🔥 Popular | Latest

Save
Save
Save
Save
Save
This was posted in a dog Facebook page, on a post about feeding bones to dogs. She claimed to be an "ER vet," and was called out as a vet tech. She quietly left the group..: 11:36 1 11:37 1 11:17 1 Search Facebook Q Search Facebook Agreea, tnat's one surgery i HATE Replies to J post 's comment on exploratories View Post Like Reply 33m WLTX.COM Suspect sought in kidnapping of Aniah Blachard A warrant for first-degree kidnapping was issued. A I'm a ER vet PLEASE for the love of all sI don't want to argue, surgeries don't give any bones cooked or not. I have done $2-10K surgeries because of both cooked and non but it doesn't say anywhere that you're a veterinarian. I'm sorry to offend if you actually are 1 Comment 2 Shares O Like A Share Comment cooked bones. I 3 Like Reply 27m Reply Like 37m November 7· 9 Not a nutrionists just regular GP. You know your a vet tech when you go home reeking yes! Like 27m Reply of dog urine #adayinmyshoes #vetmed #vettech 2 Like 35m Reply 6 Commts couldn't agree more.. punctured instestines, broken teeth... the cons go on and on - but I know people will SWEAR O Like Share Comment Suspect sought in kidropping of Aniah Blachard A waant for first degree iaping was issed. 1Caren 2ares Supdated her status. O Comment that bones are fine if uncooked. To ... November 7 each their own but being in the medical field.. I would NEVER feed Vu know your a of doguie edayinmyshoes evatmed evettech ch when you go home reeking 6Comments O Comment This content isn't available right now raw/bones. A This cetent t vate right now when happe. raunty bec te y sd pee thunged vhe an se endeted When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted. Like Reply 34m O Comment A Share Like Reply 1m Agreed, that's one surgery I HATE O Like Share Comment Write a reply... GIF Write a reply... GIF Oo Oo || This was posted in a dog Facebook page, on a post about feeding bones to dogs. She claimed to be an "ER vet," and was called out as a vet tech. She quietly left the group..
Save
Not Facebook but here's a 1000IQ redditor's opinion on the Pro-Life position.: 94 points 5 hours ago Conservative Americans certainly come off as cold hearted pieces of shit permalink embed save report give award reply 43 points 3 hours ago S They pretty much pick the worst possible stances on the whole thing. Sex ed and free contraceptives/birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancies? Nope, that's ungodly. Prenatal healthcare for pregnant women? Nope, that's socialism. Family leave when the baby's born? Nope, that's over-regulating the poor job creators. Food stamps and housing for poor families? Nope, that's handouts to the welfare queens. Lunch programs, day care, early childhood education? Shouldn't have had it if you can't afford it you commie! They'll go on and on about how abortion is murder, but when you ask them to chip in a few bucks for subsidized birth control, suddenly that's asking too much. Either they don't believe what they say, or they do and a baby's life is worth less to them than a pack of Trojan Man. permalink embed save parent report give award reply 6 points 2 hours ago I agree wholeheartedly. Well said permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] an hour ago All of it started before we had billions of people on earth and Christians were trying to take over the world. It's a method of control to get people to just keep pumping out babies so they'd have more soldiers in "god's" army. permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] 1 hour ago* You might think that they have an immoral stance, but it's not inconsistent or hypocritical. You presumably are against child rape? This won't be a pleasant read, mind. There's some data suggesting that giving pederasts access to child porn can help with reducing the rate of paedophiles acting on their urges (there's also data contradicting that; for the sake of this analogy, let's assume that it would help). Would you give them that? [edit: removed an elaboration that already derailed the first respondent] Just to be clear, I think being against contraceptives is stupid. It isn't even a moral question for me. I'm not a Christian. But you can be against a thing without necessarily accepting every possible remedy or ameliorating action, and that's not in any way inconsistent or by itself hypocritical. permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] 59 minutes ago Jesus. What kind of analogy is this? Yes. It is inconsistent and hypocritical. Also, replace "accepting every possible remedy" with "ANY possible remedy". IMO If you want to restrict the rights and pathways towards advancement of others, and offer no other alternatives, while creating opportunities for yourself YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE. Not to mention, conservatives fail to realize that 'a high tide raises all boats' and society as a whole benefits from lifting up the disadvantaged. (I won't even launch into a diatribe on the US creating issues then displacing blame in order not to solve them) Are you comparing using images of deceased children or orphans to curb pedophilic urges with.... Giving children free lunches? I know you were probably just being tongue and cheek but you're off the mark. permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] 16 minutes ago Banning abortion is a possible remedy to the problem of its existence. That's exactly what we do with a number of other crimes. We ban murder, robbery, theft, and many other things without providing anything that could conceivably reduce the rate of, or ameliorate the consequences of banning, any of those. Let's make it more explicit: If being against abortion means that you have to be in favour of preventative measures such as providing access to contraceptives, other measures of birth control, or specific forms of sex education, then it necessarily follows that you have to be in favour of preventative measures such as providing everyone with free housing if you are against robbery. I know many very liberal people who would balk at the suggestion. Similarly, if being against abortion means that you have to be in favour of postnatal care for children, then - well, then all hell breaks loose argumentatively, because this isn't even restricted to children who would have been aborted had abortion been legal. That's because you've got the premise wrong; it's not about child welfare, but about murder. IMO If you want to restrict the rights and pathways towards advancement of others Your opinion fails on the premises. There is no right to murder. Murder is precisely what abortion is to many anti- abortion Christians. Are you comparing using images of deceased children or orphans to curb pedophilic urges with.... Giving children free lunches? No, I'm explaining how "free contraceptives" is unrelated to "against abortion". These are orthogonal issues outside of the context of very specific moral frameworks not everybody holds. permalink embed save parent report give award reply 1 point 2 minutes ago Banning abortion is a possible remedy to the problem of its existence. First sentence in and your opinion is already moot. That isn't a remedy because people will need an abortion for a life threatening conditions like ectopic pregnancy, women who got raped and don't want a monster's child, and so on. You suggesting to ban abortion is abhorrent and is reflective of your ignorance to the topic. permalink embed save parent edit disable inbox replies delete reply Not Facebook but here's a 1000IQ redditor's opinion on the Pro-Life position.
Save
This niceguy on r/all getting all these awards says so much about Reddit and it’s overwhelming community of baby dicked guys who complain about women wanting to date tall men with big dicks yet post shit like this. Bro is finna die a virgin with this SuPeR WoKe mentality: ll Sprint LTE 11:03 PM 92% r/unpopularopinion u/Inseminator_Rex • 6h + JOIN 1 21 9 3 My (and I presume many other men's) penis doesn't respond to your moral arguments. I constantly see people talking about beauty as subjective, and I'm pretty sure that people are missing the point. I can't date excessively fat women, because my penis, independent of anything I tell it, goes into catatonic withdrawal at the sight of them. Morals don't factor in at all. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd presume that my penis, of its own accord, doesn't like you because you look like a risky bet for depositing sperm. It doesn't want to stop the bus and let the little guys out, because y'all look like a bad part of town. There's no argument that's going to matter. My brain can be like "aw, since you put it that way." all day, but my dick will have left the building while we were having this discussion. So why the fuck do you want to go on and on endlessly about 1 Share 6.3k 953 Add a comment This niceguy on r/all getting all these awards says so much about Reddit and it’s overwhelming community of baby dicked guys who complain about women wanting to date tall men with big dicks yet post shit like this. Bro is finna die a virgin with this SuPeR WoKe mentality
Save