🔥 Popular | Latest

libertybill: jooshcraft: theyoungpatriot1776: friendlyalien: klubbhead: friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt: thestarsareundecided: landysbear: kompanie-mutter: the-mighty-birdy: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: libertybill: libertybill: libertybill: Uh hey, CNN, why? HEY UH NYT?? WHY?? HEY UH WASHINGTON POST UH??? WHY??? Eeeyup In a world of these chucklefucks, ironically be Buzzfeed holy shit WHAT THE FUCK CNN Isn’t she the Minister of Propaganda or something? propaganda guru, communications aide, administrative gatekeeper yes.  our friends over at nbc also used some creepily similar phrasing to the other major news sources above btw, including comparing her to ivanka trump, although the headline for their piece is more neutral & less glowing. theyre still treating her like some kind of celebrity, & comparing her favorably to various member of the trump administration/family. i cant believe buzzfeed had to be a voice of reason in the press here. buzzfeed. that is horrifying. We’ve jumped timelines AGAIN The terrifying timeline where I have to agree with goddamn Buzzfeed. This feels vaguely like those occasions where an Onion article hits too close to the truth. Vaguely Attractive Communist Woman Lauded by Media Following Gulag PR Campaign. Don’t forget this shit when they try it again. Those who don’t learn history and all that whatnot 🤦🏾‍♀️: libertybill: jooshcraft: theyoungpatriot1776: friendlyalien: klubbhead: friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt: thestarsareundecided: landysbear: kompanie-mutter: the-mighty-birdy: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: libertybill: libertybill: libertybill: Uh hey, CNN, why? HEY UH NYT?? WHY?? HEY UH WASHINGTON POST UH??? WHY??? Eeeyup In a world of these chucklefucks, ironically be Buzzfeed holy shit WHAT THE FUCK CNN Isn’t she the Minister of Propaganda or something? propaganda guru, communications aide, administrative gatekeeper yes.  our friends over at nbc also used some creepily similar phrasing to the other major news sources above btw, including comparing her to ivanka trump, although the headline for their piece is more neutral & less glowing. theyre still treating her like some kind of celebrity, & comparing her favorably to various member of the trump administration/family. i cant believe buzzfeed had to be a voice of reason in the press here. buzzfeed. that is horrifying. We’ve jumped timelines AGAIN The terrifying timeline where I have to agree with goddamn Buzzfeed. This feels vaguely like those occasions where an Onion article hits too close to the truth. Vaguely Attractive Communist Woman Lauded by Media Following Gulag PR Campaign. Don’t forget this shit when they try it again. Those who don’t learn history and all that whatnot 🤦🏾‍♀️
Save
Taken from the Washington Post. Incredible that an entire generation has now been raised that knows nothing except war.: How much of your life the U.S. has been at war 2001 100% 1926 40.4% 1951 46.4% 1976 45.5% 1927 40.9 1952 45.6 1977 46.5 2002 100 1928 41.3 1953 44.8 1978 47.6 2003 100 1954 43.9 2004 100 1929 41.8 1979 48.8 By year of birth 1930 42.2 1955 44.6 2005 100 1905 34.8% 1980 1956 45.3 1906 35.1 1931 42.7 1981 51.3 2006 100 1907 35.4 1932 43.2 1957 46 1982 52.6 2007 100 1908 35.7 1958 46.8 1933 43.7 1983 54.1 2008 100 1909 36 1959 47.5 1934 44.2 1984 55.6 2009 100 1910 36.4 1960 48.3 2010 100 1935 44.7 1985 57.1 1936 45.2 1961 49.2 2011 100 1911 36.7 1986 58.8 2012 100 1912 37 1937 45.8 1962 1987 60.6 2013 100 1913 37.4 1938 46.3 1963 50.9 1988 62.5 2014 100 1914 37.7 1964 51.8 1939 46.9 1989 64.5 1940 47.5 1965 52.7 1990 66.7 1915 38.1 2015 100 1966 51.9 2016 100 1991 69 1916 38.5 1941 48.1 1967 50.9 1992 67.9 1917 38.8 1942 47.4 2017 100 2018 100 1968 50 1993 70.4 1918 38.2 1943 46.8 2019 100 1919 37.6 1944 46.1 1969 49 1994 73.1 1920 38 1945 45.3 1970 48 1995 76 1946 44.6 1971 46.9 1996 79.2 1921 38.4 1947 45.2 1922 38.8 1972 45.8 1997 82.6 1923 39.2 1973 44.7 1948 45.8 1998 86.4 1924 39.6 1999 90.5 1949 46.5 1974 43.5 1950 47.1 1975 44.4 2000 95 1925 40 THE WASHINGTON POST Taken from the Washington Post. Incredible that an entire generation has now been raised that knows nothing except war.

Taken from the Washington Post. Incredible that an entire generation has now been raised that knows nothing except war.

Save
Honestly not sure what to title this serpentine "political spectrum": www.EXPRESSIVEEGG.ORG PRESENTS (THE TRUISH AND ACTUAL POLITICAL SPECTRUM OSCAR WILDE WILLIAM MORRIS BARACK OBAMA STALIN GEORGE ORWELL MY GRANDAD KRISHNAMURTI MARX JEREMY CORBYN FD ROOSEVELT STEVEN PINKER TONY BLAIR DONALD TRUMP HITLER IVAN ILLICH TOLSTOY ALDOUS HUXLEY NOAM CHOMSKY example proponents HENRY MILLER WILHELM REICH JOHN PILGER CHARLIE CHAPLIN MARK FISHER KEN LOACH MICHEL FOUCAULT SLAVOJ ŽIŽEK ADAM CURTIS ALAIN DE BOTTON NICK COHEN THE MAIL HENRY DAVIO THOREAU (see notes) ME BEZ FRANKJE BOYLE NATIONAL FRONT BARRY LONG GEORGE WOODCOCK NOE ITO MARK CURTIS MEDIALENS MARTIN LUTHER KING BERNIE SANDERS MICHAEL MOORE JORDAN PETERSON PLATO LAO TZU HUGO CHAVEZ RONALD REAGAN AYN RAND JOHN ZERZAN DH LAWRENCE MY MUM YOUNG RAN PRIEUR LEWIS MUMFORD AMY GOODMAN GEORGE GALLOWAY JOHN RUSKIN CLEMENT ATTLEE GEORGE MONBIOT HOLLYWOD HEGE ROBERT MCNAMARA ILL HICKS OLD RAN PRIEUR R PHILIP K DICK OB BLACK PETER KROPOTKIN JOHN LENNON RICHARD WOLFF DAVID CRAEBER CHARLES DICKENS MOST OF THE WORLD MORRISSEY JUNG ST.PAUL LAURIE PENNY CHURCHILL LENIN THE BBC THATCHER HENRY KISSINGER actual meaning official meaning - THE LEFT THE CENTRE 'the far left' / 'the loony left" THE FANATICAL RIGHT THE EXTREME LEFT THE FAR LEFT THE RIGHT THE FAR RIGHT *the left" 'insanity 'terrorism' / 'extremism *the right" politics DEMOCRACTIC 'ANARCHISM (MARKET) 'DEMOCRACY / 'INDIVIDUALISM OMNARCHISM / STANDARD ANARCHISM (SOCIAL) DEMOCRACY LIBERTARIANISH MARXISM / OFFICIAL SOCIALISM LIBERTARIAN / DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM LIBERALISM (UK) FASCISM RADICAL ANARCHISM "REFUSUAL OF WORK" MOVEMENT INDIMDUALISM (POLITICAL) ANARCHO-SYNDICALISM UNOFFICIAL SOCIALISM SUPPORT FOR TOTALITARIAN SYSTEM TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP INDMDUALISM (WILDIAN) POST-LEFTISM SITUATIONISM "ENLIGHTENED' MONARCHISM AUTHORITARIAN MONARCHISM "CAPITALISM (AKA PRIVATE CAPITALISM) ANARCHO-PRIMITIVISM "COMMUNISM' (AKA STATE CAPITALISM) PROFESSIONALISM CORPORATE SOCIALISM ('STAGVERSION') AUTHORITARIAN SOCIALISM LIBERALISM (US) / WAGE-SLAVERY FEUDALISM / TRADITIONAL SLAVERY THE OVERTON WINDOW (OFFICIALLY ACCEPTABLE / 'MAINSTREAM') Rule by democratic totalitarian systems, excess of choice, limitation of access to speech platforms, assimilation of minorities, belief in emotional-morality, 'imagination' and flexibility, and control by desire, debt and implicit threat of violence. No overt control of dissent (system selects for system-friendly voices). Huxleyan Dystopia. Most of the modern world (USA, Europe, Japan, etc.) Rule by unspoken context or by temporary and powerless leaders. No institutions (no need for them). lawless (soft guideline bounded), moneyless (gift-economy) and timeless. Used by most societies (and most friendships) for most of human history. Never been tried in a No state, extreme limitation of power. Citizen's income, local currencies, jubilees, etc. Extreme limits on energY consumption, complexity of institutions, power of technology. Untried. (N.b. Some strands of anarchism (e.g. Stirnan) are fanatical, extremely violent and cultdike). These are much publicised by 'the mainstream Rule by workers' councils, direct democracy, etc. Technophilic. Scattered examples in history (eg. Spanish civil war, pre-Bolshevik soviet Russia / Makhnovist Ukraine, etc). Rule by intellectuals and professionals oversee- ing democratic welfare state. Heavy restrictions on wealth-acquisition, privatisation, etc. Heavily unionised workplaces, heavily subsidised public services. Small or non-existant military. Very rare, but 1950s -1970s Britain, Scandinavia and Cuba exhibited many features. Rule by autocratic totalitarian people/ elites, limitation of choice, repression of speech and repression of minorities, belief in order, routine and rationalmorality and control by enclosure, fear and explicit violence. Violent repression of dissent (via "the party line). Orwellian Dystopia. Most of the pre-modern world + USSR, Nazi Germany, Saudi Arabia, etc ('the bad guys') government examples modern or agriIcultural society post B,000 BC. > SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND AUTHORITARIANISM SOCIAL EQUALITY AND INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM (theology) PANTHEISM "SPIRITUALISM' MYSTIC THEISM THEISM ATHEISM AGNOTICISM EXPLANATORY NOTES Marx isn't to the right of Chomsky! FDR isn't to the left of Stalin! And so on and so forth. First of all the above graph represents the political spectrum as it actually is, in real life, rather than as it is presented in the mainstream media (MSM). In real life, for example, the USSR practiced state capitalism (a system where the state controlled surplus) which is only different to the private capitalism of the west (where private owners control surplus) in the most superficial details. Life for ordinary people under 'capitalism, 'communism' and 'fascism' is identical, because they all share the same basic attitude to money, law, growth, science, work and so on: hence Stalin, Blair, Hitler, Obama and co are all on the far right. The Overton Window is Nonsensel Another reason why this graph seems doubtful is, of course, because real people, in the real world, often have complex and contradictory views about a range of subjects. Most of the views of DH Lawrence, for example, were about as far left as you can possi- bly get; he rejected civilisation in toto. Yet he also suggested the working class should all be rounded up into Crystal Palace and gassed! My grandad used to read The Sun, voted conservative, praised Thatcher and regularly warned me about the blacks and gays up in London; yet in his actual behaviour he vigoriously reject- ed authoritarianism and inequality and believed that ordinary people did not need professionals to direct their activities. The Overton Window represents the limits of acceptable thought in mainstream media and politics. The left side is the position of the middle or professional class, the (new) Labour Party or Democrat Party, the Guardian, the BBC, the Washington Post and so on. These groups are firmly to the far right of the actual political spectrum, although it is difficult to perceive this as they also com- prise journalists and academics who are slightly to the left of them; Steven Pinker, Owen Jones, Christopher Hitchens and other corp employees (stagversives) are used to give an impression of balance and adversarialism, and to attract members of the 'anti-corp' or "socialist' demographic into their ads for carbon-neutral package holidays and ethical mousemats. To venture beyond the corp-es- tablishment friendly feminism' of Laurie Penny or the 'originality' of reactionary writers like Jared Diamond or Malcolm Gladwell-to suggest that wealth should be radically redistributed, that we should head towards a classless society or that the MSN is organ- ised to reward only establishment-friendly voices-is to go beyond the pale, into the land of woo' or, more ominously, 'extremism' This is why the Overton Window is ignored or dismissed in the MSM, which must maintain the illusion of 'impartiality, variety. 'balance' and even 'anti-establishment bias: It's also why maniacs like Nick Cohen and Oliver Kamm describe themselves as 'left-wing." So if the MSM left and right are fictions, what is left and right? On the left is individual freedom and equality, which is based on a basic basic trust in humanity, or in reality. On the right is authori- tarianism and social stratification, which is based on basic cynicism. The scale, therefore, is to some degree* one of sanity. The further right you go, the more you view the universe as a vast pyramid of power which people must do whatever is necessary to climb. For this reason I have listed 'theology, which bears upon one's funda- mental political outlook, the right being typically a place where aggressive atheism, abrahamic theism, sham 'yoga-and-mindful- ness' spirituality thrive, the left being a place of heretical (non-duat ist) theism, pantheism and the like, and the centre, typically, informed by reasonable agnostics and open-minded atheists. Likewise in no sense is Bill Hicks a Tolstoyan or Slavoj Žižek a Jungi- an or Thatcher a Hegelian. So the above scale is faithful to the range of political opinions outside the reverse telescope of the mainstream media, but it also represents a kind of schematic aggregate or rough approximation of the political position of major characters in Western political history (most of whom, yes, were white and male). Of course Hitler and Stalin, like a few ultra-ultra-ultra right wingers today, are officially just outside the acceptable spectrum (it's just not the done thing nowadays to explicitly persecute racial minori- ties). But their fundamental approach to society and to reality remains the same as Pinochet's, Thatcher's, Clinton's, Churchill's and so on: which is why in all their societies the poor end up getting shafted and nature ends up getting decimated. by Darren Allen llustrations by AI *ie. bearing in mind the approximations mentioned above -it's ludicrous to decisively rate anyone's sanity- hence 'truish-let alone cal Hicks saner than Orwell or Wilde saner than Morris. Honestly not sure what to title this serpentine "political spectrum"
Save
Trump can't be a racist or a Nazi, the economy is good!!: The muller report showed that no crimes were committed. Also the entire reason the investigation ever happend which was detailed in the Horowitz report, was because of a dirty dossier financed by the dnc, Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration. Which led to the illegal fisa warrent. That allowed the corrupt administration in power at the time to spy on it's own citizen. And still showed no crimes that were committed. The democratic party and some of the Republican party are trying like hell to remove him. Because if and when he exposes the truth of all of their corrupt dealings they all will be jailed. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and it is very obvious. You literally just spit out the exact same bullshit that the mainstream media says. You sound like CNN, the new York times, and the Washington post. The Kurd thing is absolute bull shit they lumped a terrorist organization called the pkk later forming the ygb into a general grouping by just calling them all Kurds. These are terrorist forces that the Turkish have been dealing with for years and the Kurds that fought with us in Seria were not part of that group. It's the same as saying that every white person is part of the kkk. And how in the fuck can he be racist or a nazi when the minority unemployment rate is the lowest it has EVER been!? Also the average wage in the minority groups are the highest average ever seen. We have the strongest economy ever but for some reason the media controlled sheep like yourself have so many problems with trump. If you can tell me how you personally in any way how trump has affected your life negatively other than your feelings being hurt I will stop defending a man, who truly wants what's best for America and it's people, in front of you Like Reply 2d Trump can't be a racist or a Nazi, the economy is good!!
Save