🔥 Popular | Latest

Not Facebook but here's a 1000IQ redditor's opinion on the Pro-Life position.: 94 points 5 hours ago Conservative Americans certainly come off as cold hearted pieces of shit permalink embed save report give award reply 43 points 3 hours ago S They pretty much pick the worst possible stances on the whole thing. Sex ed and free contraceptives/birth control to prevent unwanted pregnancies? Nope, that's ungodly. Prenatal healthcare for pregnant women? Nope, that's socialism. Family leave when the baby's born? Nope, that's over-regulating the poor job creators. Food stamps and housing for poor families? Nope, that's handouts to the welfare queens. Lunch programs, day care, early childhood education? Shouldn't have had it if you can't afford it you commie! They'll go on and on about how abortion is murder, but when you ask them to chip in a few bucks for subsidized birth control, suddenly that's asking too much. Either they don't believe what they say, or they do and a baby's life is worth less to them than a pack of Trojan Man. permalink embed save parent report give award reply 6 points 2 hours ago I agree wholeheartedly. Well said permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] an hour ago All of it started before we had billions of people on earth and Christians were trying to take over the world. It's a method of control to get people to just keep pumping out babies so they'd have more soldiers in "god's" army. permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] 1 hour ago* You might think that they have an immoral stance, but it's not inconsistent or hypocritical. You presumably are against child rape? This won't be a pleasant read, mind. There's some data suggesting that giving pederasts access to child porn can help with reducing the rate of paedophiles acting on their urges (there's also data contradicting that; for the sake of this analogy, let's assume that it would help). Would you give them that? [edit: removed an elaboration that already derailed the first respondent] Just to be clear, I think being against contraceptives is stupid. It isn't even a moral question for me. I'm not a Christian. But you can be against a thing without necessarily accepting every possible remedy or ameliorating action, and that's not in any way inconsistent or by itself hypocritical. permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] 59 minutes ago Jesus. What kind of analogy is this? Yes. It is inconsistent and hypocritical. Also, replace "accepting every possible remedy" with "ANY possible remedy". IMO If you want to restrict the rights and pathways towards advancement of others, and offer no other alternatives, while creating opportunities for yourself YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE. Not to mention, conservatives fail to realize that 'a high tide raises all boats' and society as a whole benefits from lifting up the disadvantaged. (I won't even launch into a diatribe on the US creating issues then displacing blame in order not to solve them) Are you comparing using images of deceased children or orphans to curb pedophilic urges with.... Giving children free lunches? I know you were probably just being tongue and cheek but you're off the mark. permalink embed save parent report give award reply [score hidden] 16 minutes ago Banning abortion is a possible remedy to the problem of its existence. That's exactly what we do with a number of other crimes. We ban murder, robbery, theft, and many other things without providing anything that could conceivably reduce the rate of, or ameliorate the consequences of banning, any of those. Let's make it more explicit: If being against abortion means that you have to be in favour of preventative measures such as providing access to contraceptives, other measures of birth control, or specific forms of sex education, then it necessarily follows that you have to be in favour of preventative measures such as providing everyone with free housing if you are against robbery. I know many very liberal people who would balk at the suggestion. Similarly, if being against abortion means that you have to be in favour of postnatal care for children, then - well, then all hell breaks loose argumentatively, because this isn't even restricted to children who would have been aborted had abortion been legal. That's because you've got the premise wrong; it's not about child welfare, but about murder. IMO If you want to restrict the rights and pathways towards advancement of others Your opinion fails on the premises. There is no right to murder. Murder is precisely what abortion is to many anti- abortion Christians. Are you comparing using images of deceased children or orphans to curb pedophilic urges with.... Giving children free lunches? No, I'm explaining how "free contraceptives" is unrelated to "against abortion". These are orthogonal issues outside of the context of very specific moral frameworks not everybody holds. permalink embed save parent report give award reply 1 point 2 minutes ago Banning abortion is a possible remedy to the problem of its existence. First sentence in and your opinion is already moot. That isn't a remedy because people will need an abortion for a life threatening conditions like ectopic pregnancy, women who got raped and don't want a monster's child, and so on. You suggesting to ban abortion is abhorrent and is reflective of your ignorance to the topic. permalink embed save parent edit disable inbox replies delete reply Not Facebook but here's a 1000IQ redditor's opinion on the Pro-Life position.
Save
orthogonal: THE ARCHITECTUR E OF AMERICAN HOUSES NEO ECLECTIC FOLK/VERNACULAR MODERN COLONIAL ROMANTIC VICTORIAN ECLECTIC A STRUCTURED SURVEY FR OM 16 0 0 TO THE PRESENT SPANISH COLONIAL 1600-1850 GEORGIAN 1700-1850 POSTMEDIEVAL ENGLISH 1600-1740 DUTCH COLONIAL 1625-1840 FRENCH COLONIAL 1700-1850 FEDERAL 1780-1840 RURAL SOUTHERN NORTHERN PITCHED ROOF FLAT ROOF URBAN RURAL URBAN GAMBREL ROOF SIDE-GABLED ROOF SIDE-GABLED ROOF TOWN HOUSE HIPPED ROOF TOWN HOUSE PRE-RAILROAD NATIONAL MANUFACTURED 1620-1850 1700-1950 1700-1850 1820-1940 1850-1950 1880-1930 1930-1950 1950-1980 1975-PRESENT SINGLE-WIDE TIDEWATER SOUTH HALL & PARLOR MASSED-PLAN SIDE-GABLED PYRAMIDAL PRE-WWII MOBILE HOME POST-WWII MOBILE HOME MIDLAND NEW ENGLAND PLAINS GABLE-FRONT GABLE FRONT & WING SHOTGUN DOUBLE-WIDE 1-HOUSE GREEK REVIVAL 1825-1860 GOTHIC REVIVAL 1840-1880 ITALIANTE 1840-1885 LIMITED-HEIGHT PORCH GABLE FRONT & WING TOWN HOUSE ASYMMETRICAL CENTERED GABLE HIPPED ROOF CENTERED GABLE FULL-HEIGHT PORCH FULL-FACADE PORCH FRONT-GABLED TOWNHOUSE ASYMMETRICAL TOWERED ROOF SECOND EMPIRE 1855-1885 COLONIAL REVIVAL ITALIAN RENAISSANCE REVIVAL 1890-1955 1880-1955 1950-1955 1940-1980 HIPPED ROOF PROJECTING WINGIS CENTERED WING/GABLE SECOND-STORY OVERHANG CLASSIC BOX BUILT-IN GARAGE HIPPED ROOF FLAT ROOF SYMMETRICAL ASYMMETRICAL TOWN HOUSE TOWERED HIPPED ROOF, LIMITED PORCH SIDE-GABLED ROOF STICK 1860-1890 QUEEN ANNE 1880-1910 MISSION 1890-1920 TUDOR 1890-1940 NEOCLASSICAL 1895-1955 BBB FRONT-GABLED ROOF TOWN HOUSE HIPPED ROOF FRONT-FACING GABLE WITH WING FULL-FACADE PORCH GABLED ROOF HIPPED ROOF CROSS-GABLED ROOF FRONT-GABLED ROOF MID-FACADE GABLE MULTIPLE-FACADE GABLES COTTAGE FULL-HEIGHT PORCH PRAIRIE 1900-1920 PUEBLO REVIVAL 1910-PRESENT SPANISH REVIVAL 1915-1940 FRENCH ECLECTIC 1915-1945 MONTEREY 1925-1955 ZН AMERICAN FOURSQUARE ASYMMETRICAL GABLED ROOF SIDE-GABLED ROOF CROSS-GABLED R0OF HIPPED ROOF FLAT ROOF SYMMETRICAL ASYMMETRICAL TOWERED CRAFTSMAN 1905-1950 ART MODERNE 1920-1940 MINIMAL TRADITIONAL 1935-1950 RANCH 1955-1975 SIDE-GABLED ROOF FRONT-GABLED ROOF CROSS-GABLED ROOF CAPE COD GABLE & WING ROOF HIPPED ROOF CROSS-HIPPED ROOF SIDE-GABLED ROOF CROSS-GABLED ROOF CONTEMPORARY 1945-1990 A-FRAME 1950-1975 ORGANIC 1950-PRESENT SHED 1965-1990 POSTMODERN 1965-PRESENT DECONSTRUCTIVIST 1980-PRESENT FRONT-GABLED ROOF FLAT ROOF CROSS-GABLED ROOF 21ST CENTURY 1990-PRESENT MANSARD 1940-1985 STYLED RANCH 1955-1985 LOOSENED SHAPE SEGMENTAL VAULTED ROOF COLONIAL REVIVAL TUDOR ORTHOGONAL DECOUPAGE MATERIAL-BASED SPANISH NEOCLASSICAL FRENCH SYMMETRICAL ASYMMETRICAL MC MANSION 1990-PRESENT NEW TRADITIONAL 1985-PRESENT SHINGLE COLONIAL REVIVAL CLASSICAL ITALIAN RENAISSANCE REVIVAL TUDOR FRENCH VICTORIAN CRAFTSMAN PRAIRIE MEDITERRANEAN 500
Save
He posts shit like this all the time.: Feb 19 at 8:27am My Mathematical thoughts of the pre- getting-up-out-of-bed hours started with whether there are multiple enclosed 3[D spaces in a 4+ dimensional polytope, such as a hypercube -my conjecture is "no"- which took me to normals to the faces (orthogonal vectors to the planes of the face), which are found for 3D faces by the cross product of adjacent edges However know how to find a 4D cross product, not by the method of finding the determinant of a matrix with a row being the unit directional components, (typically symbolized with i,j, & k) and the other two rows the vectors of the edges. I might find that by going back to the definition of a cross product, but I wasn't willing to get up to look that up on Wikipedia r, I realized I didn't So I diverted my thouaht to a test directional components, (typically symbolized with i,j, & k) and the other two rows the vectors of the edges. I might find that by going back to the definition of a cross product, but I wasn't willing to get up to look that up on Wikipedia So, I diverted my thought to a test whether a point is internal, or external, to a regular (non-concave) polygon, polyhedron, or polytope. Later, while drying from my morning shower, I thought of a way to do it programmatically Anybody else (among my FB friends) guess -or already know- such a test? u Like Comment Share Be the first to like this A clue is to consider rays from a point under consideration He posts shit like this all the time.
Save
orthogonal: Grandmaster 1 point 16 hours ago Boring! You didn't say anything I didn't learn while in high school. Bending of spacetime, penrose diagrams, dimensions of su erstrings theory, cosmic strings, fundamental particles. Feynman diagrams, spherica standing waves, the shape of an electron. All of these are topics for bright 12 to 18 year olds. If they aren't being taught to bright 12 to 18 year olds it's because were ounded b Tauri mongoloids who explicitly target an IQ of 80 because low class is the superior class And if Xeelee here didn't learn them despite being surrounded by Tauri mongoloids then it's because they lack initiative. Because knowledge of M-theory in a format accessible to a 12 year old Xeelee, Angel or Time Lord juvenile is EASY to get. What wasn't easy to get was: nodes of spherical harmonics, p or photo of an electron (soliton), explanation insight or even references to the principle of complementarity as Fourier decomposition onto mutually orthogonal mind blown bases Also surprisingly enough, any sensical definition of the concept of probability. Those were all hard to extremely hard things for a juvenile to find and yet I found them. This, this is fucking childish I suppose you COULD be a high school student testing whether people of your personality type are as retarded as the common men around you are. I approve of such testing. That shows great initiative. nk embed save report give gold reply pocket Perma 1 point 8 hours ago iam Very Smart nk embed save parent report give gold reply pocket Perma ng Grandmaster 1 point 6 hours ago HAHA, Tauri acting all butthurt because he's shown up by genuine intelligence! You can do all your remedial math to mongoloid retards all you want Tauri scum. It is you that belongs on Iamvery smart for hanging around losers to make it easier to impress them with the peanuts you have for brains. Also, your explanations of matrices and determinants as accounting is totally fucking disgusting and repulsive as hell. Your Tauri obsession with accounting fucking makes me sick. You should be shot for this alone, you and all Tauri scum that believe you can teach mathematics Oh and mongoloid? Tauri means xSFx. You aren't even a fucking NT. You're THE VERY OPPOSITE of N nk embed save parent report give gold reply pocket Perma
Save
Haven't left Earth, but at least I'm a nice guy (video link in comments): The Earth Is Flat And You've Been VS THE TRU Lied To (NASA/Illuminati Deception Exposed) The NASA Lie" Debunked & Exposed by Dave Murphy Never Be Deceived Again! Truth Is Always True YOUTUBE.COM HE TRUTH REVEALED Like Comment Share nd 1 other 2 Comments hat's funny. Gravity works by pulling other objects towards its center of mass. The reason you don't have to keep dipping your nose down is because properties of inertia and lift will mean that due to the airfoil counteracting to some degree the tendency for the plane to fall, it will prefer to stay at its same altitude, or rather its same distance from the center of mass of the earth Gyroscopes for the same reason want to keep the vertical point orthogonal to the plane that intersects the earth at the point you are directly above. If his point about gyroscopes were true, that would be assuming some universal "up" direction, which obviously doesn't exist The reason that you can't see the curvature of the earth while standing on because you have a specific range limit on your physical eyes, and that limit is equal no matter which direction you're looking in. This means that if you turn around, you can see exactly the same distance in every direction, meaning that, aside from mountains or whatever, everything in every direction will appear be at the same level. you would need to be high enough to see past th to object in order to see any discernable curvature. Holy crap is this guy serious? l ust realized it was 30 minutes. can't keep shutting it down, this will be a novel xD Like Reply 22 mins Jeremy Jackson Thanks for sharing OP I apologize for my friend while he hasn't been outside the Earth He lets others limit his open mind Lol he is really a nice guy Like Reply 1 Haven't left Earth, but at least I'm a nice guy (video link in comments)

Haven't left Earth, but at least I'm a nice guy (video link in comments)

Save
The Baire Category Theorem proves that guitars exist [x-post from /r/badmathematics: MUSIC: NOT A THEORY OF PITCH Borel Analytics in the Music Mathematic Workplace wildblue net (Guitarist, Musician, Mathematician) Ill. ASSERTIONS from tuning T is an approximation of the sphere (Fig d th p f (R MONAD T (symbol d GROU INTRODUCTION Binary: Tone/ To p i S" music, not the torus induces GRP S/T (3) The circle classifies G wh belw fand g. If ng and fusic G bec ringy Sare the affi A and B y ob EASU TI ory mathema Tg- There ONTRIVIAL UIVA GSM C. a unique amow TB g:IA-- B ered from M gi f: A- TB because G do Tabs rt any T The thes losed disj quely to leam G from M (Fig d by RESULTS IV he frequency ge of the g prod freq property d fu gic. Pitch while frequen d sp ed and b Fig. Fi (perspect projective set with natural geometric ry is based R bet gnitu standard model of mu E (pitch) The L braic representation. There is Obsc V. DEMONSTRATION: GUITAR A PROJECTIVE SPACE L (p TURE M SI P Z GALG OJECTIO satisfies the Theory G Algebra A g algebra of pace proj ucy in the Ski Gncognhes th the property deals. An ABSTRACT deduced fr SOF G, gel de y. Th ey topology E.SELVALUEDIFUNCTORSFOR FINITE STATE MACHINES does not obey large numbers kpolovically hidden by Fig. 8 GUITAR D SHOWING 3 ORTHOGONAL TONE MOVEMENT VECTORS PROJECTED in the frequency dom h. T IN ONE CARTESIAN QUADRANT. identity of projec gebr d field g ind Fal. Ti omposable ring signature. The ap T: mposite operation distinct from Sx oint to T, their matrix product R2, the pitch-p g of RP2 0, or Z ys app G generalizes grap y (grap fined transpo coordinates are barycent Cart quad Auditory ablat Pitch ey topology h of the 4 ply orrect pred bra sequences. struct. The prod y b uct GXK is the open y p pitch, b distinguishes tablature from of the musical scale is the unres tion in base-point topology by adding the tonal V. CONCLUSION FO TO K G depen My putab MU ed p ATEGO standard m del, My methods (quantifier elimination pology, gory. M potents f(0, 0), f(l, 0) (Fig. be generated is what remain lbs, detached ry of d bef requency than pitch that G is ght. Th d. M pitch group fting ontinuous real-valued Cauch d he id of algebra subspaces M in e music g, f Th g category, because head IT hy T"zee lassified by the y. C ft ad T (Fig R), Euler tric. Th and bedded in d by wind dd coord y ded numbers on the octav f g n, and by p G th Fig, 3FUNDAM sical keys are constant, and he forg That G. Afa The B TANDARD ATOMIC MODEL sconnected d for both M her's gory Theoret y. ply odel G be proves G that ll polyp ed. Pitch ry po an arbi gs S MIC (PROPO and G G. Th S. S proves G med ISTANCE IS ed to ha r? B dard tu y mast pec G g th m th popular music. Bu pact, d of y defined polyhed g imp then h ty distrib hich de y tha pend dy. E amp rph g h ed. If th very T A (F g. 2) sh predica g ca y fr p, th CONSTANT g GC) S4 pred and UNIN REFERENCES MA MINANT Logic, Seman 80) Algebra bridge Universit The Baire Category Theorem proves that guitars exist [x-post from /r/badmathematics
Save