🔥 Popular | Latest

I think I mistakenly hacked IntelliJ and got root access to their website: JET BRAINS Tools Languages Solutions Support Store IntelliJ IDEA Coming in 2018.3 What's New Features Learn Buy Download Thank you for downloading IntelliJ IDEA! Your download should start shortly. If it doesn't, please use the direct link. Download and verify the file SHA-256 checksum Getting Started New to IntelliJ IDEA? Send me helpful tips & tricks during evaluation Cookies and IP addresses allow us to deliver and improve our web content and to provide you with a personalized experience. Our website uses cookies and collects your IP address for these purposes. Tell me about new product features as they come out Your Email I JetBrains may use cookies and my IP address to I collect individual statistics and to provide me with I I personalized offers and ads subject to the Privacy I I POLİCY and the Terms of Use. JetBrains may use I agree to my email address, names, and location being used by JetBrains sr.О. ("JetBrains") for the purposes outlined above. I agree that JetBrains may process said data using third-party services for these purposes in accordance with th withdraw this conse addition, an unsubs for this purpose. I can revoke I my consent at any time by visiting the Opt-Out page. I I [Yles, I agree [N]o, thanks KotlinConf 2018 Live ~ root# SUBSCRIBE I think I mistakenly hacked IntelliJ and got root access to their website

I think I mistakenly hacked IntelliJ and got root access to their website

Save
Yass!! 💜🙌🏽😊 Via The San Diego Union-Tribune: "Hector Barajas, who became the face and voice of deported veterans after his own deportation, will be allowed to return to the place he considers home and become a U.S. citizen. Barajas burst into joyous tears seated on a couch Thursday afternoon in front of a large American flag as he read a document informing him that he would be sworn in as a citizen on April 13 in San Diego. “Fourteen years, man,” Hector said, his voice cracking. “Oh my God, this is great. Hallelujah! Hallelujah!”. “I’m coming home, mom!” he added. Barajas was honorably discharged from the Army in 2001 but struggled readjusting to civilian life. He took a plea deal for a charge of shooting at an occupied car in 2002. Because of that conviction, the government took away his green card, and he was deported in 2004 after he finished a prison sentence. “I made bad decisions,” Barajas-Varela told the Union-Tribune last year about that time in his life. “I put myself in that situation... I wouldn’t put myself in that situation again.” Barajas founded the Deported Veterans Support House, known to many as “the Bunker,” in 2013 to support deportees in Tijuana. He became a leader in a push for legislative changes to help U.S. military veterans who had not become citizens avoid deportation and to bring back those who were already removed. He was born in Mexico but raised in Los Angeles from age seven. Since he had a green card, he was able to serve in the Army and was part of the 82nd Airborne Division from 1995 to 2001. At the time, he thought he’d automatically become a citizen, but that was not the case. Members of the military are allowed to apply for citizenship with no waiting period. They still have to fill out the paperwork and pass the tests. Noncitizens who serve in the military are still at risk for deportation if they commit crimes that can cause the U.S. to revoke their green cards.": Justino Mora @JustinoMora1 Hector Barajas, a U.S. veteran, was deported in 2004. Today, our dear friend Hector won his battle against the U.S. government and will be allowed to return home, become a U.S. citizen, and reunite with his family! Hector will be sworn in as a citizen on April 13th in San Diego. Yass!! 💜🙌🏽😊 Via The San Diego Union-Tribune: "Hector Barajas, who became the face and voice of deported veterans after his own deportation, will be allowed to return to the place he considers home and become a U.S. citizen. Barajas burst into joyous tears seated on a couch Thursday afternoon in front of a large American flag as he read a document informing him that he would be sworn in as a citizen on April 13 in San Diego. “Fourteen years, man,” Hector said, his voice cracking. “Oh my God, this is great. Hallelujah! Hallelujah!”. “I’m coming home, mom!” he added. Barajas was honorably discharged from the Army in 2001 but struggled readjusting to civilian life. He took a plea deal for a charge of shooting at an occupied car in 2002. Because of that conviction, the government took away his green card, and he was deported in 2004 after he finished a prison sentence. “I made bad decisions,” Barajas-Varela told the Union-Tribune last year about that time in his life. “I put myself in that situation... I wouldn’t put myself in that situation again.” Barajas founded the Deported Veterans Support House, known to many as “the Bunker,” in 2013 to support deportees in Tijuana. He became a leader in a push for legislative changes to help U.S. military veterans who had not become citizens avoid deportation and to bring back those who were already removed. He was born in Mexico but raised in Los Angeles from age seven. Since he had a green card, he was able to serve in the Army and was part of the 82nd Airborne Division from 1995 to 2001. At the time, he thought he’d automatically become a citizen, but that was not the case. Members of the military are allowed to apply for citizenship with no waiting period. They still have to fill out the paperwork and pass the tests. Noncitizens who serve in the military are still at risk for deportation if they commit crimes that can cause the U.S. to revoke their green cards."

Yass!! 💜🙌🏽😊 Via The San Diego Union-Tribune: "Hector Barajas, who became the face and voice of deported veterans after his own deportatio...

Save
cornsnoot: sassy-in-glasses: staff: 🚨 The internet needs you 🚨 You’re up again, Tumblr.  Back in 2015 you demanded that the FCC adopt strict net neutrality rules and establish a free and open internet. And you won.  That should’ve been the end of it. But apparently not. The new head of the FCC wants to undo the net neutrality protections you fought so hard for. His proposed changes open the door to your web traffic being slowed down, or even blocked altogether. You could be forced to pay extra to use your favorite apps. You could even be prevented from getting news from the sources you trust. Title II protects consumers and democracy by ensuring all voices can be heard. You know the drill. Here’s what to do: The FCC is taking comments from the public, and dearfcc.org is making it as simple as possible for you to make your voice heard. Go there now 👉 dearfcc.org ✌️ You’ll just need to provide a name, an address, and then say a little bit about why rolling back Title II protections is a bad idea. If you’re not quite sure what to write, here’s something to get you started: I’m writing to urge you to keep our Open Internet rules based on Title II in place. Without them, we could lose the internet as we know it. The proposed changes to FCC rules would allow fast lanes for sites that pay, and force everyone else into slow lanes. We’ve already seen access to streaming services like Netflix, popular games like League of Legends, and communication platforms like FaceTime slowed down, or even blocked. Conditions like this hurt businesses large and small, and penalize the users who patronize them.  The changes also open the door to unfair taxes on internet users, and could also make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can’t pay up to have their voices heard. Please leave the existing net neutrality rules based on Title II in place. Thank you! If you need more ammo, feel free to quote these experts from our net neutrality Issue Time. TechCrunch and Battle for the Net also have some good starters. Everyone is counting on everyone else here. Do your part and tell the FCC to keep a free and open internet under Title II.  THE ONE TIME I AGREE WITH @staff alright I’ve been hesitant to reblog a net neutrality post to my snake blog but fuck, even staff is on this boat, I hope it comes across as important : HERE LIES THE INTERNET 1969 212 2 NET NEUTRALITY UPDATE cornsnoot: sassy-in-glasses: staff: 🚨 The internet needs you 🚨 You’re up again, Tumblr.  Back in 2015 you demanded that the FCC adopt strict net neutrality rules and establish a free and open internet. And you won.  That should’ve been the end of it. But apparently not. The new head of the FCC wants to undo the net neutrality protections you fought so hard for. His proposed changes open the door to your web traffic being slowed down, or even blocked altogether. You could be forced to pay extra to use your favorite apps. You could even be prevented from getting news from the sources you trust. Title II protects consumers and democracy by ensuring all voices can be heard. You know the drill. Here’s what to do: The FCC is taking comments from the public, and dearfcc.org is making it as simple as possible for you to make your voice heard. Go there now 👉 dearfcc.org ✌️ You’ll just need to provide a name, an address, and then say a little bit about why rolling back Title II protections is a bad idea. If you’re not quite sure what to write, here’s something to get you started: I’m writing to urge you to keep our Open Internet rules based on Title II in place. Without them, we could lose the internet as we know it. The proposed changes to FCC rules would allow fast lanes for sites that pay, and force everyone else into slow lanes. We’ve already seen access to streaming services like Netflix, popular games like League of Legends, and communication platforms like FaceTime slowed down, or even blocked. Conditions like this hurt businesses large and small, and penalize the users who patronize them.  The changes also open the door to unfair taxes on internet users, and could also make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can’t pay up to have their voices heard. Please leave the existing net neutrality rules based on Title II in place. Thank you! If you need more ammo, feel free to quote these experts from our net neutrality Issue Time. TechCrunch and Battle for the Net also have some good starters. Everyone is counting on everyone else here. Do your part and tell the FCC to keep a free and open internet under Title II.  THE ONE TIME I AGREE WITH @staff alright I’ve been hesitant to reblog a net neutrality post to my snake blog but fuck, even staff is on this boat, I hope it comes across as important
Save
<p><a href="https://cornsnoot.tumblr.com/post/167783996008/sassy-in-glasses-staff-the-internet-needs" class="tumblr_blog">cornsnoot</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://sassy-in-glasses.tumblr.com/post/167761051207/staff-the-internet-needs-you-youre-up" class="tumblr_blog">sassy-in-glasses</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://staff.tumblr.com/post/162900642426/the-internet-needs-you-youre-up-again" class="tumblr_blog">staff</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h2>🚨 <b>The internet needs you</b> 🚨 <br/></h2> <p>You’re up again, Tumblr. </p> <p>Back in 2015 you demanded that the FCC adopt strict net neutrality rules and establish a free and open internet. <a href="https://staff.tumblr.com/post/97238609065/incredible-work-everyone-these-numbers-are"><b>And you won</b></a>. </p> <p>That should’ve been the end of it. But apparently not.</p> <h2>The new head of the FCC wants to undo the net neutrality protections you fought so hard for.</h2> <p><b></b></p> <p>His proposed changes open the door to your web traffic being slowed down, or even blocked altogether. You could be forced to pay extra to use your favorite apps. You could even be prevented from getting news from the sources you trust.</p> <p>Title II protects consumers and democracy by ensuring all voices can be heard.</p> <h2>You know the drill. Here’s what to do:</h2> <p>The FCC is taking comments from the public, and <a href="https://dearfcc.org/"><b>dearfcc.org</b></a> is making it as simple as possible for you to make your voice heard.</p> <h2>Go there now 👉 <a href="https://dearfcc.org/">dearfcc.org</a> ✌️</h2> <p><b></b></p> <p>You’ll just need to provide a name, an address, and then say a little bit about why rolling back Title II protections is a bad idea. If you’re not quite sure what to write, here’s something to get you started:<br/></p> <p><b></b></p> <blockquote> <p><i>I’m writing to urge you to keep our Open Internet rules based on Title II in place. Without them, we could lose the internet as we know it. </i></p> <p><i><i>The proposed changes to FCC rules would allow fast lanes for sites that pay, and force everyone else into slow lanes. <i>We’ve already seen access to streaming services like Netflix, popular games like League of Legends, <i>and communication platforms like FaceTime slowed down, or even blocked. Conditions like this </i></i></i>hurt businesses large and small, and penalize the users who patronize them. </i></p> <p><i>The changes also open the door to unfair taxes on internet users, and </i><i>could also make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can’t pay up to have their voices heard.</i></p> <p><i>Please leave the existing net neutrality rules based on Title II in place.</i></p> <p><i>Thank you!</i></p> </blockquote> <p><b></b></p> <p>If you need more ammo, feel free to <b><a href="https://action.tumblr.com/tagged/net+neutrality">quote these experts</a></b> from our net neutrality Issue Time. <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/27/how-to-comment-on-the-fccs-proposal-to-revoke-net-neutrality/"><b>TechCrunch</b></a> and <b><a href="https://www.battleforthenet.com/">Battle for the Net</a></b> also have some good starters.</p> <p><b>Everyone is counting on everyone else here. Do your part and tell the FCC to keep a free and open internet under Title II. </b></p> </blockquote> <h1>THE ONE TIME I AGREE WITH <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mr_BTLFg8QzTPUMVSbe3vbg">@staff</a> </h1> </blockquote> <p>alright I’ve been hesitant to reblog a net neutrality post to my snake blog but fuck, even staff is on this boat, I hope it comes across as important</p> </blockquote>: HERE LIES THE INTERNET 1969 212 2 NET NEUTRALITY UPDATE <p><a href="https://cornsnoot.tumblr.com/post/167783996008/sassy-in-glasses-staff-the-internet-needs" class="tumblr_blog">cornsnoot</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="https://sassy-in-glasses.tumblr.com/post/167761051207/staff-the-internet-needs-you-youre-up" class="tumblr_blog">sassy-in-glasses</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://staff.tumblr.com/post/162900642426/the-internet-needs-you-youre-up-again" class="tumblr_blog">staff</a>:</p> <blockquote> <h2>🚨 <b>The internet needs you</b> 🚨 <br/></h2> <p>You’re up again, Tumblr. </p> <p>Back in 2015 you demanded that the FCC adopt strict net neutrality rules and establish a free and open internet. <a href="https://staff.tumblr.com/post/97238609065/incredible-work-everyone-these-numbers-are"><b>And you won</b></a>. </p> <p>That should’ve been the end of it. But apparently not.</p> <h2>The new head of the FCC wants to undo the net neutrality protections you fought so hard for.</h2> <p><b></b></p> <p>His proposed changes open the door to your web traffic being slowed down, or even blocked altogether. You could be forced to pay extra to use your favorite apps. You could even be prevented from getting news from the sources you trust.</p> <p>Title II protects consumers and democracy by ensuring all voices can be heard.</p> <h2>You know the drill. Here’s what to do:</h2> <p>The FCC is taking comments from the public, and <a href="https://dearfcc.org/"><b>dearfcc.org</b></a> is making it as simple as possible for you to make your voice heard.</p> <h2>Go there now 👉 <a href="https://dearfcc.org/">dearfcc.org</a> ✌️</h2> <p><b></b></p> <p>You’ll just need to provide a name, an address, and then say a little bit about why rolling back Title II protections is a bad idea. If you’re not quite sure what to write, here’s something to get you started:<br/></p> <p><b></b></p> <blockquote> <p><i>I’m writing to urge you to keep our Open Internet rules based on Title II in place. Without them, we could lose the internet as we know it. </i></p> <p><i><i>The proposed changes to FCC rules would allow fast lanes for sites that pay, and force everyone else into slow lanes. <i>We’ve already seen access to streaming services like Netflix, popular games like League of Legends, <i>and communication platforms like FaceTime slowed down, or even blocked. Conditions like this </i></i></i>hurt businesses large and small, and penalize the users who patronize them. </i></p> <p><i>The changes also open the door to unfair taxes on internet users, and </i><i>could also make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can’t pay up to have their voices heard.</i></p> <p><i>Please leave the existing net neutrality rules based on Title II in place.</i></p> <p><i>Thank you!</i></p> </blockquote> <p><b></b></p> <p>If you need more ammo, feel free to <b><a href="https://action.tumblr.com/tagged/net+neutrality">quote these experts</a></b> from our net neutrality Issue Time. <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/27/how-to-comment-on-the-fccs-proposal-to-revoke-net-neutrality/"><b>TechCrunch</b></a> and <b><a href="https://www.battleforthenet.com/">Battle for the Net</a></b> also have some good starters.</p> <p><b>Everyone is counting on everyone else here. Do your part and tell the FCC to keep a free and open internet under Title II. </b></p> </blockquote> <h1>THE ONE TIME I AGREE WITH <a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mr_BTLFg8QzTPUMVSbe3vbg">@staff</a> </h1> </blockquote> <p>alright I’ve been hesitant to reblog a net neutrality post to my snake blog but fuck, even staff is on this boat, I hope it comes across as important</p> </blockquote>
Save
<p>Internet security PSA: Do you have a Facebook? Do you even have an old Facebook you don&rsquo;t get on much anymore but it still there? If the answer is yes, then there is a better than average chance that there are dozens if not hundreds of apps and websites that have unrestricted access to your personal information. When I first thought to check into my app permissions, I was floored to see how much information and data apps I haven&rsquo;t used in years still had access to. Photos, birthdate, friends lists, statuses, the list goes on. Above is a screenshot of just some of the permissions I saw a random app I used when I was 16 had. Of course a lot of this happened in my early days of Facebook when I was far less careful about being safe online. We&rsquo;ve all seen those little games and quizzes pop up on Facebook like &ldquo;which Game of Thrones character are you&rdquo; or &ldquo;how would Morgan Freeman narrate your life&rdquo;. Every one of these Apps and websites can be built by malicious hackers and used to gain access to profile information. And almost no one thinks to go in and revoke the permissions after they&rsquo;re done playing. To revoke or limit your permissions, go to settings &gt; Account settings &gt; apps.</p>: old, female and other public info Friend list and 611 others Relationships Your loved ones and other family members on Facebook. Relationship interests Your relationship details. Birthday August Work history Telerx, Self-Employed and 8 others Status updates Your status updates Education history Montreat College, Erskine College and 1 other Linto 3 <p>Internet security PSA: Do you have a Facebook? Do you even have an old Facebook you don&rsquo;t get on much anymore but it still there? If the answer is yes, then there is a better than average chance that there are dozens if not hundreds of apps and websites that have unrestricted access to your personal information. When I first thought to check into my app permissions, I was floored to see how much information and data apps I haven&rsquo;t used in years still had access to. Photos, birthdate, friends lists, statuses, the list goes on. Above is a screenshot of just some of the permissions I saw a random app I used when I was 16 had. Of course a lot of this happened in my early days of Facebook when I was far less careful about being safe online. We&rsquo;ve all seen those little games and quizzes pop up on Facebook like &ldquo;which Game of Thrones character are you&rdquo; or &ldquo;how would Morgan Freeman narrate your life&rdquo;. Every one of these Apps and websites can be built by malicious hackers and used to gain access to profile information. And almost no one thinks to go in and revoke the permissions after they&rsquo;re done playing. To revoke or limit your permissions, go to settings &gt; Account settings &gt; apps.</p>

<p>Internet security PSA: Do you have a Facebook? Do you even have an old Facebook you don&rsquo;t get on much anymore but it still ther...

Save
staff: 🚨 The internet needs you 🚨 You’re up again, Tumblr. Back in 2015 you demanded that the FCC adopt strict net neutrality rules and establish a free and open internet. And you won. That should’ve been the end of it. But apparently not.The new head of the FCC wants to undo the net neutrality protections you fought so hard for.His proposed changes open the door to your web traffic being slowed down, or even blocked altogether. You could be forced to pay extra to use your favorite apps. You could even be prevented from getting news from the sources you trust.Title II protects consumers and democracy by ensuring all voices can be heard.You know the drill. Here’s what to do:The FCC is taking comments from the public, and dearfcc.org is making it as simple as possible for you to make your voice heard.Go there now 👉 dearfcc.org ✌️You’ll just need to provide a name, an address, and then say a little bit about why rolling back Title II protections is a bad idea. If you’re not quite sure what to write, here’s something to get you started:I’m writing to urge you to keep our Open Internet rules based on Title II in place. Without them, we could lose the internet as we know it. The proposed changes to FCC rules would allow fast lanes for sites that pay, and force everyone else into slow lanes. We’ve already seen access to streaming services like Netflix, popular games like League of Legends, and communication platforms like FaceTime slowed down, or even blocked. Conditions like this hurt businesses large and small, and penalize the users who patronize them. The changes also open the door to unfair taxes on internet users, and could also make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can’t pay up to have their voices heard.Please leave the existing net neutrality rules based on Title II in place.Thank you!If you need more ammo, feel free to quote these experts from our net neutrality Issue Time. TechCrunch and Battle for the Net also have some good starters.Everyone is counting on everyone else here. Do your part and tell the FCC to keep a free and open internet under Title II. : HERE LIES THE INTERNET 1969 212 2 NET NEUTRALITY UPDATE staff: 🚨 The internet needs you 🚨 You’re up again, Tumblr. Back in 2015 you demanded that the FCC adopt strict net neutrality rules and establish a free and open internet. And you won. That should’ve been the end of it. But apparently not.The new head of the FCC wants to undo the net neutrality protections you fought so hard for.His proposed changes open the door to your web traffic being slowed down, or even blocked altogether. You could be forced to pay extra to use your favorite apps. You could even be prevented from getting news from the sources you trust.Title II protects consumers and democracy by ensuring all voices can be heard.You know the drill. Here’s what to do:The FCC is taking comments from the public, and dearfcc.org is making it as simple as possible for you to make your voice heard.Go there now 👉 dearfcc.org ✌️You’ll just need to provide a name, an address, and then say a little bit about why rolling back Title II protections is a bad idea. If you’re not quite sure what to write, here’s something to get you started:I’m writing to urge you to keep our Open Internet rules based on Title II in place. Without them, we could lose the internet as we know it. The proposed changes to FCC rules would allow fast lanes for sites that pay, and force everyone else into slow lanes. We’ve already seen access to streaming services like Netflix, popular games like League of Legends, and communication platforms like FaceTime slowed down, or even blocked. Conditions like this hurt businesses large and small, and penalize the users who patronize them. The changes also open the door to unfair taxes on internet users, and could also make it harder for blogs, nonprofits, artists, and others who can’t pay up to have their voices heard.Please leave the existing net neutrality rules based on Title II in place.Thank you!If you need more ammo, feel free to quote these experts from our net neutrality Issue Time. TechCrunch and Battle for the Net also have some good starters.Everyone is counting on everyone else here. Do your part and tell the FCC to keep a free and open internet under Title II. 
Save
<p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/159721122849/honeylazors-alaija-spacey-sandwich" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://honeylazors.tumblr.com/post/159720836024/alaija-spacey-sandwich-tamhonks" class="tumblr_blog">honeylazors</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://alaija.tumblr.com/post/159711262583/spacey-sandwich-tamhonks-blaire-white-how" class="tumblr_blog">alaija</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://spacey-sandwich.tumblr.com/post/159706634229/tamhonks-blaire-white-how-dumb-must-you-be" class="tumblr_blog">spacey-sandwich</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://tamhonks.tumblr.com/post/159700740443/blaire-white-how-dumb-must-you-be" class="tumblr_blog">tamhonks</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://blaire-white.tumblr.com/post/159700667130/how-dumb-must-you-be" class="tumblr_blog">blaire-white</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>how dumb must you be-</p></blockquote> <p>EJKSDHFKJSFHLKJSDHFLKJSJK </p> </blockquote> <p>Ohmygod.</p> </blockquote> <p>I thought that they were not facing Mecca gave it away…</p> <p><br/></p> <p>Is the purpose of the drill so you can kiss your arse goodbye?</p> </blockquote> <p>You’re covering the back of your head and against a wall away from windows. That’s the idea anyways</p> </blockquote> <p>Damn Muslims and their ritualistic prayers to the tornado gods…<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>Those damn mooslims are at it again! 😡😡😡😂</p>: AMERICAN MIDDLE-SCHOOLS CAUGHT FORCING STUDENTS TO DO MUSLIM PRAYERS 5 TIMES A DAY. TIME 2 REVOKE FUNDING! RT!! Replying to @cuckpatroller This is what decades of rejecting Jesus Christ has done to this nation the children are worshiping Satan it's a tornado drill. <p><a href="http://celticpyro.tumblr.com/post/159721122849/honeylazors-alaija-spacey-sandwich" class="tumblr_blog">celticpyro</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://honeylazors.tumblr.com/post/159720836024/alaija-spacey-sandwich-tamhonks" class="tumblr_blog">honeylazors</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://alaija.tumblr.com/post/159711262583/spacey-sandwich-tamhonks-blaire-white-how" class="tumblr_blog">alaija</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://spacey-sandwich.tumblr.com/post/159706634229/tamhonks-blaire-white-how-dumb-must-you-be" class="tumblr_blog">spacey-sandwich</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://tamhonks.tumblr.com/post/159700740443/blaire-white-how-dumb-must-you-be" class="tumblr_blog">tamhonks</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://blaire-white.tumblr.com/post/159700667130/how-dumb-must-you-be" class="tumblr_blog">blaire-white</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>how dumb must you be-</p></blockquote> <p>EJKSDHFKJSFHLKJSDHFLKJSJK </p> </blockquote> <p>Ohmygod.</p> </blockquote> <p>I thought that they were not facing Mecca gave it away…</p> <p><br/></p> <p>Is the purpose of the drill so you can kiss your arse goodbye?</p> </blockquote> <p>You’re covering the back of your head and against a wall away from windows. That’s the idea anyways</p> </blockquote> <p>Damn Muslims and their ritualistic prayers to the tornado gods…<br/></p> </blockquote> <p>Those damn mooslims are at it again! 😡😡😡😂</p>
Save
millennial-review: terex1970: millennial-review: Donald Trump threatening jail or to revoke citizenship of people who burn the flag shows just how little he knows about the constitution and more importantly how little he cares about basic human rights. Think whatever you want about burning the flag and people who do, but the fact is it’s protected speech and we can’t allow that to change. That is not protected speech!! That should be punished by imprisonment!!! Its direspect of this nation you idiot!! Many men and women died for that flag and what it stands for and for some dumb motherfucker to stand there and stomp on it or burn it they need to lose citizenship of this country! I support Donald Trump on his mission of protecting the flag and what it stands for! If you dont love the flag you dont love this country and you should get the hell out!!!!!!! So go fuck yourself It’s actually constitutionally protected speech under the first amendment, as the Supreme Court and various state courts have said time and time again when people like you get all worked up about it. I’m all for respecting American ideals, but people like you really confuse me.America was founded by people who told almost at thousand years of political and religious tradition to fuck off. They told their fellow citizens to fuck off. They told their flag to fuck off. What’s more important, the principles this country was founded on, the actual ideals we try to uphold, or the symbolism we’ve chosen to convey those ideals?America was founded so people could live in a country where they are free to burn the flag, tell people who blindly support the flag they’re stupid and wrong, and most importantly, to provide safe haven for people who choose to display those controversial opinions.I’m not saying you have to like it, but if you’re going to claim to be a good American, you better fucking stand up for other people’s rights as dictated by our constitution.  That’s my flag too, it’s my country too, and in my country WE HAVE THE FREEDOM to burn OUR flag WHENEVER THE FUCK WE WANT.: George Takei GeorgeTakei Follow I pledged allegiance to the flag every morning inside an internment camp. I would never burn one, but I'd die to protect the right to do so. Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag if they do, there must be consequences -perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail! RETWEETS LIKES 5,088 2,672 8:30 AM -29 Nov 2016 1 2.7K 5.1K eee millennial-review: terex1970: millennial-review: Donald Trump threatening jail or to revoke citizenship of people who burn the flag shows just how little he knows about the constitution and more importantly how little he cares about basic human rights. Think whatever you want about burning the flag and people who do, but the fact is it’s protected speech and we can’t allow that to change. That is not protected speech!! That should be punished by imprisonment!!! Its direspect of this nation you idiot!! Many men and women died for that flag and what it stands for and for some dumb motherfucker to stand there and stomp on it or burn it they need to lose citizenship of this country! I support Donald Trump on his mission of protecting the flag and what it stands for! If you dont love the flag you dont love this country and you should get the hell out!!!!!!! So go fuck yourself It’s actually constitutionally protected speech under the first amendment, as the Supreme Court and various state courts have said time and time again when people like you get all worked up about it. I’m all for respecting American ideals, but people like you really confuse me.America was founded by people who told almost at thousand years of political and religious tradition to fuck off. They told their fellow citizens to fuck off. They told their flag to fuck off. What’s more important, the principles this country was founded on, the actual ideals we try to uphold, or the symbolism we’ve chosen to convey those ideals?America was founded so people could live in a country where they are free to burn the flag, tell people who blindly support the flag they’re stupid and wrong, and most importantly, to provide safe haven for people who choose to display those controversial opinions.I’m not saying you have to like it, but if you’re going to claim to be a good American, you better fucking stand up for other people’s rights as dictated by our constitution.  That’s my flag too, it’s my country too, and in my country WE HAVE THE FREEDOM to burn OUR flag WHENEVER THE FUCK WE WANT.
Save
<p><a href="http://conservativecathy444.tumblr.com/post/146045197387/carter-banned-iranians-not-muslims-and-the" class="tumblr_blog">conservativecathy444</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Carter banned Iranians not muslims and the government can review and revoke visas any time they want and they should but not based on a religion but on conduct/safety of America and an area of the world.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>Also why do people keep making the argument &ldquo;a dumb liberal did this before so the fact that Donald Trump is doing it now is a good thing!&rdquo;. Like comparing him to FDR as though his imprisoning of Japanese-Americans was some sort of standard to live up to.</p>: DURING THE HOSTAGE CRISIS, JIMMY CARTER BANNED IRANIANS & SHIITE MUSLIMS FROM ENTERING THE U.S., HAD THE FBI RE-EVALUATE THOSE WITHIN OUR BORDERS, AND THEN DEPORTED SHIITE & IRANIAN STUDENTS NO LIBERALS CALLED HIM RACIST <p><a href="http://conservativecathy444.tumblr.com/post/146045197387/carter-banned-iranians-not-muslims-and-the" class="tumblr_blog">conservativecathy444</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Carter banned Iranians not muslims and the government can review and revoke visas any time they want and they should but not based on a religion but on conduct/safety of America and an area of the world.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>Also why do people keep making the argument &ldquo;a dumb liberal did this before so the fact that Donald Trump is doing it now is a good thing!&rdquo;. Like comparing him to FDR as though his imprisoning of Japanese-Americans was some sort of standard to live up to.</p>

<p><a href="http://conservativecathy444.tumblr.com/post/146045197387/carter-banned-iranians-not-muslims-and-the" class="tumblr_blog">cons...

Save
<p><a href="http://the-liberty-republican.tumblr.com/post/108601184484/rightwinged-the-liberty-republican" class="tumblr_blog">the-liberty-republican</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rightwinged.tumblr.com/post/108587344108/the-liberty-republican-rightwinged">rightwinged</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-liberty-republican.tumblr.com/post/108583007079/rightwinged-atimeforchoosing">the-liberty-republican</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rightwinged.tumblr.com/post/108582285363/atimeforchoosing-the-liberty-republican-when">rightwinged</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://atimeforchoosing.tumblr.com/post/108581496309/the-liberty-republican-when-women-are-allowed">atimeforchoosing</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-liberty-republican.tumblr.com/post/108577868539/when-women-are-allowed-to-vote-government-always">the-liberty-republican</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>When women are allowed to vote government always gets bigger. Single women tend to use voting as a giant exercise in cuckholdry, government essentially becomes their new provider in place of a partner. Don’t be fooled, Women today are not more independent, they just depend on tax dollars (and federal agencies bullying private companies on their behalf) rather than their husband’s.</p> <p>So no, I wouldn’t mind sacrificing my right to vote if it meant I wouldn’t have to deal with all this other feminist bullshit.</p> </blockquote> <p>I get your point.  Between LBJ’s idiotic “Great Society” and modern feminism’s support of the destruction of the family, increasing numbers of women have used the government as baby daddy. </p> <p>However, I don’t think we should cut off our nose to spite our face.  We need to work to end the programs that encourage this behavior and help inform women so they can make better decisions when voting.</p> </blockquote> <p>So in other words, ‘I don’t share the same views as many women so let’s deny them all the right to vote’.</p> <p>While we’re at it, let’s revoke the right to vote from men since I disagree with many of them, too.</p> </blockquote> <p>Once again, I’m not advocating anything. I’m saying that I wouldn’t shed tears if this did somehow happen even though it’s just about impossible. Please actually read what I’m writing here.</p> </blockquote> <p>Just because I disagree with you doesn’t mean I didn’t read what you wrote. I’ve seen people make your argument before, and it’s more than idiotic to blame the spread of liberalism and degeneracy on women and women alone seeing as many men are liberal and take those views to positions of power and act on them [See: LBJ, Obama, etc.]. A country where women have no place in politics would look like Saudi Arabia. I consider your argument against women keeping the right to vote weak, and that’s just my opinion.</p> </blockquote> <p>No, dear. You’re not reading what I’m saying because you’re completely misrepresenting what my point was. Here, let me try again, although I get the feeling that this exercise is falling upon deaf ears- </p> <p><strong>Once again, I’m not advocating anything. I’m saying that I wouldn’t shed tears if this did somehow happen even though it’s just about impossible. Please actually read what I’m writing here.</strong></p> </blockquote> With all due respect, I have read what you wrote and I&rsquo;m pretty sure <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/micL3f9MQx--YtYVmTwJpqg">rightwinged</a> has too. I strongly disagree. You are essentially saying that women gaining the right to vote has had an adverse effect on politics. I just totally disagree with that. There are plenty of uninformed men just as there are women. I don&rsquo;t believe for a moment that women voting is the cause for the spread of liberalism. It doesn&rsquo;t matter that you aren&rsquo;t &ldquo;advocating anything&rdquo;, you are in fact saying that you wouldn&rsquo;t mind women not being able to vote, which is essentially advocating it by proxy. It&rsquo;s like the people who say they are pro-choice even though they&rsquo;re personally against abortion. Now to be clear, I don&rsquo;t think your opinion is tantamount to abortion in any way, I&rsquo;m just comparing the nature of the statement. It&rsquo;s really hard to say &ldquo;I wouldn&rsquo;t mind if this thing happened, but I&rsquo;m not supporting it happening.&rdquo; I believe that it is in fact important for all American people to have the right to vote. I would care very much if it were taken away from me.: 4:07 PM 3 notes lovelyardie replied to this post I wouldn't really shed a tear if you accidentally bit your tongue off, just saying banging-dickens replied to this post Why? capt-shiny liked this This Randian Bitch thiS acn the-liberty-republican posted <p><a href="http://the-liberty-republican.tumblr.com/post/108601184484/rightwinged-the-liberty-republican" class="tumblr_blog">the-liberty-republican</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rightwinged.tumblr.com/post/108587344108/the-liberty-republican-rightwinged">rightwinged</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-liberty-republican.tumblr.com/post/108583007079/rightwinged-atimeforchoosing">the-liberty-republican</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://rightwinged.tumblr.com/post/108582285363/atimeforchoosing-the-liberty-republican-when">rightwinged</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://atimeforchoosing.tumblr.com/post/108581496309/the-liberty-republican-when-women-are-allowed">atimeforchoosing</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://the-liberty-republican.tumblr.com/post/108577868539/when-women-are-allowed-to-vote-government-always">the-liberty-republican</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>When women are allowed to vote government always gets bigger. Single women tend to use voting as a giant exercise in cuckholdry, government essentially becomes their new provider in place of a partner. Don’t be fooled, Women today are not more independent, they just depend on tax dollars (and federal agencies bullying private companies on their behalf) rather than their husband’s.</p> <p>So no, I wouldn’t mind sacrificing my right to vote if it meant I wouldn’t have to deal with all this other feminist bullshit.</p> </blockquote> <p>I get your point.  Between LBJ’s idiotic “Great Society” and modern feminism’s support of the destruction of the family, increasing numbers of women have used the government as baby daddy. </p> <p>However, I don’t think we should cut off our nose to spite our face.  We need to work to end the programs that encourage this behavior and help inform women so they can make better decisions when voting.</p> </blockquote> <p>So in other words, ‘I don’t share the same views as many women so let’s deny them all the right to vote’.</p> <p>While we’re at it, let’s revoke the right to vote from men since I disagree with many of them, too.</p> </blockquote> <p>Once again, I’m not advocating anything. I’m saying that I wouldn’t shed tears if this did somehow happen even though it’s just about impossible. Please actually read what I’m writing here.</p> </blockquote> <p>Just because I disagree with you doesn’t mean I didn’t read what you wrote. I’ve seen people make your argument before, and it’s more than idiotic to blame the spread of liberalism and degeneracy on women and women alone seeing as many men are liberal and take those views to positions of power and act on them [See: LBJ, Obama, etc.]. A country where women have no place in politics would look like Saudi Arabia. I consider your argument against women keeping the right to vote weak, and that’s just my opinion.</p> </blockquote> <p>No, dear. You’re not reading what I’m saying because you’re completely misrepresenting what my point was. Here, let me try again, although I get the feeling that this exercise is falling upon deaf ears- </p> <p><strong>Once again, I’m not advocating anything. I’m saying that I wouldn’t shed tears if this did somehow happen even though it’s just about impossible. Please actually read what I’m writing here.</strong></p> </blockquote> With all due respect, I have read what you wrote and I&rsquo;m pretty sure <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/micL3f9MQx--YtYVmTwJpqg">rightwinged</a> has too. I strongly disagree. You are essentially saying that women gaining the right to vote has had an adverse effect on politics. I just totally disagree with that. There are plenty of uninformed men just as there are women. I don&rsquo;t believe for a moment that women voting is the cause for the spread of liberalism. It doesn&rsquo;t matter that you aren&rsquo;t &ldquo;advocating anything&rdquo;, you are in fact saying that you wouldn&rsquo;t mind women not being able to vote, which is essentially advocating it by proxy. It&rsquo;s like the people who say they are pro-choice even though they&rsquo;re personally against abortion. Now to be clear, I don&rsquo;t think your opinion is tantamount to abortion in any way, I&rsquo;m just comparing the nature of the statement. It&rsquo;s really hard to say &ldquo;I wouldn&rsquo;t mind if this thing happened, but I&rsquo;m not supporting it happening.&rdquo; I believe that it is in fact important for all American people to have the right to vote. I would care very much if it were taken away from me.
Save
echoesofoswin: whouffletothemax: an-imaginary-soldier: enigmarainbow: darkreed: onvern: asksiddian: autisticpancake: deltaink: That’s not cool Tumblr. no Reblogging just in case this is true. I’ll get it off my blog here later, but for now…. Yeah if this is true… I’m just leaving this here and may or not remove all art. TIME TO READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CHANGES. what Bleh Oh yeah. It’s true. What makes this even more of a shitshow though? Well, if you don’t feel like digging through all the legalese to find this section, I’ve done it for you. This is what it says as of 2014-01-25, 19:53 PST: Read that. Read all of it. Not just the legalese in white. Not just the “skimmer-friendly” version in gray. Read both and notice how they technically, for all legal purposes, say the same things…yet completely contradict one another from any practical standpoint. The gray boxes are all nice and friendly. The legalese is basically a great big ol’ FUCK YOU. So yeah, signal boost the hell out of this. Does this include your own fanfiction as well? THIS IS WRONG AND HORRIBLE GUYS REBLOG THIS : staff It's been almost two years since we last updated Tumbir's terms and policies. A lot has happened since then! To make sure these documents tully reflect our product and philosophies, and are as understandable and up-to-date as they can be, our Legal and Policy teams have taken the last few weeks (and a tremendous amount of care) to update our Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Community Guidelines. Ther you Attention! er of changes, so w ou read them all fo o Updates to reflect changes to our products over the last two years o Information about how we work with our new parent company, Yahoo o Credits for open source projects o Some language that makes it easier for U.S. government organizations to blog on Tumblr o An attribution policy reminding people not to be jerks o Updated annotations(! You can review the drafts via the links above. You can also see every change, letter for letter, on GitHub (minus the plain English annotations) We're planning to officially launch the new terms soon and we'd really love to staff It's been almost two years since we last updated Tumblr's terms and policie s you all know; tumblr is changing its privacy policy, erms/conditions and community guidelineS What they convenient To mal sure these documents fully reflect our product and philosophles, and update our Il for o Cleanup to make al of the documents more readable ears y, Yahoo Credits for open source projects An attribution policy reminding people not to be jerks You can review the drafts via the links above. You can also see every change letter for letter, on GitHub (minus the plain English annotations) We're planning to officially launch the new terms soon and we'd really love to hear any questions or concerns. Please write to policy@tumblr.com 1,909 notes that they arenow reserving the ight to OWN ANY ORIGINAL, UNCOPYRIGHTED CONTENT YOU POST AND SELL IT FOini A PROFIT and policies A lot has happened since the There are a fair number of changes, so we insist you read them all for o Updates to reflect changes to our products over the last two years with our new parent company, Yahoo Some language that makes it easier for U.S. government organizations o Ubdated annotations U u can also see every change h annotations) h the new terms soon and we'd really love to ase write to policy@tumblr.com 909 notes staff This means that any.m art umblr's terms and policies A lot has happened since then! are as updrstandable and up-to-date as they can be, our Legal and Policy update our Terms of Service, Priva e sure these documents fully reflect our product and philosophies, and en the last few weeks (and a tremendous amount of care) to photography olicy, and Community Guidelines r a nges, so we insist you read them all for ourself Some notable updates include: - le nup to make all of the documents more readable or even creative idn Yaho that you post can, and will anzaion be exploited without your he last two years ent company, ganizations to blog on Tumblr o Updated annotations (! knowledgeonnconsent ifsee every change letter for letter, on Git Hub (minus the plain English annotations) you do not have a copyright ove 1 on themct hear any questions or concerns. Please write to policy@tumblr.com 1,909 notes The changes do not t's beeh almost two years soe we last updated Tumbir's terms and policies. A lot has happenes singe then! into effect .until osophies, and are as understandable and up-to-date as they can be, our Legal and Policy Feb 9th, 159pm eastern here are a fair number of changes, so we insist you read them all for me notable updates include Cleapup to make all of the documents more readable We have until then to boycott this change and force tumblr/yahoo to revoke their sneaky little addition to the fine print. years ent Colpany, Yahoo o Credits for open source projects ns o An attribution policy remining people net to be jerksS You can review the drafts via the links above. You can also see every change hearranCuesions or concerns. Pase writepolicy@tumblr.con 1,909 notes echoesofoswin: whouffletothemax: an-imaginary-soldier: enigmarainbow: darkreed: onvern: asksiddian: autisticpancake: deltaink: That’s not cool Tumblr. no Reblogging just in case this is true. I’ll get it off my blog here later, but for now…. Yeah if this is true… I’m just leaving this here and may or not remove all art. TIME TO READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CHANGES. what Bleh Oh yeah. It’s true. What makes this even more of a shitshow though? Well, if you don’t feel like digging through all the legalese to find this section, I’ve done it for you. This is what it says as of 2014-01-25, 19:53 PST: Read that. Read all of it. Not just the legalese in white. Not just the “skimmer-friendly” version in gray. Read both and notice how they technically, for all legal purposes, say the same things…yet completely contradict one another from any practical standpoint. The gray boxes are all nice and friendly. The legalese is basically a great big ol’ FUCK YOU. So yeah, signal boost the hell out of this. Does this include your own fanfiction as well? THIS IS WRONG AND HORRIBLE GUYS REBLOG THIS
Save