film, Feige chose to attack Jane’s strength and capability, which would have been a very special dig at Portman.
Do you want to know what none of this sounds like? Taika Waititi’s opinion. Waititi is a master storyteller who does not sacrifice his feminist views for laughs. You can bet that Feige’s ridiculous slams on Portman and her character Jane– disguised as “promotion” for WAITITI’S FILM– would have troubled him immensely. This is a man with a Māori father, who had to use his mother’s maiden name– Cohen– for earlier work because an indigenous last name kept him away from opportunity. This man does NOT fuck around with entertainment that gets its power off of sexism and inequality. He knows from experience just how infuriating it is when it comes to directors missing out on opportunities because they aren’t a white man.
So how does he fix this? How does he fix the idea that Jane Foster can’t go to space, or that she’s not powerful enough for Thor, the god of thunder?
He makes her Thor.
Waititi saw Portman / Jane Foster’s name dragged through the mud by Kevin Feige in order to promote his movie, and when he got hired to direct again, he decided to right those wrongs. This picture means everything. He is on his knee, handing her Thor’s hammer, essentially saying, you will never have to go through that shit with me. With me, you’re a god. And the expression on her face, after Marvel attempted to break her, doesn’t need words.
What a photo. What a film. What a man.

Save

Is this facts?: This is Jane. Jane is in a relationship. Jane doesn't post on social media about how much she loves her partner. She tells him this in person. She doesn't mention every little insignificant thing they do Jane knows that nobody gives a damn Jane is smart. Be like Jane. Is this facts?

Is this facts?: This is Jane.
Jane is in a relationship.
Jane doesn't post on social media about how
much she loves her partner. She tells him this
in person. She doesn't mention
every little insignificant thing they do
Jane knows that nobody gives a damn
Jane is smart. Be like Jane.
Is this facts?

Is this facts?: This is Jane.
Jane is in a relationship.
Jane doesn't post on social media about how
much she loves her partner. She tells him this
in person. She doesn't mention
every little insignificant thing they do
Jane knows that nobody gives a damn
Jane is smart. Be like Jane.
Is this facts?

Is this facts?

Save

Jane: "Iwas quiet but was not blind. " Jane Austen

Jane: "Iwas quiet
but was not blind. "
Jane Austen

Jane: "Iwas quiet
but was not blind. "
Jane Austen

Save

Jane: It isn't what we say or think that defines us, but what we do Jane Austen Sense and Sensibility

Jane: It isn't
what we say
or think
that defines us,
but what
we do
Jane Austen
Sense and Sensibility

Jane: It isn't
what we say
or think
that defines us,
but what
we do
Jane Austen
Sense and Sensibility

Save

Jane: "Why would someone else's actions upset you that much? Women should have more freedom than that." -Christina Aguilera, Jane October 2006

Jane: "Why would someone else's actions
upset you that much? Women
should have more freedom than
that."
-Christina Aguilera, Jane October 2006

Jane: "Why would someone else's actions
upset you that much? Women
should have more freedom than
that."
-Christina Aguilera, Jane October 2006

Save

jane goodall woman quotes: IT ACTUALLY DOESN'T TAKE MUCH TO BE CONSIDERED A DIFFICULT WOMAN. THAT'S WHY THERE ARE SO MANY OF US. SayingImages.com JANE GOODALL jane goodall woman quotes

jane goodall woman quotes: IT ACTUALLY
DOESN'T TAKE
MUCH TO BE
CONSIDERED A
DIFFICULT
WOMAN. THAT'S
WHY THERE ARE
SO MANY OF US.
SayingImages.com
JANE GOODALL
jane goodall woman quotes

jane goodall woman quotes: IT ACTUALLY
DOESN'T TAKE
MUCH TO BE
CONSIDERED A
DIFFICULT
WOMAN. THAT'S
WHY THERE ARE
SO MANY OF US.
SayingImages.com
JANE GOODALL
jane goodall woman quotes

jane goodall woman quotes

Save

Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj: @historylvrsclub Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25, @WILL ENT and 90. rachel jane andelman @rajandelman Gonna say it... Picasso did not age well Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj

Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj: @historylvrsclub
Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25,
@WILL ENT
and 90.
rachel jane andelman
@rajandelman
Gonna say it... Picasso did not age
well
Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj

Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj: @historylvrsclub
Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25,
@WILL ENT
and 90.
rachel jane andelman
@rajandelman
Gonna say it... Picasso did not age
well
Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj

Picasso am i right via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2xKmCfj

Save

Picasso am i right: @historylvrsclub Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25, @WILL ENT and 90. rachel jane andelman @rajandelman Gonna say it... Picasso did not age well Picasso am i right

Picasso am i right: @historylvrsclub
Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25,
@WILL ENT
and 90.
rachel jane andelman
@rajandelman
Gonna say it... Picasso did not age
well
Picasso am i right

Picasso am i right: @historylvrsclub
Picasso's self-portrait at ages 18, 25,
@WILL ENT
and 90.
rachel jane andelman
@rajandelman
Gonna say it... Picasso did not age
well
Picasso am i right

Picasso am i right

Save

This is godly levels of thinking: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply pop your coat on before answer- ing your front door. If it's some- one you don't want to see, you can say you are on your way out In the unlikely event it's someone you do want to see, you can sim- ply say you've just arrived home. Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives calamitylou Where has this been all my life? 2pankunchiii Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are living in 2018 This is godly levels of thinking

This is godly levels of thinking: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply
pop your coat on before answer-
ing your front door. If it's some-
one you don't want to see, you
can say you are on your way out
In the unlikely event it's someone
you do want to see, you can sim-
ply say you've just arrived home.
Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives
calamitylou
Where has this been all my life?
2pankunchiii
Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are
living in 2018
This is godly levels of thinking

This is godly levels of thinking: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply
pop your coat on before answer-
ing your front door. If it's some-
one you don't want to see, you
can say you are on your way out
In the unlikely event it's someone
you do want to see, you can sim-
ply say you've just arrived home.
Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives
calamitylou
Where has this been all my life?
2pankunchiii
Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are
living in 2018
This is godly levels of thinking

This is godly levels of thinking

Save

This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz MORE MEMES: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply pop your coat on before answer- ing your front door. If it's some- one you don't want to see, you can say you are on your way out In the unlikely event it's someone you do want to see, you can sim- ply say you've just arrived home. Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives calamitylou Where has this been all my life? 2pankunchiii Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are living in 2018 This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz MORE MEMES

This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz
MORE MEMES: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply
pop your coat on before answer-
ing your front door. If it's some-
one you don't want to see, you
can say you are on your way out
In the unlikely event it's someone
you do want to see, you can sim-
ply say you've just arrived home.
Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives
calamitylou
Where has this been all my life?
2pankunchiii
Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are
living in 2018
This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz
MORE MEMES

This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz
MORE MEMES: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply
pop your coat on before answer-
ing your front door. If it's some-
one you don't want to see, you
can say you are on your way out
In the unlikely event it's someone
you do want to see, you can sim-
ply say you've just arrived home.
Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives
calamitylou
Where has this been all my life?
2pankunchiii
Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are
living in 2018
This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz
MORE MEMES

This is godly levels of thinking by NocturnalBlitz MORE MEMES

Save

Jane: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply pop your coat on before answer- ing your front door. If it's some- one you don't want to see, you can say you are on your way out. In the unlikely event it's someone you do want to see, you can sim- ply say you've just arrived home Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives calamitylou Where has this been all my life? pankunchiii Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are living in 2018

Jane: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply
pop your coat on before answer-
ing your front door. If it's some-
one you don't want to see, you
can say you are on your way out.
In the unlikely event it's someone
you do want to see, you can sim-
ply say you've just arrived home
Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives
calamitylou
Where has this been all my life?
pankunchiii
Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are
living in 2018

Jane: UNSOCIABLE people. Simply
pop your coat on before answer-
ing your front door. If it's some-
one you don't want to see, you
can say you are on your way out.
In the unlikely event it's someone
you do want to see, you can sim-
ply say you've just arrived home
Jane Hoole Garner, St. Ives
calamitylou
Where has this been all my life?
pankunchiii
Jane living in 3047 while us suckers are
living in 2018

Save

Jane: This is Jane. Jane is in a relationship. Jane doesn't post on social media about how much she loves her partner. She tells him this in person. She doesn't mention every little insignificant thing they do. Jane knows that nobody gives a damn Jane is smart. Be like Jane.

Jane: This is Jane.
Jane is in a relationship.
Jane doesn't post on social media about
how much she loves her partner. She tells
him this in person. She doesn't mention
every little insignificant thing they do.
Jane knows that nobody gives a damn
Jane is smart. Be like Jane.

Jane: This is Jane.
Jane is in a relationship.
Jane doesn't post on social media about
how much she loves her partner. She tells
him this in person. She doesn't mention
every little insignificant thing they do.
Jane knows that nobody gives a damn
Jane is smart. Be like Jane.

Save

jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! = GET YOURS HERE = I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! = GET YOURS HERE = I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

Save

jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! = GET YOURS HERE = I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! = GET YOURS HERE = I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

Save

jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! = GET YOURS HERE = I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu: life-is-chrome: mikasslime: roses-on-the-rocks: scatterations: cute-aesthetics-things: What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger? Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres. This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family! = GET YOURS HERE = I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open I have a strong want for this I need this If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever I really want one oml it’s beautiful

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful : jane-the-killer-is-wifu:

life-is-chrome:

mikasslime:

roses-on-the-rocks:

scatterations:

cute-aesthetics-things:
What if you could wear the entire universe on your finger?
Since ancient times, astronomers around the world have used models of the sky to make calculations. With the advent of the armillary sphere, stargazers were given a physical model to better visualize the lines of celestial longitude and latitude. Created independently in ancient Greece and ancient China, these armillary spheres consisted of spherical rings centered on either the Earth or the Sun. During the 16th and 17th centuries, these astronomy tools were sized down to become fashionable finger rings that moved just like regular armillary spheres.
This beautiful and unique Ring will make a lovely gift for your friends and family!
= GET YOURS HERE =

I’ve bought the silver one. I think it’ll double as a pendant when it’s open

I have a strong want for this

I need this

If anyone gets me this ill melt in your arms and you’ll have my heart forever

I really want one oml it’s beautiful

Save