🔥 Popular | Latest

<p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171941535734/guide-to-the-galaxy-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://guide-to-the-galaxy.tumblr.com/post/171939218338/libertarirynn-libertarirynn-this-isnt" class="tumblr_blog">guide-to-the-galaxy</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938362009/libertarirynn-this-isnt-having-an-opinion" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938189669/this-isnt-having-an-opinion-about-being-shot" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>This isn’t “having an opinion about being shot“ you fucking moron. It’s actively trying to change laws they know nothing about.</p></blockquote> <p>“If you could possibly be involved in a terrorist attack, you deserve to be Secretary of State.”</p> <p>“If you’re old enough to eat, you’re old enough to be a member of the FDA.”</p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-tumblr-attribution="pureheartsaredope:NablJ_6nlOw7y0Anm10tmQ:Z8RwUf2PlHG3c" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_inline_p5pd4aFWZU1rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"/></figure><p>OP, the logical fallacy here is…epic dude. you completely jumped from one situation/position and exaggerated it 10x more. i could at least hear you out if you didn’t straw man the whole thing and actually stuck to the facts of the matter here. overall, this counterargument sucks 👎🏽</p> </blockquote> <p>Please explain to me specifically how suggesting that anyone who can eat should be able to make rules about food is different from saying anyone who can be shot should be able to make rules about guns?</p> I always like it when I address the logical fallacies in an argument by making a similarly illogical argument and I get “no that’s just stupid. Your example is so stupid! That’s dumb! You’re dumb!”, yet they never bother to explain exactly how it’s stupid and why it’s different from the original argument.</blockquote>: HE TH TREVOR NO SHOW "IF THEYRE TOO YOUNG TO BUY GUNS, WHY SHOULD THEY BE MAKING MY GUN LAWS?" IF KIDS ARE OLD ENOUGH TO BE SHOT, THEY'RE OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE AN OPINION ABOUT BEING SHOT <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171941535734/guide-to-the-galaxy-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://guide-to-the-galaxy.tumblr.com/post/171939218338/libertarirynn-libertarirynn-this-isnt" class="tumblr_blog">guide-to-the-galaxy</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938362009/libertarirynn-this-isnt-having-an-opinion" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938189669/this-isnt-having-an-opinion-about-being-shot" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>This isn’t “having an opinion about being shot“ you fucking moron. It’s actively trying to change laws they know nothing about.</p></blockquote> <p>“If you could possibly be involved in a terrorist attack, you deserve to be Secretary of State.”</p> <p>“If you’re old enough to eat, you’re old enough to be a member of the FDA.”</p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-tumblr-attribution="pureheartsaredope:NablJ_6nlOw7y0Anm10tmQ:Z8RwUf2PlHG3c" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_inline_p5pd4aFWZU1rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"/></figure><p>OP, the logical fallacy here is…epic dude. you completely jumped from one situation/position and exaggerated it 10x more. i could at least hear you out if you didn’t straw man the whole thing and actually stuck to the facts of the matter here. overall, this counterargument sucks 👎🏽</p> </blockquote> <p>Please explain to me specifically how suggesting that anyone who can eat should be able to make rules about food is different from saying anyone who can be shot should be able to make rules about guns?</p> I always like it when I address the logical fallacies in an argument by making a similarly illogical argument and I get “no that’s just stupid. Your example is so stupid! That’s dumb! You’re dumb!”, yet they never bother to explain exactly how it’s stupid and why it’s different from the original argument.</blockquote>
Save
<p><a href="https://guide-to-the-galaxy.tumblr.com/post/171939218338/libertarirynn-libertarirynn-this-isnt" class="tumblr_blog">guide-to-the-galaxy</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938362009/libertarirynn-this-isnt-having-an-opinion" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938189669/this-isnt-having-an-opinion-about-being-shot" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>This isn’t “having an opinion about being shot“ you fucking moron. It’s actively trying to change laws they know nothing about.</p></blockquote> <p>“If you could possibly be involved in a terrorist attack, you deserve to be Secretary of State.”</p> <p>“If you’re old enough to eat, you’re old enough to be a member of the FDA.”</p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-tumblr-attribution="pureheartsaredope:NablJ_6nlOw7y0Anm10tmQ:Z8RwUf2PlHG3c" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_inline_p5pd4aFWZU1rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"/></figure><p>OP, the logical fallacy here is…epic dude. you completely jumped from one situation/position and exaggerated it 10x more. i could at least hear you out if you didn’t straw man the whole thing and actually stuck to the facts of the matter here. overall, this counterargument sucks 👎🏽</p> </blockquote> <p>Please explain to me specifically how suggesting that anyone who can eat should be able to make rules about food is different from saying anyone who can be shot should be able to make rules about guns?</p> I always like it when I address the logical fallacies in an argument by making a similarly illogical argument and I get “no that’s just stupid. Your example is so stupid! That’s dumb! You’re dumb!”, yet they never bother to explain exactly how it’s stupid and why it’s different from the original argument.: HE TH TREVOR NO SHOW "IF THEYRE TOO YOUNG TO BUY GUNS, WHY SHOULD THEY BE MAKING MY GUN LAWS?" IF KIDS ARE OLD ENOUGH TO BE SHOT, THEY'RE OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE AN OPINION ABOUT BEING SHOT <p><a href="https://guide-to-the-galaxy.tumblr.com/post/171939218338/libertarirynn-libertarirynn-this-isnt" class="tumblr_blog">guide-to-the-galaxy</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938362009/libertarirynn-this-isnt-having-an-opinion" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/171938189669/this-isnt-having-an-opinion-about-being-shot" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>This isn’t “having an opinion about being shot“ you fucking moron. It’s actively trying to change laws they know nothing about.</p></blockquote> <p>“If you could possibly be involved in a terrorist attack, you deserve to be Secretary of State.”</p> <p>“If you’re old enough to eat, you’re old enough to be a member of the FDA.”</p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-tumblr-attribution="pureheartsaredope:NablJ_6nlOw7y0Anm10tmQ:Z8RwUf2PlHG3c" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_inline_p5pd4aFWZU1rw09tq_540.gif" data-orig-height="320" data-orig-width="268" data-orig-src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/c7120c6c282cc374153781af843a27ef/tumblr_ovwl27QOGi1vk067bo1_400.gif"/></figure><p>OP, the logical fallacy here is…epic dude. you completely jumped from one situation/position and exaggerated it 10x more. i could at least hear you out if you didn’t straw man the whole thing and actually stuck to the facts of the matter here. overall, this counterargument sucks 👎🏽</p> </blockquote> <p>Please explain to me specifically how suggesting that anyone who can eat should be able to make rules about food is different from saying anyone who can be shot should be able to make rules about guns?</p> I always like it when I address the logical fallacies in an argument by making a similarly illogical argument and I get “no that’s just stupid. Your example is so stupid! That’s dumb! You’re dumb!”, yet they never bother to explain exactly how it’s stupid and why it’s different from the original argument.
Save
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/128358531149">celticpyro</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://venix-savreux.tumblr.com/post/128357788838">venix-savreux</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://ppaction.tumblr.com/post/115214533028">ppaction</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/31/indiana-planned-parenthood_n_6977232.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013">Your daily reminder that political attacks on Planned Parenthood do a lot more damage than just restricting abortion access.</a></p> </blockquote> <p>Correlation does not equal causation?</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, and the SCOTUS bill created all those wildfires in Washington state, right?</p> <p>PP is so desperate to prove their relevance they’re resorting to logical fallacies to garner support.<br/></p> </blockquote>: Indiana Shut Down Its Rural Planned Parenthood Clinics And Got An HIV Outbreak Posted: 03/31/2015 12:17 pm EDTUpdated: 1 hour ago <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/128358531149">celticpyro</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://venix-savreux.tumblr.com/post/128357788838">venix-savreux</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://ppaction.tumblr.com/post/115214533028">ppaction</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/31/indiana-planned-parenthood_n_6977232.html?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000013">Your daily reminder that political attacks on Planned Parenthood do a lot more damage than just restricting abortion access.</a></p> </blockquote> <p>Correlation does not equal causation?</p> </blockquote> <p>Yeah, and the SCOTUS bill created all those wildfires in Washington state, right?</p> <p>PP is so desperate to prove their relevance they’re resorting to logical fallacies to garner support.<br/></p> </blockquote>

<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/128358531149">celticpyro</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog...

Save
<p><a href="http://whatwouldthomasjeffersondo.tumblr.com/post/108194097257/micdotcom-watch-2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts" class="tumblr_blog">whatwouldthomasjeffersondo</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://micdotcom.tumblr.com/post/108090077591/watch-2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts-down-nancy-grace">micdotcom</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Watch: <strong><a href="http://mic.com/articles/108454/2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts-down-nancy-grace-in-legal-weed-debate?utm_source=policymicTBLR&amp;utm_medium=main&amp;utm_campaign=social">2 Chainz wonderfully shuts down Nancy Grace in legal weed debate</a></strong> </p> <blockquote> <p>Rapper 2 Chainz, aka Tity Boi, aka Tauheed Epps, may have seemed like an easy target for cable television host and general hysteria-monger Nancy Grace. But when she tried to slam him for supporting marijuana legalization, <strong><a href="http://mic.com/articles/108454/2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts-down-nancy-grace-in-legal-weed-debate?utm_source=policymicTBLR&amp;utm_medium=main&amp;utm_campaign=social">he wouldn’t stand for it.</a></strong></p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>I wanted to watch this interview, I really did. But I think I’d rather self-immolate than put myself through Nancy Grace debating the merits of marijuana legalization. I swear the only sentences she can form are logical fallacies while she yells and rolls her eyes.<br/><br/>Next time I feel numb and need to feel something, I’ll put on Nancy Grace. She pisses me off.</p></blockquote> <p>I&rsquo;ve often laughed because Nancy Grace seems to be the one &ldquo;journalist&rdquo; most conservatives and most liberals are unified on. She&rsquo;s an idiot.</p>: Imnotsureiryou know this,buteveryboay hastheability togettheir hands on potrght nowwhetherits legal or not. <p><a href="http://whatwouldthomasjeffersondo.tumblr.com/post/108194097257/micdotcom-watch-2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts" class="tumblr_blog">whatwouldthomasjeffersondo</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://micdotcom.tumblr.com/post/108090077591/watch-2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts-down-nancy-grace">micdotcom</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Watch: <strong><a href="http://mic.com/articles/108454/2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts-down-nancy-grace-in-legal-weed-debate?utm_source=policymicTBLR&amp;utm_medium=main&amp;utm_campaign=social">2 Chainz wonderfully shuts down Nancy Grace in legal weed debate</a></strong> </p> <blockquote> <p>Rapper 2 Chainz, aka Tity Boi, aka Tauheed Epps, may have seemed like an easy target for cable television host and general hysteria-monger Nancy Grace. But when she tried to slam him for supporting marijuana legalization, <strong><a href="http://mic.com/articles/108454/2-chainz-wonderfully-shuts-down-nancy-grace-in-legal-weed-debate?utm_source=policymicTBLR&amp;utm_medium=main&amp;utm_campaign=social">he wouldn’t stand for it.</a></strong></p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p>I wanted to watch this interview, I really did. But I think I’d rather self-immolate than put myself through Nancy Grace debating the merits of marijuana legalization. I swear the only sentences she can form are logical fallacies while she yells and rolls her eyes.<br/><br/>Next time I feel numb and need to feel something, I’ll put on Nancy Grace. She pisses me off.</p></blockquote> <p>I&rsquo;ve often laughed because Nancy Grace seems to be the one &ldquo;journalist&rdquo; most conservatives and most liberals are unified on. She&rsquo;s an idiot.</p>
Save