The Office
Work Memes
the office quotes
office space meme
Michael Scott Memes
The Office Memes
Funny Work Memes
Co Worker Memes
the office gifs
Memes About Work
🔥 Popular | Latest
awesomacious: man fuck that workplace except her
And a recently separated coworker who can’t wait to tell you how great the single life is when literally no one asked (Twitter: alexblaze)
🤣🤣 TheOffice Netflix DwightSchrute TheOfficeShow TV Movies
25 Brutally Hilarious Memes Proving Trump Is A Joke: http://bit.ly/2wyx073
President Trump clashed Tuesday with Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi with the cameras rolling in the Oval Office, as the p...
man fuck that workplace except her via /r/wholesomememes https://ift.tt/2L96Dx5
Time to start voting the lazy, self-serving, socialist loving, unAmerican politicans out of office!!
The top Democrat expected to lead the House Judiciary Committee next month claimed on Sunday that if President Trump broke campaign finance ...
Speeding, buying alcohol for 19 year old strippers, banging the Staff Sergeant's wife, masterbating on duty, sleeping on post, malingering, ...
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday blocked the Trump administration’s bid to immediately reinstate its poli...
Didnt see that coming? via /r/memes https://ift.tt/2Ur2zfS
Kindness is not dead via /r/wholesomememes https://ift.tt/2zOZ1vc
Me communicating with @samstryker that one time I snuck past security @ buzzfeed
Office memes are always hot. INVEST NOW! via /r/MemeEconomy https://ift.tt/2QC7lrU
New Twitter format. Just replace text or image. via /r/MemeEconomy https://ift.tt/2PlqERM
Vice President @mike.pence delivered remarks as former President George H.W. Bush lies in state in the U.S. Captiol Rotunda. Vice President ...
Get lost, drugs. via /r/wholesomememes https://ift.tt/2RugiAO
forgotten-sea-god: ceruleanfuckup: hervacationh0me: Only way this shit gonna top marvel is if I get my own 8 foot tall genetically engine...
Here's a copy of the letter that George H.W. Bush left for Bill Clinton in January 1993. It was part of a tradition passed from president to...
![Ass, Fucking, and Google: unpicasso
probably my favorite thing abt being a millennial is that i can lie on my resume
abt shit like being proficient in excel bc i have the common sense to just google
anything i dont know how to do which gives me a giant fucking edge over gen x
in the job market bc somehow that strategy never occurs to employers and my
underqualified ass looks like steve jobs every time i use a youtube tutorial to
make a spreadsheet
jadelyn
Everyone in my office sings my praises for what I can do with excel for this
exact reason, even though I joke with them that "I have no idea how to do that
but give me half an hour and an internet connection and I'lI figure something
out for you." I even once specifically said in response to my grandboss
commenting on my excel skills, "You do realize that I just like.. .google stuff
when you ask me to do something with excel that I don't know how to do,
right?"
But his praise didn't change at all. There was no "Wait, that's all it is?
Instead, he said "Yes, but the fact that you think to do that and that you know
exactly how to phrase your searches and how to sift through the results to get
the right answer, and you then integrate what you've learned and use it going
forward is still so much more than any of the rest of us [the other 5 ppl on my
team are all mid-40s and up] can do. To you, it's "just googling stuff, but it's
still a unique and valuable skill you bring, so don't shrug off the compliments so
cavalierly, okay?
And this was coming from an executive with an MBA. Don't undervalue your
googling skills, kids. It's not lying if you know you can figure it out
a millennial’s advantage](https://pics.me.me/thumb_unpicasso-probably-my-favorite-thing-abt-being-a-millennial-is-38190524.png)
A photo provided by the office of Sen. Lisa Murkowski shows a cracked Minnesota Drive in Anchorage, Alaska after a 7.0 magnitude earthquake ...
where's clippy when you need him via: @rachelzarrelllllll
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.me.me/thumb_january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-38002597.png)
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.me.me/thumb_january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-37997924.png)
