馃敟 Popular | Latest

lessonsinsilence: lordrachaelmarissa: bando鈥揼rand-scamyon: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 馃憦 THE 馃憦 FUCK 馃憦 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child鈥檚 parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible鈥攁nd then] 聽鈥nd then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn鈥檛 pertain to you. I鈥檓 sorry 鈥 White teacher: 鈥攜ou know what, I鈥檓 sorry -I鈥檓 sorry鈥 Black student: 鈥擭o, no, no鈥 let you talk -I let you talk, you鈥檙e gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I鈥檓 sorry that this is the way that it is. You鈥檙e right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything鈥nd that鈥檚 not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we鈥檙e complaining or we鈥檙e ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about聽鈥極h, I don鈥檛 want鈥攖here鈥檚 too many Latinos and there鈥檚 too many鈥斺 White teacher: I didn鈥檛 say that鈥 [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don鈥檛 want this to turn into a Latin country because there鈥檒l be too many聽 White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept鈥 White teacher: Don鈥檛 tell me I鈥檓 closed-minded鈥 Black student: Everything you鈥檝e said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don鈥檛 agree with you doesn鈥檛 mean I鈥檓 closed-minded. Black student: You don鈥檛 need to agree鈥擨 -I鈥檝e had conversations with people that don鈥檛 agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept鈥攜ou鈥檙e not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right鈥 White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything鈥.who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN鈥橳 HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF聽 Other Random: GO OFF鈥 *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON鈥橳 SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I鈥檓 mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! YES, BECAUSE I鈥橫 MAD. This gives me hope. I鈥檓 22. I鈥檓 not that old, but I鈥檓 assuming I鈥檓 older than these students in the video. To see this young intelligent woman school her teacher on white privilege and the affects of white supremacy gives me hope. They are young and using their voice! This is gives me hope ya鈥檒l.聽 this馃憦student馃憦deserves馃憦an馃憦award馃憦for馃憦putting馃憦up馃憦with馃憦that馃憦teacher馃憦 : lessonsinsilence: lordrachaelmarissa: bando鈥揼rand-scamyon: suitepetite: nico-incognito: nerdyblackfangirl: asinine-sunshine: GO 馃憦 THE 馃憦 FUCK 馃憦 OFF. Also, the American educational system is trash. I applaud this child鈥檚 parents for giving her a voice and standing up against bias authority. (Can someone caption this?) Classroom full of mostly black and brown students: Black student: [unintelligible鈥攁nd then] 聽鈥nd then throwing everything away beneath it because it doesn鈥檛 pertain to you. I鈥檓 sorry 鈥 White teacher: 鈥攜ou know what, I鈥檓 sorry -I鈥檓 sorry鈥 Black student: 鈥擭o, no, no鈥 let you talk -I let you talk, you鈥檙e gonna let me talk. [Other students gasps] White student: Go ahead. Finish. Black student: I鈥檓 sorry that this is the way that it is. You鈥檙e right, it is fucked up. But white people control everything鈥nd that鈥檚 not fair. And when anybody, any other minority tries to say anything about it or change it, we鈥檙e complaining or we鈥檙e ungrateful or all this other stuff because we still have this or that. But then you say something about聽鈥極h, I don鈥檛 want鈥攖here鈥檚 too many Latinos and there鈥檚 too many鈥斺 White teacher: I didn鈥檛 say that鈥 [Various students disagree] White teacher: I said I want to control the border! Black student: You said you don鈥檛 want this to turn into a Latin country because there鈥檒l be too many聽 White teacher: I did not say that. [Various students disagree] Student 2: You said you want to preserve the American culture. Black student: There is no American culture. American culture is EVERYTHING. [Various students agree] Random: Mayonnaise! [Students laugh] Black student: And because you are white and so closed-minded, you refuse to accept that, you refuse to accept鈥 White teacher: Don鈥檛 tell me I鈥檓 closed-minded鈥 Black student: Everything you鈥檝e said to me is closed-minded. White teacher: Just because I don鈥檛 agree with you doesn鈥檛 mean I鈥檓 closed-minded. Black student: You don鈥檛 need to agree鈥擨 -I鈥檝e had conversations with people that don鈥檛 agree with me, but if they at least listen and try to accept鈥攜ou鈥檙e not accepting the truth. White teacher: Why do I have to accept what you think is right? Black student: You need to accept the truth! Not what I think is right, what is actually happening right鈥 White teacher: Well, let me tell you what I think. You said white people have been in control of everything鈥.who is the president of the United States right now?! Students: A black man! *Various sounds of incredulity* Black student: WITH A WHITE CONGRESS! WITH A WHITE SENATE! WITH WHITE EVERYTHING ELSE! HE DOESN鈥橳 HAVE THE CONTROL OF EVERYTHING! Random: GO OFF聽 Other Random: GO OFF鈥 *The class is in an uproar* Random student: YOU ARE SO PRIVILEGED THAT YOU JUST DON鈥橳 SEE IT! White teacher: Do we have to yell?! Black student: Yes, because I鈥檓 mad. Reblogging for the captioning. Thanks! YES, BECAUSE I鈥橫 MAD. This gives me hope. I鈥檓 22. I鈥檓 not that old, but I鈥檓 assuming I鈥檓 older than these students in the video. To see this young intelligent woman school her teacher on white privilege and the affects of white supremacy gives me hope. They are young and using their voice! This is gives me hope ya鈥檒l.聽 this馃憦student馃憦deserves馃憦an馃憦award馃憦for馃憦putting馃憦up馃憦with馃憦that馃憦teacher馃憦
Save
chaoswolf1982: liberalsarecool: catbirdseat4u: 鉃 NBD people鈥 聽Just the latest thing trending on Twitter 鉃 Oh, and you can access Trump鈥檚 original tweet HERE. #SudafedHead Trump is not well. #Sudafed #addict Trump was never well. It鈥檚 just that now the proof is coming out. : JRehling @JRehling THREAD In 2016, Trump posted a photo of himself that gave away more than he intended. An open desk drawer revealed box after box of Sudafed, piled on top of one another. 11:32 AM Oct 5, 2019 - Twitter Web App 8.1K Retweets 18.9K Likes JRehling @JRehling 23h Replying to @JRehling Even stranger, although the photo was taken in New York, the boxes include a type that is only sold in the United Kingdom, with a different box and distinctive ingredients not found in the U.S. SUDAFED MUCUS RELIEF DAY& NIGHT Capsules Paracetamol, Caffeine & Phenylephrine Reduces mucus Two different capsules-one for day and one for night 16 capsules DAY NIGHT t 486 89 2.4K JRehling @JRehling 23h Sudafed is sometimes used for a high that includes increased alertness, but also has a side effect of pupil dilation t 481 65 2.8K JRehling @JRehling 23h Abuse of this drug was rare, but in order to limits its abuse, regulations were passed limiting the frequency in which an individual could purchase it, and requiring the individual show ID. t270 68 1.9K JRehling @JRehling 23h The desk drawer full of Sudafed, including boxes in New York purchased in the UK indicate that the legal limits of purchase are being circumvented, and that the then-candidate Trump was abusing Sudafed for its high rather than its decongestant effect 27 t490 2.9K JRehling @JRehling 23h From addictionhope.com "A sign of abuse of this drug might be finding a large amount of cold medicine drug packaging among someone's belongings." Addiction Hope: Resources for Those Struggling.. Addiction Hope is an online recovery & support resource site. You'll find education about addicti... addictionhope.com 4 t278 2.1K JRehling @JRehling 23h Beyond pupil dilation, more serious side effects include hallucinations and paranoid psychosis It is very concerning for the entire planet that someone with access to nuclear weapons is showing signs of abusing a drug that leads to paranoid psychosis 16 L 719 4.1K JRehling @JRehling 23h A desk drawer full of a controlled substance, however benign, shows signs that someone is systematically circumventing the law. The side effects of a cold drug are particularly concerning in this case, is a threat to the security of the United States and the world. [END] and this ti394 43 2.7K JRehling @JRehling 23h Note: These observations are not original or complete. @CaslerNoel has posted on this previously, with additional details and deserves all credit for noticing this earlier. NoelCaslerComedy @CaslerNoel Sep 9 Trump snorted Adderall all thru the day on 'Apprentice' he also ate UK. Sudafed like candy. But at night and at parties he switched to cocaine and high-end Methamphetamine that was hand-delivered by Bikers. The point is he was always high. That hasn't changed. @realDonaldTrump 1687 3.2K 45 JRehling @JRehling 16h Replying to @JRehling In response to many who have wondered if the photo is real, it is still up on Trump's Twitter timeline. twitter.com/realdonaldtrum... chaoswolf1982: liberalsarecool: catbirdseat4u: 鉃 NBD people鈥 聽Just the latest thing trending on Twitter 鉃 Oh, and you can access Trump鈥檚 original tweet HERE. #SudafedHead Trump is not well. #Sudafed #addict Trump was never well. It鈥檚 just that now the proof is coming out.

chaoswolf1982: liberalsarecool: catbirdseat4u: 鉃 NBD people鈥 聽Just the latest thing trending on Twitter 鉃 Oh, and you can access Trum...

Save
peachtipple: gaytimesmag聽On June 12 2016, Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was the scene of one of the deadliest mass shootings by a single assailant in the history of the United States. At the time, it marked the deadliest terrorist attack on US soil since the tragedy of 9/11. Today we remember the 49 people who lost their lives that night. 馃枻 Head to gaytimes.co.uk to read our interview with the team behind Pulse on what this anniversary means to them, and how the club has become an enduring reminder of how far we鈥檝e left to go. 馃彸锔忊嶐煂: Remembering the 49 people who lost their lives as a result of the Pulse Massacre. Stanley Almodovar III, 23 Alejandro Barrios Martinez, 21 Amanda L. Alvear, 25 Brenda Marquez McCool, 49 Oscar A. Aracena Montero, 26 Gilberto R. Silva Menendez, 25 Rodolfo Ayala Ayala, 33 Kimberly Jean Morris, 37 Antonio Davon Bron, 29 Akyra Monet Murray, 18 Darryl Roman Burt lI, 29 Luis Omar Ocasio Capo, 20 Angel Candelario-Padro, 28 Geraldo A. Ortiz Jimenez, 25 Juan Chavez Martinez, 25 Eric Ivan Ortiz-Rivera, 36 Luis Daniel Conde, 39 Joel Rayon Paniagua, 32 Cory James Connell, 21 Jean Carlos Mendez Perez, 35 Tevin Eugene Crosby, 25 Enrique L. Rios, Jr., 25 Deonka Deidra Drayton, 32 Jean Carlos Nieves Rodr铆guez, 27 Sim贸n Adrian Carrillo Fern谩ndez, 31 Xavier Emmanuel Serrano-Rosado, 35 Leroy Valentin Fernandez, 25 Christopher Joseph Sanfeliz, 24 Mercedez Marisol Flores, 26 Yilmary Rodr铆guez Solivan, 24 Peter Ommy Gonzalez Cruz, 22 Edward Sotomayor Jr., 34 Juan Ramon Guerrero, 22 Shane Evan Tomlinson, 33 Paul Terrell Henry, 41 Martin Benitez Torres, 33 Frank Hernandez, 27 Jonathan A. Camuy Vega, 24 Miguel Angel Honorato, 30 Juan Pablo Rivera Vel谩zquez, 37 Javier Jorge Reyes, 40 Luis Sergio Vielma, 22 Jason Benjamin Josaphat, 19 Franky Jimmy DeJesus Vel谩zquez, 50 Eddie Jamoldroy Justice, 30 Luis Daniel Wilson-Leon, 37 Anthony Luis Laureano Disla, 25 Jerald Arthur Wright, 31 Christopher Andrew Leinonen, 32 peachtipple: gaytimesmag聽On June 12 2016, Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was the scene of one of the deadliest mass shootings by a single assailant in the history of the United States. At the time, it marked the deadliest terrorist attack on US soil since the tragedy of 9/11. Today we remember the 49 people who lost their lives that night. 馃枻 Head to gaytimes.co.uk to read our interview with the team behind Pulse on what this anniversary means to them, and how the club has become an enduring reminder of how far we鈥檝e left to go. 馃彸锔忊嶐煂

peachtipple: gaytimesmag聽On June 12 2016, Pulse Nightclub in Orlando was the scene of one of the deadliest mass shootings by a single as...

Save
Some of these are not true, but wich ones?: 50 THINGS YOU DON'T NEED TO KNOW "1- RUBBER BANDS LAST LONGER WHEN REFRIGERATED 2-PEANUTS ARE ONE OF THE INGREDIENTS OF DYNAMITE 3- THERE ARE 293 WAYS TO MAKE CHANGE FOR A DOLLAR * 4-THE AVERAGE PERSON'S LEFT HAND DOES 56% OF THE TYPING 5- A SHARK IS THE ONLY FISH THAT CAN BLINK WITH BOTH EYES. 6- THERE ARE MORE CHICKENS THAN PEOPLE IN THE WORLD 7- THE LONGEST ONE-SYLLABLE WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE IS "SCREECHED. 8- ON A CANADIAN TWO-DOLLAR BILL, THE FLAG FLYING OVER THE PARLIAMENT BUILDING IS AN AMERICAN FLAG. 9- ALL OF THE CLOCKS IN THE MOVIE "PULP FICTION" ARE STUCK ON 4:20 10 NO WORD IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE RHYMES WITH MONTH, ORANGE, SILVER OR PURPLE 11-"DREAMT IS THE ONLY ENGLISH WORD THAT ENDS IN THE LETTERS "MT 12-ALMONDS ARE A MEMBER OF THE PEACH FAMILY 13- THERE ARE ONLY 4 WORDS IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE WHICH END IN DOUS TREMENDOUS, HORRENDOUS, STUPENDOUS, AND HAZARDOUS 14-A CAT HAS 32 MUSCLES IN EACH EAR. " 15- AN OSTRICH'S EYE IS BIGGER THAN ITS BRAIN 16- TIGERS HAVE STRIPED SKIN, NOT JUST STRIPED FUR. " 17- IN MOST ADVERTISEMENTS, THE TIME DISPLAYED ON A WATCH IS 10:10 18- AL CAPONE'S BUSINESS CARD SAID HE WAS A USED FURNITURE DEALER " 19- THE CHARACTERS BERT & ERNIE ON SESAME STREET WERE NAMED AFTER BERT THE COP AND ERNIE THE TAXI DRIVER IN FRANK CAPRA'S "ITS A WONDERFULLIFE 20- A DRAGONFLY HAS A LIFE SPAN OF 1-6 MONTHS 21- A GOLDFISH HAS A MEMORY SPAN OF 3 SECONDS 22- ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO SNEEZE WITH YOUR EYES OPEN. 23- THE GIANT SQUID HAS THE LARGEST EYES IN THE WORLD 24- IN ENGLAND, THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IS NOT ALLOWED TO SPEAK. 25- THE MICROWAVE WAS INVENTED AFTER A RESEARCHER WALKED BY A RADAR TUBE AND A CHOCOLATE BAR MELTED IN HIS POCKE 26- THE AVERAGE PERSON FALLS ASLEEP IN SEVEN MINUTES. 27- THERE ARE 336 DIMPLES ON A REGULATION GOLF BALL 28-THE AVERAGE HUMAN EATS 8 SPIDERS IN THEIR LIFETIME AT NIGHT 29- A COCKROACH CAN LIVE NINE DAYS WITHOUT ITS HEAD BEFORE IT STARVES TO DEATH 30- A POLAR BEAR'S SKIN IS BLACK. ITS FUR IS NOT WHITE, BUT ACTUALLY CLEAR. 31- ELVIS HAD A TWIN BROTHER NAMED AARON, WHO DIED AT BIRTH, WHICH IS WHY ELVIS MIDDLE NAME WAS SPELLED ARON: IN HONOR OF HIS BROTHER. IT IS ALSO MIS SPELLED ON HIS TOMB STONE 32- DONALD DUCK COMICS WERE BANNED IN FINLAND BECAUSE HE DOESN'T WEAR PANTS 33- MORE PEOPLE ARE KILLED BY DONKEYS ANNUALLY THAN ARE KILLED IN PLANE CRASHES. 34- STEWARDESSES IS THE LONGEST WORD TYPED WITH ONLY THE LEFT HAND. 35- SHAKESPEARE INVENTED THE WORDS "ASSASSINATION" AND "BUMP." 36- MARILYN MONROE HAD 6 TOES ON ONE FOOT. (NOT TRUE, WE'RE TOLDI) 37- IF YOU KEEP A GOLDFISH IN THE DARK ROOM, IT WILL EVENTUALLY TURN WHITE. 38-WOMEN BLINK NEARLY TWICE AS MUCH AS MEN 39- RIGHT-HANDED PEOPLE LIVE, ON AVERAGE, NINE YEARS LONGER THAN LEFT HANDED PEOPLE DO *40- THE SENTENCE "THE QUICK BROWN FOX JUMPS OVER THE LAZY DOG USES EVERY LETTER IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE *41- THE NAMES OF THE CONTINENTS ALL END WITH THE SAME LETTER WITH WHICH THEY START 42- TYPEWRITER IS THE LONGEST WORD THAT CAN BE MADE USING THE LETTERS ON ONLY ONE ROW OF THE KEYBOARD 43- THE WORD RACECAR AND KAYAK ARE THE SAME WHETHER THEY ARE READ LEFT TO RIGHT OR RIGHT TO LEFT 44- A SNAIL CAN SLEEP FOR 3 YEARS 45- AMERICAN AIRLINES SAVED $40,000 IN 1987 BY ELIMINATING ONE OLIVE FROM EACH SALAD SERVED IN FIRST-CLASS 46- THE ELECTRIC CHAIR WAS INVENTED BY A DENTIST 47- VATICAN CITY IS THE SMALLEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WITH A POPULATION OF 1,000 AND A SIZE OF 108.7 ACRES 48-"I AM" IS THE SHORTEST COMPLETE SENTENCE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE * 49- NO PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WAS AN ONLY CHILD AND LAST AND DEFINITELY MOST IMPORTANT 50- THE AVERAGE CHOCOLATE BAR HAS 8 INSECTS LEGS IN IT l KNOW SO MUCH NOW lolmeme.th Some of these are not true, but wich ones?

Some of these are not true, but wich ones?

Save
friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I鈥檓 now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn鈥檛 want to be here. Okay, @angrybell 鈥 actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don鈥檛 read that with a tone, don鈥檛 read that as an attack. That鈥檚 my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn鈥檛 translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author鈥檚 reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn鈥檛 convince you, there鈥檚 the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He鈥檚 broken literally every one of those rules. He鈥檚 openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn鈥檛 *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn鈥檛 his to distribute. That鈥檚 aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that鈥檚 treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that鈥檚 an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that鈥檚 treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he鈥檚 on the hook for contempt, if he doesn鈥檛 then he鈥檚 on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn鈥檛 go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he鈥檚 committing grand larceny by fraud, because he鈥檚 taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, 鈥渉igh crimes and misdemeanors鈥. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. Trump鈥檚 supporters probably believe he鈥檚 done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn鈥檛 like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they鈥檝e ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. 鈥 His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. 鈥 I like how Bogleech doesn鈥檛 know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It鈥檚 not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That鈥檚 what 鈥榓bove reproach鈥 means. An impossible standard, considering people 鈥渞eproach鈥 Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I鈥檝e seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says聽鈥渕erits this鈥. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets鈥 Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don鈥檛 need to know the context, or any other point, when you鈥檙e indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump鈥檚 execution, we鈥檙e 5 paragraphs in and you haven鈥檛 even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I鈥檓 guessing, because I鈥檓 not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-鈥漜oncocting鈥 a response, and yet you鈥檙e waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn鈥檛 about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn鈥檛 mean they鈥檙e criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump鈥檚 execution. That鈥檚 it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of,聽鈥淪o, click-bait subtitle that you don鈥檛 see until you鈥檝e already clicked on the article link out of the way, here鈥檚 what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,鈥 could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It鈥檚 like鈥 it鈥檚 like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like,聽鈥淥h, seems you made a typo,鈥 you鈥檇 jump in like,聽鈥淏ut what about they鈥檙e perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They鈥檙e lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it鈥. You and what鈥檚 his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y鈥檃ll keep saying聽鈥渂ut what of the context?鈥 when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken.聽鈥淪ure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.鈥 Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride: Jason Fuller, Contributor Working to bring about the best in America, both on-line and off. Impeachment Is No Longer Enough; Donald Trump Must Face Justice Impeachment and removal from office are only the first steps; for treason and-if convicted in a court of law-executed. 06/11/2017 10:39 pm ET for America to be redeemed, Donald Trump must be prosecuted Donald Trump has been President of the United States for just shy of six months now. I think that most of us among the electorate knew that his presidency would be a relative disaster, but I am not sure how many among us expected the catastrophe our nation now faces. friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: hominishostilis: abstractandedgyname: siryouarebeingmocked: mississpithy: bogleech: notyourmoderate: angrybell: thinksquad: http://archive.is/5VvI5 Huffpo, everybody. Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Or is the HuffPo just publishing outright fantasies? God dammit, I鈥檓 now in the position of defending Huffington. I didn鈥檛 want to be here. Okay, @angrybell 鈥 actually, @ literally everyone who reblogged this uncritically as a tacit endorsement and agreement. Such as @the-critical-feminist that I reblog this from.My first question has to be: are you serious? Don鈥檛 read that with a tone, don鈥檛 read that as an attack. That鈥檚 my first question: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Are you asking a sincere question or is this the sort of rhetoric that doesn鈥檛 translate well into text? And, if you are actually asking this question, are ou going to hear the answer or are you going to immediately start concocting your counter-argument because you just know in your heart that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong, so you start formulating a plan to prove them wrong before you actually hear what they have to say?Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets and simply believe that the author鈥檚 reasoning does not hold up for whatever reasons you have chosen not to state, and you believe their source information is falsified for whatever reason you have chosen not to state, I will move on. After I have given you and yours every conceivable benefit of the doubt and every charitable assumption. Because if the article itself doesn鈥檛 convince you, there鈥檚 the fact that Donald Trump has broken literally every federal law against corruption and conflict of interest. Not one or two, not most, not all but a few. Literally every single law we have against corruption, from the Constitution to the informal guidelines circulated as a memo from the White House ethics scholars. He鈥檚 broken literally every one of those rules. He鈥檚 openly traded favors for money and favors for months now. Hell, that Chinese influence-peddler that paid him off for sixteen million dollars should have been enough to get him convicted of treason. Sharing code-word level classified information with a government on the opposite side of an ongoing military conflict isn鈥檛 *necessarily* treason, unless the information was part of a share program with an allied nation and wasn鈥檛 his to distribute. That鈥檚 aiding a foreign aggressor at the expense of a military ally, and that鈥檚 treason. Giving aid and comfort to enemies of the nation. Obstruction of justice is pretty clear-cut, that鈥檚 an impeachment, except that the justice in question is also a matter of national security, so that鈥檚 treason. Again. Defaming the former president? Misdemeanor, impeachable. The way he drags his heels nominating posts in Justice and State could be prosecuted as dereliction of duty. If he has tapes of Comey, he鈥檚 on the hook for contempt, if he doesn鈥檛 then he鈥檚 on the hook for witness tampering. Hell, deleting the covfefe tweet is destroying federal records, which is a misdemeanor, and impeachable. The man doesn鈥檛 go a week without bringing on an impeachable offense. Strictly speaking, every time he goes to Mar-A-Lago he鈥檚 committing grand larceny by fraud, because he鈥檚 taking millions of dollars of American funds for his own benefit, after promising not to do that. There are dozens, hundreds maybe, of impeachable offenses already in this 140 days, 鈥渉igh crimes and misdemeanors鈥. Actual counts of treason, punishable by death by hanging, is probably only five or six counts. Only five or six counts of high treason by our sitting president. His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. Trump鈥檚 supporters probably believe he鈥檚 done nothing impeachable or treasonous because they spent eight years claiming on no grounds whatsoever that Obama was impeachable and treasonous, just because they didn鈥檛 like him. They now probably convince themselves that these facts about Trump are as fake as their Obama theories and they鈥檝e ruined the gravity of these terms for themselves. 鈥 His job does not put him above reproach. His job is to *be* above reproach. And he鈥檚 failing that job. 鈥 I like how Bogleech doesn鈥檛 know many Trump supporters are former Obama supporters. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/obama-trump-swing-voters.html https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/16/17980820/trump-obama-2016-race-racism-class-economy-2018-midterm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama-Trump_voters It鈥檚 not even a secret. But why am I not surprised bogleech - that intellectual titan - failed to do basic research? And last time I checked, no nation required their politicans to be perfect. Which is what NYM is asking for with that quote; perfection. That鈥檚 what 鈥榓bove reproach鈥 means. An impossible standard, considering people 鈥渞eproach鈥 Trump for feeding fish wrong, for his skin color, for any and every little thing, even if they have to twist reality into a pretzel to do it. In fact, I鈥檝e seen people take pictures of kids in cages from 2014, and blame Trump for it. So this: Are you asking a serious question about what high crimes or misdemeanors Trump has perpetrated? Is a question of this: Can someone tell me what high crime or misdemeanor Trump has committed that merits this? Seems you missed the part that says聽鈥渕erits this鈥. Next: did you read the article that was posted in the link you responded to? Because the author of that article does a reasonable job of explaining their thought process behind the headline. Or did you lash out before you read the article? (The underlined is in the subtitle, not the headline.) Okay, presuming that you did read the article in good faith, evaluate its points, perform the follow-up research to understand context, and still disagree with the central tenets鈥 Context? Central tenets? Do you not know how highlighting works? You don鈥檛 need to know the context, or any other point, when you鈥檙e indicating a specific, explicit, and isolated quality. The subtitle called for Trump鈥檚 execution, we鈥檙e 5 paragraphs in and you haven鈥檛 even acknowledged that part yet. Or at all, I鈥檓 guessing, because I鈥檓 not reading further. You keep talking around it. You accuse others, preemptively, of not hearing the answer and pre-鈥漜oncocting鈥 a response, and yet you鈥檙e waffling on about shit around the one, sole, isolated thing that was indicated in the first place. This isn鈥檛 about ignoring context, this is about criticising one thing. Which is a thing people are allowed to do, by the way, just because people criticise one thing, doesn鈥檛 mean they鈥檙e criticising everything about the everyone involved, and everything said before, adjacent to, and after that one thing, and therefore are required to include all of those things in their consideration and assessment of this one thing. The specific criticism of the indicated quality is the advocation of Trump鈥檚 execution. That鈥檚 it. No context is needed to understand that this is what was said, especially since that which was said, which is being criticised, is explicit. No amount of,聽鈥淪o, click-bait subtitle that you don鈥檛 see until you鈥檝e already clicked on the article link out of the way, here鈥檚 what I actually meant when I said I wanted this person tried and executed,鈥 could excuse the use of that language, let alone actually believing in it. It鈥檚 like鈥 it鈥檚 like if someone makes a typo, someone else is like,聽鈥淥h, seems you made a typo,鈥 you鈥檇 jump in like,聽鈥淏ut what about they鈥檙e perfectly reasonable spelling everywhere else? Hm? Forced to ignore contextual perfect spelling I see. They鈥檙e lack of typos everywhere else explains this typo, and vindicates it鈥. You and what鈥檚 his face, James, fuckin ReasonAndEmpathy or whatever now, y鈥檃ll keep saying聽鈥渂ut what of the context?鈥 when the criterion of criticism is isolated, atomic, specific, and/or explicit. No amount of context invalidates the very specific, singular words explicitly spoken.聽鈥淪ure he called for Trump to be executed, but he explains himself.鈥 Fucking and? When did the death sentence become ok? When did that happen? Moderates are ok with the death sentence now? Aight, weird. Man this fucking post aged like fine wine, take a SIP Delicious This was quite a ride
Save
: Germans have a running gag where they pretend the town of Bielefeld does not exist. Even when Angela Merkel talked about a meeting she had in Bielefeld,shieadded- , if it existsat all. Bielefeld has even released a statement insisting their existence, but unknowing ly published it on April 1 existence, but unknowing memeguy-com Why should Germans be the only ones having this kind of fun Fellow citizens of the United States I nominate Wyoming abessinier Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you- the Bielefeld Conspiracy squirrelofdoom You shouldn't spread this kind of nonsense. Non-German followers may believe that Bielefeld actually exists. official-berlin the oldest yet biggest german meme hopeforbrighter Other versions [edit Similar satire conspiracy theories exists in other countries 路鍥矪razil Acre[12] India: Jhumri Talalya 13 Israet Petah Tikva Italy: Molisel Norway: Kyrks忙terora Romania: salaj County Russia: Khabarovsk Spain: Teruel15 Turkey Bilecik6 and Baybur Canada: Winnineal17 Finland The whole country New Zeala . w Piymouth18 voidwerks o Verizon12:05 AM 67% boards.4chan.org -D Board /pol/-Politically Incorrect 鈻糞ettings Home There are allegedly around 6.5 million Finns, right? That's out of a 7.125 billion humans. That means Finns make up .0912% of the planet. 118 KB JPG That's not 9%--that's point zero nine percent, less than a percent, less than a tenth of a percent. To put that another way, 99.9% of the planet are not Finns. How do we know this? Government censuses. Now, the best government censuses have a margin of error of at least 1 %. So Finns make up .0912% of the planet, plus or minus one percent. In conclusion: there is a 50/50 chance Finland doesn't exist. # 2272585077 # 2272585345 I can't say for certain that I believe in Finland's existence
Save