🔥 Popular | Latest

what-the-fandomm: 2sunchild2: kukumomoart: chancethereaper: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. bro you can literally see every fold of her pussy that just isn’t how fabric works Lol body painting literally Clothes don’t suction themselves around tiddies.If that was the case I’d be wearing hoodies all year i mean there is dangerous objectification for male characters, but it’s not prevalent in written or drawn sources because that doesn’t harm the person and therefore isn’t relevant. it’s only something to bring into the conversation when you’re talking about how it affects the actors.male actors are sometimes forced to starve for days so that they can get scenes where their muscles are stood out (there’s a really good post with article links about this i’ll try to find it), but these drawings don’t affect an actual personit’s a completely different subjectand i mean for god’s sake you can’t counter the fact that someone deliberately drew her with her coochie out with some bullshit about how male characters are hyper-masculine in a glorified way: Frank Cho added 2 new photos with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speechless CHO! NERT SE prasLE THE caMERa 2G CRap! IG a stock N HEET CRP SERNG P 1RT ENTM FR MA RA what-the-fandomm: 2sunchild2: kukumomoart: chancethereaper: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. bro you can literally see every fold of her pussy that just isn’t how fabric works Lol body painting literally Clothes don’t suction themselves around tiddies.If that was the case I’d be wearing hoodies all year i mean there is dangerous objectification for male characters, but it’s not prevalent in written or drawn sources because that doesn’t harm the person and therefore isn’t relevant. it’s only something to bring into the conversation when you’re talking about how it affects the actors.male actors are sometimes forced to starve for days so that they can get scenes where their muscles are stood out (there’s a really good post with article links about this i’ll try to find it), but these drawings don’t affect an actual personit’s a completely different subjectand i mean for god’s sake you can’t counter the fact that someone deliberately drew her with her coochie out with some bullshit about how male characters are hyper-masculine in a glorified way
Save
guiltlessdeviant: aaliyahbreaux: big-mood-energy: aaliyahbreaux: girldont: flyandfamousblackgirls: drdrunkpigeon-phd: abstractandedgyname: libertarirynn: paradise-dream222: flyandfamousblackgirls: Shae Scott: “This is why I don’t date ugly guys..” I’ve dated an ugly guy before and he was just a WASTE of my time. He didn’t get cocky, but he should’ve been a lil more appreciative of me. Seeing that no other girl would even look at him before I did. Holy fuck y’all are conceited. Those men are dodging bullets. Hey, my boyfriend may not be conventionally attractive or the most attractive in the world but it’s almost as if when your personalities really click they become so attractive to you! But obviously, yall can’t do that as you need a personality to begin with. This bitch fully is under the impression that she should date an attractive boring guy rather than an ugly boring guy, as if looks are the only defining things in relationships. How about, date an ugly [fun, interesting, caring, sex god] guy vs a hot [boring, simple, arrogant, sexually incompetent] guy. Maybe all the ugly you’ve dated have been ugly on the inside too, must be if they date such a wretched creature as yourself, but news flash lady! Everyone is different for fuck sake !!!! So when guys say women are too tall, too dark, too fat, hair not long enough, hair too “nappy”, her teeth, because she has tattoos or weave, because she wears makeup or they don’t wanna date her because she’s trans….Thats ok. But women are obligated to accept any man as he is? Interesting…yall are proving her point. Imagine openly saying you don’t find your SO physically attractive, that’s embarrassing for yourself and the person you’re with. studies show no matter how old men get typically they are most attracted to women in their twenties whereas women are most attracted to men around their age. and yet, women are seen as being superficial and shallow for just wanting to be with someone attractive… yes, basing whether or not you date somebody on their looks is shallow. it’s the definition of shallow, in fact. shallow is dating some entirely for their looks. dating someone you find attractive is just how attration works Ugly. You need to be attracted to the person you date. That’s just logic. Don’t settle for someone you’re not attracted to. The issue here is not just saying “you should someone you find attractive”, the issue is saying “don’t date ugly guys” as though that’s some sort of objective classification and acting like you’re literally better than people because you’re more physically attractive and they should be thanking the gods if you even grace them with your presence. That’s the conceited bullshit. Also for most people attraction has to be more than physical. Physical can be a part of it but there are plenty of hot assholes.: guiltlessdeviant: aaliyahbreaux: big-mood-energy: aaliyahbreaux: girldont: flyandfamousblackgirls: drdrunkpigeon-phd: abstractandedgyname: libertarirynn: paradise-dream222: flyandfamousblackgirls: Shae Scott: “This is why I don’t date ugly guys..” I’ve dated an ugly guy before and he was just a WASTE of my time. He didn’t get cocky, but he should’ve been a lil more appreciative of me. Seeing that no other girl would even look at him before I did. Holy fuck y’all are conceited. Those men are dodging bullets. Hey, my boyfriend may not be conventionally attractive or the most attractive in the world but it’s almost as if when your personalities really click they become so attractive to you! But obviously, yall can’t do that as you need a personality to begin with. This bitch fully is under the impression that she should date an attractive boring guy rather than an ugly boring guy, as if looks are the only defining things in relationships. How about, date an ugly [fun, interesting, caring, sex god] guy vs a hot [boring, simple, arrogant, sexually incompetent] guy. Maybe all the ugly you’ve dated have been ugly on the inside too, must be if they date such a wretched creature as yourself, but news flash lady! Everyone is different for fuck sake !!!! So when guys say women are too tall, too dark, too fat, hair not long enough, hair too “nappy”, her teeth, because she has tattoos or weave, because she wears makeup or they don’t wanna date her because she’s trans….Thats ok. But women are obligated to accept any man as he is? Interesting…yall are proving her point. Imagine openly saying you don’t find your SO physically attractive, that’s embarrassing for yourself and the person you’re with. studies show no matter how old men get typically they are most attracted to women in their twenties whereas women are most attracted to men around their age. and yet, women are seen as being superficial and shallow for just wanting to be with someone attractive… yes, basing whether or not you date somebody on their looks is shallow. it’s the definition of shallow, in fact. shallow is dating some entirely for their looks. dating someone you find attractive is just how attration works Ugly. You need to be attracted to the person you date. That’s just logic. Don’t settle for someone you’re not attracted to. The issue here is not just saying “you should someone you find attractive”, the issue is saying “don’t date ugly guys” as though that’s some sort of objective classification and acting like you’re literally better than people because you’re more physically attractive and they should be thanking the gods if you even grace them with your presence. That’s the conceited bullshit. Also for most people attraction has to be more than physical. Physical can be a part of it but there are plenty of hot assholes.
Save
flyandfamousblackgirls: drdrunkpigeon-phd: abstractandedgyname: libertarirynn: paradise-dream222: flyandfamousblackgirls: Shae Scott: “This is why I don’t date ugly guys..” I’ve dated an ugly guy before and he was just a WASTE of my time. He didn’t get cocky, but he should’ve been a lil more appreciative of me. Seeing that no other girl would even look at him before I did. Holy fuck y’all are conceited. Those men are dodging bullets. Hey, my boyfriend may not be conventionally attractive or the most attractive in the world but it’s almost as if when your personalities really click they become so attractive to you! But obviously, yall can’t do that as you need a personality to begin with.This bitch fully is under the impression that she should date an attractive boring guy rather than an ugly boring guy, as if looks are the only defining things in relationships. How about, date an ugly [fun, interesting, caring, sex god] guy vs a hot [boring, simple, arrogant, sexually incompetent] guy.Maybe all the ugly you’ve dated have been ugly on the inside too, must be if they date such a wretched creature as yourself, but news flash lady! Everyone is different for fuck sake !!!! So when guys say women are too tall, too dark, too fat, hair not long enough, hair too “nappy”, her teeth, because she has tattoos or weave, because she wears makeup or they don’t wanna date her because she’s trans….Thats ok. But women are obligated to accept any man as he is? Interesting…yall are proving her point. Who the absolute fuck said any of that shit in this thread? : flyandfamousblackgirls: drdrunkpigeon-phd: abstractandedgyname: libertarirynn: paradise-dream222: flyandfamousblackgirls: Shae Scott: “This is why I don’t date ugly guys..” I’ve dated an ugly guy before and he was just a WASTE of my time. He didn’t get cocky, but he should’ve been a lil more appreciative of me. Seeing that no other girl would even look at him before I did. Holy fuck y’all are conceited. Those men are dodging bullets. Hey, my boyfriend may not be conventionally attractive or the most attractive in the world but it’s almost as if when your personalities really click they become so attractive to you! But obviously, yall can’t do that as you need a personality to begin with.This bitch fully is under the impression that she should date an attractive boring guy rather than an ugly boring guy, as if looks are the only defining things in relationships. How about, date an ugly [fun, interesting, caring, sex god] guy vs a hot [boring, simple, arrogant, sexually incompetent] guy.Maybe all the ugly you’ve dated have been ugly on the inside too, must be if they date such a wretched creature as yourself, but news flash lady! Everyone is different for fuck sake !!!! So when guys say women are too tall, too dark, too fat, hair not long enough, hair too “nappy”, her teeth, because she has tattoos or weave, because she wears makeup or they don’t wanna date her because she’s trans….Thats ok. But women are obligated to accept any man as he is? Interesting…yall are proving her point. Who the absolute fuck said any of that shit in this thread?
Save
thewickedverkaiking: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. MEN WANT OBJECTS WOMEN WANT PEOPLE : Frank Cho added 2 new photos with Frank D Cho. 2 hrs Well, this just happened. Milo Manara, master artist and storyteller, came in at the last ten minutes of my Art and Women panel and handed me a special gift in appreciation for fighting censorship- an original watercolor painting of Spider-Woman. The packed auditorium went wild. Wow. I'm just speechless CHO! NERT SE prasLE THE caMERa 2G CRap! IG a stock N HEET CRP SERNG P 1RT ENTM FR MA RA thewickedverkaiking: aglassroseneverfades: pmastamonkmonk: schnerp: feminism-is-radical: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: brithwyr: auntiewanda: houroftheanarchistwolf: aawb: starsapphire: is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that? It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot.  It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for.  I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..? And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters.  Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing. We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine.  What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do. This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks:  Also:  He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence. You can see her butthole for chrissakes I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers. Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity. Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs. Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock. Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE. This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you. MEN WANT OBJECTS WOMEN WANT PEOPLE
Save
An eloquent response to the issues with Tumblr staff: tenaflyviper Tumblr has always been one of the most poorly-run sites I've ever seen. It has been the laughingstock of the internet for YEARS be- cause of this. @staff, I'm gonna lay this down right now: In making this latest decision, you have not made the site any safer, especially when a lot of the "harm to minors" around here comes from users' piss-poor treatment of each other that you've always turned a blind eye to. You have not made it more appealing to investors, especially because you'll be forcing content creators out in droves, thus leaving behind pretty much only the previously-mentioned piss-poor behavior. Do you honestly believe focusing on tags is going to work? And what do you propose to do when people simply stop using tags, or come up with alternative ones? Focusing on links? We've been sending links to each other's inboxes right under your noses for years-we just replace a few dots with commas, and your system misses it. If WE can get around it, I'm pretty sure bots can be programmed to do the same. Nixxing links to third-party sites? Well, you've just screwed over a lot of people looking for support on Patreon or trying to start fundraisers for their injured pets. You were asked to do two things that many sites haven't had much issue taking care of: Getting rid of spam bots, and keeping the site reasonably clear of illegal content. Your staff is so collossally inept that every attempt you've ever made to rectify these issues has caused loss of site function, and massive backlash from the user base. Only now that it's affecting your wallets do you attempt to do anything about it, and the thing you've chosen to do is essentially lose the majority of your users by coming up with half-ass "solutions" that actually do more harm to those users than the legitimate criminals you're trying to eradicate If what you really want is a site for children and teens without any adult content, then MAKE ONE (not that it'd really solve anything, since the most prolific producers of drawn and written porn are teenage girls, and nothing would stop users there from continuing to be abusive as hell towards each other). The users on this site are literally 85% adults that came here under the impression that they wouldn't be heavily censored or limited as they are on other social media outlets, and could create a visual and written expression of themselves, and their interests Congratulations on removing the only draw this site ever had Source: staff An eloquent response to the issues with Tumblr staff
Save
Man Found Guilty in Death of Gender-Fluid Teen He Thought Was Biologically Female - Blogged by: @RaquelHarrisTV ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On Friday, 90 minutes was all a jury needed to give 23-year-old JorgeSandersGalvez’s guilty verdict in the murder of KedarieJohnson, a gender-fluid teenager. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez and his friend, Jaron Purham, were found guilty of first-degree murder in the killing of Johnson, who was found dead in an alley with two gunshots in his chest on March 2, 2016. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez and Purham gagged Johnson, covered his head in a bag and drenched his body with bleach. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez and Purham met Johnson in a Hy-Vee and were under the impression that Johnson was biologically female. At the time, Johnson was wearing leggings, hair extensions with a pink head band. The two decided they wanted to take the teen back to a local but popular meeting spot for sex. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Prosecutors say when the duo discovered Johnson wasn't biologically female they stuffed a plastic bag down his throat, covered his mouth with a ripped T- shirt, went to an alley and killed him. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The trial lasted only nine days with two days of jury selection. The jury consisted of eleven Caucasians and one African-American person. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez will be officially sentenced to mandatory life in prison on Dec. 18 without any possibility of parole. Purham will be tried separately and also charged with first-degree murder.: Man Found Guilty in Death of Gender- Fluid Teen He Thought Was Biologically Female @balleralert Man Found Guilty in Death of Gender-Fluid Teen He Thought Was Biologically Female - Blogged by: @RaquelHarrisTV ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On Friday, 90 minutes was all a jury needed to give 23-year-old JorgeSandersGalvez’s guilty verdict in the murder of KedarieJohnson, a gender-fluid teenager. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez and his friend, Jaron Purham, were found guilty of first-degree murder in the killing of Johnson, who was found dead in an alley with two gunshots in his chest on March 2, 2016. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez and Purham gagged Johnson, covered his head in a bag and drenched his body with bleach. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez and Purham met Johnson in a Hy-Vee and were under the impression that Johnson was biologically female. At the time, Johnson was wearing leggings, hair extensions with a pink head band. The two decided they wanted to take the teen back to a local but popular meeting spot for sex. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Prosecutors say when the duo discovered Johnson wasn't biologically female they stuffed a plastic bag down his throat, covered his mouth with a ripped T- shirt, went to an alley and killed him. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The trial lasted only nine days with two days of jury selection. The jury consisted of eleven Caucasians and one African-American person. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Sanders-Galvez will be officially sentenced to mandatory life in prison on Dec. 18 without any possibility of parole. Purham will be tried separately and also charged with first-degree murder.

Man Found Guilty in Death of Gender-Fluid Teen He Thought Was Biologically Female - Blogged by: @RaquelHarrisTV ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ On Fr...

Save
<p><a href="http://manonfireforchrist.tumblr.com/post/147117145911/proudblackconservative-i-would-like-to-signal" class="tumblr_blog">manonfireforchrist</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/147116927499/i-would-like-to-signal-boost-this-i-have-not" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>I would like to signal boost this. I have not fully researched the veracity of the later paragraphs but I do know that this picture was the one going around last night of the “person of interest” and it is not right. He was completely cleared of all charges and had nothing to do with the shootings and should not be viewed as a suspect or criminal. I pray no harm comes to him and that people spread the word that he was not the guy.</p></blockquote> <p>What ive heard is upon hearing he was a person of interest he went in and talked to the police who have cleared him.</p></blockquote> <p>Good to hear. Unfortunately some of the damage was done as a lot of people were under the impression he was guilty based on the pictures that were shared.</p>: This man, Mark Hughes, was plastered all over social media as a suspectin the shooting in Dallas Because he was open carryi his AR-TS atthe protest. As soon as the shootings started, he handed over weapon to police and askih he and his brother could hel in the situation. He turned himse in to clear his name. He proved that it's not the Gun that kills but Evil People www.American behind the Gun. Thank you Mark WarriorRevolution.com <p><a href="http://manonfireforchrist.tumblr.com/post/147117145911/proudblackconservative-i-would-like-to-signal" class="tumblr_blog">manonfireforchrist</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="https://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/147116927499/i-would-like-to-signal-boost-this-i-have-not" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>I would like to signal boost this. I have not fully researched the veracity of the later paragraphs but I do know that this picture was the one going around last night of the “person of interest” and it is not right. He was completely cleared of all charges and had nothing to do with the shootings and should not be viewed as a suspect or criminal. I pray no harm comes to him and that people spread the word that he was not the guy.</p></blockquote> <p>What ive heard is upon hearing he was a person of interest he went in and talked to the police who have cleared him.</p></blockquote> <p>Good to hear. Unfortunately some of the damage was done as a lot of people were under the impression he was guilty based on the pictures that were shared.</p>

<p><a href="http://manonfireforchrist.tumblr.com/post/147117145911/proudblackconservative-i-would-like-to-signal" class="tumblr_blog">man...

Save
<p><a href="http://vikinglibertarian.tumblr.com/post/143023793035/libertybill-themost-beautiful-bitterfruit" class="tumblr_blog">vikinglibertarian</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/143018881832">libertybill</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://themost-beautiful-bitterfruit.tumblr.com/post/143018194875">themost-beautiful-bitterfruit</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://vikinglibertarian.tumblr.com/post/143016288530">vikinglibertarian</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/53b4bceb0b3552c7cab4038750262906/tumblr_inline_o5uc6hujoo1rc2uyi_540.jpg" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"/></figure></p> </blockquote> <p>I just searched his twitter for this. It’s fake</p> </blockquote> <p>Kyle, I don’t think anyone is under the impression that this is real. <br/></p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/4659bfab9a2822b433cb7af957af5576/tumblr_inline_o5ujv15HXF1rc2uyi_540.jpg" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"/></figure><p><a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mIiX85InXZ_5gFO1XlH6zKA">@libertybill</a> </p></blockquote>: Bernie Bernie Sanders 016 @BernieSanders the fact that tens of thousands of people refuse to send me their money is sickening. grow up 10/10/14, 4:05 AM <p><a href="http://vikinglibertarian.tumblr.com/post/143023793035/libertybill-themost-beautiful-bitterfruit" class="tumblr_blog">vikinglibertarian</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://libertybill.tumblr.com/post/143018881832">libertybill</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://themost-beautiful-bitterfruit.tumblr.com/post/143018194875">themost-beautiful-bitterfruit</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://vikinglibertarian.tumblr.com/post/143016288530">vikinglibertarian</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p><figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/53b4bceb0b3552c7cab4038750262906/tumblr_inline_o5uc6hujoo1rc2uyi_540.jpg" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"/></figure></p> </blockquote> <p>I just searched his twitter for this. It’s fake</p> </blockquote> <p>Kyle, I don’t think anyone is under the impression that this is real. <br/></p> </blockquote> <figure class="tmblr-full" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"><img src="https://78.media.tumblr.com/4659bfab9a2822b433cb7af957af5576/tumblr_inline_o5ujv15HXF1rc2uyi_540.jpg" data-orig-height="332" data-orig-width="540"/></figure><p><a class="tumblelog" href="https://tmblr.co/mIiX85InXZ_5gFO1XlH6zKA">@libertybill</a> </p></blockquote>

<p><a href="http://vikinglibertarian.tumblr.com/post/143023793035/libertybill-themost-beautiful-bitterfruit" class="tumblr_blog">vikingli...

Save
<p><a href="http://motorrot.tumblr.com/post/119211238024/feministfailures-psiotechniqa" class="tumblr_blog">motorrot</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://feministfailures.tumblr.com/post/119205456980/psiotechniqa-tenaflyviper" class="tumblr_blog">feministfailures</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://psiotechniqa.tumblr.com/post/119186951368/tenaflyviper-talk-to-the-hands-dommer" class="tumblr_blog" style="">psiotechniqa</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/119124889215/talk-to-the-hands-dommer-dear-cis-people" class="tumblr_blog">tenaflyviper</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://talk-to-the-hands.tumblr.com/post/78688059333/dommer-dear-cis-people-check-your" class="tumblr_blog">talk-to-the-hands</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://dommer.tumblr.com/post/33796856743/dear-cis-people-check-your-motherfucking" class="tumblr_blog">dommer</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear cis people,</p> <p><b>Check your motherfucking privilege. </b></p> </blockquote> <p>Guess what, sunshine? <br/><br/>Everyone has the right to refuse anyone else sex for any reason. Doesn’t matter if you don’t agree with it! Doesn’t matter if it hurts your feelings! Everyone has the right to choose when, where, and with whom they get it on. You thinking someone owes you sex doesn’t make you right; it makes you a rapist. </p></blockquote> <p>SJWs and “feminists” operate under this umbrella notion that all men act as though they’re “entitled” to sex, but honestly, I’ve never seen anyone act more entitled to sex than SJWs and “feminists”.</p><p>Being a minority of <i>any</i> kind does not automatically entitle you t<i>o </i>another person’s body.</p><p>If you’re a lesbian badgering heterosexual women about trying lesbian sex, you’re acting like a sexual predator.</p><p>If you’re someone like the OP, you’re trying to force someone to have sex regardless of whether or not they are comfortable with it.  That, too, is acting like a sexual predator.</p><p>This also includes if someone has preferences regarding body hair or size.  I see these same people that whine about guys that are short or have facial hair throwing a hissy fit when a guy loses his hard-on at the site of their majestic afropits.  Body positivity is fine, but not when you’re trying to use it as a reason for why you should be able to have any guy you want, regardless of that person’s feelings or preferences.  If you wouldn’t date a hairy fat guy, then no guy is obligated to sleep with <i>you</i>, either.</p><p>All the majority of this “activism” really looks like is a bunch of social outcasts trying to use their own victimization complexes as excuses for acting like spoiled children, rather than making any effort whatsoever to either improve themselves physically, or improve their <i>attitudes</i>.  Everything they say and do only revolves around<i> them</i>.  The feelings and preferences of other people don’t matter to these individuals.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>And here I thought SJWs were all about people’s right to withdraw consent at any time</p></blockquote> <p>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND THE SMACKDOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWN</p></blockquote> <p>this post is a fucking trainwreck</p><p>none of this is saying “everyone HAS to have sex with _______!!!” NOWHERE has it said anything like this. the point of this post is, if you take home a trans person and plan to have sex with them, you can’t just find out about their genitals and suddenly decide that you no longer want to do it. All of you are obnoxious transphobes.</p><p><a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mRHFN7ni4P86T2JgmMBEeSw">talk-to-the-hands</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mHue_-D20htXwuQu7paOx-w">tenaflyviper</a> <a href="http://psiotechniqa.tumblr.com/post/119186951368/tenaflyviper-talk-to-the-hands-dommer" class="tumblr_blog">psiotechniqa</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/m58laxQu5VvQahBKadb7IpQ">feministfailures</a></p></blockquote> <p>Ahahahahahaha NO. You can absolutely decide at any point that you don&rsquo;t want to have sex with someone, especially if they came home with you under false pretenses. If you took a girl home under the impression that she had a vagina, and it didn&rsquo;t come up until she was naked that that wasn&rsquo;t the case, it is not even slightly transphobic to change your mind about sex. How does it feel to be this bloody delusional?</p>: Dear Cis People Just because you are straight doesn't give you the right to refuse a transwomen sex after bringing her home just because she wasn't born a girl. dearcispeopletumblr.com <p><a href="http://motorrot.tumblr.com/post/119211238024/feministfailures-psiotechniqa" class="tumblr_blog">motorrot</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://feministfailures.tumblr.com/post/119205456980/psiotechniqa-tenaflyviper" class="tumblr_blog">feministfailures</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://psiotechniqa.tumblr.com/post/119186951368/tenaflyviper-talk-to-the-hands-dommer" class="tumblr_blog" style="">psiotechniqa</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/119124889215/talk-to-the-hands-dommer-dear-cis-people" class="tumblr_blog">tenaflyviper</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://talk-to-the-hands.tumblr.com/post/78688059333/dommer-dear-cis-people-check-your" class="tumblr_blog">talk-to-the-hands</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a href="http://dommer.tumblr.com/post/33796856743/dear-cis-people-check-your-motherfucking" class="tumblr_blog">dommer</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dear cis people,</p> <p><b>Check your motherfucking privilege. </b></p> </blockquote> <p>Guess what, sunshine? <br/><br/>Everyone has the right to refuse anyone else sex for any reason. Doesn’t matter if you don’t agree with it! Doesn’t matter if it hurts your feelings! Everyone has the right to choose when, where, and with whom they get it on. You thinking someone owes you sex doesn’t make you right; it makes you a rapist. </p></blockquote> <p>SJWs and “feminists” operate under this umbrella notion that all men act as though they’re “entitled” to sex, but honestly, I’ve never seen anyone act more entitled to sex than SJWs and “feminists”.</p><p>Being a minority of <i>any</i> kind does not automatically entitle you t<i>o </i>another person’s body.</p><p>If you’re a lesbian badgering heterosexual women about trying lesbian sex, you’re acting like a sexual predator.</p><p>If you’re someone like the OP, you’re trying to force someone to have sex regardless of whether or not they are comfortable with it.  That, too, is acting like a sexual predator.</p><p>This also includes if someone has preferences regarding body hair or size.  I see these same people that whine about guys that are short or have facial hair throwing a hissy fit when a guy loses his hard-on at the site of their majestic afropits.  Body positivity is fine, but not when you’re trying to use it as a reason for why you should be able to have any guy you want, regardless of that person’s feelings or preferences.  If you wouldn’t date a hairy fat guy, then no guy is obligated to sleep with <i>you</i>, either.</p><p>All the majority of this “activism” really looks like is a bunch of social outcasts trying to use their own victimization complexes as excuses for acting like spoiled children, rather than making any effort whatsoever to either improve themselves physically, or improve their <i>attitudes</i>.  Everything they say and do only revolves around<i> them</i>.  The feelings and preferences of other people don’t matter to these individuals.<br/></p></blockquote> <p>And here I thought SJWs were all about people’s right to withdraw consent at any time</p></blockquote> <p>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAND THE SMACKDOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWN</p></blockquote> <p>this post is a fucking trainwreck</p><p>none of this is saying “everyone HAS to have sex with _______!!!” NOWHERE has it said anything like this. the point of this post is, if you take home a trans person and plan to have sex with them, you can’t just find out about their genitals and suddenly decide that you no longer want to do it. All of you are obnoxious transphobes.</p><p><a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mRHFN7ni4P86T2JgmMBEeSw">talk-to-the-hands</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/mHue_-D20htXwuQu7paOx-w">tenaflyviper</a> <a href="http://psiotechniqa.tumblr.com/post/119186951368/tenaflyviper-talk-to-the-hands-dommer" class="tumblr_blog">psiotechniqa</a> <a class="tumblelog" href="http://tmblr.co/m58laxQu5VvQahBKadb7IpQ">feministfailures</a></p></blockquote> <p>Ahahahahahaha NO. You can absolutely decide at any point that you don&rsquo;t want to have sex with someone, especially if they came home with you under false pretenses. If you took a girl home under the impression that she had a vagina, and it didn&rsquo;t come up until she was naked that that wasn&rsquo;t the case, it is not even slightly transphobic to change your mind about sex. How does it feel to be this bloody delusional?</p>
Save
<p><a href="http://ilovetillsmoobs.tumblr.com/post/118663298822/proudblackconservative-there-some-dude-talking" class="tumblr_blog">ilovetillsmoobs</a>:</p><blockquote><p><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/117897753294/there-some-dude-talking-at-the-very-beginning-and" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>There some dude talking at the very beginning and end, but most of this is the dash cam footage of the cop shooting this elderly man for reaching for his cane. It’s pretty clear that the officer was under the impression that he was reaching for a weapon, although I think to say this was an overreaction is an understatement given the circumstances. Judge for yourself. And I’m just going to say this: if the races had been reversed, this would be national news.</p></blockquote> <p>Yeah but you can clearly hear the cop sobbing and begging God for forgiveness. It’s clear that the officer realized his error and deeply DEEPLY regretted it. Did the murderer of Mike Brown apologize or admit wrongdoing? Or what about countless others?</p></blockquote> <p>Nobody murdered Mike Brown. He got killed while attacking an officer and plenty of evidence corroborates this. I’m also not sure how relevant this officer’s sorrow is since it wouldn’t make this guy any less dead/injured. But he shouldn’t have gotten out of the vehicle in the first place. And the cop should have articulated himself better. Bad choices were made all around.</p>: Cop shot 70yrs Man 6 times for reaching for cane. Then Deputy weep Oh, God, forgive me': <p><a href="http://ilovetillsmoobs.tumblr.com/post/118663298822/proudblackconservative-there-some-dude-talking" class="tumblr_blog">ilovetillsmoobs</a>:</p><blockquote><p><a href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/117897753294/there-some-dude-talking-at-the-very-beginning-and" class="tumblr_blog">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>There some dude talking at the very beginning and end, but most of this is the dash cam footage of the cop shooting this elderly man for reaching for his cane. It’s pretty clear that the officer was under the impression that he was reaching for a weapon, although I think to say this was an overreaction is an understatement given the circumstances. Judge for yourself. And I’m just going to say this: if the races had been reversed, this would be national news.</p></blockquote> <p>Yeah but you can clearly hear the cop sobbing and begging God for forgiveness. It’s clear that the officer realized his error and deeply DEEPLY regretted it. Did the murderer of Mike Brown apologize or admit wrongdoing? Or what about countless others?</p></blockquote> <p>Nobody murdered Mike Brown. He got killed while attacking an officer and plenty of evidence corroborates this. I’m also not sure how relevant this officer’s sorrow is since it wouldn’t make this guy any less dead/injured. But he shouldn’t have gotten out of the vehicle in the first place. And the cop should have articulated himself better. Bad choices were made all around.</p>

<p><a href="http://ilovetillsmoobs.tumblr.com/post/118663298822/proudblackconservative-there-some-dude-talking" class="tumblr_blog">ilove...

Save
<p><a href="http://draw2much.tumblr.com/post/117901793116/proudblackconservative-there-some-dude-talking" class="tumblr_blog">draw2much</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/117897753294/there-some-dude-talking-at-the-very-beginning-and">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>There some dude talking at the very beginning and end, but most of this is the dash cam footage of the cop shooting this elderly man for reaching for his cane. It’s pretty clear that the officer was under the impression that he was reaching for a weapon, although I think to say this was an overreaction is an understatement given the circumstances. Judge for yourself. And I’m just going to say this: if the races had been reversed, this would be national news.</p></blockquote> <p>Oh man, that poor old guy. I feel so sooo sorry for him (and his family, that must be super awful for them). And if the cop is even a semi-decent person, he’s feeling really awful about what happened too. (Though probably quietly relieved it was an old white guy he shot, not an old black guy…)</p></blockquote> <p>Well thankfully he&rsquo;s expected to be alright. And the cop clearly feels awful, you can hear it on the tape.</p>: Cop shot 70yrs Man 6 times for reaching for cane. Then Deputy weep Oh, God, forgive me': <p><a href="http://draw2much.tumblr.com/post/117901793116/proudblackconservative-there-some-dude-talking" class="tumblr_blog">draw2much</a>:</p> <blockquote><p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://proudblackconservative.tumblr.com/post/117897753294/there-some-dude-talking-at-the-very-beginning-and">proudblackconservative</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>There some dude talking at the very beginning and end, but most of this is the dash cam footage of the cop shooting this elderly man for reaching for his cane. It’s pretty clear that the officer was under the impression that he was reaching for a weapon, although I think to say this was an overreaction is an understatement given the circumstances. Judge for yourself. And I’m just going to say this: if the races had been reversed, this would be national news.</p></blockquote> <p>Oh man, that poor old guy. I feel so sooo sorry for him (and his family, that must be super awful for them). And if the cop is even a semi-decent person, he’s feeling really awful about what happened too. (Though probably quietly relieved it was an old white guy he shot, not an old black guy…)</p></blockquote> <p>Well thankfully he&rsquo;s expected to be alright. And the cop clearly feels awful, you can hear it on the tape.</p>

<p><a href="http://draw2much.tumblr.com/post/117901793116/proudblackconservative-there-some-dude-talking" class="tumblr_blog">draw2much</...

Save
<p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://heaven4thegodless.tumblr.com/post/106806440966/twitter-is-censoring-and-being-oppressive-spread">heaven4thegodless</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Twitter is censoring and being oppressive</p> <p>Spread the word that Twitter does not support freedom of speech and censors their media to fit their own agenda</p> <p>Where they will ban you for quoting someone else just so they can have an excuse to censor you</p> <p>Twitter is not egalitarian, and sensors people who do not share their own conserved and skewed views</p> <p><a href="http://www.infowars.com/twitter-bans-womenagainstfeminism-founder-for-saying-christmas-is-not-oppressive-to-women/">http://www.infowars.com/twitter-bans-womenagainstfeminism-founder-for-saying-christmas-is-not-oppressive-to-women/</a></p> <p>Bombard twitter with complaints, or stop using Twitter until they stop censoring free speach, especially if you’re banned for quoting the person who reported your tweets…</p> </blockquote>: TWITTER BANS #WOMENAGAINSTFEMINISM FOUNDER FOR SAYING CHRISTMAS IS NOT OPPRESSIVE TO WOMEN Account erased for quoting radical feminist's own words On her Facebook page, Bloomfield explained how her difference of opinion on this matter ended in yet ANOTHER Twitter ban: I have twice been suspended from Twitter after harassment campaigns from other Iwitter users who are angry with me for being the main driver behind the #WomenAgainstFeminism hashtag. My account has never tweeted abuse nor have I ever threatened anyone, although I frequently get death threats myself. My most recent suspension is the result of me tweeting the actual words of Guardian journalist Jessica Valenti back to her. Prompted by @davidfutrelle, a harassment campaign to report me for spam/abuse was undertaken by users who appear to be under the impression that I made up the Valenti quotes and falsely attributed them to her. This is not true, Valenti did indeed write that wrapping Christmas presents oppresses women, and that "jingle bell time aside, it's [Christmas] a goddam clusterfuck.". I did not make these words up. They are her own The other quotes are also taken from articles Valenti wrote at the Guardian and for Atlantic magazine. This is the third time that I have been wrongly targotod and T hawo remmostod that TrArittor tweeting the actual words of Guardian journalist Jessica Valenti back to her. Prompted by @davidfutrelle, a harassment campaign to report me for spam/abuse was undertaken by users who appear to be under the impressior that I made up the Valenti quotes and falsely attributed them to her. This is not true. Valenti did indeed write that wrapping Christmas presents oppresses women, and that "jingle bell time aside, it's [Christmas] a goddam clusterfuck.". I did not make these words up. They are her own The other Чuotes are also taken from articles Valenti wrote at the Guardian and for Atlantic magazine. This is the third time that I have been wrongly targeted, and I have requested that Twitter restore and verify my account to avoid further issues. To date, Twitter has not responded. Is Twitter allowing their harassment tools to be used to silence dissenting voices? Since when 1S tweeting a journalist's words back at her harassment? If you are on Twitter, please tweet @support and ask them to #FreeludgyBitch Janet Bloomfield <p><a class="tumblr_blog" href="http://heaven4thegodless.tumblr.com/post/106806440966/twitter-is-censoring-and-being-oppressive-spread">heaven4thegodless</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Twitter is censoring and being oppressive</p> <p>Spread the word that Twitter does not support freedom of speech and censors their media to fit their own agenda</p> <p>Where they will ban you for quoting someone else just so they can have an excuse to censor you</p> <p>Twitter is not egalitarian, and sensors people who do not share their own conserved and skewed views</p> <p><a href="http://www.infowars.com/twitter-bans-womenagainstfeminism-founder-for-saying-christmas-is-not-oppressive-to-women/">http://www.infowars.com/twitter-bans-womenagainstfeminism-founder-for-saying-christmas-is-not-oppressive-to-women/</a></p> <p>Bombard twitter with complaints, or stop using Twitter until they stop censoring free speach, especially if you’re banned for quoting the person who reported your tweets…</p> </blockquote>
Save