Close
New Group
pick a name for your first meme group
Loading
Most annoying people on the planet.
It sells itself. Buy now! Spongebob, outrage, it has it all! via /r/MemeEconomy http://bit.ly/2MV1SIF
monicalewinsky1996: that is an outrage
Your outrage is embarrassingly misguided America.. 💭🤔🤔🤔🤔💭 Join Us: @TheFreeThoughtProject 💭 TheFreeThoughtProject 💭 LIKE our Facebook page
Tutancummin via /r/funny https://ift.tt/2SDGYz4
advice-animal: After seeing the outrage that Apple Samsung have been fined for purposely slowing down their old phones
After seeing the outrage that Apple Samsung have been fined for purposely slowing down their old phones
whyyoustabbedme:It would be absolutely beyond the pale.
It would be absolutely beyond the pale. by GriffonsChainsaw MORE MEMES
![Children, Club, and Dad: Cheko reacted quickly when he saw his
owner get threatend with a knife in a
domestic dispute, he dived in front of his
mom to protect her. Here he is shown
recovering from being stabbed 13 times.
Four intruders, one armed with a
shotgun broke into a family home
where the father was threatened to
open the family safe, when the dad of
3 didn't comply the indruder got
ready to open fire where Lefty the pit
bull jumped at him blocking the shot
from his daddy and got a bullet wound
to his shoulder. The intruder was injured
by the dog and they all quickly fled from
the scene.
Baby, a 10 year old pit bull woke up her
family in the middle of the night to alert
them of a blazing fire that had broken
out. Managing to avoid the vicious
flames, one by one she woke up each
family member and led them to safty.
After putting her humans out of
danger, she then ran back into the
burning house to save the family's
other five dogs, one of which was blind
and too scared to go with her so she
pulled the dog out by the scruff of the
neck. The home was completely
distroyed but thanks to Baby, no-one
had a single burn.
Cara was walking her dog, Creature one
night and couldn't help but notice he
had a lot of interest in a certain bush.
Shrugging it of as he's just seen a cat,
Creature carried on to pull and bark to
alert his owner that something wasn't
quite right. Cara finally went with her
companions instinct and decided to
check it out, where she found an
elderly woman in her PJs on the
ground, shivering from the cold. Who
she found was Carmen Mitchell, 89,
suffers from Alzheimer's and had
wandered from her home.
When Bella the pit bull mix was seen
running into traffic and barking at
pedestrians, she was thought to be just
another stray. Teri was one of those
pedestrians and decided the follow the
mixed breed. Bella lead Teri to her
home, where her wheelchair-bound
owner was found on the floor with
stab wounds in his neck while clinging
to life. Her owner luckily survived and
says that he owes his life to Bella for
running to get help.
I made this comp because the media only
concerntrates on the badly-owned pit
bulls then blame their breed for it for
their actions. There's hundreds of stories
about heroic pit bulls that saidly never
make it to mainstream media as people
seem to love an outrage. If this gets a
good reaction then i'll put more up but i
don't want to bore anyone for now.
I have a pit bull who i took from a dog
fighter when he was a puppy, even
though he's been 'bred to fight' i've
raised him right and in the 11 years of
having him he's never hurt anyone and
has given me nothing but happiness (and
maybe a couple of chewed up shoes)
Thanks for reading guys, i hope
the world is a little more open-
minded on this misunderstood
yet lovable breed.
malicemanaged:
almostrose:
helainetieu:
I hope everyone reblogs this.
For most of the 114 years since the American pitbull terrier was first recognized by the United Kennel Club, the breed was rightly seen as the perfect “nanny dog” for children because of its friendly nature, loyalty and stability. [x]
Pit bulls have always been protectors. With good owners and proper care, they still are. Chako*, Lefty, Baby, Creature, and Bela are proof of that.
Pitbulls are great dogs and anyone who says otherwise can fucking fight me](https://pics.me.me/thumb_cheko-reacted-quickly-when-he-saw-his-owner-get-threatend-44685696.png)
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.me.me/thumb_january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-38002597.png)
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.me.me/thumb_january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-37997924.png)
![Laughter, Gay, and Outrage: [BI OUTRAGE]
[GAY LAUGHTER]](https://pics.me.me/thumb_bi-outrage-gay-laughter-42361032.png)
