🔥 Popular | Latest

libertarirynn: vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. You’re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since i’ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isn’t the same thing as making a good one, and you’ve made a bad argument cause you’re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesn’t mean we have to think it’s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesn’t make it reasonable or good. You’re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument is…insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. “I personally dont find an. Issue with this law” is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward. “Breaking the law is illegal” is the entirety of what you’re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic you’re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.  If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony you’d defend people being locked away only because they “broke the law”. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt “breaking the law is illegal”, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as “harmless”. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. “I will break this law because i personally dont like it/think it’s harmless” is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. “maybe if those jews didn’t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldn’t have been jewish in poland.” that’s exactly what you sound like lmao. I’m really not sure what argument you’re trying to go for right now? Oh, i’m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^ Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.: Alyssa Milano @Alyssa_Milano Follow Ns NEWS MARIJU 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018 MAKEMAT 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes 主与玉丰丰 -- libertarirynn: vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. You’re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since i’ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isn’t the same thing as making a good one, and you’ve made a bad argument cause you’re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesn’t mean we have to think it’s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesn’t make it reasonable or good. You’re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument is…insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. “I personally dont find an. Issue with this law” is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward. “Breaking the law is illegal” is the entirety of what you’re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic you’re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.  If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony you’d defend people being locked away only because they “broke the law”. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt “breaking the law is illegal”, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as “harmless”. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. “I will break this law because i personally dont like it/think it’s harmless” is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. “maybe if those jews didn’t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldn’t have been jewish in poland.” that’s exactly what you sound like lmao. I’m really not sure what argument you’re trying to go for right now? Oh, i’m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^ Also forcing people into legal slavery by arresting and imprisoning them for victimless crimes sure as shit sounds like persecution to me.
Save
vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. You’re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since i’ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isn’t the same thing as making a good one, and you’ve made a bad argument cause you’re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesn’t mean we have to think it’s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesn’t make it reasonable or good. You’re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument is…insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. “I personally dont find an. Issue with this law” is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward. “Breaking the law is illegal” is the entirety of what you’re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic you’re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.  If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony you’d defend people being locked away only because they “broke the law”. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt “breaking the law is illegal”, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as “harmless”. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. “I will break this law because i personally dont like it/think it’s harmless” is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. “maybe if those jews didn’t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldn’t have been jewish in poland.” that’s exactly what you sound like lmao. I’m really not sure what argument you’re trying to go for right now? Oh, i’m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^: Alyssa Milano @Alyssa_Milano Follow Ns NEWS MARIJU 4:14 PM 18 Apr 2018 MAKEMAT 1,593 Retweets 4.735 Likes 主与玉丰丰 -- vaporwavevocap: cheshireinthemiddle: napoleonbonerfarte: cheshireinthemiddle: pseudopupil: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: hardboiledoldman: cheshireinthemiddle: But you knowingly broke the law. You could sleep with a 17 year old and the age of consent of your state can lower the next year. You still broke the law. You’re an unfathomably dumb cunt. At least I have a good argument. And since i’ve already gone into great detail proving my point, unless you have something constructive to add, move along. A sound argument is not a good argument, you dummy. Making a sound argument isn’t the same thing as making a good one, and you’ve made a bad argument cause you’re a dumb as fuck bootlicker. We all know breaking the law has consequences, doesn’t mean we have to think it’s morally good, you brain-worm-riddled moron. Something being normal and the accepted reality doesn’t make it reasonable or good. You’re not smart and your rhetoric is garbage-tier. Eat shit. A sound argument is one that is well thought out and covers its bases. Which is what I gave. Your counterargument is…insults. You personally not agreeing with a law doesnt mean that you can just break it. If youre an immigrant coming from a country with a liwer legal drinking age or age of consent, you can see breaking those laws in the US as harmless. You can think they are stupid laws. They might even change in the future. But if you break them in the US, you will be punished. “I personally dont find an. Issue with this law” is not a defense. If you want to do something illegal and think it is unfair, work to have the law changed. Advocate for its change. And abide by the new rules (in this case, get a license, sell only to specific people, and dont sell to children). And this isnt slavery. This isnt criminalized homosexuality. This isnt infringing on your right to live. You can wait to get high in this particular method or sell it to others after it has been legalized. It isnt that hard. You are such an idiot and coward. “Breaking the law is illegal” is the entirety of what you’re saying (congrats on your basic baby brain logic) but its still fucking pathetic you’re defending a heinous prison system simply because you are pussy who loves authority and pointless contrarianism. Like it IS a stupid law and the point of this comic is that no one should lose years (or any time!) of their life over it.  If the government made a law that jaywalking is a felony you’d defend people being locked away only because they “broke the law”. Thats stupid and says more about you than anything. Grow a spine you slug. Another person who just insults and doesnt read. The argument isnt “breaking the law is illegal”, but that knowingly breaking the law comes with predictable punishments. If you dont agree with a law, you advocate for its change. You dont personally get to decide what is and isnt a stupid law. The age of consent in France is 15. And if you live in France, that could seem harmless. But if you immigrated to Japan or the US and started sleeping with 15 year olds, you can argue that it is harmless all you want, but it is still illegal. The government has made leaving your preteen or lower child home alone as a form child abuse. You can have your children taken away if you do it too much. I was left alone at 8 years old. All the time. I was fine. The other little kids left alone were fine. We could handle ourselves. We and Our parents saw it as “harmless”. That doesnt mean the parents cant be pubished for it. “I will break this law because i personally dont like it/think it’s harmless” is acceptable to you until it is used on a law that you actually support. “maybe if those jews didn’t want to get sent to concentration camps they shouldn’t have been jewish in poland.” that’s exactly what you sound like lmao. I’m really not sure what argument you’re trying to go for right now? Oh, i’m sorry, I guess you getting high is comparable to persecution now. Your argument can be used to justify breaking literally any law. There is a HUGE difference between laws that violate your right to live and laws that you just dont feel like following. If you cant see the difference then i feel very sorry for you. It is persecution, if there is no victim there is no crime, therefore treating people like criminals without a crime is persecution. What she said ^
Save
plannedparenthood: A proposed Trump/Pence policy is attempting to take away your basic rights. We have until July 31 to submit comments against this gag rule that violates medical ethics. The gag rule would: Impose new rules designed to make it impossible for millions of patients to get birth control or preventive care from Planned Parenthood.Under this rule, doctors, nurses, hospitals, and community health centers across the country would no longer be able to refer their patients for safe, legal abortion.Remove the guarantee that you’re getting full and accurate information about your health care from your doctor. For nearly two decades, Title X law has been clear: Health care providers cannot withhold information from you about your pregnancy options. This rule means they can.Delete the requirement that contraception provided be medically approved, and no longer directs providers to ensure you have access to the full range of birth control.We have a chance to stop this rule, but we need your help : Don't gag my doctor Don't block my health care #NoGagRule Gag rule (n.) A dangerous Trump-Pence policy that prevents doctors, nurses, and other providers from counseling, referring, providing, or even mentioning abortion by taking away their Title X funds if they do. Designed to block millions of patients from care and unbiased information at Planned Parenthood health centers. #NOGăą Rule #NoGağRule #NoGağRule #NoGa Rule plannedparenthood: A proposed Trump/Pence policy is attempting to take away your basic rights. We have until July 31 to submit comments against this gag rule that violates medical ethics. The gag rule would: Impose new rules designed to make it impossible for millions of patients to get birth control or preventive care from Planned Parenthood.Under this rule, doctors, nurses, hospitals, and community health centers across the country would no longer be able to refer their patients for safe, legal abortion.Remove the guarantee that you’re getting full and accurate information about your health care from your doctor. For nearly two decades, Title X law has been clear: Health care providers cannot withhold information from you about your pregnancy options. This rule means they can.Delete the requirement that contraception provided be medically approved, and no longer directs providers to ensure you have access to the full range of birth control.We have a chance to stop this rule, but we need your help

plannedparenthood: A proposed Trump/Pence policy is attempting to take away your basic rights. We have until July 31 to submit comments a...

Save
<p>At fist I was like &ldquo;but &lsquo;97 was only 10 years ago&rdquo; and then I got depressed.</p>: katie whitlock @whitlock_ katie My dad's been writing my mom a poem every valentine's day for 20 years and this year he took a line from every single one since 1997 20 Years '97: we walk outside into a new life I and feel the warm sun on our faces 98: give us a new star I dropped from the dark sky I a spark set loose from the fires of heaven '99: as our baby girl with the banged-up head and the tube in her chest opened her mouth to cry but couldn't | you had faith '00: you in your cap and gown | a professional healer of hearts & minds | body & soul 01: I cry out for help, and who does appear It's Daddy (whom I love too) but not quite so dear l As you l Want my Mommy! '02: Grace | It's a name for a girl | It's also a thought that changed the world | Grace finds goodness | In everything 04: And if I ever don't see | What I need to see | To help you | Ever again | Please try a little harder to show me '05: a home filled to the brim with love, happily squealing little girls, and the intoxicating smells of another gourmet dinner 06: His emotions swell and he can't even look the nurse practitioner in the eye. He stares down at his feet. No words come, but a few tears do. '07: the fact that you have volunteered for this double duty says a whole lot of wonderful things about you | that beautiful, shiny heart of yours just got a little bit shinier '08: let's celebrate | that God is so good | and a dozen years later | I still love you so much that it hurts '10: new rules at our house I don't leave the butter uncovered | or a long tongue will lick it up '12: You make it easy to remember that every breath is a gift of audacious grace, yours and mine together, breathing the same air, speaking the name of God in unisor '13: Your Valentine from fate this year is a PET scan on February 14th | And in a bizarre ankle-twist to our story, I wait for the results of my own scan | Happy Valentine's Day to us! 14: I know you don't want to be cancer girl. So, don't be cancer girl. Be incredible-faith-story-girl. 15: You should talk to people dying of cancer, so you figure out what to say to them in person before you try to write it in your book '16: It has been a wild ride and a shower of blessings | From a sliding-down-the-wall seizure to "we are sooo lucky" <p>At fist I was like &ldquo;but &lsquo;97 was only 10 years ago&rdquo; and then I got depressed.</p>
Save
Somebody Sign Me Up to Work in This Officehttp://meme-rage.tumblr.com: Employees, Due to the recent actions of a specific employee, we have been forced to update our office rules. Please find these new rules below: 1. Do not take food from the break room that is not yours 2. Do not use office printers to print personal items (e.g. invitations to your fish's birthday party) 3. Do not dress up as a ghost and 'haunt' the supply room 4. Do not play the saxophone in the elevator and refuse to let people exit if they don't tip you 5. Do not tie a rolling chair to coworkers and yell "MUSH" in the hopes they will drag you around the office 6. Do not hire a rooster to be your assistant 7. Do not replace an employee's family portraits with pictures of yourself playing the saxophone 8. Do not yell "spaghetti fight" and then start throwing spaghetti 9. Do not secretly board up the entrances to cubicles so employees can't get out 10. Do not collect money from everyone to pick up lunch and then go to the casino 11. Do not fill a donut box with scorpions and leave it in the break room 12. Do not spend all day Googling images of "cool guys playing the saxophone" 13.DO NOT PUT CHEESE SLICES IN THE PAPER SHREDDER 14. Do not write "day care" on the bathroom door and leave your baby in there 15. Do not call a company-wide meeting that is really just a 'concert' of you in the parking lot playing the saxophone 16. Do not tell everyone Brad is dead. Brad is not dead. He is in Florida. He will be back on Monday. Moving forward, failure to abide by these rules will be grounds for termination. Thank you, Management obvious plant Somebody Sign Me Up to Work in This Officehttp://meme-rage.tumblr.com

Somebody Sign Me Up to Work in This Officehttp://meme-rage.tumblr.com

Save
New Rules: Society's New Rules* DO NOT *according to the internet I REALLY LIKE T-SHIRTS. HEY, WHOA! I LIKE TANK TOPS, SO STOP SHAMING ME FOR ITI HAVE AN INNOCUOUS OPINION DO NOT WHY DID YOU NO, STOP SAY "ALL QUEER QUESTIONING SUPPORTERS YOU'RE GIVING ME! SUCK"? ME AN ANXIETY HARASSMENT! ATTACK! PARTICIPATE IN A CONVERSATION DO NOT .AND THEN TCH! THE BALLOONS HOW ABOUT "SURPRISED"? HE'LL BE SO WILL GO THERE. "EMOTIONALLY SURPRISED! IT'LL BE BLACKMAILED" BY YOUR ABUSIVE, GREAT! EXTROVERTED WAYS? THROW A PARTY DO NOT он, ООн, DON'T SAY COME ON! THAT WORD! I TOTALLY SAW THAT TWIST "TW*ST" IS VERY COMING! TRIGGERING тО МЕ. YOU NEED TO STOP USING IT. SAY CERTAHN ANY WORDS CHAOSLIFE. FINDCHAOS. COM IT'S EASY!** THE WORLD MUST BE TAILORED TO ME AND MY RIDICULOUSLY RESTRICTIVE STANDARDS! WHAT'S A LITTLE CENSORSHIP BETWEEN FRIENDS? **DISCLAIMER: This comic is not intended to defend any person(s) looking to be purposefully contentious or emotionally damaging towards others. It is merely a humorous observation of commonly experienced reactions towards otherwise harmless exchanges between two parties. The previous sent- -ence's use of the word "humorous" was to describe the creators' intent and not necessarily the experi- -ence of the reader. Any humor that was potentially damaging to the reader is solely the responsibility of the reader, having accepted liability through use of the above comic. Any other damages incurred by the reader, up to and including eye strain, papercuts, distraction, and general unease at having to think, should be reported immediately to the nearest wall. Do you suppose people read this far into legal jargon? I could really be saying anything at this point. 1 like slapping lunchmeat together, that might be weird. It's just very satisfying and feels a little taboo. Plus, it sort of sounds like "thwek." That's a pretty good onomatopoeia in my opinion. The views expressed by the grey character do not necessarily reflect the views of the entire int- -ernet; just the small, fragile pockets that shouldn't be allowed outside, let alone have access to a machine that can instantly connect them to millions of anonymous, sometimes contradictory opinions. Opinions are for personal use only. Do not apply censorship directly to iritant. Discontinue use of the internet and call a doctor immediately if you experience any of the following symptoms: headache, butthurt, use of the phrase "I'm not racist/homophobic/sexist, but.", rash, feelings of self-righteousness, feelings that the world may indeed revolve around you, anxiety over particular words being used in normal conversation, palpitations, regurgitation of popular opinions that may not reflect your own, or emotional baggage from negative views.
Save