🔥 Popular | Latest

terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 i read that article and it still doesn’t seem possible given “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”and at first i thought this’d be a good way to secure trump his second term, but… judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh. The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.It’s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldn’t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.: let's get it popping. Biden/Obama 2020 yeah yeah i know @WeCloutChase The 22nd amendment would allow Joe Biden to run as President and Barrack Obama as his VP. Just saying. Show this thread 600 terrapinfox: libertarirynn: hst3000: libertarirynn: The constitutionality of this would likely be questioned by the electoral college but it miiiight get through depending on how strictly they interpret the 22nd amendment, since Obama would not technically be being “elected” to the office of president, which is the explicit provisional language in the amendment (Not that somebody couldn’t theoretically hold the office more than twice, but that they could not be elected to it twice). All that said it would be a shitshow but mighty entertaining. 12th amendment, guys: No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. Obama is an unconstitutional selection. Not exactly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/06/could-joe-biden-pick-barack-obama-as-his-running-mate-yes-but/?utm_term=.dc9a5700ef57 i read that article and it still doesn’t seem possible given “No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”and at first i thought this’d be a good way to secure trump his second term, but… judging by the sheer amount of lunatics in usa atm, a kinda technicality shadow president could have a chance, which would be terrifying and dangerous tbh. The article lose things out pretty clearly, and I summarize it in the OP: the exact wording of the 22nd amendment says that a person cannot be ELECTED more than twice to the office of president. It does not prohibit someone becoming president through a line of succession, Having not been directly elected to the office. A former president would not be constitutionally ineligible based on those parameters.It’s a loophole in the wording but the law is literally build on loopholes. A constitutional lawyer could and would argue this if they tried to make it happen. Now this article also points out they almost certainly wouldn’t try to make it happen because of the backlash and lack of likelihood that the electoral college would approve such a ticket. But it is theoretically possible.
Save
<p><a href="https://unlimited-shitpost-works.tumblr.com/post/172254908457/cankristi-libertarirynn-cankristi" class="tumblr_blog">unlimited-shitpost-works</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://cankristi.tumblr.com/post/172251581035/libertarirynn-cankristi-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">cankristi</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/172251389154/cankristi-libertarirynn-cankristi" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://cankristi.tumblr.com/post/172250725045/libertarirynn-cankristi-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">cankristi</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/172250552859/cankristi-libertarirynn-ill-give-them-a-tiny" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://cankristi.tumblr.com/post/172250148495/libertarirynn-ill-give-them-a-tiny-bit-of-credit" class="tumblr_blog">cankristi</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/172250024264/ill-give-them-a-tiny-bit-of-credit-for-moving" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>I’ll give them a tiny bit of credit for moving away from Harry Potter but we’re still in the lame fictional character references.</p></blockquote> <p>Better than LARPing the American Revolution as an excuse to not do anything about guns. THE SPIRIT OF 1776 WILL RISE AGAIN!!! YEEEHAWWWW</p> </blockquote> <p>Gun violence still accounts for a teeny tiny percentage of deaths in the United States but please go on pretending it’s the biggest issue of our times.</p> </blockquote> <p>All countries have violence. Not all countries have mass shootings on the regular. It’s a big issue because it’s unique to us, not because it has the biggest body count. <br/><br/>The unique psychological impact of fearing the next school shooting when you’re trying to learn is a big issue. Children in schools shouldn’t be expecting to get  shot to death. We’re the only country in the developed world where that’s an ongoing fear. <br/><br/>(Also you didn’t address the fact that LARPing as if it’s 1776 is something grown ass adults have done to support their beliefs long before left-leaning people made harry potter references)</p> </blockquote> <p>I didn’t say anything about LARPing 1776 because I don’t give a shit about it. At least 1776 actually happened, unlike the battle of fucking Hogwarts. And whether people want to dress up or not changes nothing about the actual facts of the issue. America does not the highest rate of gun violence. Not even close. In fact we have the highest rate of gun ownership and yet do not have the highest rate of gun violence. If guns were really the problem, we should be the most violent nation in the world.</p> </blockquote> <p>Dodging the issue yet again. We’re the only developed country where kids go to school and are afraid of being shot to death in a mass shooting. That’s why it’s a big issue now. The March for Our Lives organized by the students for the students. <br/><br/>And of course if you take countries with lower standards of living, more corrupt criminal justice systems, less stable governments,  etc etc. you’re more likely to see gun violence there. That’s why the qualifier of developed is so important. We’re similar enough to developed countries that a comparison makes sense, and different enough in our relationship to guns that they’re a likely candidate for the determining variable. <br/><br/>And really? You don’t give a shit about it? So I take it you don’t believe we need guns for revolution? If you do that’s LARPing based on historical conditions that are no longer reality. </p> </blockquote> <p>Here’s an article that explains why comparing the US to other “developed” countries is a mistake:</p> <p><a href="https://mises.org/wire/mistake-only-comparing-us-murder-rates-developed-countries">https://mises.org/wire/mistake-only-comparing-us-murder-rates-developed-countries</a></p> <p>If you don’t want to read it, I’ll summarize. What you really mean when you say “developed” is an arbitrary list of countries, that are mostly rich, white, and/or European. The fact that you only want to look at a particular set of countries is because if you look at the whole world, you are forced to acknowledge that a particular country’s homicide rate is driven by many factors other than guns, and your narrative falls apart.</p> <p>You are statistically more likely to be struck by lightning that killed in a mass shooting. It’s an irrational fear.</p> <p>The March for our Lives was organized by Everytown and backed by people as big as Oprah.</p> </blockquote>: I DON'T REMEMBER MR, FEENY HAVING A GUN Ro Oh man, isn't this election just like when Voldemort faced Harry in The Deathly Hallows? l am physically unable to talk about real world issues without correlating it to level entry "geek" media because l'm so disconnected with reality that I need to use pop culture as a motivator to care about anything this is what Twitter wants please buy my zelda clone on itch.io AME 聲麗·都融顦.運海 七 <p><a href="https://unlimited-shitpost-works.tumblr.com/post/172254908457/cankristi-libertarirynn-cankristi" class="tumblr_blog">unlimited-shitpost-works</a>:</p><blockquote> <p><a href="http://cankristi.tumblr.com/post/172251581035/libertarirynn-cankristi-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">cankristi</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/172251389154/cankristi-libertarirynn-cankristi" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://cankristi.tumblr.com/post/172250725045/libertarirynn-cankristi-libertarirynn" class="tumblr_blog">cankristi</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/172250552859/cankristi-libertarirynn-ill-give-them-a-tiny" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://cankristi.tumblr.com/post/172250148495/libertarirynn-ill-give-them-a-tiny-bit-of-credit" class="tumblr_blog">cankristi</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="https://libertarirynn.tumblr.com/post/172250024264/ill-give-them-a-tiny-bit-of-credit-for-moving" class="tumblr_blog">libertarirynn</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>I’ll give them a tiny bit of credit for moving away from Harry Potter but we’re still in the lame fictional character references.</p></blockquote> <p>Better than LARPing the American Revolution as an excuse to not do anything about guns. THE SPIRIT OF 1776 WILL RISE AGAIN!!! YEEEHAWWWW</p> </blockquote> <p>Gun violence still accounts for a teeny tiny percentage of deaths in the United States but please go on pretending it’s the biggest issue of our times.</p> </blockquote> <p>All countries have violence. Not all countries have mass shootings on the regular. It’s a big issue because it’s unique to us, not because it has the biggest body count. <br/><br/>The unique psychological impact of fearing the next school shooting when you’re trying to learn is a big issue. Children in schools shouldn’t be expecting to get  shot to death. We’re the only country in the developed world where that’s an ongoing fear. <br/><br/>(Also you didn’t address the fact that LARPing as if it’s 1776 is something grown ass adults have done to support their beliefs long before left-leaning people made harry potter references)</p> </blockquote> <p>I didn’t say anything about LARPing 1776 because I don’t give a shit about it. At least 1776 actually happened, unlike the battle of fucking Hogwarts. And whether people want to dress up or not changes nothing about the actual facts of the issue. America does not the highest rate of gun violence. Not even close. In fact we have the highest rate of gun ownership and yet do not have the highest rate of gun violence. If guns were really the problem, we should be the most violent nation in the world.</p> </blockquote> <p>Dodging the issue yet again. We’re the only developed country where kids go to school and are afraid of being shot to death in a mass shooting. That’s why it’s a big issue now. The March for Our Lives organized by the students for the students. <br/><br/>And of course if you take countries with lower standards of living, more corrupt criminal justice systems, less stable governments,  etc etc. you’re more likely to see gun violence there. That’s why the qualifier of developed is so important. We’re similar enough to developed countries that a comparison makes sense, and different enough in our relationship to guns that they’re a likely candidate for the determining variable. <br/><br/>And really? You don’t give a shit about it? So I take it you don’t believe we need guns for revolution? If you do that’s LARPing based on historical conditions that are no longer reality. </p> </blockquote> <p>Here’s an article that explains why comparing the US to other “developed” countries is a mistake:</p> <p><a href="https://mises.org/wire/mistake-only-comparing-us-murder-rates-developed-countries">https://mises.org/wire/mistake-only-comparing-us-murder-rates-developed-countries</a></p> <p>If you don’t want to read it, I’ll summarize. What you really mean when you say “developed” is an arbitrary list of countries, that are mostly rich, white, and/or European. The fact that you only want to look at a particular set of countries is because if you look at the whole world, you are forced to acknowledge that a particular country’s homicide rate is driven by many factors other than guns, and your narrative falls apart.</p> <p>You are statistically more likely to be struck by lightning that killed in a mass shooting. It’s an irrational fear.</p> <p>The March for our Lives was organized by Everytown and backed by people as big as Oprah.</p> </blockquote>
Save
You know what to do! It's not enough that he just resigned... he needs to be arrested and tried for treason. An investigation is also in order as to what Trump knew, when he knew it, and why he chose to IGNORE the Department of Justice's warning that Flynn was being actively blackmailed by Putin's Russia. Something smells fishy! According to the Washington Post: "From that call and subsequent intercepts, FBI agents wrote a secret report summarizing ­Flynn’s discussions with Kislyak. Yates, then the deputy attorney general, considered Flynn’s comments in the intercepted call to be “highly significant” and “potentially illegal,” according to an official familiar with her thinking. Yates and other intelligence officials suspected that Flynn could be in violation of an obscure U.S. statute known as the Logan Act, which bars U.S. citizens from interfering in diplomatic disputes with another country." According to the New York Times: "The Justice Department had warned the White House that Mr. Flynn had misled senior Trump administration officials about whether he had discussed American sanctions against Vladimir V. Putin’s regime during a secret phone call with Russia’s ambassador to the United States weeks before the inauguration, and that he could be open to blackmail by Russia, said a former senior official." Read more here: http:-wapo.st-2lJm1Cs and here: http:-nyti.ms-2kqyI3S: Democrats I DEMAND that Trump's National Security Advisor, Michael Flynn, be arrested for treason and charged with violating the Logan Act for secretly communicating with Russian officials to undermine American foreign policy. SHARE IF YOU AGREE! You know what to do! It's not enough that he just resigned... he needs to be arrested and tried for treason. An investigation is also in order as to what Trump knew, when he knew it, and why he chose to IGNORE the Department of Justice's warning that Flynn was being actively blackmailed by Putin's Russia. Something smells fishy! According to the Washington Post: "From that call and subsequent intercepts, FBI agents wrote a secret report summarizing ­Flynn’s discussions with Kislyak. Yates, then the deputy attorney general, considered Flynn’s comments in the intercepted call to be “highly significant” and “potentially illegal,” according to an official familiar with her thinking. Yates and other intelligence officials suspected that Flynn could be in violation of an obscure U.S. statute known as the Logan Act, which bars U.S. citizens from interfering in diplomatic disputes with another country." According to the New York Times: "The Justice Department had warned the White House that Mr. Flynn had misled senior Trump administration officials about whether he had discussed American sanctions against Vladimir V. Putin’s regime during a secret phone call with Russia’s ambassador to the United States weeks before the inauguration, and that he could be open to blackmail by Russia, said a former senior official." Read more here: http:-wapo.st-2lJm1Cs and here: http:-nyti.ms-2kqyI3S

You know what to do! It's not enough that he just resigned... he needs to be arrested and tried for treason. An investigation is also in...

Save
The FBI assassinated MLK... Here is one of their subsequent-current operations for the destruction of Africans... Mainstream media demonises Africans in order to: To justify use of police force (brutality) To influence popular opinion To create suspicion and a divide between the African Middle class and working class. To discredit the campaign for justice against an oppressive and racist system. Did you hear about cointelpro ? Well it's still going on, it's just more classified, the US government knows the influence African could have in government and they are scared. Here is how the US Government thinks. Below is Extracts from operation cointelpro stolen from the FBI by Africans Americans and Europeans American activists. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM-46 MARCH 17, 1978 Presidential Review Memorandum NSCM-46 TO: The Secretary of State The Secretary of Defense The Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Black Africa and the U.S. Black Movement II. A. U.S. INTERESTS IN BLACK AFRICA A multiplicity of interests influences the U.S. attitude toward black Africa. The most important of these interests can be summarized as follows: 1. POLITICAL If black African states assume attitudes hostile to the U.S. national interest, our policy toward the white regimes; which is a key element in our relations with the black states, may be subjected by the latter to great pressure for fundamental change. Thus the West may face a real danger of being deprived of access to the enormous raw material resources of southern Africa which are vital for our defense needs as well as losing control over the Cape sea routes by which approximately 65% of Middle Eastern oil is supplied to Western Europe. Moreover, such a development may bring about internal political difficulties by intensifying the activity of the black movement in the United States itself. It should also be borne in mind that black Africa is an integral part of a continent where tribal and regional discord, economic backwardness, inadequate infrastructures, drought, and famine, are constant features of the scene. In conjunction with the artificial borders imposed by the former chakabars: First they criminalize you, then they kill you, then they act like they agreed with you all along BIRMINGHAM ALA The FBI assassinated MLK... Here is one of their subsequent-current operations for the destruction of Africans... Mainstream media demonises Africans in order to: To justify use of police force (brutality) To influence popular opinion To create suspicion and a divide between the African Middle class and working class. To discredit the campaign for justice against an oppressive and racist system. Did you hear about cointelpro ? Well it's still going on, it's just more classified, the US government knows the influence African could have in government and they are scared. Here is how the US Government thinks. Below is Extracts from operation cointelpro stolen from the FBI by Africans Americans and Europeans American activists. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM-46 MARCH 17, 1978 Presidential Review Memorandum NSCM-46 TO: The Secretary of State The Secretary of Defense The Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: Black Africa and the U.S. Black Movement II. A. U.S. INTERESTS IN BLACK AFRICA A multiplicity of interests influences the U.S. attitude toward black Africa. The most important of these interests can be summarized as follows: 1. POLITICAL If black African states assume attitudes hostile to the U.S. national interest, our policy toward the white regimes; which is a key element in our relations with the black states, may be subjected by the latter to great pressure for fundamental change. Thus the West may face a real danger of being deprived of access to the enormous raw material resources of southern Africa which are vital for our defense needs as well as losing control over the Cape sea routes by which approximately 65% of Middle Eastern oil is supplied to Western Europe. Moreover, such a development may bring about internal political difficulties by intensifying the activity of the black movement in the United States itself. It should also be borne in mind that black Africa is an integral part of a continent where tribal and regional discord, economic backwardness, inadequate infrastructures, drought, and famine, are constant features of the scene. In conjunction with the artificial borders imposed by the former chakabars

The FBI assassinated MLK... Here is one of their subsequent-current operations for the destruction of Africans... Mainstream media demoni...

Save
Save