๐Ÿงผ  Clean Memes

๐Ÿ˜ด  Sleep Meme

๐Ÿ—‘  Petty Memes

๐Ÿ’ฅ  Anime Memes

โœŠ  Arthur Memes

๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ  Confused Memes

ruined Memes

Sirening
Sirening
Littled
Littled
Ruinning
Ruinning
little things
little things
fucking weird
fucking weird
hire
hire
thanksgiving dinner
thanksgiving dinner
there
there
mate
mate
overly
overly 

    
                    

                

            
        
    

    
    
    






            

            
            

                

                    
                

                

                    
                    
                    

                        


	


    ๐Ÿ”ฅ Popular | Latest






    

    
        
            
                

                    

                        
                    

                    
                    

                        
                            Cosplayer Allegedly Stole, Ruined Wig At MAGfest- And the Memes Are Hot
                        
                    

                    
                

            
        
    
        
            
                

                    

                        
                        
                        
                    

                    
                    

                        
                            Why Fans Say 'RHOBH' Alum Taylor Armstrong Ruined the 'Woman Yelling at a Cat' Meme
                        
                    

                    
                

            
        
    
    






    

    
    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        lazyshoes:

libertarirynn:

julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ


Because it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing. It also forces the government to hear your opinion, which is a good thing. You can still protest the candidates by throwing away your vote, but then you have to acknowledge the fact that you decided to not to care enough to pick your favorite candidate. 


โ€œBecause it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing.โ€>Implying that we actually have any say in how the country is run: lazyshoes:

libertarirynn:

julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ


Because it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing. It also forces the government to hear your opinion, which is a good thing. You can still protest the candidates by throwing away your vote, but then you have to acknowledge the fact that you decided to not to care enough to pick your favorite candidate. 


โ€œBecause it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing.โ€>Implying that we actually have any say in how the country is run
        

            
            

                
                
                    lazyshoes:

libertarirynn:

julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ


Because it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing. It also forces the government to hear your opinion, which is a good thing. You can still protest the candidates by throwing away your vote, but then you have to acknowledge the fact that you decided to not to care enough to pick your favorite candidate. 


โ€œBecause it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing.โ€>Implying that we actually have any say in how the country is run: lazyshoes:

libertarirynn:

julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ


Because it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing. It also forces the government to hear your opinion, which is a good thing. You can still protest the candidates by throwing away your vote, but then you have to acknowledge the fact that you decided to not to care enough to pick your favorite candidate. 


โ€œBecause it forces people to participate in deciding how their country is run, which is a good thing.โ€>Implying that we actually have any say in how the country is run
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ: julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ
        

            
            

                
                
                    julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ: julad:
thisdiscontentedwinter:

salparadisewasright:

sapphicdalliances:

jonpertwee:

hamfistedbunvendor:


jonpertwee:
I feel like this would be a slippery slope towards making it illegal for people to choose to not vote.
thatโ€™s already how it is in australia


Thatโ€™s just so fucked up. :( Do certain medical conditions exempt you?

?????? why is it be fucked up to have compulsory voting? thatโ€™s the way it is in most democratic countries? itโ€™s a part of being a citizen, like paying taxes and obeying speed limits? the fine for not voting is only like $50 and because of the compulsory voting law, our country bends over backwards to make it accessible: itโ€™s always on a weekend, lasts most of the day, and is set up at schools and community centers so thereโ€™s one within easy reach of almost everybody. you can also mail your ballot or vote early if youโ€™ll be out of the country on the day. like, ITโ€™S EASY TO VOTE, and the penalty isnโ€™t even that ridiculous. i donโ€™t understand why the usa doesnโ€™t have this, except obviously it would make it harder to literally stop minorities from voting.

I think we Americans tend to forget that a lot of other countries donโ€™t actively work to make it harder to vote.

Adding to this here, in Australia you donโ€™t have to vote. Or, more precisely, thereโ€™s no way they can tell if you ruined your ballot.ย You have to turn up, get your name marked off, but you can put a line through the ballot if you donโ€™t think any of the candidates are worth voting for. Or do this:ย 
Or this:ย 

Or this:ย 
You have get your name crossed off (if you donโ€™t want to wear the fine), but you donโ€™t have to make your vote counted if youโ€™re opposed to it.ย 
And it is so, so easy to vote. Stuck at work or on holidays? Thatโ€™s fine. Do a postal vote. ย Stuck in hospital? Thatโ€™s fine. Theyโ€™ll go to you. Stuck in an old peopleโ€™s home and canโ€™t get around? Again, theyโ€™ll go to you. Itโ€™s amazing to me that itโ€™s so hard for so many Americans to actually vote. If you make it compulsory, than at least the government is obligated to provide you with the means to vote.ย 
And look, I get it. Sometimes I donโ€™t want to vote either. But I suck it up, I walk three minutes down the street, and I hope that this year theyโ€™re selling lamingtons again. Oh, and I buy a democracy sausage, which, even if all the candidates suck, makes the effort of turning up pretty worthwhile.ย 

ALSO, you can see even on the fucked up ballots that you NUMBER  CANDIDATES IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. Thereโ€™s no need to calculate whether I would be throwing away my vote on the candidate that I most agree with if theyโ€™re not from a major party. I can say, I want that independent person to get in, but if not them, give me Big Party A, and if not them, that minor party person is still better that Big Party B, and Iโ€™m not giving any preference to the Lunatic Fringe Party. 
Our system certainly has some issues still, but I can show up to somewhere nearby, line up for a few minutes (if at all), vote exactly in line with my values (on paper, leaving a paper trail that can be recounted), and then buy a sausage and some home made cupcakes on my way out. 
A countryโ€™s voting system matters a hell of a lot and every citizen deserves one that makes it easy to vote and results in a government that is representational and accountable. 
And by the way, one time I had a bad asthma flare-up on Election Day and didnโ€™t make it to my polling station. I got my fine in the mail, I filled out the form explaining why I couldnโ€™t vote, no more fine. I would rather have, you know, expressed my preference for who should run my country, but they were cool with the fact that I couldnโ€™t do it that day.



I still donโ€™t like the idea that I have to vote if I donโ€™t want to. Why the hell should that be mandatory?๏ฟผ
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:

solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? 


Syndicate is based on victorian era & thereโ€™s gangsI literally had to hide because I keep walking to area higher than my current level because of main story line


Goddammit AC. You had one job: solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:

solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? 


Syndicate is based on victorian era & thereโ€™s gangsI literally had to hide because I keep walking to area higher than my current level because of main story line


Goddammit AC. You had one job
        

            
            

                
                
                    solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:

solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? 


Syndicate is based on victorian era & thereโ€™s gangsI literally had to hide because I keep walking to area higher than my current level because of main story line


Goddammit AC. You had one job: solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:

solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? 


Syndicate is based on victorian era & thereโ€™s gangsI literally had to hide because I keep walking to area higher than my current level because of main story line


Goddammit AC. You had one job
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? : solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? 
        

            
            

                
                
                    solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? : solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
solaredarisen:


randomnightlord:

mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing is
Watching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experience
Playing youโ€™re experiencing it
I watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it



Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it

I have to go 50/50 on that one because I tend to avoid fights in AC: 
Syndicate




Isnโ€™t the whole point of AC to avoid fighting? Or did that change since Brotherhood? 
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing isWatching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experiencePlaying youโ€™re experiencing itI watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it


Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it: solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing isWatching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experiencePlaying youโ€™re experiencing itI watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it


Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it
        

            
            

                
                
                    solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing isWatching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experiencePlaying youโ€™re experiencing itI watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it


Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it: solaredarisen:

randomnightlord:
mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 

The different between watching and playing isWatching youโ€™re seeing someoneโ€™s experiencePlaying youโ€™re experiencing itI watched a lot of gameplay and playing some of the games myself have a very different feels to it


Understandable but why waste money on a 70 bucks game if you cut out like 30 or 40 percent? Thatโ€™s not worth it
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? : mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 
        

            
            

                
                
                    mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? : mordinette:

rocketmermaid:

atelierabintra:

pmseymourva:

dreamwalkertara:

enigmaticagentalice:

theheroheart:

glitterpill:

dropkicks:

lesbianmooncolony:

sinbadism:

maxofs2d:

guitarbeard:

alexxdz:

GO WATCH A MOVIE 

Next up on Worth Reading: The other team should just fucking let me win when I play baseball.ย 

well this isnโ€™t necessarily a bad point. there are games with great stories and really awful shoehorned fighting sequences. then you also have handicapped/disabled gamers who donโ€™t necessarily have the dexterity to finish a game but would still like to be able to.
optionalย โ€œcakewalkโ€ modes arenโ€™t that bad of an idea.

what if i want to just see the story of the game and dont want to actually play it? like??
as it is i would never pay for a bioshock game or a fallout game but i am very interested in the story. so i just watch youtube videos of it. they could get money from me if they sold the skip combat mode

iโ€™m a games developer and an avid gamer and i really really think games should let you skip combat

honestly one of my favourite things about la noire was when you failed a sequence twice the game was like โ€œyo do you just wanna skip this bit?โ€the gaming industry/community has a huge problem with accessibility tbh. like, thank god for standardised control schemes (although bring back full customisation jfc  not enough games have that anymore) but fights require time, literacy in both that type of gaming & in the individual game, you need to be able to navigate the system which can be anywhere from slightly difficult to hellish for people with visual/audio processing disorders. and tbh sometimes you just wanna enjoy the story and not get stressed the hell out doing the sAME FIGHT 700 times. itโ€™s why i always put a game on easy/casual when Iโ€™m replaying unless  iโ€™m specifically going for difficulty based achievements.not to mention SO MANY GAMES have either poorly designed battles or fights that have been shoved in for no reason other than to pad out the game (dxhr & da2 come to mind immediately) that sometimes itโ€™d honestly improve the gameplay to just skip them altogether

Imagine if you were a gamer with arthritis or MS or some other disability that took away your ability to click buttons quickly, and every fight became as frustrating as THAT GODDAMN DA: ORIGINS OH FUCK Iโ€™M ON FIRE SLIDE PUZZLE.ย 
Yeah. Skipping combat might seem like a not bad idea then.

Mass Effect 3 has this:
[Screenshot from a Mass Effect 3 menu, with title:ย โ€œChoose Your Experienceโ€, showing the optionsย โ€˜actionโ€™,ย โ€˜role playingโ€™ andย โ€˜storyโ€™.]
โ€˜Actionโ€™ makes most story choices for you and conversations become straight up cutscenes.ย โ€˜Role playingโ€™ is the default experience, both challenging gameplay and character/story building. Andย โ€˜storyโ€™ has the roleplaying butย very easy combat, letting you breeze through it. (You also have a โ€˜casualโ€™ difficulty setting thatโ€™s a bit more rewarding but still pretty easy.)
The thing about video games (particularly RPGs or in general games that allow you to explore or direct the story) is that the interactivity is what makes it different from movies or watching LPs on youtube. And Iโ€™ve played games that got FAR stronger emotional reactions out of me simply because I had to carry out the actions myself rather than just watching. And that experience should be more accessible.
Because SHOCKINGLY: games arenโ€™t always about winning, or being good at it. Itโ€™s about having fun. This is kindergarten education here.

Yeah, it always baffles me when I see people react so negatively to a perfectly reasonable suggestion like this.
Why the hell shouldnโ€™t games let you skip combat if you want to? Why shouldnโ€™t there be a super-duper-easy-peasy mode for everything? No-one is gonna force YOU to play it like that if you donโ€™t want to! Continue to be as hardcore as you like!
I just donโ€™t understand the resistance at all. What weโ€™re talking about is simply having more options for gamers. Youโ€™re adding something that would make games more accessible and fun for loads of new fans, and youโ€™re not taking ANYTHING away from existing fans.
Likeโ€ฆdo youโ€ฆnot want more people to enjoy these games?? Do you really hate the idea of other people having fun so much that youโ€™ll rile against it even when it literally has no effect on you or your experience whatsoever?? Are you honestly that selfish??

I am *horrifically* bad at gaming, but itโ€™s a genre that Iโ€™m intensely interested in and very desperately want to be more immersed in. I would HAPPILY buy so many more games if combat was a skippable option.ย 

Not to mention one of the best indie games out right now is pretty much telling you if you want the best ending, donโ€™t fight.



Yeah, I hate the elitist mentality that only those ~*~*hardcore*~*~ enough should be allowed to enjoy video games. I mean, gaming should be an experience to be had and not just an obstacle to clear, right?Then again, my poor mental health situation and chronic pain+mobility issues on my right hand means that my gaming options are severely limited nowadays. So Iโ€™m all about making gaming accessible for everyone in the first place.Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Anyone who thinks gaming will be ruined by making it more accessible need to realize that they have already ruined gaming for many.



Iโ€™ve had to stop playing certain games because all the button mashing aggravated my carpal tunnel pain, and I rage quit some because they had a super frustrating part that I could never get past. Games should be fun, not a test of endurance. At least, they should let you skip the difficult parts you are unable to do. They can still have a hardcore mode for people who enjoy a challenge. They would still get to brag about their accomplishments without preventing others from enjoying an otherwise fun game.



Unpopular opinion but just watch the game on youtube then? Why spend money when you donโ€™t get the full experience? 
                    
                
            

            
            
        

    

    

        
Save

    



        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            








        

    

    
    

        

            









    

        
        
        
        
        
        
        
    

    

        Joke ruined: Joke ruined
        

            
            

                
                
                    Joke ruined: Joke ruined
                    
                
            

            
                
                
Joke ruined

                
            
            
        

    

    

        
Save