Was
Was

Was

Do You See
Do You See

Do You See

The
The

The

One Beer
One Beer

One Beer

When Im
When Im

When Im

Other
Other

Other

Majesticity
Majesticity

Majesticity

special
special

special

missing
missing

missing

two
 two

two

🔥 Popular | Latest

Anaconda, Ass, and Dude: Tweet 3h My point being that remasters are rip offs simple as that 2 3h Why? They're offering people the chance to play games that aren't available on modern consoles with modern graphics. Of course they're gonna CHARGE MONEY for a copy of a game, even if that game isn't a new one. 2 3h By your logic, the Mega Man Legacy Collection is a ripoff because l could buy an NES and play Mega Man 1-6 on the old hardware. 1) l'm not paying out the ass for a retro console that works and specific, sometimes rare games 2) l'd rather play them on my PC Tweet your reply Tweet Depends Where you're from a NES will cost me £10 the games at £3 still cheaper than a remaster. Just putting my view out there that remasters are rip offs Replying and others Where the fuck are you getting a fully functional NES and a copy of Mega Man 2 for £10?! The average price for a working NES is anywhere between £20-100 depending on how well it works 5:20 pm 21 Nov 18 View Tweet activity Tweet your reply Tweet View Tweet activity 8m eplying to and 4 others Also, I got both Legacy For £20. 10 games over 4 consoles. Let's say that it's £10 per console (even though that's an insanely good price for any working console) and £3 per game (you bought it from people who have no idea how much MM8 is worth) [1/2] 3m (10x4)+(3x10) 70 You'd literally be buying 3 and a half Legacy Collections to "avoid getting scammed", even when lowballing the games' prices as much as you are. Tweet your reply "Remasters and Collections are Scams! It's Cheaper to Get the Originals!" (I'm Purple)

"Remasters and Collections are Scams! It's Cheaper to Get the Originals!" (I'm Purple)

Bad, Beautiful, and College: 5 hrs Ok. This is NOT a joke. We paid a photographer, who claimed to be a professional, $250 for a family photo shoot. Please see these FOR REAL photos she delivered to us....She said the shadows were really bad on the beautiful, clear, sunny day and that her professor never taught her to retouch photos. Feel Magery by Lesa Hall C 2017 Magery by Lesa Hall IMagery by Lesa Hall O 2017 willow-wanderings: libertarirynn: r3druger: tiffanarchy: libertarirynn: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: Holy shit she NPC’d them! You get what you pay for… Since when is $250 considered “cheap” for a family photo? what lol When you value a freelancer’s actual talent enough to pay then real money for doing a real job. Yeah, $250 is definitely on the lower end for professional photographs. I have quite a few photographer friends. As a mercenary soul-caputurer myself, yeah, you get what you fucking pay for. Photography has the same costs as any other business. The price you charge has to cover the cost of materials (film if you’re shooting old school, prints, maintenance for your camera whether analog or digital), labor (time spent setting up and shooting), and overhead (gas, food, website hosting costs, etc. if you need it to do some part of the job, it’s in your overhead). Now those are just your operating costs, if you want to actually make money you have to add a percentage for profit (e.g. operating costs + 20%). Let me give you non-photographers a frame of reference here. Paying $250 for a single-day private photo session on location (which means travel costs on top of everything else), is the equivalent of paying $50 for a huge ornate wedding cake you ordered the day before the wedding.This ‘tog is still severely unprofessional and unqualified, though. I consider myself still a beginner but taking good photos in bright sunlight isn’t hard, I do it all the time. Like literally three-quarters of my flickr is all natural light shoots, it’s easier than studio shoots in some ways (light source, directionality, and intensity is constant on a clear day; you don’t have to worry about flash timing; the only thing you need to control for is your camera settings, etc.). I really don’t understand how they screwed this shoot so badly.Other things wrong with this cheap shoot:Out of focusLow contrastLow saturationBad white balanceGrainyThere’s really no excuse for this, it’s all very basic stuff. I took ONE photography class in college and I’ve only been shooting off and on for a couple of years, and I could still do a better shoot than this. It’s not that this person’s professor didn’t teach them how to retouch photos, their professor didn’t teach them how to shoot at all.

willow-wanderings: libertarirynn: r3druger: tiffanarchy: libertarirynn: siryouarebeingmocked: derpomatic: Holy shit she NPC’d them! ...