Points



                

                
                

                    

                        
  

                    

                

                
            

        
    







            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    

                        


	

	
    
        

            

                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Definately
        

            
            Definately
        

    

    

         
Definately

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Ends
        

            
            Ends
        

    

    

         
Ends

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Eatliver Com
        

            
            Eatliver Com
        

    

    

         
Eatliver Com

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Eatliver
        

            
            Eatliver
        

    

    

         
Eatliver

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Part
        

            
            Part
        

    

    

         
Part

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        From
        

            
            From
        

    

    

         
From

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Your Point
        

            
            Your Point
        

    

    

         
Your Point

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        The
        

            
            The
        

    

    

         
The

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Todays
        

            
            Todays
        

    

    

         
Todays

    



                
                    
                    
                    
                    

    

        Cant
        

            
            Cant
        

    

    

         
Cant

    



                
            

        

    
    

        🔥 | Latest
    

    
    

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                




    Bigfoot, Fucking, and Google: 11:39 PM
 points 23 hours ago
 I believe you can't find one reputable source to support
 your claim. I have linked the Wikipedia article about the
 disease as well as a BBC article
 You. Have. Produced. Nothing
 So, whos the troll?
 DONE
 HIDE
 ROOT
 PARENT
 : 2 points 22 hours ago
 You've produced a link to a BBC article that says a
 woman claims she has Aquagenic Urtecaria so severe
 that she'll die if she drinks a cup of water, but she lives
 on Diet Coke
 1) Aquagenic urtecaria is a skin condition. It is not
 fatal. It does not produce anaphylaxis, and calling it an
 allergy is a misnomer, because it is not caused by any
 of the physiological processes that cause allergic
 reactions. They don't even know what causes it
 2) Diet Coke is more than 90% water. Orange Juice is
 almost 90% water. Whole milk is almost 90% water.
 Every lungful of air she breathes is about 4% water.
 Every bite of foud she sticks in her gob has water in it
 Her own shit is 75% water. Her blood plasma is an
 aqueous solution that is 92% water, 8% plasma
 proteins, and trace amounts of minerals. You can find
 all of this information for yourself on Google. You
 cannot be allergic to water.
 If you believe this woman's claims, which have mostly
 been covered by The Dail Mail and equally reputable
 sources, then you're a damn fool. You probably also
 believe in Bat Boy, Bigfoot, and the Loch Ness
 Monster, all of which have been covered by the BBC
 Either way, I don't care if you want to be willfully stupid,
 and it isn't my job to fix you, ya fucking troll
Redditor calls out medical hoax.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                
                    Bigfoot, Fucking, and Google: 11:39 PM
 points 23 hours ago
 I believe you can't find one reputable source to support
 your claim. I have linked the Wikipedia article about the
 disease as well as a BBC article
 You. Have. Produced. Nothing
 So, whos the troll?
 DONE
 HIDE
 ROOT
 PARENT
 : 2 points 22 hours ago
 You've produced a link to a BBC article that says a
 woman claims she has Aquagenic Urtecaria so severe
 that she'll die if she drinks a cup of water, but she lives
 on Diet Coke
 1) Aquagenic urtecaria is a skin condition. It is not
 fatal. It does not produce anaphylaxis, and calling it an
 allergy is a misnomer, because it is not caused by any
 of the physiological processes that cause allergic
 reactions. They don't even know what causes it
 2) Diet Coke is more than 90% water. Orange Juice is
 almost 90% water. Whole milk is almost 90% water.
 Every lungful of air she breathes is about 4% water.
 Every bite of foud she sticks in her gob has water in it
 Her own shit is 75% water. Her blood plasma is an
 aqueous solution that is 92% water, 8% plasma
 proteins, and trace amounts of minerals. You can find
 all of this information for yourself on Google. You
 cannot be allergic to water.
 If you believe this woman's claims, which have mostly
 been covered by The Dail Mail and equally reputable
 sources, then you're a damn fool. You probably also
 believe in Bat Boy, Bigfoot, and the Loch Ness
 Monster, all of which have been covered by the BBC
 Either way, I don't care if you want to be willfully stupid,
 and it isn't my job to fix you, ya fucking troll
Redditor calls out medical hoax.
                    
                
            

            
            
Redditor calls out medical hoax.

            
            
        

    



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                



            

        

        
        

            

                




    Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama
 2020
 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase
 The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden
 to run as President and Barrack Obama as
 his VP.
 Just saying.
 Show this thread
 600
terrapinfox:

libertarirynn:
hst3000:

libertarirynn:

The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice).

All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining.

12th amendment, guys:

No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall 
be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. 
Obama is an unconstitutional selection. 

Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57

i read that article and it still doesn’t seem possible given “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”and at first i thought this’d be a good way to secure trump his second term, but… judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh.

The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.It’s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldn’t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.
    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        

            
            

                
                
                    Arguing, College, and Joe Biden: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama
 2020
 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase
 The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden
 to run as President and Barrack Obama as
 his VP.
 Just saying.
 Show this thread
 600
terrapinfox:

libertarirynn:
hst3000:

libertarirynn:

The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice).

All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining.

12th amendment, guys:

No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall 
be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. 
Obama is an unconstitutional selection. 

Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57

i read that article and it still doesn’t seem possible given “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”and at first i thought this’d be a good way to secure trump his second term, but… judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh.

The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.It’s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldn’t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.
                    
                
            

            
            
terrapinfox:

libertarirynn:
hst3000:

libertarirynn:

The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but...