Definately
Definately

Definately

Ends
Ends

Ends

Eatliver Com
Eatliver Com

Eatliver Com

Eatliver
Eatliver

Eatliver

Part
Part

Part

From
From

From

Your Point
Your Point

Your Point

The
The

The

Todays
Todays

Todays

Cant
Cant

Cant

🔥 | Latest

Bigfoot, Fucking, and Google: 11:39 PM points 23 hours ago I believe you can't find one reputable source to support your claim. I have linked the Wikipedia article about the disease as well as a BBC article You. Have. Produced. Nothing So, whos the troll? DONE HIDE ROOT PARENT : 2 points 22 hours ago You've produced a link to a BBC article that says a woman claims she has Aquagenic Urtecaria so severe that she'll die if she drinks a cup of water, but she lives on Diet Coke 1) Aquagenic urtecaria is a skin condition. It is not fatal. It does not produce anaphylaxis, and calling it an allergy is a misnomer, because it is not caused by any of the physiological processes that cause allergic reactions. They don't even know what causes it 2) Diet Coke is more than 90% water. Orange Juice is almost 90% water. Whole milk is almost 90% water. Every lungful of air she breathes is about 4% water. Every bite of foud she sticks in her gob has water in it Her own shit is 75% water. Her blood plasma is an aqueous solution that is 92% water, 8% plasma proteins, and trace amounts of minerals. You can find all of this information for yourself on Google. You cannot be allergic to water. If you believe this woman's claims, which have mostly been covered by The Dail Mail and equally reputable sources, then you're a damn fool. You probably also believe in Bat Boy, Bigfoot, and the Loch Ness Monster, all of which have been covered by the BBC Either way, I don't care if you want to be willfully stupid, and it isn't my job to fix you, ya fucking troll Redditor calls out medical hoax.

Redditor calls out medical hoax.

Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 i read that article and it still doesn’t seem possible given “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”and at first i thought this’d be a good way to secure trump his second term, but… judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh. The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.It’s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldn’t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.

terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but...