🔥 Popular | Latest

Bad, Blunts, and Dad: 50% COOL WAYS TO SAY ND TO WEED 1. Are you kidding me? Grow up 26.1 was raised right, I won't light. 2. Ganja is for goons, no thanks. 27. I'd like to keep my job, thanks. 3. Get a job you hippie wastoid. 28. You wish, pot junker! Back off 4. No thanks, I'm a good person. 29. I'm calling the Coast Guard 5.You need to go to jail, hempo. 30. No tokes for me. l'm cool 6. My dad told me better, no way. 31. Leave me be, you blunt blazer! 7. Grass is crass, also gross! Nol 32. No, I'm as clean as a whistle. 8. Uhhh.. no thanks loser! 9. Get away from me, THC addict. 34. I'll pass on your pot offer. 10. Yeah right, I'm way too smart. 35. Cannabis is crap, you cretin! 11. Let me think... No way, never. 36. Pish posh, pot is for the birds! 12. No. You are trash if you toke. 37. Nope. THC is not for me. 13. Back off, bucko. You're bad. 38. Step out of my zone, now. 14. I would rather not, okay? 39. Get off my case, weed stoner 15. Injecting weed is for dummies. 40. Nuh uh, I respect the police. 16. I will never do one toke. 17. Absolutely not, I love myself. 42. NOI Blunts are for bad men. 18. Get a grip you sativa snorter 43. I'd rather not die. Tokes kill. 19. Bugger off, you bong addict 44. No, weeds are for whacking. 20. I will use my taser on yu. 45. Marijuana is for morons, ok? 21. What do I look like? A failure 46. Are you serious? Get a life. 22. Nah, bongs are wrong 23. No way Hemp is horible 48. Stoners are loners. I'm good 24. I'd rather not be a canniba. 49. Nope! Spliffs are for wimps 25.I don't think so, l'm 33. That's a death "roach." No. 41. Lay off,I isten to the law. ay o 47. You're domb if you do "dank." m nice. 50. No, man. I follow MMYV www.facebook.com/MMYVofficial 13/10 choose 20 and 29!

13/10 choose 20 and 29!

Save
Alive, Anaconda, and Bailey Jay: THE HILL The Hill @thehill Florida survivor defends officer who did not enter shooting scene: Who wants to go down the barrel of an AR-15? hillcm/le7qEOd US 2/24/18, 7:25 PM 500 Retweets 1,572 Likes <p><a href="https://iamprincessbelle17.tumblr.com/post/171286785107/libertarirynn-oh-god-why-fivestarrejects" class="tumblr_blog">iamprincessbelle17</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171285689624/oh-god-why-fivestarrejects" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://oh-god-why.tumblr.com/post/171267721485/fivestarrejects" class="tumblr_blog">oh-god-why</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://fivestarrejects.tumblr.com/post/171257106105/friendly-neighborhood-patriarch" class="tumblr_blog">fivestarrejects</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://friendly-neighborhood-patriarch.tumblr.com/post/171256787377/hot-chubbies-with-cheese-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">friendly-neighborhood-patriarch</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://hot-chubbies-with-cheese.tumblr.com/post/171256756089/libertarirynn-bahahaha-what-in-the-shit-wh" class="tumblr_blog">hot-chubbies-with-cheese</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171255999094/bahahaha-what-in-the-shit" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Bahahaha what in the shit?</p></blockquote> <p>wh</p> <p><br/></p> <p>what?</p> </blockquote> <p>Huh…</p> </blockquote> <p>Isn’t this that same fucker who’s an actor? There’s pictures of him in California too. There’s pictures going around of his yearbook he doesn’t even go to that school. </p> <p>How is no one stopping this guy????</p> </blockquote> <p>wow its almost like people can…. move!! from one state to another! and even change schools when they do so because it would be impractical for them to fly out every single morning and fly back every single afternoon! also, there were MULTIPLE REPORTS that it sounded like there was more than one shooter because of the acoustics of the school, and I’m not gonna get too mad at a guy who didn’t immediately rush in with nothing but a pistol to defend himself and the students against what he probably thought was a group of people with automatic machine-guns. Are you gonna charge 3 people shooting at you with AR-15’s while using nothing to defend yourself except a handgun?</p> </blockquote> <blockquote><p> I’m not gonna get too mad at a guy who didn’t immediately rush in with nothing but a pistol to defend himself and the students against what he probably thought was a group of people with automatic machine-guns. Are you gonna charge 3 people shooting at you with AR-15’s while using nothing to defend yourself except a handgun?</p></blockquote> Look either resource officers are a useful defense against school shootings or they’re not. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t have a person whose job it supposedly is to protect students completely not do that job and then say “well I mean you can’t really blame him it is scary after all“.</blockquote> <p>As someone who suffers from PTSD, I am very familiar with how the brain reacts to trauma. This officer had a classic freeze response, which is ONE HUNDRED PERCENT NATURAL IN A TRAUMATIC SITUATION. You people who are barrating him for being a fucking human being are disgusting. You don’t know that you wouldn’t do the same fucking thing, so lay off him. Don’t you think he already feels guilty enough?! He was SCARED. I would be too. Anyone who thinks this is okay to blame him for is a dick head and obviously needs to take a psychology class. He couldn’t help how his brain reacted. When in a traumatic situation, one freezes because their body chooses to conserve its energy in order to keep the person alive. His hands and legs may have been shaky and unable to move because the blood flow that normally goes to those extremities is pumping fully into his heart to keep it beating. All unneccesary parts of the brain shut down and all the energy of the brain is used to keep the person’s heart pumping and keep their lungs breathing in air. That’s also why when panicked its harder to breathe. Your body is trying to get as much oxygen as physically possible so you don’t die. So ya’ll just fucking chill about this man. Its a natural and involuntary response to trauma and you weren’t there. Fuck you for being part of the problem.</p></blockquote> <p><i>The point</i> is that clearly police officers are not these infallible superhumans who can be 100% trusted to protect us so it’s ridiculous to suggest that they are the only ones who need guns. People go on and on about the extensive training these people get and how if we are ever in trouble we can just call the police and we don’t need to worry about arming ourselves but then shit like this happens and the reality is it’s not even uncommon for police officers to choose saving their own hides over protecting other people. We know cops are human. That’s why we don’t put all of our trust in them.</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-width="300" data-orig-height="200" data-tumblr-attribution="cubieapp-blog:R-_GwJNBNVcuyQhcWhnj8g:ZWnzBvqyULo-"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/3c54cfa19060ccbea9ca669aaa752af4/tumblr_mqqfd6o9je1rx54ajo1_400.gifv" data-orig-width="300" data-orig-height="200"/></figure>
Save
America, Arguing, and Crime: ITS EASY TO FORGET THAT FOR DECADES THE U.S. HAD A HEALTHCARE SYSTEM THAT WAS THE ENVY OF THE WORLD. WE HAD THE FINEST DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS, PATIENTS RECEIVED HIGH QUALITY, AFFORDABLE MEDICAL CARE, AND THOUSANDS OF PRIVATELY FUNDED CHARITIES PROVIDED HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE PO0 RON PAUL TURNING POINT USA <p><a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/165630900777/bushmeat-said-when-they-tell-you-how-ghastly" class="tumblr_blog">redbloodedamerica</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://bushmeat.tumblr.com/" title="bushmeat">bushmeat</a> said:</p><blockquote><p>When they tell you how ghastly socialised healthcare is, remember what they are saying is absolute bullshit <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-40608253</a></p></blockquote><p>If I had a nickel every time some leftist moron linked to a World Healthcare Organization or Commonwealth Fund study, well, I would have a shitload of nickels.</p><p>Since my previous source’s website is currently down–<a href="http://redbloodedamerica.tumblr.com/post/142352613032/that-red-guy-montypla-weaselwonderworld">which I’ve used in the past</a> to slap this idiotic notion that other countries’ healthcare systems are somehow superior the US’s private system–I’ll instead point to this <a href="https://object.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa654.pdf">other great explanation</a> by the folks over at CATO on why this pathetic claim is always made by these left-wing think-tanks:</p><blockquote><p><i> The debate over how to reform America’s health care sector often involves comparisons between the United States and other countries, and with good reason. Looking at other countries can help us learn which policies, if any, to emulate, and which to avoid. </i></p><p><i>There have been many attempts at international health care system comparisons.Among the most influential are the World Health Report 2000 published by the World Health Organization, several studies published by the Commonwealth Fund, and individual measures such as infant mortality and “mortality amenable to health care.” Generally in these studies, the United States performs poorly in comparison to Europe, Australia, and Japan. Therefore, scholars often use the studies to argue for adding even more government regulations to our already highly regulated health care system. </i></p><p><i>However, these studies suffer from several problems. First, they often rely on unadjusted aggregate data—such as life expectancy, or mortality from heart disease—that can be affected by many non–health care factors, including nutrition, exercise, and even crime rates. Second,they often use process measures, such as how many patients have received a pap smear or mammogram in the past three years. Process measures tell us what doctors do, but provide only an indirect measure of doctors’ productivity. Third, some of these studies inappropriately incorporate their own biases about financing in their statistics, which makes market-driven health systems appear worse even if their outcomes are similar or better. </i></p><p><i>An additional limitation of these studies is the omission of any measure of innovation. None of the best-known studies factor in the contribution of various countries to the advances that have come to characterize the current practice of health care in the developed world. </i></p><p><i>Every single health care test or treatment must be invented at some point. We would be living in a different world today were it not for the remarkable genius and hard work of health care inventors in the past, as well as investments from government health agencies and pharmaceutical and medical device companies. The health care issues commonly considered most important today—controlling costs and covering the uninsured— arguably should be regarded as secondary to innovation, inasmuch as a treatment must first be invented before its costs can be reduced and its use extended to everyone. </i><br/></p></blockquote><p>Furthermore, from another Glen Whitman <a href="https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/bp101.pdf">article</a>:</p><blockquote><p><i> Those who cite the WHO rankings typically present them as an objective measure of the relative performance of national health care systems. They are not. The WHO rankings depend crucially on a number of underlying assumptions- some of them logically incoherent, some characterized by substantial uncertainty, and some rooted in ideological beliefs and values that not everyone shares. <br/></i></p><p><i> The WHO health care rankings result from an index of health-related statistics. As with any index, it is important to consider how it was constructed, as the construction affects the results. </i><br/></p><p><i> There is good reason to account for the quality of care received by a country’s worst-off or poorest citizens. Yet the Health Distribution and Responsiveness Distribution factors do not do that.Instead, they measure relative differences in quality, without regard to the absolute level of quality. To account for the quality of care received by the worst-off, the index could include a factor that measures health among the poor, or a health care system’s responsiveness to the poor. This would, in essence, give greater weight to the well-being of the worst off.  Alternatively, a separate health performance index could be constructed for poor households or members of disadvantaged minorities. These approaches would surely have problems of their own, but they would at least be focused on the absolute level of health care quality, which should be the paramount concern. <br/></i></p><p><i> The WHO rankings, by purporting to measure the efficacy of health care systems, implicitly take all differences in health outcomes not explained by spending or literacy and attribute them entirely to health care system performance. Nothing else, from tobacco use to nutrition to sheer luck, is taken into account. </i></p><p><i>To some extent, the exclusion of other variables is simply the result of inadequacies in the data. It is difficult to get information on all relevant factors, and even more difficult to account for their expected effects on health. But some factors are deliberately excluded by the WHO analysis on the basis of paternalistic assumptions about the proper role of health systems. An earlier paper laying out the WHO methodological framework asserts, “Problems such as tobacco consumption, diet, and unsafe sexual activity must be included in an assessment of health system performance.” </i></p><p><i>In other words, the WHO approach holds health systems responsible not just for treating lung cancer, but for preventing smoking in the first place; not just for treating heart disease, but for getting people to exercise and lay off the fatty foods. <br/></i></p><p><i> Second, the WHO approach fails to consider people’s willingness to trade off health against other values. Some people are happy to give up a few potential months or even years of life in exchange for the pleasures of smoking, eating, having sex, playing sports, and so on. The WHO approach, rather than taking the public’s preferences as given, deems some preferences better than others (and then praises or blames the health system for them). </i></p><p><i>A superior (though still imperfect) approach would take people’s health-related behavior as given, and then ask which health systems do the best job of dealing with whatever health conditions arise.<br/></i></p></blockquote><p>In other words, its a bunch of meaningless cherry-picked measurements framed in a way to make the private system appear terrible in order to push for more socialized medicine.  </p><p>Despite all of it’s flaws, which are usually thanks to government market intervention, the United States still has the best health care system on the entire goddamn planet per capita.  It’s most likely that the life-saving equipment and procedures that are used in other hellholes using slave healthcare to save lives are thanks to us.  </p><p>You’re welcome.</p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/b97a460c917c68f3900de0bc46e50c59/tumblr_inline_owpcxquafE1r1jtxd_540.gif" data-orig-height="250" data-orig-width="450"/></figure></blockquote>
Save
Beer, Birthday, and Church: HOW NOT TO BEHAVE IN 15 COUNTRIES CHILE CROATIA DONTEAT ANYTHING WITH YOUR HANDS DON'T RAISE YOUR THUMB, MIDDLE, AND INDEX FINGER ALLAT ONCE You'll be mistaken for a Serbian nationalst SINGAPORE YOU CAN GET FINED FOR DON'T KISS IN PUBLIC A LOT OF THINGS This includes feeding birds, spitting. and ittering NO PHYSICAL CONTACT WITH THE OPPOSITE SEX Dont shake hands or hug You could end up injal a local offers FRANCE DON'TEXPECT AHUGE DON TEXPECT PEOPLE TO SPEAK ENGLISH DON'T TALK ABOUT MONEY AMOUNT OF VEGAN OPTIONS Not many French are and few accept the practice The French education system does not focus on teaching foreign languages DON'T HUG PEOPLE YOU JUST MET DONT STAND ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ESCALATOR It's not part of the culture. People don't ike it Do what the locals do MEXICO DON'T PATRONIZE PEOPLE DON'T BE EASILY OFFENDED DONT BE AFRAID TO TRY E Meécans have a big sense of humor mply that youre beer because is off imits Mexicans lave when youtry to speak the language or NEW ZEALAND DON T CONFUSE KIWIS DON'T MAKE FUN OF RUGBY LORD OF THE RINGS OR THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND New Zealanders take all three of these seriously DON'T FREAK OUT ABOUT PEOPLE NOT WEARING SHOES WITH They don't like it It's DONT STARE AT NAKED PEOPLE DONTASK PEOPLE ABOUT CHURCH It's considered nude, and most den't attend church anyway DON TEXPECT SPECIAL TREATMENT Norwegians change clothes in public but people are expected to look away areinformal, and most with one another DON'T GIVE AN EVEN NUMBER OF FLOWERS AS A GIFT That's only done for the deceased DON'T RELY ON A CREDIT CARD DON'T ASSUME THE PEOPLE THE GOVERNMENT DOES Russians often aiticize their govemment. Many places are cash only TURKEY DONT MAKE THE OK SIGN WITH YOUR THUMB AND FOREFINGER LAY OFF THE ALCOHOL DONT BLOW YOUR NOSE OR PICK YOUR TEETH IN PUBLIC These awanpelte when don at a restaurant, ca orb" Being drunk is seen as a dsgrace t's UNITED KINGDOM DON'T CUT IN LINE DON T ASK HOW MUCH MONEY SOMEONE MAKES Insteedt, just ask other related questioss DONTINVITE SOMEONE TO YOUR HOME That is, unless you know them very wel IRELAND DON'T BE CHEAP DON'T ATTEMPT AN IRISH ACCENT For the lnish, there is no such hing there are only accents TOP OF THE MORNING Dos't join infor a round at pub without being able to pay GERMANY DON'T STARE You'l appear DONT DO THE NAZI SALUTE DONT BE OVERLY DONT WMSH SOMEONE A HAPPY BIRTHDAY BEFORE THE ACTUAL DAY There's a superstition that you do, that person couid R'saorine, and Germans take time to KENYA DONT DON T TALK ABOUT SEX IN MIXED COMPANY DON TCALL SOMEONE BY THEIR FIRST NAME Hardly anything or anyone, A large part of the Only do this d someone uses their first name with you. How Not To Behave In 15 Countries
Save
Save