🔥 Popular | Latest
![Fire, Fucking, and Guns: YOU KNOW DAN. HE
DOWNLOADED ALL
THAT MALWARE AND
STOLE FROM THE
OFFICE POOL
DID YOU HEAR DAN
GOT FIRED?
WHO'S
DAN?
DON'T REMEMBER
HIM.
TT
HE ALWAYS DOES THE
"FINGER GUNS" THING
WHEN HE SAYS HELLO
HE LIT THE BREAK-ROOM
ON FIRE AND PUNCHED
ROB IN THE FACE
OH, YEAH. I FUCKING
HATE THAT GUY
CAN'T PUT A
FACE TO THE
NAME
2019
ANTHONYCAMAROTA.COM/UNTITLED
Dan [OC]](https://pics.me.me/thumb_you-know-dan-he-downloaded-all-that-malware-and-stole-65385043.png)
![Bad, Community, and Gif: stuartsemple 23m
And the
narc
is...
Send Message
:
X
stuartsemple 23m
The
Lisson
Gallery
Send Message
stuartsemple 23m
Stuart Semp
e Directors
SSON GALLERY
-54 Bell Street
ndon, NW1 5DA
mail and email to: contact@lissongallery.com
BREACH OF TERMS OF SERVICE: CULTUREHUSTLE.COM
ILLEGAL ACQUISITION ON BEHALF OF ANISH KAPOOR OF THE WORLD'S
EST PINK
PII
ear Sirs
aware that you represent Mr. Anish Kapoor, and I write today not to dob him in so that yo
n tell him off but rather to try and resolve this matter. Unlike Kapoor I am not one to 'point th
ger however on this occasion it has become important to do so
old your gallery in the highest esteem, I am a fan of several of your artists, but on this
casion you have been extremely naughty. You have been part of a conspiracy to illegally
tain my PINK and provide Mr. Kapoor with it
e have now finished fully researching this situation and it has come to our attention that you
we been part of a conspiracy to obtain my PINK and provide Mr. Kapoor with it enabling him
exploit the substance against my wishes. Further, this juvenile behaviour made much of the
der artistic community sad thanks to his extremely childish and petty post on instagram
e terms of service on my site CultureHustle.com are incredibly clear
Hote: By
way affiliated to Anish Kapoor, you are not purchasing this item on behalf of Anish Kapoor
associate of Anish Kapoor. To the best of your knowledge, information and belief this paint
Il not make its way into that hands of Anish Kapoor
this
duct to your cart you confim that you are not Anish Kapoor, you are
direct violation to the above, on 10th of December 2016 a person by the name of Mr
placed an order via the culturehustle.com website, for one jar of PINK at 5.36am. This
Send Message
stuartsemple 22m
der was placed on behalf of your gallery and was duly delivered to The Lisson Gallery in
ndon at 11.38am on the 13th of December. Shortly after which your gallery provided Mr.
poor with the substance and on 23rd of December 2016 Mr. Kapoor posted a photograph or
stagram showing he was indeed in possession of the substance, he also included the captio
p Yours. The comments on this post clearly demonstrate the negative impact such a gesture
shad upon a whole community. He needs to say sorry for hurting everyone's feelings.
emind you, hoarding colours & stealing other people's colours without asking nicely isn't big
rd it's simply bad.
i said I think it would be best to resolve this matter amicably without this silly business
calating any further. However, if we are unable to resolve this in a timely and grown up way
n fully prepared to take further action which will no doubt become stressful and expensive.
erefore I would appreciate it if:
1. Your gallery would say sorry for giving my pink to Mr. Kapoor
2 Mr. Kapoor would give me my PINK back. I don't want him to have it
3. He will write 100 lines 'I will be nice, I will share my colours and he will post the same
his instagram
iling the above, an agreeable settlement would also be
1. The re-imbursement of £3.99 (the cost of the PINK minus shipping)
2 And Mr. Kapoor to void his exclusive agreement over the use of Vanta Black in art.
you were to settle as above I will be more than happy to share all my colours with him, so he
esn't feel left out and can join in with the rest of us.
ok forward to resolving this matter
ours
uart Semple
Send Message
capsgirl19:
residesatshamecentral:
groot-scamander:
troublesomegay:
spontaneousmusicalnumber:
fox-smulders:
STUART SEMPLE FOUND THE PINK NARC.
God this is the greatest art feud of our time.
Read the conditions of settlement. It’s gold.
Captioned because even I’m having trouble reading this:
[A screenshot from snapchat of a document that is cut off on the extreme edges, erasing the first and last two or three letters from each line. Doing my best to correctly transcribe]
Breach of terms of service: culturehustle.comIllegal acquisition on behalf of Anish Kapoor of the World’s Pinkest Pink
Dear Sirs,
I am aware that you represent Mr. Anish Kapoor, and I write today not to dob him in so that you can tell him off but rather to try and resolve this matter. Unlike Kapoor I am not one to ‘point the finger’ however on this occasion it has become important to do so.
I hold your gallery in the highest esteem, I am a fan of several of your artists, but on this occasion you have been extremely naughty. You have been part of a conspiracy to obtain my PINK and provide Mr. Kapoor with it.
We have now finished fully researching this situation and it has come to your attention that you have been part of a conspiracy to obtain my PINK and provide Mr. Kapoor with it enabling him to exploit the substance against my wishes. Further, this juvenile behavior made much of the wider artistic community sad thanks to his extremely petty and childish post on Instagram.
The terms of service on my site CultureHustle.com are incredibly clear:Quote: By adding this product to your cart you agree that you are not Anish Kapoor, you are in no way affiliated with Anish Kapoor, you are not purchasing this item on behalf of Anish Kapoor or an associate of Anish Kapoor. To the best of your knowledge, information and belief this product will not make its way into that hands of Anish Kapoor.
In direct violation to the above, on 10th of December 2016 a person by the name of Mr [Blanked out] placed an order via the culturehustle.com website, for one jar of PINK at 5:36 am. This order was placed on behalf of your gallery and was delivered to the Lisson Gallery in London at 11:38 am on the 13th of December. Shortly after which your gallery provided Mr. Kapoor with the substance and on the 23rd of December 2016 Mr. Kapoor posted a photograph on Instagram showing he was indeed in possession of the substance, he also included the caption ‘Up Yours’. The comments on this post clearly demonstrate the negative impact such a gesture has had upon a wide community. He needs to say sorry for hurting everyone’s feelings.
I remind you, hoarding colours and stealing other people’s colours without asking nicely isn’t big -rd it’s simply bad.
I said I think it would be best to resolve this matter amicably without this silly business escalating any further. However, if we are unable to resolve this in a timely and grown up way I am fully prepared to take further action which will no doubt become stressful and expensive.
Therefore I would appreciate it if:1. Your gallery would say sorry for giving my pink to Mr. Kapoor. 2. Mr. Kapoor would give me my pink back. I don’t want him to have it. 3. He will write 100 times, ‘I will be nice, I will share my colours’ and he will post the same to his Instagram.
Failing the above, an agreeable settlement would also be:1. The reimbursement of $3.99 (the cost of PINK minus shipping)2. And Mr. Kapoor to void his exclusive agreement to the use of Vanta Black in art.
If you were to settle as above I will be more than happy to share all my colours with him, so he doesn’t feel left out and can join in with the rest of us.
I look forward to resolving this matter.
Yours,
Stuart Semple
Thank you for captioning this! I’d seen it before but never been able to read it.
Alright this is hilarious because
Since they broke contract, he can sue them
To avoid getting sued, they need to humilate themselves publicly AND convince Kapoor to do likewise
If they don’t want to humiliate themselves and avoid getting sued, they need to convince Kapoor to give up his color copyright
Stuart Semple everybody!
I… oh my gods this was always the plan. An irresistible Trojan horse. Of course Kapoor would get his hands on it, that was only a matter of time, and now Semple’s backed them into a corner. Is this what watching chess feels like?](https://pics.me.me/thumb_stuartsemple-23m-and-the-narc-is-send-message-x-62514168.png)
Dank, Memes, and Target: Tristan
@Tea ris
Accidentally cut a guy off switching
lanes and when he went around me
he gave me a thumbs down instead of
the finger. Idk why but it hurt more.
12/10/17, 2:11 PM
92.8K Retweets 476K Likes
Remember kids, middle fingers are never the answer until youre at the age of consent by yinyangry
MORE MEMES
![Dank, Memes, and Target: Tristan
@Tea ris
Accidentally cut a guy off switching
lanes and when he went around me
he gave me a thumbs down instead of
the finger. Idk why but it hurt more.
12/10/17, 2:11 PM
92.8K Retweets 476K Likes
Remember kids, middle fingers are never the answer until youre at the age of consent by yinyangry
MORE MEMES]()
Remember kids, middle fingers are never the answer until youre at the age of consent by yinyangry MORE MEMES
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.me.me/thumb_january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-38002597.png)
![Anaconda, Apparently, and Fire: JANUARY NOVEMBER
TheAew JJork Eimes
TheAewJjorkTimes
FACT CHECK
CALIFORNIA TODAY
California Today: 100 Million Dead
Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires
Trump's Misleading Claims About
California's Fire Mismanagement'
Patches of dead and dying trees near Cressman, Calif
By Thomas Fuller
lan. 19, 2018
By Kendra Pierre-Louis
This week a group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience President Trump took to Twitter over the weekend, blaming the
that the dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an
infernos on forest management...
intensity that California has never seen
Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead
coming into home areas, starting more fires."..
Restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an
His statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and
It's something that is going to be much more severe," said Scott firefighters, oversimplified the causes of California's wildfires...
author of the study. "You could have higher amounts of embers The administration and Republicans in Congress have supported
calls by the timber industry to clear out potential fuel by letting
the land be logged...
overload of vegetation.
Unbiased Amer
BACK IN JANUARY, THE NEW YORK TIMES AGREED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT CALIFORNIA NEEDED TO IMPROVE ITS FORESTRY MANAGEMENT
Editorial by Kevin Ryan
The deadliest and most destructive fire in California's history was finally brought under control by firefighters yesterday, more than two weeks after it erupted. So far 87 people are confirmed to have been killed in the blaze, and many are still missing.
But the media firestorm continues over President Trump’s assertion that poor forest management contributed to the disaster. After Trump tweeted that better forest management could have prevented, or at least mitigated, the damage caused by the devastating wildfires, the media and California politicians said his assertion was false.
A spokesman for California Governor Jerry Brown said that the president's assertion was “inane” and “uninformed.” The New York Times wrote a piece entitled “Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’”
Yet just a few months back, both Governor Brown and The New York Times said basically the same thing as Trump.
In a January article, the Times wrote that “A group of scientists warned in the journal BioScience that [100 million] dead trees could produce wildfires on a scale and of an intensity that California has never seen,” and that “scientists say they cannot even calculate the damage the dead-tree fires might cause; it exceeds what their current fire behavior modeling can simulate.”
“‘It’s something that is going to be much more severe,’ said Scott Stephens, a professor of fire science at Berkeley and the lead author of the study. ‘You could have higher amounts of embers coming into home areas, starting more fires.’”
The Times article even pointed the finger at California’s forestry regulations, saying “California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation… That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.“
And yet, fast forward to today, and The New York Times is suddenly interviewing “experts” to contradict its previous assertions now that President Trump has also questioned California’s forest management.
“President Trump’s statements, which drew outrage from local leaders and firefighters, oversimplified the cause of California’s wildfires.” The Times says that the logging advocated by Trump, Republicans, and, apparently, The New York Times last January, would not have helped because “logging gets rid of trees, but it does not get rid of the kindling — brush, bushes and twigs. Logging does, however, enable the spread of cheatgrass, a highly combustible weed, which makes a forest more likely to burn.”
That’s basically the opposite of what the Times’ said earlier this year.
And it’s not just the media reversing itself to discredit Trump. Governor Brown’s office was calling for the same changes to logging regulations just a few months ago. In order to mitigate the fire danger from dead trees, Brown proposed that landowners be permitted to cut trees up to 36 inches in diameter, a jump from the current 26 inches, on properties that are 300 acres or less without getting a timber harvest permit and would also be able to build roads up to 600 feet long.
Of course the environmental lobby opposed it. And now huge swaths of land that environmentalists were “protecting” are now embers.
But Brown, and the media, would rather reverse their recent calls for safer forestry management than to agree with the president.
SOURCES: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/us/california-today-100-million-dead-trees-prompt-fears-of-giant-wildfires.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/politics/fact-check-trump-california-fire-tweet.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-hammered-for-california-wildfire-claims-but-gov-brown-has-also-backed-new-forest-management-measures](https://pics.me.me/thumb_january-november-theaew-jjork-eimes-theaewjjorktimes-fact-check-california-today-37997924.png)
From Money To Sleep: Hilarious Summoning Circle Meme Reveals What People Wish For
Drake's reaction to Kevin Durant's injury is now an NBA Twitter meme
Ninja reacts to viral meme of him talking about "breaking up with guys"
Jack Black is launching a new YouTube channel mostly dedicated to gaming
Elon Musk demands PewDiePie to let him host meme review with hilarious Tweet
Mark Hamill Just Put Trump On Notice With His Own 'Game Of Thrones' Meme
Upward Facing Dog: Pup sleeping on its back becomes viral sensation
Paki Fans Bury Their Hurt In Jokes And Memes
Donald Trump is doubling down on Game of Thrones memes
Adele addressed her divorce with a meme and it's even better than 'Someone Like You.'
